Home Use of an Artificial Beta Cell in Type 1 Diabetes

H Thabit, M Tauschmann, J M Allen, L Leelarathna, S Hartnell, M E Wilinska, C L Acerini, S Dellweg, C Benesch, L Heinemann, J K Mader, M Holzer, H Kojzar, J Exall, J Yong, J Pichierri, K D Barnard, C Kollman, P Cheng, P C Hindmarsh, F M Campbell, S Arnolds, T R Pieber, M L Evans, D B Dunger, R Hovorka, Carlo L Acerini, Janet M Allen, David B Dunger, Daniela Elleri, Samantha J Goode, Josephine Hayes, Roman Hovorka, Helen R Murphy, Zoe A Stewart, Martin Tauschmann, Hood Thabit, Malgorzata E Wilinska, Sara Hartnell, Fiona M Campbell, Jane Exall, James Yong, Peter C Hindmarsh, Jennifer Pichierri, Peiyao Cheng, Craig Kollman, John Lum, Nelly Njeru, Judy Sibayan, Jasdip Mangat, Janet M Allen, Mark L Evans, Samantha J Goode, Josephine Hayes, Roman Hovorka, Lalantha Leelarathna, Yue Ruan, Martin Tauschmann, Hood Thabit, Malgorzata E Wilinska, Sara Hartnell, Sabine Arnolds, Carsten Benesch, Sibylle Dellweg, Martina Haase, Lutz Heinemann, Kirstin Kuschma, Maren Luebkert, Elke Przetak, Krisztina Schmitz-Grozs, Martin Ellmerer, Manuel Holzer, Harald Kojzar, Julia K Mader, Thomas R Pieber, Katharine D Barnard, Jasdip Mangat, J Hans DeVries, Eric Renard, Steve Lane, Claudio Cobelli, H Thabit, M Tauschmann, J M Allen, L Leelarathna, S Hartnell, M E Wilinska, C L Acerini, S Dellweg, C Benesch, L Heinemann, J K Mader, M Holzer, H Kojzar, J Exall, J Yong, J Pichierri, K D Barnard, C Kollman, P Cheng, P C Hindmarsh, F M Campbell, S Arnolds, T R Pieber, M L Evans, D B Dunger, R Hovorka, Carlo L Acerini, Janet M Allen, David B Dunger, Daniela Elleri, Samantha J Goode, Josephine Hayes, Roman Hovorka, Helen R Murphy, Zoe A Stewart, Martin Tauschmann, Hood Thabit, Malgorzata E Wilinska, Sara Hartnell, Fiona M Campbell, Jane Exall, James Yong, Peter C Hindmarsh, Jennifer Pichierri, Peiyao Cheng, Craig Kollman, John Lum, Nelly Njeru, Judy Sibayan, Jasdip Mangat, Janet M Allen, Mark L Evans, Samantha J Goode, Josephine Hayes, Roman Hovorka, Lalantha Leelarathna, Yue Ruan, Martin Tauschmann, Hood Thabit, Malgorzata E Wilinska, Sara Hartnell, Sabine Arnolds, Carsten Benesch, Sibylle Dellweg, Martina Haase, Lutz Heinemann, Kirstin Kuschma, Maren Luebkert, Elke Przetak, Krisztina Schmitz-Grozs, Martin Ellmerer, Manuel Holzer, Harald Kojzar, Julia K Mader, Thomas R Pieber, Katharine D Barnard, Jasdip Mangat, J Hans DeVries, Eric Renard, Steve Lane, Claudio Cobelli

Abstract

Background: The feasibility, safety, and efficacy of prolonged use of an artificial beta cell (closed-loop insulin-delivery system) in the home setting have not been established.

Methods: In two multicenter, crossover, randomized, controlled studies conducted under free-living home conditions, we compared closed-loop insulin delivery with sensor-augmented pump therapy in 58 patients with type 1 diabetes. The closed-loop system was used day and night by 33 adults and overnight by 25 children and adolescents. Participants used the closed-loop system for a 12-week period and sensor-augmented pump therapy (control) for a similar period. The primary end point was the proportion of time that the glucose level was between 70 mg and 180 mg per deciliter for adults and between 70 mg and 145 mg per deciliter for children and adolescents.

Results: Among adults, the proportion of time that the glucose level was in the target range was 11.0 percentage points (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.1 to 13.8) greater with the use of the closed-loop system day and night than with control therapy (P<0.001). The mean glucose level was lower during the closed-loop phase than during the control phase (difference, -11 mg per deciliter; 95% CI, -17 to -6; P<0.001), as were the area under the curve for the period when the glucose level was less than 63 mg per deciliter (39% lower; 95% CI, 24 to 51; P<0.001) and the mean glycated hemoglobin level (difference, -0.3%; 95% CI, -0.5 to -0.1; P=0.002). Among children and adolescents, the proportion of time with the nighttime glucose level in the target range was higher during the closed-loop phase than during the control phase (by 24.7 percentage points; 95% CI, 20.6 to 28.7; P<0.001), and the mean nighttime glucose level was lower (difference, -29 mg per deciliter; 95% CI, -39 to -20; P<0.001). The area under the curve for the period in which the day-and-night glucose levels were less than 63 mg per deciliter was lower by 42% (95% CI, 4 to 65; P=0.03). Three severe hypoglycemic episodes occurred during the closed-loop phase when the closed-loop system was not in use.

Conclusions: Among patients with type 1 diabetes, 12-week use of a closed-loop system, as compared with sensor-augmented pump therapy, improved glucose control, reduced hypoglycemia, and, in adults, resulted in a lower glycated hemoglobin level. (Funded by the JDRF and others; AP@home04 and APCam08 ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01961622 and NCT01778348.).

Figures

Figure 1. Sensor Glucose Levels and Insulin…
Figure 1. Sensor Glucose Levels and Insulin Delivery
Shown are the median sensor glucose levels and the median values for insulin delivery during the day-and-night closed-loop study involving adults (Panel A) and the overnight closed-loop study involving children and adolescents (Panel B). The bands indicate interquartile ranges. To convert the values for glucose to millimoles per liter, multiply by 0.05551.
Figure 2. Overnight Glucose Levels
Figure 2. Overnight Glucose Levels
Shown are the individual overnight mean sensor glucose levels in adults (Panel A) and in children and adolescents (Panel B). Adults used the closed-loop systems day and night and children and adolescents used the closed-loop systems overnight. The size of the bubble indicates the proportion of time overnight during which the glucose level was below 50 mg per deciliter (2.8 mmol per liter).

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit