Significance of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Assessed Tumor Response for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Treated With Preoperative Long-Course Chemoradiation

Mohamed Salah Fayaz, Gerges Attia Demian, Wael Moftah Fathallah, Heba El-Sayed Eissa, Mustafa Shawki El-Sherify, Sadeq Abozlouf, Thomas George, Suzanne Mona Samir, Mohamed Salah Fayaz, Gerges Attia Demian, Wael Moftah Fathallah, Heba El-Sayed Eissa, Mustafa Shawki El-Sherify, Sadeq Abozlouf, Thomas George, Suzanne Mona Samir

Abstract

Purpose: To study the predictive and prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-assessed tumor response after long-course neoadjuvant therapy for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Methods: This study included 79 patients who had T3 or T4 and/or N+ rectal cancer treated with long-course neoadjuvant chemoradiation. MRI-assessed tumor regression grade (mrTRG) was assessed in 64 patients. MRIs were reviewed by the study radiologist. Surgical and pathologic reports for those who underwent surgery were reviewed. Disease-free survival (DFS) was estimated. Progression during therapy, local relapse, metastasis, and death resulting from the tumor were classified as events. Statistical significance was calculated.

Results: In 11 patients, the tumor completely disappeared on MRI; that is, it had an mrTRG of 1. All but one patient, who chose deferred surgery, had a complete pathologic response (pCR), with a positive predictive value of nearly 100%. Of the 20 patients who had an mrTRG of 2 on MRI, six had a pCR. mrTRG 3, mrTRG 4, and mrTRG 5 were detected in 24, six, and three patients, respectively, of whom only one patient had a pCR. The 2-year DFS was 77%. The mrTRG was significant for DFS. The 2-year DFS was 88% for patients with a good response versus 66% for those with a poor response (P = .046).

Conclusion: MRI-assessed complete tumor response was strongly correlated with pCR and, therefore, can be used as a surrogate marker to predict absence of viable tumor cells. Our results can be used to implement use of mrTRGs in larger prospective correlative studies as a tool to select patients for whom deferred surgery may be appropriate. Also, those with a poor response may be offered further treatment options before definitive surgery.

Conflict of interest statement

Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and contributions are found at the end of this article.The following represents disclosure information provided by authors of this manuscript. All relationships are considered compensated. Relationships are self-held unless noted. I = Immediate Family Member, Inst = My Institution. Relationships may not relate to the subject matter of this manuscript. For more information about ASCO's conflict of interest policy, please refer to www.asco.org/rwc or jco.ascopubs.org/site/ifc. Mohamed Salah FayazNo relationship to discloseGerges Attia DemianNo relationship to discloseWael Moftah FathallahNo relationship to discloseHeba El-Sayed EissaNo relationship to discloseMustafa Shawki El-SherifyNo relationship to discloseSadeq AbozloufNo relationship to discloseThomas GeorgeNo relationship to discloseSuzanne Mona SamirNo relationship to disclose

References

    1. Rödel C, Martus P, Papadoupolos T, et al. Prognostic significance of tumor regression after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:8688–8696.
    1. Dworak O, Keilholz L, Hoffmann A. Pathological features of rectal cancer after preoperative radiochemotherapy. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1997;12:19–23.
    1. Patel UB, Taylor F, Blomqvist L, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-detected tumor response for locally advanced rectal cancer predicts survival outcomes: MERCURY experience. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:3753–3760.
    1. Habr-Gama A, Perez RO, Proscurshim I, et al. Patterns of failure and survival for nonoperative treatment of stage c0 distal rectal cancer following neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:1319–1328. discussion 1328-1329.
    1. Suárez J, Vera R, Balén E, et al. Pathologic response assessed by Mandard grade is a better prognostic factor than down staging for disease-free survival after preoperative radiochemotherapy for advanced rectal cancer. Colorectal Dis. 2008;10:563–568.
    1. Maas M, Nelemans PJ, Valentini V, et al. Long-term outcome in patients with a pathological complete response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer: A pooled analysis of individual patient data. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:835–844.
    1. Habr-Gama A, Gama-Rodrigues J, São Julião GP, et al. Local recurrence after complete clinical response and watch and wait in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: Impact of salvage therapy on local disease control. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;15:822–828.
    1. Garcia-Aguilar J, Chow OS, Smith DD, et al. Timing of Rectal Cancer Response to Chemoradiation Consortium Effect of adding mFOLFOX6 after neoadjuvant chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer: A multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16:957–966.
    1. National Institutes of Health: Trial evaluating 3-year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer treated with chemoradiation plus induction or consolidation chemotherapy and total mesorectal excision or non-operative management. .
    1. Al-Basmy A et al: Kuwait Cancer Registry: Annual report 2011. Shuwaikh, Kuwait, Ministry of Health of State of Kuwait.
    1. Veruttipong D, Soliman AS, Gilbert SF, et al. Age distribution, polyps and rectal cancer in the Egyptian population-based cancer registry. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:3997–4003.
    1. Siegel RL, Jemal A, Ward EM. Increase in incidence of colorectal cancer among young men and women in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009;18:1695–1698.
    1. Rowan S, Brewster D. SMPS No 68: Cancer Atlas of the United Kingdom and Ireland 1991-2000—Chapter 07: Colorectal. .
    1. Guillem JG, Chessin DB, Cohen AM, et al. Long-term oncologic outcome following preoperative combined modality therapy and total mesorectal excision of locally advanced rectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2005;241:829–836.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit