A survey of patients with surgical wounds healing by secondary intention; an assessment of prevalence, aetiology, duration and management

I C Chetter, A V Oswald, M Fletcher, J C Dumville, N A Cullum, I C Chetter, A V Oswald, M Fletcher, J C Dumville, N A Cullum

Abstract

Background: Surgical wounds healing by secondary intention (SWHSI) are often difficult and costly to treat. There is a dearth of clinical and research information regarding SWHSI. The aim of this survey was to estimate the prevalence of SWHSI and to characterise the aetiology, duration and management of these wounds.

Methods: Anonymised data were collected from patients with SWHSI receiving treatment in primary, secondary and community settings. Over a two weeks period, data were collected on the patients, their SWHSI, clinical and treatment details.

Results: Data were collected from 187 patients with a median age of 58.0 (95% CI = 55 to 61) years. The prevalence of SWHSI was 0.41 (95% CI = 0.35 to 0.47) per 1000 population. More patients with SWHSI were being treated in community (109/187, 58.3%) than in secondary (56/187, 29.9%) care settings. Most patients (164/187, 87.7%) had one SWHSI and the median duration of wounds was 28.0 (95% CI = 21 to 35) days. The most common surgical specialities associated with SWHSI were colorectal (80/187, 42.8%), plastics (24/187, 12.8%) and vascular (22/187, 11.8%) surgery. Nearly half of SWHSI were planned to heal by secondary intention (90/187, 48.1%) and 77/187 (41.2%) were wounds that had dehisced. Dressings were the most common single treatment for SWHSI, received by 169/181 (93.4%) patients. Eleven (6.1%) patients were receiving negative pressure wound therapy.

Conclusions: This survey provides a previously unknown insight into the occurrence, duration, treatment and types of surgery that lead to SWHSI. This information will be of value to patients, health care providers and researchers.

Keywords: Secondary intention; Surgical wounds.

Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

References

    1. Hospital episode statistics: England. Financial year 2005–06. [].
    1. Moore P., Foster L. Acute surgical wound care 1: an overview of treatment. Br J Nurs. 1998;7(18):1101–1106.
    1. National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health . 2008. Surgical site infection.
    1. Srinivasaiah N., Dugdall H., Barrett S., Drew P.J. A point prevalence survey of wounds in north-east England. J Wound Care. 2007;16:413–419.
    1. Vowden K.R., Vowden P. The prevalence, management and outcome for acute wounds identified in a wound care survey within one English health care district. J Tissue Viability. 2009;18:7–12.
    1. Sussman C., Bates-Jensen B.M. fourth ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2011. Wound care: a collaborative practice manual for health professionals.
    1. Dinah F., Adhikari A. Gauze packing of open surgical wounds: empirical or evidence-based practice? Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2006;88(1):33–36.
    1. Vermeulen H., Ubbink D., Goossens A., de Vos R., Legemate D. Dressings and topical agents for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention. Cochrane database Syst Rev. 2004;2:CD003554.
    1. National Research Ethics Service . 2011. Does my project require review by a Research Ethics Committee?
    1. Office for National Statistics . 2013. Table P01UK 2011 Census: usual resident population by five-year age group, local authorities in the United Kingdom.
    1. Hall J., Buckely H.L., Lamb K., Stubbs N., Saramago P., Dumville J. Point prevalence of complex wounds in a defined United Kingdom population. Wound Repair Regen. 2014, Sep 15 [Epub ahead of print]
    1. Office for National Statistics . 2011. Neighbourhood statistics, ethnic group 2011, kingston upon Hull.
    1. Haverstock B.D., Bowering C.K., McMurty M.S., Senior P.A., Bowker S.L., Tsuyuki R.T. Diabetes, Foot disease and lower limb amputations in alberta. In: Johnson J.A., editor. Alberta diabetes atlas edn. Institute of Health Economics; Edmonton: 2011.
    1. Heikkinen M., Saarinen J., Suominen V.P., Virkkunen J., Salenius J. Lower limb amputations: differences between the genders and long-term survival. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007;31(3):277–286.
    1. Peek M.E. Gender differences in diabetes-related lower extremity amputations. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(7):1951–1955.
    1. Sondenaa K., Andersen E., Nesvik I., Soreide J.A. Patient characteristics and symptoms in chronic pilonidal sinus disease. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1995;10(1):39–42.
    1. Cohen B., Choi Y.J., Hyman S., Furuya E.Y., Neidell M., Larson E. Gender differences in risk of bloodstream and surgical site infections. J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Oct;28(10):1318–1325.
    1. Oldfield A. Surgical wounds: why do they dehisce? Wound Essentials. 2009;4:84–91.
    1. Oldfield A. Assessing the open surgical wound. Wound Essentials. 2010;5:48–56.
    1. Sandy-Hodgetts K., Carville K., Leslie G.D. Determining risk factors for surgical wound dehiscence: a literature review. Int Wound J. 2015 Jun;12(3):265–275.
    1. Berry D.P., Bale S., Harding K.G. Dressings for treating cavity wounds. J Wound Care. 1996;5(1):10–17.
    1. Viciano V., Castera J.E., Medrano J., Aguilo J., Torro J., Botella M.G. Effect of hydrocolloid dressings on healing by second intention after excision of pilonidal sinus. Eur J Surg. 2000;166(3):229–232.
    1. Shackelford D.P., Fackler E., Hoffman M.K., Atkinson S. Use of topical recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor BB in abdominal wound separation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186(4):701–704.
    1. Battaglia M.P. Sage Publications, Inc.; Thousand Oaks, CA: 2008. Purposive sample. Encyclopedia of survey research methods.
    1. Burns K.E., Duffett M., Kho M.E., Meade M.O., Adhikari N.K., Sinuff T. A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians. CMAJ Can Med Assoc J J de l'Assoc Med Can. 2008;179(3):245–252.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit