Single-dose fosaprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: results of a randomized, double-blind phase III trial
C Weinstein, K Jordan, S A Green, E Camacho, S Khanani, E Beckford-Brathwaite, W Vallejos, L W Liang, S J Noga, B L Rapoport, C Weinstein, K Jordan, S A Green, E Camacho, S Khanani, E Beckford-Brathwaite, W Vallejos, L W Liang, S J Noga, B L Rapoport
Abstract
Background: To establish the role of antiemetic therapy with neurokinin-1 (NK1) receptor antagonists (RAs) in nonanthracycline and cyclophosphamide (AC)-based moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC) regimens, this study evaluated single-dose intravenous (i.v.) fosaprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) associated with non-AC MEC.
Patients and methods: In this international, phase III, double-blind trial, adult cancer subjects scheduled to receive ≥1 non-AC MEC on day 1 were randomized to a regimen comprising single-dose i.v. fosaprepitant 150 mg or placebo along with ondansetron and dexamethasone on day 1; control regimen recipients received ondansetron on days 2 and 3. Primary end points were the proportion of subjects achieving a complete response (CR; no vomiting and no use of rescue medication) in the delayed phase (25-120 h after MEC initiation) and safety. Secondary end points included CR in the overall and acute phases (0-120 and 0-24 h after MEC initiation, respectively) and no vomiting in the overall phase. Nausea and the Functional Living Index-Emesis were assessed as exploratory end points.
Results: The fosaprepitant regimen improved CR significantly in the delayed (78.9% versus 68.5%; P < 0.001) and overall (77.1% versus 66.9%; P < 0.001) phases, but not in the acute phase (93.2% versus 91.0%; P = 0.184), versus control. In the overall phase, the proportion of subjects with no vomiting (82.7% versus 72.9%; P < 0.001) and no significant nausea (83.2% versus 77.9%; P = 0.030) was also significantly improved with the fosaprepitant regimen. The fosaprepitant regimen was generally well tolerated.
Conclusion: Single-dose fosaprepitant added to a 5-HT3 RA and dexamethasone was well tolerated and demonstrated superior control of CINV (primary end point achieved) associated with non-AC MEC. This is the first study to evaluate NK1 RA therapy as an i.v. formulation in a well-defined non-AC MEC population.
Clinicaltrialsgov: NCT01594749 (https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT01594749).
Keywords: fosaprepitant dimeglumine; moderately emetogenic chemotherapy; nausea; neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists; vomiting.
© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology.
Figures
References
- Roila F, Herrstedt J, Aapro M et al. . Guideline update for MASCC and ESMO in the prevention of chemotherapy- and radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: results of the Perugia consensus conference. Ann Oncol 2010; 21(suppl 5): v232–v243.
- National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Inc. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Antiemesis. Version 1.2014. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Web site; 2014.
- Gralla RJ, Roila F, Tonato M, Herrstedt J. MASCC/ESMO antiemetic guideline 2013. Hillerød, Denmark: Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer; 2014.
- Jordan K, Gralla R, Jahn F, Molassiotis A. International antiemetic guidelines on chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV): content and implementation in daily routine practice. Eur J Pharmacol 2014; 722: 197–202.
- Basch E, Prestrud AA, Hesketh PJ et al. . Antiemetics: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 4189–4198.
- Hickok JT, Roscoe JA, Morrow GR et al. . 5-Hydroxytryptamine-receptor antagonists versus prochlorperazine for control of delayed nausea caused by doxorubicin: a URCC CCOP randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2005; 6: 765–772.
- Geling O, Eichler HG. Should 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonists be administered beyond 24 hours after chemotherapy to prevent delayed emesis? Systematic re-evaluation of clinical evidence and drug cost implications. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 1289–1294.
- Hesketh PJ, Grunberg SM, Gralla RJ et al. . The oral neurokinin-1 antagonist aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a multinational, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin—the Aprepitant Protocol 052 Study Group. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 4112–4119.
- Poli-Bigelli S, Rodrigues-Pereira J, Carides AD et al. . Addition of the neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist aprepitant to standard antiemetic therapy improves control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Results from a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Latin America. Cancer 2003; 97: 3090–3098.
- Warr DG, Hesketh PJ, Gralla RJ et al. . Efficacy and tolerability of aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with breast cancer after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23: 2822–2830.
- Prescribing information. Emend (Aprepitant) Capsules, for Oral use. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 2013.
- Prescribing information. Emend (Fosaprepitant Dimeglumine) for Injection, for Intravenous use. Whitehouse Station, NJ: Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. 2013.
- Jordan K, Jahn F, Aapro M. Recent developments in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV): a comprehensive review. Ann Oncol 2015; 26: 1081–1090.
- Hesketh PJ, Kris MG, Grunberg SM et al. . Proposal for classifying the acute emetogenicity of cancer chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 1997; 15: 103–109.
- Saito H, Yoshizawa H, Yoshimori K et al. . Efficacy and safety of single-dose fosaprepitant in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Ann Oncol 2013; 24: 1067–1073.
- Gralla RJ, de Wit R, Herrstedt J et al. . Antiemetic efficacy of the neurokinin-1 antagonist, aprepitant, plus a 5HT3 antagonist and a corticosteroid in patients receiving anthracyclines or cyclophosphamide in addition to high-dose cisplatin: analysis of combined data from two phase III randomized clinical trials. Cancer 2005; 104: 864–868.
- Rapoport BL, Jordan K, Boice JA et al. . Aprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with a broad range of moderately emetogenic chemotherapies and tumor types: a randomized, double-blind study. Support Care Cancer 2010; 18: 423–431.
- Aapro M, Rugo H, Rossi G et al. . A randomized phase 3 study evaluating the efficacy and safety of NEPA, a fixed-dose combination of netupitant and palonosetron, for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 2014; 25: 1328–1333.
- Schnadig ID, Modiano MR, Poma A et al. . Phase 3 trial results for rolapitant, a novel NK-1 receptor antagonist, in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in subjects receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC). J Clin Oncol 2014; 32(5 suppl): abstr 9633.
- Grunberg S, Chua D, Maru A et al. . Single-dose fosaprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with cisplatin therapy: randomized, double-blind study protocol—EASE. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 1495–1501.
- Gralla RJ, Bosnjak SM, Hontsa A et al. . A phase III study evaluating the safety and efficacy of NEPA, a fixed-dose combination of netupitant and palonosetron, for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting over repeated cycles of chemotherapy. Ann Oncol 2014; 25: 1333–1349.
- Leal AD, Kadakia KC, Looker S et al. . Fosaprepitant-induced phlebitis: a focus on patients receiving doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide therapy. Support Care Cancer 2014; 22: 1313–1317.
Source: PubMed