Biological effects of exposure to magnetic resonance imaging: an overview

Domenico Formica, Sergio Silvestri, Domenico Formica, Sergio Silvestri

Abstract

The literature on biological effects of magnetic and electromagnetic fields commonly utilized in magnetic resonance imaging systems is surveyed here. After an introduction on the basic principles of magnetic resonance imaging and the electric and magnetic properties of biological tissues, the basic phenomena to understand the bio-effects are described in classical terms. Values of field strengths and frequencies commonly utilized in these diagnostic systems are reported in order to allow the integration of the specific literature on the bio-effects produced by magnetic resonance systems with the vast literature concerning the bio-effects produced by electromagnetic fields. This work gives an overview of the findings about the safety concerns of exposure to static magnetic fields, radio-frequency fields, and time varying magnetic field gradients, focusing primarily on the physics of the interactions between these electromagnetic fields and biological matter. The scientific literature is summarized, integrated, and critically analyzed with the help of authoritative reviews by recognized experts, international safety guidelines are also cited.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Frequency dependence of relative permittivity ε (x) and conductivity σ (o); the major dispersion regions α, β and γ are indicated. The frequency range of interest for MRI devices is reported. (adapted from Ref. [16])
Figure 2
Figure 2
Spectrum of magnetic susceptibilities. The figure shows that the majority of human tissues is diamagnetic or weakly paramagnetic. (from Ref. [17])
Figure 3
Figure 3
The mean peripheral nerve stimulation thresholds and cardiac stimulation thresholds for the most sensitive population percentile estimated by Reilly. (adapted from Ref. [47])
Figure 4
Figure 4
Mean human nerve stimulation thresholds by z gradient; in figure are shown the experimental data and the Reilly fit. (adapted from Ref. [47])
Figure 5
Figure 5
Estimated probability of cardiac stimulation assuming dB/dt levels are at the mean peripheral nerve stimulation thresholds. (adapted from Ref. [47])

References

    1. STOA-Directorate general for research-European Parliament The physiological and environmental effects of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation. Final study. 2001.
    1. International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields. Health Physics Society. 1998.
    1. Portier C, Wolfe MS, NIEHS Working Group Assessment of health effects from exposure to power-line frequency electric and magnetic fields : NIEHS Working Group report. [Research Triangle Park, NC (PO Box 1 Research Triangle Park 27709): National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences US National Institute of Health US Dept of Health and Human Services Public Health Services. 1998.
    1. Ordidge RJ, Shellock FG, Kanal E. A Y2000 Update of Current Safety Issues Related to MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12:1. doi: 10.1002/1522-2586(200007)12:1<1::AID-JMRI1>;2-Z.
    1. Center for Devices and Radiological Health Medical Device Report database, US Food and Drug Administration. April 20, 2002.
    1. Shellock FG. Reference manual for magnetic resonance safety. Salt Lake City, Amirsys Inc. 2003.
    1. Sawyer-Glover A, Shellock FG. Pre-MRI procedure screening: recommendations and safety considerations for biomedical implants and devices. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12:92–106. doi: 10.1002/1522-2586(200007)12:1<92::AID-JMRI11>;2-7.
    1. Ho HS. Safety of metallic implants in magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;14:472–477. doi: 10.1002/jmri.1209.
    1. Shellock FG. Magnetic Resonance Safety Update 2002: Implants and Devices. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2002;16:485–496. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10196.
    1. Dempsey MF, Condon B. Thermal injuries associated with MRI. Clin Radiol. 2001;56:457–465. doi: 10.1053/crad.2000.0688.
    1. Shellock FG, Crues 3rd JV. MR safety and the American College of Radiology White Paper. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:1349–1352.
    1. Nakamura T, Fukuda K, Hayakawa K, Aoki I, Matsumoto K, Sekine T, Ueda H, Shimizu Y. Mechanism of burn injury during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) – simple loops can induce heat injury. Front Med Biol Eng. 2001;11:117–129. doi: 10.1163/156855701316922298.
    1. Pictet J, Meuli R, Wicky S, van der Klink JJ. Radiofrequency heating effects around resonant lengths of wire in MRI. Phys Med Biol. 2002;47:2973–2985. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/47/16/312.
    1. Yeung CJ, Susil RC, Atalar E. RF heating due to conductive wires during MRI depends on the phase distribution of the transmit field. Magn Reson Med. 2002;48:1096–1098. doi: 10.1002/mrm.10310.
    1. Krasin F, Wagner H. Biological effects of nonionizing electromagnetic radiation. In: Webster JG, editor. Encyclopedia of Medical Devices and Instrumentation. 1988.
    1. Lin JC. Advances in electromagnetic fields in living systems. III. Kluwer Academic; 2001.
    1. Schenck JF. Safety of strong, static magnetic fields. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12:2–19. doi: 10.1002/1522-2586(200007)12:1<2::AID-JMRI2>;2-V.
    1. Peterson F, Kennelly AE. Some physiological experiment with magnets at Edison laboratory. NY Med J. 1892;56:729–734.
    1. Drinker CK, Thomson RM. Does the magnetic field constitute an industrial hazard? J Ind Hyg. 1921;3:117–129.
    1. Davis LD, Pappajohn K, Plavnieks IM. Bibliography of the biological effects of magnetic fields. Fed Proc. 1962;21 Pt2:1–38.
    1. Budinger TF. Nuclear magnetic resonance in vitro studies: known thresholds for health effects. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1981;5:800–811.
    1. High WB, Sikora J, Ugurbil K, Garwood M. Subchronic in vivo effects of a high static magnetic field (9.4 T) in rats. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12:122–139. doi: 10.1002/1522-2586(200007)12:1<122::AID-JMRI14>;2-3.
    1. Schenck JF, Dumoulin CL, Redington RW, Kressel HY, Elliott RT, McDougall IL. Human exposure to 4.0 T magnetic fields in a whole-body scanner. Med Phys. 1992;19:1089–1098. doi: 10.1118/1.596827.
    1. von Klitzing L. Do static magnetic fields of NMR influence biological signals? Clin Phys Physiol Meas. 1986;7:157–160. doi: 10.1088/0143-0815/7/2/006.
    1. Hong CZ, Shellock F. Short term exposure to a 1.5 Tesla static magnetic field does not affect somato-sensory-evoked potentials in man. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1990;8:65–69. doi: 10.1016/0730-725X(90)90214-M.
    1. Muller S, Hotz M. Human brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEP) before and after MR examinations. Magn Reson Med. 1990;16:476–480.
    1. Pacini S, Vannelli GB, Barni T, Ruggiero M, Sardi I, Pacini P, Gulisano M. Effect of 0.2 T static magnetic field on human neurons: remodeling and inhibition of signal transduction without genome instability. Neuroscience letters. 1999;267:185–188. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3940(99)00362-6.
    1. Klucznik RP, Carrier DA, Pyka R, Haid RW. Placement of a ferromagnetic intracerebral aneurysm clip with a fatal outcome. Radiology. 1993;187:855–856.
    1. Kanal E, Shellock F. MR imaging of patients with intracranial aneurysm clips. Radiology. 1993;187:612–614.
    1. Gimbel JR, Johnson D, Levine PA, Wilkoff BL. Safe performance of magnetic resonance imaging on five patients with permanent cardiac pacemakers. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1996;19:913–919.
    1. Beischer DE, Knepton JC., Jr Influence of strong magnetic fields on electrocardiogram of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri sciureus. Aerosp Med. 1964;35:939–944.
    1. Togawa T, Okay O, Ohima M. Observation of blood flow e.m.f. in externally applied strong magnetic fields by surface electrodes. Med Biol Eng. 1967;5:169–170.
    1. Tenforde TS, Gaffey CT, Moyer BR, Budinger TF. Cardiovascular alterations in Macaca monkeys exposed to stationary magnetic fields: experimental observations and theoretical analysis. Bioelectromagnetics. 1983;4:1–9.
    1. Kangarlu A, Burgess RE, Zhu H, Nakayama T, Hamlin RL, Abduljalil AM, Robitaille PM. Cognitive, cardiac, and physiological safety studies in ultra high field magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 1999;17:1407–1416. doi: 10.1016/S0730-725X(99)00086-7.
    1. Chakeres DW, Kangarlu A, Boudoulas H, Young DC. Effect of static magnetic field exposure of up to 8 Tesla on sequential human vital sign measurements. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;18:346–352. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10367.
    1. Schenck JF. Health and physiological effects of human exposure to whole-body 4 Tesla magnetic fields during MRI. In: Magin RL, Liburdy RP, Persson B, editor. Biological and safety aspects of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. Ann NY Acad Sci. Vol. 649. 1992. pp. 285–301.
    1. Kleinman MH, Shevchenko T, Bohne C. Magnetic field effects on the dynamics of radical pairs: the partition effects in vescicles. Photochem Photobiol. 1998;68:710–718. doi: 10.1562/0031-8655(1998)068<0710:MFEOTD>;2.
    1. Scaiano JC, Cozens FL, McLean L. Model for the rationalization of magnetic fields effects in vivo. Application of the radical-pair mechanism to biological systems. Photochem Photobiol. 1994;59:585–589.
    1. Scaiano JC, Cozens FL, Mohtat N. Influence of combined AC-DC magnetic fields on free radical in organized and biological systems. Development of a model and application of the radical pair mechanism to radicals in micelles. Photochem Photobiol. 1995;62:818–829.
    1. Brocklehurst B, McLauchlan KA. Free radical mechanism for the effects of environmental electromagnetic fields on biological systems. Int J Radiat Biol. 1996;69:3–24. doi: 10.1080/095530096146147.
    1. Brocklehurst B. Magnetic isotope effects in biology: a marker for radical pair reactions and electromagnetic effects? Int J Radiat Biol. 1997;72:587–596. doi: 10.1080/095530097143086.
    1. Cozens FL, Scaiano JC. A comparative study of magnetic field effects on the dynamics of germinate and random radical pair processes in micelles. J Am Chem Soc. 1993;115:5204–5211.
    1. Everson RW, Timmel CR, Brocklehurst B, Hore PJ, McLauchlan KA. The effects of weak magnetic fields on radical recombination reactions in micelles. Int J Radiat Biol. 2000;76:1509–1522. doi: 10.1080/09553000050176270.
    1. Brocklehurst B. Magnetic fields and radical reactions: recent developments and their role in nature. Chem Soc Rev. 2002;31:301–311. doi: 10.1039/b107250c.
    1. Budinger TF. Book of abstracts. Berkeley, CA: Society of magnetic resonance in medicine; 1987. Magneto hydrodynamic retarding effect on blood flow velocity at 4.7 Tesla found to be insignificant; p. 183.
    1. Keltner JR, Roos MS, Brakeman PR, Budinger TF. Magneto hydrodynamics of blood flow. Magn Reson Med. 1990;16:139–149.
    1. Schaefer DJ, Bourland JD, Nyenhuis JA. Review of patient safety in time-varying gradient fields. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12:20–29. doi: 10.1002/1522-2586(200007)12:1<20::AID-JMRI3>;2-P.
    1. Bergeron J. General Electric Memo. 1985.
    1. Reilly JP. Peripheral nerve stimulation by induced electric currents: exposure to time-varying magnetic fields. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1989;27:101–110.
    1. Reilly JP. Magnetic field excitation of peripheral nerves and the heart: a comparison of thresholds. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1991;29:571–579.
    1. Reilly JP. Principles of nerve and heart excitation by time-varying magnetic fields. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1992;649:96–117.
    1. Havel W, Nyenhuis J, Bourland J, Foster KS, Geddes LA, Graber GP, Waninger MS, Schaefer DJ. Comparison of rectangular and damped sinusoidal dB/dt waveforms in magnetic stimulation. IEEE Trans Magn. 1997;33:4269–4271. doi: 10.1109/20.619732.
    1. Schaefer DJ. Safety aspects of switched gradient fields. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 1998;6:731–748.
    1. Reilly JP. Applied bioelectricity: from electrical stimulation to electro pathology. New York: Springer; 1998. pp. 194–411.
    1. Bourland JD, Nyenhuis JA, Mouchawar GA, Geddes LA, Schaefer DJ. Human peripheral nerve stimulation from z-gradients. Proceedings of the Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Annual Meeting. 1990. p. 1157.
    1. Bourland JD, Nyenhuis JA, Noe WA, Schaefer DJ, Foster KS, Geddes LA. Motor and sensory strength-duration curves for MRI gradient fields. Proceedings of the Society of Magnetic Resonance 4th Annual Meeting, New York. 1996. p. 1724.
    1. Bourland JD, Nyenhuis JA, Schaefer DJ. Physiologic effects of intense MR Imaging gradient fields. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 1999;9:363–377.
    1. Nyenhuis JA, Bourland JD, Mouchawar GA, Elabbady TZ, Geddes LA, Schaefer DJ, Riehl ME. Comparison of stimulation effects of longitudinal and transverse MRI gradient coils. Proceedings of theSociety for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Annual Meeting. 1991. p. 1275.
    1. Budinger TF, Fischer H, Hentschel D, Reinfelder HE, Schmitt F. Physiological effects of fast oscillating magnetic field gradients. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1991;15:909–914.
    1. Cohen MS, Weisskoff RM, Rzedzian RR, Kantor HL. Sensory stimulation by time varying magnetic fields. Magn Reson Med. 1990;14:409–414.
    1. Schaefer DJ, Bourland JD, Nyenhuis JA, Foster KS, Wirth WF, Geddes LA, Riehl ME. Determination of gradient-induced, human peripheral nerve stimulation thresholds for trapezoidal pulse trains (abstract) Proceedings of the Society of Magnetic Resonance 2th Annual Meeting, San Francisco. 1994. p. 101.
    1. Schaefer DJ, Bourland JD, Nyenhuis JA, Foster KS, Licato PE, Geddes LA. Effects of simultaneous gradient combinations on human peripheral nerve stimulation thresholds. Proceedings of the Society of Magnetic Resonance 3rd Annual Meeting, Nice, France. 1995. p. 1220.
    1. Bourland DJ, Nyenhuis JA, Foster KS, Geddes LA. Threshold and pain strength-duration curves for MRI gradient fields. Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine Annual Meeting, Vancouver. 1997. p. 1974.
    1. Ham CL, Engels JM, van de Wiel GT, Machielsen A. Peripheral nerve stimulation during MRI: effects of high gradient amplitudes and switching rates. J Magn Reson Imaging. 1997;7:933–937.
    1. Chronik BA, Ramachandran M. Simple anatomical measurements do not correlate significantly to individual peripheral nerve stimulation thresholds as measured in MRI gradient coils. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17:716–721. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10300.
    1. Polk C. Biological effects of nonionizing electromagnetic fields. In: Bronzino J, editor. Handbook of biomedical engineering. CRC Press; 1995.
    1. International Commission on Non-ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz) Health Physics Society. 1998.
    1. Shellock FG. Radiofrequency energy-induced heating during MR procedures: a review. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;12:30–36. doi: 10.1002/1522-2586(200007)12:1<30::AID-JMRI4>;2-S.
    1. Shellock FG. Thermal responses in human subjects exposed to magnetic resonance imaging. Ann NY Acad Sci. 1992:260–272.
    1. Bottomley PA, Edelstein WA. Power deposition in whole body NMR imaging. Med Phys. 1981;8:510–512. doi: 10.1118/1.595000.
    1. Bottomley PA, Redington RW, Edelstein WA, Schenck JF. Estimating radiofrequency power deposition in body NMR imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1985;2:336–349.
    1. Shellock FG. MRI bioeffects and safety. In: Athlas S, editor. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine. New York: Raven Press; 1990.
    1. Gordon CJ. Normalizing the thermal effects of radiofrequency radiation: body mass versus total body surface area. Bioelectromagnetics. 1987;8:111–118.
    1. Athey TW. A model of the temperature rise in the head due to magnetic resonance imaging procedures. Magn Reson Med. 1989;9:177–184.
    1. Adair ER, Berglund LG. On the thermoregulatory consequences of NMR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging. 1986;4:321–333. doi: 10.1016/0730-725X(86)91042-8.
    1. Adair ER, Berglund LG. Thermoregulatory consequences of cardiovascular impairment during NMR imaging in warm/humid environments. Magn Reson Imaging. 1989;7:25–37. doi: 10.1016/0730-725X(89)90321-4.
    1. Schaefer DJ, Barber BJ, Gordon CJ, Zielonka J, Hecker J. Book of abstracts, Society for magnetic resonance in medicine. Vol. 2. Berkeley, CA: Society for magnetic resonance in medicine; 1985. Thermal effects of magnetic resonance imaging; p. 925.
    1. Shellock FG, Crues JV. Temperature, heart rate, and blood pressure changes associated with clinical MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology. 1987;163:259–262.
    1. Shellock FG, Schaefer DJ, Grundfest W, Crues JV. Thermal effects of high-field (1.5 Tesla) magnetic resonance imaging of the spine: clinical experience above a specific absorption rate of 0.4 W/Kg. Acta Radiol Suppl. 1986;369:514–516.
    1. Shellock FG, Gordon CJ, Schaefer DJ. Thermoregulatory response to clinical magnetic resonance imaging of the head at 1.5 Tesla: lack of evidence for direct effects on the hypothalamus. Acta Radiol Suppl. 1986;369:512–513.
    1. Shellock FG, Schaefer DJ, Crues JV. Alterations in body and skin temperatures caused by MR imaging: Is the recommended exposure for radiofrequency radiation too conservative? Br J Radiol. 1989;62:904–909.
    1. Shellock FG, Schaefer DJ, Crues JV. Evaluation of skin blood flow, body and skin temperatures in man during MR imaging at high levels of RF energy. Magn Reson Imaging. 1989;7:335.
    1. Vogl T, Krimmel K, Fuchs A, Lissner J. Influence of magnetic resonance imaging of human body core and intravascular temperature. Med Phys. 1988;15:562–566. doi: 10.1118/1.596207.
    1. Kido DK, Morris TW, Erickson JL, Plewes DB, Simon JH. Physiologic changes during high field strength MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987;148:1215–1218.
    1. Kangarlu A, Shellock FG, Chakeres DW. 8.0-Tesla human MR system: temperature changes associated with radiofrequency-induced heating of a head phantom. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003;17:220–2265. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10236.
    1. Shellock FG, Schaefer DJ, Kanal E. Physiologic responses to MR imaging performed at an SAR level of 6.0 W/Kg. Radiology. 1994;192:865–868.
    1. Berman E. Biological effects of radiofrequency radiation. Washington, DC: EPA-600/8-83-026A; 1984. Reproductive effects; pp. 529–542.
    1. Shellock FG, Rothman B, Sarti D. Heating of the scrotum by high-field-strenght MR imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1990;154:1229–1232.
    1. Shellock FG, Crues JV. Corneal temperature changes associated with high-field MR imaging using a head coil. Radiology. 1988;167:809–811.
    1. Shellock FG, Schatz CJ. Increases in corneal temperature caused by MR imaging of the eye with a dedicated local coil. Radiology. 1992;185:697–699.
    1. Beers J. Biological effects of weak electromagnetic fields from 0 Hz to 200 MHz: a survey of the literature with special emphasis on possible magnetic resonance effects. Magn Reson Imaging. 1989;7:309–331. doi: 10.1016/0730-725X(89)90556-0.
    1. Partain CL, Price RR. MR Safety. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;19:1. doi: 10.1002/jmri.10459.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit