Bilateral movement training and stroke motor recovery progress: a structured review and meta-analysis
James H Cauraugh, Neha Lodha, Sagar K Naik, Jeffery J Summers, James H Cauraugh, Neha Lodha, Sagar K Naik, Jeffery J Summers
Abstract
The purpose was to conduct a structured review and meta-analysis to determine the cumulative effect of bilateral arm training on motor capabilities post stroke. Forty-eight stroke studies were selected from three databases with 25 comparisons qualifying for inclusion in our meta-analysis. We identified and coded four types of bilateral arm interventions with 366 stroke patients. A random effects model using the standardized mean difference technique determined a large and significant effect size (0.734; SE=0.125), high fail-safe N (532), and medium variability in the studies (I(2)=63%). Moderator variable analysis on the type of bilateral training revealed two large and significant effects: (a) BATRAC (0.842; SE=0.155) and (b) coupled bilateral and EMG-triggered neuromuscular stimulation (1.142; SE=0.176). These novel findings provide strong evidence supporting bilateral arm training with the caveat that two coupled protocols, rhythmic alternating movements and active stimulation, are most effective.
Copyright © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Figures
![Figure 1](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/2889142/bin/nihms-141817-f0001.jpg)
![Figure 2](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/2889142/bin/nihms-141817-f0002.jpg)
![Figure 3](https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/2889142/bin/nihms-141817-f0003.jpg)
Source: PubMed