Trial to re-evaluate ultrasound in the treatment of tibial fractures (TRUST): a multicenter randomized pilot study

Jason W Busse, Mohit Bhandari, Thomas A Einhorn, James D Heckman, Kwok-Sui Leung, Emil Schemitsch, Paul Tornetta 3rd, Stephen D Walter, Gordon H Guyatt, Jason W Busse, Mohit Bhandari, Thomas A Einhorn, James D Heckman, Kwok-Sui Leung, Emil Schemitsch, Paul Tornetta 3rd, Stephen D Walter, Gordon H Guyatt

Abstract

Background: The role of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) in the management of fractures remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of a definitive trial to determine the effect of LIPUS on functional and clinical outcomes in tibial fractures managed operatively.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter, concealed, blinded randomized trial of 51 skeletally mature adults with operatively managed tibial fractures who were treated with either LIPUS or a sham device. All participating centers were located in Canada and site investigators were orthopedic surgeons specializing in trauma surgery. The goals of our pilot study were to determine recruitment rates in individual centers, investigators' ability to adhere to study protocol and data collection procedures, our ability to achieve close to 100% follow-up rates, and the degree to which patients were compliant with treatment. Patients were followed for one year and a committee (blinded to allocation) adjudicated all outcomes. The committee adjudicators were experienced (10 or more years in practice) orthopedic surgeons with formal research training, specializing in trauma surgery.

Results: Our overall rate of recruitment was approximately 0.8 patients per center per month and site investigators successfully adhered to the study protocol and procedures. Our rate of follow-up at one year was 84%. Patient compliance, measured by an internal timer in the study devices, revealed that 39 (76%) of the patients were fully compliant and 12 (24%) demonstrated a greater than 50% compliance. Based on patient feedback regarding excessive questionnaire burden, we conducted an analysis using data from another tibial fracture trial that revealed the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) dysfunction index offered no important advantages over the SF-36 Physical Component Summary (PCS) score. No device-related adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: Our pilot study identified key issues that might have rendered a definitive trial unfeasible. By modifying our protocol to address these challenges we have enhanced the feasibility of a definitive trial to explore the effect of LIPUS on tibial fracture healing.

Trial registration: The TRUST definitive trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 21 April 2008 (identifier: NCT00667849).

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient recruitment and follow-up schedule (CONSORT flow diagram).

References

    1. Heckman JD, Sarasohn-Kahn J. The economics of treating fracture healing. Bull Hosp Jt Dis. 1997;56:63–72.
    1. Turen CH, Burgess AR, Vanco B. Skeletal stabilization of tibial fractures associated with acute compartment syndrome. Clin Orthop. 1995;315:163–169.
    1. Watson JT, Anders M, Moed B. Management strategies for bone loss in tibial fractures. Clin Orthop. 1995;315:138–153.
    1. Burgess AR, Poka A, Brumback RJ, Flagle CL, Loeb PE, Ebraheim NA. Pedestrian tibial injuries. J Trauma. 1987;27:596–601. doi: 10.1097/00005373-198706000-00002.
    1. Blick SS, Brumback RJ, Poka A, Burgess AR, Ebraheim NA. Compartment syndrome in open tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1986;68A:1348–1353.
    1. Sarmiento A, Sharpe FE, Ebramzadeh E, Normand P, Shankwiler J. Factors influencing outcome of closed tibial fractures treated with functional bracing. Clin Orthop. 1995;315:8–25.
    1. Busse JW, Bhandari M. Therapeutic ultrasound and fracture healing: a survey of beliefs and practices. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:1653–1656. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.12.040.
    1. Busse JW, Morton E, Lacchetti C, Guyatt GH, Bhandari M. Current management of tibial shaft fractures: a survey of 450 Canadian orthopedic trauma surgeons. Acta Orthop. 2008;79:689–694. doi: 10.1080/17453670810016722.
    1. Busse JW, Kaur J, Mollon B, Bhandari M, Tornetta P 3rd, Schünemann HJ, Guyatt GH. Low intensity pulsed ultrasonography for fractures: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2009;338:b351. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b351.
    1. Ware JE. The SCD, MOS. 36-Item short form health survey (SF-36). Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–483. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002.
    1. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Lu JF, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care. 1994;32:40–66. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199401000-00004.
    1. Ware JE Jr L, editor. SF-36 Physical & Mental Health Summary Scales: A User's Manual. RI: Quality Metric Inc; 1997. SF-36 Physical & Mental Health Summary Scales: A User's Manual.
    1. Bhandari M, Sprague S, Hanson B, Busse JW, Dawe DE, Moro JK, Guyatt GH. Health-related quality of life following operative treatment of unstable ankle fractures: a prospective observational study. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18:338–345. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200407000-00002.
    1. Trudel JG, Rivard M, Dobkin PL, Leclerc JM, Robaey P. Psychometric properties of the health utilities index mark 2 system in paediatric oncology patients. Qual Life Res. 1998;7:421–432.
    1. Boyle MH, Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance GW, Hatcher J. Reliability of the Health Utilities Index–Mark III used in the 1991 cycle 6 Canadian General Social Survey Health Questionnaire. Qual Life Res. 1995;4:249–257. doi: 10.1007/BF02260864.
    1. Torrence GW, Feeny DH, Furlong WJ, Barr RD, Zhang Y, Wang Q. Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2. Med Care. 1996;34:702–722. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199607000-00004.
    1. Swiontkowski MF, Engelberg R, Martin DP, Agel J. Short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire: validity, reliability, and responsiveness. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1999;81:1245–1260.
    1. Whelan DB, Bhandari M, McKee MD, Guyatt GH, Kreder HJ, Stephen D, Schemitsch EH. Interobserver and intraobserver variation in the assessment of the healing of tibial fractures after intramedullary fixation. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 2002;84:15–18. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.84B1.11347.
    1. Kooistra BW, Dijkman BG, Busse JW, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH, Bhandari M. The radiographic union scale in tibial fractures: reliability and validity. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(Suppl 1):S81–S86.
    1. Whelan DB, Bhandari M, Stephen D, Kreder H, McKee MD, Zdero R, Schemitsch EH. Development of the radiographic union score for tibial fractures for the assessment of tibial fracture healing after intramedullary fixation. J Trauma. 2010;68:629–632. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181a7c16d.
    1. Stewart AL, Greenfield S, Hays RD, Wells K, Rogers WH, Berry SD, McGlynn EA, Ware JE Jr. Functional status and well-being of patients with chronic conditions. Results from the Medical Outcomes Study. JAMA. 1989;262:907–913. doi: 10.1001/jama.1989.03430070055030.
    1. Bhandari M, Guyatt G, Tornetta P 3rd, Schemitsch EH, Swiontkowski M, Sanders D, Walter SD. Study to Prospectively Evaluate Reamed Intramedullary Nails in Patients with Tibial Fractures Investigators. Randomized trial of reamed and unreamed intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:2567–2578.
    1. Busse JW, Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Heels-Ansdell D, Mandel S, Sanders D, Schemitsch E, Swiontkowski M, Tornetta P 3rd, Wai E, Walter SD. The SPRINT Investigators. Use of both short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire and short form-36 among tibial-fracture patients was redundant. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:1210–1217. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.01.014.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit