Maternal psychological responses during pregnancy after ultrasonographic detection of structural fetal anomalies: A prospective longitudinal observational study

Anne Kaasen, Anne Helbig, Ulrik F Malt, Tormod Næs, Hans Skari, Guttorm Haugen, Anne Kaasen, Anne Helbig, Ulrik F Malt, Tormod Næs, Hans Skari, Guttorm Haugen

Abstract

In this longitudinal prospective observational study performed at a tertiary perinatal referral centre, we aimed to assess maternal distress in pregnancy in women with ultrasound findings of fetal anomaly and compare this with distress in pregnant women with normal ultrasound findings. Pregnant women with a structural fetal anomaly (n = 48) and normal ultrasound (n = 105) were included. We administered self-report questionnaires (General Health Questionnaire-28, Impact of Event Scale-22 [IES], and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale) a few days following ultrasound detection of a fetal anomaly or a normal ultrasound (T1), 3 weeks post-ultrasound (T2), and at 30 (T3) and 36 weeks gestation (T4). Social dysfunction, health perception, and psychological distress (intrusion, avoidance, arousal, anxiety, and depression) were the main outcome measures. The median gestational age at T1 was 20 and 19 weeks in the group with and without fetal anomaly, respectively. In the fetal anomaly group, all psychological distress scores were highest at T1. In the group with a normal scan, distress scores were stable throughout pregnancy. At all assessments, the fetal anomaly group scored significantly higher (especially on depression-related questions) compared to the normal scan group, except on the IES Intrusion and Arousal subscales at T4, although with large individual differences. In conclusion, women with a known fetal anomaly initially had high stress scores, which gradually decreased, resembling those in women with a normal pregnancy. Psychological stress levels were stable and low during the latter half of gestation in women with a normal pregnancy.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1. Comparison of maternal psychological distress…
Fig 1. Comparison of maternal psychological distress during pregnancy with and without a fetal anomaly.
The figure presents psychological distress in women in the study group (with fetal anomaly) and comparison group (normal ultrasound findings) at the four assessments, as measured by the Intrusion subscale of the Impact of Event Scale (IES). Box-and-whiskers plots show 50% of cases (25–75 percentiles) in the rectangle, each of the whiskers represents the smallest and largest values. The line within the rectangle represents the median value.
Fig 2. Comparison of maternal psychological distress…
Fig 2. Comparison of maternal psychological distress during pregnancy with and without a fetal anomaly.
The figure presents psychological distress in women in the study group (with fetal anomaly) and comparison group (normal ultrasound findings) at the four assessments, as measured by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS). Box-and-whiskers plots show 50% of cases (25–75 percentiles) in the rectangle, each of the whiskers represents the smallest and largest values. The line within the rectangle represents the median value.

References

    1. Kaasen A, Helbig A, Malt UF, Naes T, Skari H, Haugen GN. Paternal psychological response after ultrasonographic detection of structural fetal anomalies with a comparison to maternal response: a cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2013;13(147).
    1. Kaasen A, Helbig A, Malt UF, Næs T, Skari H, Haugen G. Acute maternal social dysfunction, health perception and psychological distress after ultrasonographic detection of a fetal structural anomaly. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. 2010;117(9):1127–38.
    1. Titapant V, Chuenwattana P. Psychological effects of fetal diagnoses of non-lethal congenital anomalies on the experience of pregnant women during the remainder of their pregnancy. The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research. 2015;41(1):77–83. Epub 2014/09/27. 10.1111/jog.12504
    1. Nes RB, Roysamb E, Hauge LJ, Kornstad T, Landolt MA, Irgens LM, et al. Adaptation to the birth of a child with a congenital anomaly: a prospective longitudinal study of maternal well-being and psychological distress. Developmental psychology. 2014;50(6):1827–39. Epub 2014/03/05. 10.1037/a0035996
    1. Aite L, Zaccara A, Trucchi A, Brizzi C, Nahom A, Iacobelli B, et al. When uncertainty generates more anxiety than severity: the prenatal experience with cystic adenomatoid malformation of the lung. Journal of perinatal medicine. 2009;37(5):539–42. Epub 2009/06/06. 10.1515/JPM.2009.098
    1. Goldberg DP, Hillier VF. A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychological medicine. 1979;9(1):139–45. Epub 1979/02/01.
    1. Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W. Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic medicine. 1979;41(3):209–18. Epub 1979/05/01.
    1. Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. The British journal of psychiatry: the journal of mental science. 1987;150:782–6. Epub 1987/06/01.
    1. Prady SL, Pickett KE, Croudace T, Fairley L, Bloor K, Gilbody S, et al. Psychological distress during pregnancy in a multi-ethnic community: findings from the born in Bradford cohort study. PloS one. 2013;8(4):e60693 Epub 2013/05/03. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc3640042. 10.1371/journal.pone.0060693
    1. Skreden M, Skari H, Malt U, Haugen G, Pripp A, Faugli A, et al. Long-Term Parental Psychological Distress Among Parents of Children With a Malformation-A Prospective Longitudinal Study. Am J Med Genet A. 2010;152A(9):2193–202. 10.1002/ajmg.a.33605
    1. Weiss DF, Marmer CR (1997) The Impact of Event Scale-Revised In: Wilson JP, Keane TM, editors. Assessing Psychological Trauma and PTSD: A practitioners handbook. Second edition ed. New York: The Guilford Press; 2004. pp. 399–411.
    1. Eid J, Larsson G, Johnsen BH, Laberg JC, Bartone PT, Carlstedt B. Psychometric properties of the Norwegian Impact of Event Scale-Revised in a non-clinical sample. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 2009, Vol63(5), p426-432. 2009;63(5):426–32. 10.1080/08039480903118190
    1. Qu Z, Tian D, Zhang Q, Wang X, He H, Zhang X, et al. The impact of the catastrophic earthquake in China's Sichuan province on the mental health of pregnant women. Journal of affective disorders. 2012;136(1–2):117–23. Epub 2011/09/23. 10.1016/j.jad.2011.08.021
    1. Rychik J, Donaghue DD, Levy S, Fajardo C, Combs J, Zhang X, et al. Maternal psychological stress after prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease. The Journal of pediatrics. 2013;162(2):302–7.e1. Epub 2012/09/15. 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.07.023
    1. Murray L, Carothers AD. The validation of the Edinburgh Post-natal Depression Scale on a community sample. The British journal of psychiatry: the journal of mental science. 1990;157:288–90. Epub 1990/08/01.
    1. Eberhard-Gran M, Eskild A, Tambs K, Schei B, Opjordsmoen S. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale: validation in a Norwegian community sample. Nordic journal of psychiatry. 2001;55(2):113–7. Epub 2002/01/23. 10.1080/08039480151108525
    1. Skari H, Malt UF, Bjornland K, Egeland T, Haugen G, Skreden M, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of congenital malformations and parental psychological distress—a prospective longitudinal cohort study. Prenatal Diagnosis. 2006;26(11):1001–9. 10.1002/pd.1542
    1. Karlehagen S, Malt UF, Hoff H, Tibell E, Herrstromer U, Hildingson K, et al. The effect of major railway accidents on the psychological health of train drivers—II. A longitudinal study of the one-year outcome after the accident. Journal of psychosomatic research. 1993;37(8):807–17. Epub 1993/12/01.
    1. Salvesen KA, Oyen L, Schmidt N, Malt UF, Eik-Nes SH. Comparison of long-term psychological responses of women after pregnancy termination due to fetal anomalies and after perinatal loss. Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology: the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. 1997;9(2):80–5. Epub 1997/02/01.
    1. Heron J, O'Connor TG, Evans J, Golding J, Glover V. The course of anxiety and depression through pregnancy and the postpartum in a community sample. Journal of affective disorders. 2004;80(1):65–73. Epub 2004/04/20. 10.1016/j.jad.2003.08.004
    1. Rallis S, Skouteris H, McCabe M, Milgrom J. A prospective examination of depression, anxiety and stress throughout pregnancy. Women and birth: journal of the Australian College of Midwives. 2014;27(4):e36–42. Epub 2014/09/23.
    1. Liou SR, Wang P, Cheng CY. Longitudinal study of perinatal maternal stress, depressive symptoms and anxiety. Midwifery. 2014;30(6):795–801. Epub 2013/12/18. 10.1016/j.midw.2013.11.007
    1. Adams SS, Eberhard-Gran M, Hofoss D, Eskild A. Maternal emotional distress in pregnancy and delivery of a small-for-gestational age infant. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011;90(11):1267–73. Epub 2011/06/08. 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01204.x
    1. Tebeka S, Le Strat Y, Dubertret C. Developmental trajectories of pregnant and postpartum depression in an epidemiologic survey. Journal of affective disorders. 2016;203:62–8. Epub 2016/06/10. 10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.058
    1. Horsch A, Brooks C, Fletcher H. Maternal coping, appraisals and adjustment following diagnosis of fetal anomaly. Prenat Diagn. 2013;33(12):1137–45. Epub 2013/07/31. 10.1002/pd.4207
    1. Hudson CG. Socioeconomic status and mental illness: tests of the social causation and selection hypotheses. The American journal of orthopsychiatry. 2005;75(1):3–18. Epub 2005/02/16. 10.1037/0002-9432.75.1.3
    1. Fonseca A, Nazare B, Canavarro MC. Parental psychological distress and quality of life after a prenatal or postnatal diagnosis of congenital anomaly: a controlled comparison study with parents of healthy infants. Disability and health journal. 2012;5(2):67–74. Epub 2012/03/21. 10.1016/j.dhjo.2011.11.001
    1. Kübler-Ross E. On death and dying: what the dying have to teach doctors, nurses, clergy and their own families [40th ann. ed.]. ed. London: Routledge; 2009.
    1. Fonseca A, Nazare B, Canavarro MC. Clinical determinants of parents' emotional reactions to the disclosure of a diagnosis of congenital anomaly. Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing: JOGNN / NAACOG. 2013;42(2):178–90. Epub 2013/02/05.
    1. Lipinski SE, Lipinski MJ, Biesecker LG, Biesecker BB. Uncertainty and perceived personal control among parents of children with rare chromosome conditions: the role of genetic counseling. American journal of medical genetics Part C, Seminars in medical genetics. 2006;142c(4):232–40. Epub 2006/10/28. 10.1002/ajmg.c.30107
    1. Detraux JJ, Gillot-de Vries F, Vanden Eynde S, Courtois A, Desmet A. Psychological impact of the announcement of a fetal abnormality on pregnant women and on professionals. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 1998;847:210–9. Epub 1998/07/21.
    1. Hunfeld JA, Tempels A, Passchier J, Hazebroek FW, Tibboel D. Brief report: parental burden and grief one year after the birth of a child with a congenital anomaly. Journal of pediatric psychology. 1999;24(6):515–20. Epub 1999/12/23.
    1. Gruer L, Hart CL, Watt GC. After 50 years and 200 papers, what can the Midspan cohort studies tell us about our mortality? Public health. 2017;142:186–95. Epub 2015/08/10. 10.1016/j.puhe.2015.06.017
    1. Moore CJ, Cunningham SA. Social position, psychological stress, and obesity: a systematic review. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 2012;112(4):518–26. Epub 2012/06/20. 10.1016/j.jand.2011.12.001

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit