The impact of clinical data on the evaluation of tibial fracture healing

Bernadette G Dijkman, Jason W Busse, Stephen D Walter, Mohit Bhandari, TRUST Investigators, Bernadette G Dijkman, Jason W Busse, Stephen D Walter, Mohit Bhandari, TRUST Investigators

Abstract

Background: Radiographic healing is a common outcome measure in orthopedic trials and adjudication by outcome assessors is often conducted on the basis of plain films alone. The degree to which this process reflects clinical practice, in which both plain films and clinical notes are available, is uncertain. We explored the effect of adding clinical notes to radiographs in the adjudication process of a feasibility trial of tibial shaft fractures.

Methods: Radiographic and clinical data from a multicenter randomized controlled trial of 51 patients with operatively treated tibial fractures formed the basis of the study data. At the completion of the trial, serial radiographs (anteroposterior and lateral) were independently evaluated for progression of fracture healing, defined as bridging of at least 3 of 4 cortices, by an adjudication committee comprised of 3 blinded orthopaedic trauma surgeons. Immediately after determination of radiographic time to healing, each surgeon was provided with clinical notes associated with each radiographic follow up visit and asked to re-visit their initial impression. Consensus was achieved for both adjudications. We calculated the percentage of time to healing consensus decisions that changed after evaluation of clinical notes. We further examined the contents of clinical notes and their relative influence on the committee's decisions.

Results: 47 of 51 patients were determined to have healed radiographically during the trial follow-up period, and consideration of clinical notes resulted in a change of 40% (19 of 47) of time to healing consensus decisions; however, revised decisions were equally likely to support an earlier or a later time to healing. Clinical notes that resulted in a change to either a 'healed' or a 'not healed' decision contained significantly more comments of either pain resolution or deterioration, respectively, resumption of or failure to resume weightbearing, or either return or no return to work/pre-injury activities (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: The addition of clinical notes to the adjudication of radiographic fracture healing changed the outcome decision in a substantial number of cases. Orthopedic trialists should consider the addition of clinical notes to adjudication material in studies of fracture healing in order to enhance the generalizability of their results.

Trial registration: The TRUST trial was registered [ID NCT00667849] at https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT00667849.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Comparison of the percentages of comments in clinical notes from follow up visits with a 'healed' radiographic decision that did or did not change the decision to 'unhealed'.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparison of the percentage of comments in clinical notes from follow up visits with an 'unhealed' radiographic decision that did or did not change the decision to 'healed'.

References

    1. Friedman LM, Furberg CD, DeMets DL. Fundamentals of Clinical Trials. 3. Springer-Verlag, New York; 1998. Data Collection and Quality Control.
    1. Bhandari M, Joensson A. Clinical research for surgeons. 1. Thieme, New York; 2009. Should our outcomes be separately adjudicated?
    1. Leung KS, Lee WS, Tsui HF, Liu PP, Cheung WH. Complex tibial fracture outcomes following treatment with low-intensity pulsed ultrasound. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2004;30:389–395. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2003.11.008.
    1. Emami A, Petrén-Mallmin M, Larsson S. No effect of low-intensity ultrasound on healing time of intramedullary fixed tibial fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 1999;13:252–257. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199905000-00005.
    1. Handolin L, Kiljunen V, Arnala I, Kiuru MJ, Pajarinen J, Partio EK, Rokkanen P. Effect of ultrasound therapy on bone healing of lateral malleolar fractures of the ankle joint fixed with bioabsorbable screws. J Orthop Sci. 2005;10:391–395. doi: 10.1007/s00776-005-0901-0.
    1. Mammi GI, Rocchi R, Cadossi R, Massari L, Traina GC. The electrical stimulation of tibial osteotomies. Double-blind study. Clin Orthop. 1993;288:246–253.
    1. Corrales LA, Morshed S, Bhandari M, Miclau T. Variability in the assessment of fracture-healing in orthopaedic trauma studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90:1862–1868. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01580.
    1. McClelland D, Thomas PB, Bancroft G, Moorcraft CI. Fracture healing assessment comparing stiffness measurements using radiographs. Clinical Orthop Relat Res. 2006;457:214–219.
    1. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174. doi: 10.2307/2529310.
    1. Csimma C, Swiontkowski MF. Large clinical trials in musculoskeletal trauma: are they possible? Lessons learned from the international study of the use of rhBMP-2 in open tibial fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:218–222.
    1. Bhandari M, Guyatt GH, Swiontkowski MF, Tornetta P, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH. A lack of consensus in the assessment of fracture healing among orthopaedic surgeons. J Orthop Trauma. 2002;16:562–566. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200209000-00004.
    1. Morshed S, Corrales L, Genant H, Miclau T. Outcome assessment in clinical trials of fracture-healing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 1):62–67.
    1. Busse JW, Kaur J, Mollon B, Bhandari M, Tornetta P, Schünemann HJ, Guyatt GH. Low intensity pulsed ultrasonography for fractures: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2009;338:b351. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b351.
    1. Beaton DE, Schemitsch E. Measures of health-related quality of life and physical function. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;413:90–105.
    1. Agel J, Swiontkowski MF. Guide to outcomes instruments for musculoskeletal trauma research. J Orthop Trauma. 2006;20:S65–146. doi: 10.1097/00005131-200609001-00001.
    1. Tudor GR, Finlay D, Taub N. An assessment of inter-observer agreement and accuracy when reporting plain radiographs. Clin Radiol. 1997;52:235–238. doi: 10.1016/S0009-9260(97)80280-2.
    1. Skolasky RL, Maggard AM, Hilibrand AS, Northrup BE, Ullrich CG, Albert TJ, Coe JD, Riley LH. Agreement between surgeons and an independent panel with respect to surgical site fusion after single-level anterior cervical spine surgery: a prospective, multicenter study. Spine. 2006;31:E503–506.
    1. Irwig L, Macaskill P, Walter SD, Houssami N. New methods give better estimates of changes in diagnostic accuracy when prior information is provided. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:299–307. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.08.013.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit