Prognostic Value of Sex After Revascularization for Left Main Coronary Disease: Extended PRECOMBAT Study

Yujin Yang, Yeong Jin Jeong, Junho Hyun, Junghoon Lee, Ju Hyeon Kim, Sehee Kim, Do-Yoon Kang, Pil Hyung Lee, Jung-Min Ahn, Duk-Woo Park, Seung-Jung Park, PRECOMBAT Investigators, Yujin Yang, Yeong Jin Jeong, Junho Hyun, Junghoon Lee, Ju Hyeon Kim, Sehee Kim, Do-Yoon Kang, Pil Hyung Lee, Jung-Min Ahn, Duk-Woo Park, Seung-Jung Park, PRECOMBAT Investigators

Abstract

Background: Female subjects have poorer outcomes in left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease compared with male subjects. However, limited information is available on the long-term prognostic impact of sex and sex-treatment interactions in patients with LMCA disease undergoing coronary revascularization.

Objectives: The goal of this study was to investigate the long-term effects of sex and related differential outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in LMCA disease.

Methods: The extended PRECOMBAT (Premier of Randomized Comparison of Bypass Surgery versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients with Left Main Coronary Artery Disease) trial evaluated the >10-year clinical outcomes in patients with LMCA disease randomized to undergo PCI with drug-eluting stents (n = 300) or CABG (n = 300). The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (composite of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization) at 10 years.

Results: Of the 600 patients, 459 (76.5%) were male. The 10-year rates of MACCE were similar between male and female subjects in the overall cohort (27.3% vs 27.0%; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.70-1.59), the PCI arm (30.6% vs 27.1%; aHR: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.69-2.05), and the CABG arm (24.0% vs 26.9%; aHR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.53-1.62). The 10-year risks for MACCE did not significantly differ between PCI and CABG in both male (aHR: 1.37; 95% CI: 0.95-1.97) and female (aHR: 1.07; 95% CI: 0.56-2.07) subjects. There was no significant sex-treatment interaction regarding the adjusted risk of MACCE at 10 years (P for interaction = 0.52).

Conclusions: In this 10-year follow-up of the PRECOMBAT trial, there was no sex-related impact on the long-term risk of MACCE after PCI and CABG for LMCA disease. (Ten-Year Outcomes of PRECOMBAT Trial; NCT03871127).

Keywords: CABG, coronary artery bypass grafting; CAD, coronary artery disease; CI, confidence interval; DES, drug-eluting stents; HR, hazard ratio; LMCA, left main coronary artery; MACCE, major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events; MI, myocardial infarction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention; RCT, randomized controlled trial; TVR, target vessel revascularization; coronary artery bypass surgery; left main coronary artery disease; mortality; percutaneous coronary intervention; sex.

Conflict of interest statement

This research was partly supported by the Cardiovascular Research Foundation. The sponsors had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose.

© 2022 The Authors.

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
Figure 1
Figure 1
10-Year Event Curves for the Primary Endpoint Between Male and Female Subjects Event curves are shown in the overall cohort (A), the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) arm (B), and the coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) arm (C). P values are derived from the log-rank test. Primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events, which was defined as a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization.
Central Illustration
Central Illustration
Adjusted Hazard Ratios for the Primary Endpoint According to Sex and Treatment Adjusted hazard ratios (95% CI) were stratified according to sex group (A) and treatment group (B). Adjusted variables included age, medically treated diabetes, clinical presentation, ejection fraction, left main bifurcation involvement, SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score, and EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation). Primary end point was major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events, which was defined as a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization. CABG = coronary artery bypass grafting; PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figure 2
Figure 2
10-Year Event Curves of the Primary Endpoint Between PCI and CABG Event curves are shown in the male cohort (A) and female cohort (B). P values are derived from the log-rank test. Primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events, which was defined as a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization. Abbreviations as in Figure 1.

References

    1. Khamis R.Y., Ammari T., Mikhail G.W. Gender differences in coronary heart disease. Heart. 2016;102:1142–1149.
    1. Aggarwal N.R., Patel H.N., Mehta L.S., et al. Sex differences in ischemic heart disease. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2018;11(2)
    1. Haider A., Bengs S., Luu J., et al. Sex and gender in cardiovascular medicine: presentation and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome. Eur Heart J. 2019;41:1328–1336.
    1. Sotomi Y., Onuma Y., Cavalcante R., et al. Geographical difference of the interaction of sex with treatment strategy in patients with multivessel disease and left main disease: a meta-analysis from SYNTAX (Synergy Between PCI With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery), PRECOMBAT (Bypass Surgery Versus Angioplasty Using Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Left Main Coronary Artery Disease), and BEST (Bypass Surgery and Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation in the Treatment of Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease) randomized controlled trials. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10(5)
    1. Head S.J., Milojevic M., Daemen J., et al. Mortality after coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for coronary artery disease: a pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet. 2018;391:939–948.
    1. Serruys P.W., Cavalcante R., Collet C., et al. Outcomes after coronary stenting or bypass surgery for men and women with unprotected left main disease: the EXCEL Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv. 2018;11:1234–1243.
    1. Park H., Ahn J.M., Yoon Y.H., et al. Effect of age and sex on outcomes after stenting or bypass surgery in left main coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2019;124:678–687.
    1. Hara H., Takahashi K., van Klaveren D., et al. Sex differences in all-cause mortality in the decade following complex coronary revascularization. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76:889–899.
    1. Park D.W., Ahn J.M., Park H., et al. Ten-year outcomes after drug-eluting stents versus coronary artery bypass grafting for left main coronary disease: extended follow-up of the PRECOMBAT trial. Circulation. 2020;141:1437–1446.
    1. Park S.J., Kim Y.H., Park D.W., et al. Randomized trial of stents versus bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1718–1727.
    1. Ahn J.M., Roh J.H., Kim Y.H., et al. Randomized trial of stents versus bypass surgery for left main coronary artery disease: 5-year outcomes of the PRECOMBAT study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015;65:2198–2206.
    1. Yun J.E., Kim Y.J., Park J.J., et al. Safety and effectiveness of contemporary P2Y12 inhibitors in an East Asian population with acute coronary syndrome: a nationwide population-based cohort study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8
    1. Taggart D.P., Gaudino M. PCI or CABG for left main coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:290.
    1. Virani S.S., Alonso A., Benjamin E.J., et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2020 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;141:e139–e596.
    1. Schiele F., Meneveau N., Seronde M.F., et al. Propensity score-matched analysis of effects of clinical characteristics and treatment on gender difference in outcomes after acute myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108:789–798.
    1. Ferrari R., Abergel H., Ford I., et al. Gender- and age-related differences in clinical presentation and management of outpatients with stable coronary artery disease. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167:2938–2943.
    1. Kosmidou I., Leon M.B., Zhang Y., et al. Long-term outcomes in women and men following percutaneous coronary intervention. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;75:1631–1640.
    1. Khan N.A., Daskalopoulou S.S., Karp I., et al. Sex differences in acute coronary syndrome symptom presentation in young patients. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:1863–1871.
    1. Park J.S., Kim Y.J., Shin D.G., et al. Gender differences in clinical features and in-hospital outcomes in ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction: from the Korean Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry (KAMIR) study. Clin Cardiol. 2010;33:E1–E6.
    1. Sorbets E., Fox K.M., Elbez Y., et al. Long-term outcomes of chronic coronary syndrome worldwide: insights from the international CLARIFY registry. Eur Heart J. 2020;41:347–356.
    1. Farooq V., Serruys P.W., Bourantas C., et al. Incidence and multivariable correlates of long-term mortality in patients treated with surgical or percutaneous revascularization in the Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX) trial. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:3105–3113.
    1. Farooq V., van Klaveren D., Steyerberg E.W., et al. Anatomical and clinical characteristics to guide decision making between coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention for individual patients: development and validation of SYNTAX score II. Lancet. 2013;381:639–650.
    1. Holm N.R., Makikallio T., Lindsay M.M., et al. Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in the treatment of unprotected left main stenosis: updated 5-year outcomes from the randomised, non-inferiority NOBLE trial. Lancet. 2020;395:191–199.
    1. Modolo R., Chichareon P., van Klaveren D., et al. Impact of non-respect of SYNTAX score II recommendation for surgery in patients with left main coronary artery disease treated by percutaneous coronary intervention: an EXCEL substudy. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2020;57:676–683.
    1. Takahashi K., Serruys P.W., Fuster V., et al. Redevelopment and validation of the SYNTAX score II to individualise decision making between percutaneous and surgical revascularisation in patients with complex coronary artery disease: secondary analysis of the multicentre randomised controlled SYNTAXES trial with external cohort validation. Lancet. 2020;396:1399–1412.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit