Factors influencing implementation of the GLA:D Back, an educational/exercise intervention for low back pain: a mixed-methods study

Inge Ris, Eleanor Boyle, Corrie Myburgh, Jan Hartvigsen, Line Thomassen, Alice Kongsted, Inge Ris, Eleanor Boyle, Corrie Myburgh, Jan Hartvigsen, Line Thomassen, Alice Kongsted

Abstract

Introduction and aims: Guidelines for low back pain (LBP) management recommend patient education and exercises. GLA:D Back, a structured group-based patient-education exercise program for LBP, facilitates evidence-based care implementation. This study aimed to inform on the implementation processes, assessing clinician-related factors. Objectives were to describe profiles of implementers and nonimplementers by demographics, and responses to the tailored version of the Determinants of Implementation Behaviour Questionnaire (DIBQ-t) qualitatively explore clinician perspectives on implementation, and compare the results of the DIBQ-t with the interview data to evaluate their fit of integration for facilitators, barriers, and new insights.

Methods: A mixed-methods parallel design study was conducted. Physiotherapists and chiropractors, educated in the GLA:D Back program, were asked to complete the DIBQ-t (measuring theoretical determinants of implementation) 6 months after their training. Implementers and nonimplementers of the program were selected for interviews. Qualitative data were used to understand clinicians' viewpoints on implementation, providing a broader perspective on the quantitative data and exploring new aspects.

Results: More physiotherapists than chiropractors implemented the program. Implementers responded more positively on most domains of the DIBQ-t. The interviews revealed three themes important for implementation: personal gain, practicalities, and buying-in on the program. Clinicians' attitudes to the program appeared additionally as relevant to implementation.

Conclusion: The profession of the clinician was associated with implementation behavior. Implementers and nonimplementers identified the same themes but perceived them as either positive or negative. Both groups reported high levels of knowledge and skills, indicating that training alone is insufficient for implementation.

Conflict of interest statement

A.K.'s position at the University of Southern Denmark is financially supported by the Foundation for Chiropractic Research and Postgraduate Education. I.R.'s position is supported by income from the GLA:D Back clinician courses. GLA:D is a nonprofit initiative hosted at the University of Southern Denmark, and the GLA:D trademark is the property of the University of Southern Denmark. The GLA:D initiative is developed in close collaboration with the SDU Research & Innovation Organization, including legal reviews. The researchers do not have any personal financial benefits from working with the project.

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the University of Adelaide, Joanna Briggs Institute.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overview of the design.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Domains divided by themes, identified implementation-facilitators (green), or barriers (red) for implementers, nonimplementers.

References

    1. Grol R, Wensing M. What drives change? Barriers to and incentives for achieving evidence-based practice. Med J Aust 2004; 180: (6 Suppl): S57–S60.
    1. Davy C, Bleasel J, Liu H, Tchan M, Ponniah S, Brown A. Factors influencing the implementation of chronic care models: a systematic literature review. BMC Fam Pract 2015; 16:102.
    1. Fischer F, Lange K, Klose K, Greiner W, Kraemer A. Barriers and strategies in guideline implementation – a scoping review. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) 2016; 4:36.
    1. Savigny P, Watson P, Underwood M. Early management of persistent non-specific low back pain: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2009; 338:b1805.
    1. Foster NE, Anema JR, Cherkin D, et al. . Prevention and treatment of low back pain: evidence, challenges, and promising directions. Lancet 2018; 391:2368–2383.
    1. Sundhedsstyrelsen (Danish Health Authority). Recommendations for cross-sectoral interventions for people with chronic low back pain [in Danish]. Copenhagen: Sundhedsstyrelsen; 2017.
    1. Whitehurst DG, Bryan S, Lewis M, Hay EM, Mullis R, Foster NE. Implementing stratified primary care management for low back pain: cost-utility analysis alongside a prospective, population-based, sequential comparison study. Spine 2015; 40:405–414.
    1. Gardner T, Refshauge K, Smith L, McAuley J, Hübscher M, Goodall S. Physiotherapists’ beliefs and attitudes influence clinical practice in chronic low back pain: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. J Physiother 2017; 63:132–143.
    1. Synnott A, O’Keeffe M, Bunzli S, Dankaerts W, O'Sullivan P, O'Sullivan K. Physiotherapists may stigmatise or feel unprepared to treat people with low back pain and psychosocial factors that influence recovery: a systematic review. J Physiother 2015; 61:68–76.
    1. Kent PM, Keating JL, Taylor NF. Primary care clinicians use variable methods to assess acute nonspecific low back pain and usually focus on impairments. Man Ther 2009; 14:88–100.
    1. Briggs AM, Jordan JE, Jennings M, et al. . Supporting evaluation and implementation of musculoskeletal models of care: a globally-informed framework for judging ‘readiness’ and ‘success’. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2016; 69:567–577.
    1. Slade SC, Kent P, Patel S, Bucknall T, Buchbinder R. Barriers to primary care clinician adherence to clinical guidelines for the management of low back pain: a systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies. Clin J Pain 2016; 32:800–816.
    1. Hartvigsen J, Hancock MJ, Kongsted A, et al. . What low back pain is and why we need to pay attention. Lancet 2018; 391:2356–2367.
    1. Langridge N, Roberts L, Pope C. The clinical reasoning processes of extended scope physiotherapists assessing patients with low back pain. Man Ther 2015; 20:745–750.
    1. Kongsted A, Hartvigsen J, Boyle E, et al. . GLA:D® Back: group-based patient education integrated with exercises to support self-management of persistent back pain – feasibility of implementing standardised care by a course for clinicians. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2019; 5:65.
    1. Kongsted A, Ris I, Kjaer P, Vach W, Morsø L, Hartvigsen J. GLA:D® Back: implementation of group-based patient education integrated with exercises to support self-management of back pain – protocol for a hybrid effectiveness-implementation study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2019; 20:85.
    1. Kjaer P, Kongsted A, Ris I, et al. . GLA:D® Back group-based patient education integrated with exercises to support self-management of back pain – development, theories and scientific evidence. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2018; 19:418.
    1. Skou ST, Roos EM. Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA:D): evidence-based education and supervised neuromuscular exercise delivered by certified physiotherapists nationwide. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017; 18:72.
    1. Zadro JR, O’Keeffe M, Allison JL, Lembke KA, Forbes JL, Maher CG. Effectiveness of implementation strategies to improve adherence of physical therapist treatment choices to clinical practice guidelines for musculoskeletal conditions: systematic review. Phys Ther 2020; 100:1516–1541.
    1. Al Zoubi FM, Menon A, Mayo NE, Bussieres AE. The effectiveness of interventions designed to increase the uptake of clinical practice guidelines and best practices among musculoskeletal professionals: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2018; 18:435.
    1. Mesner SA, Foster NE, French SD. Implementation interventions to improve the management of non-specific low back pain: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2016; 17:258.
    1. Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, Lawton R, Parker D, Walker A. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Qual Saf Health Care 2005; 14:26–33.
    1. Cane J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research. Implement Sci 2012; 7:37.
    1. Mosavianpour M, Sarmast HH, Kissoon N, Collet JP. Theoretical domains framework to assess barriers to change for planning health care quality interventions: a systematic literature review. J Multidiscip Healthc 2016; 9:303–310.
    1. Huijg JM, Gebhardt WA, Dusseldorp E, et al. . Measuring determinants of implementation behavior: psychometric properties of a questionnaire based on the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci 2014; 9:33.
    1. Fetters MD, Curry LA, Creswell JW. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs – principles and practices. Health Serv Res 2013; 48 (6 Pt 2):2134–2156.
    1. O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy 2008; 13:92–98.
    1. Huijg JM, Gebhardt WA, Crone MR, Dusseldorp E, Presseau J. Discriminant content validity of a theoretical domains framework questionnaire for use in implementation research. Implement Sci 2014; 9:11.
    1. Polit DF, Beck CT. The content validity index: are you sure you know what's being reported? Critique and recommendations. Res Nurs Health 2006; 29:489–497.
    1. Atkins L, Francis J, Islam R, et al. . A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems. Implement Sci 2017; 12:77.
    1. Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2011.
    1. Braun V, Clarke V. What can ‘thematic analysis’ offer health and wellbeing researchers? Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being 2014; 9:26152.
    1. Schroder K, Oberg B, Enthoven P, Kongsted A, Abbott A. Confidence, attitudes, beliefs and determinants of implementation behaviours among physiotherapists towards clinical management of low back pain before and after implementation of the BetterBack model of care. BMC Health Serv Res 2020; 20:443.
    1. Richmond H, Hall AM, Hansen Z, Williamson E, Davies D, Lamb SE. Exploring physiotherapists’ experiences of implementing a cognitive behavioural approach for managing low back pain and identifying barriers to long-term implementation. Physiotherapy 2018; 104:107–115.
    1. Bernhardsson S, Johansson K, Nilsen P, Oberg B, Larsson ME. Determinants of guideline use in primary care physical therapy: a cross-sectional survey of attitudes, knowledge, and behavior. Phys Ther 2014; 94:343–354.
    1. Shaw BR, Heywood SE, Page CJ, et al. . Advanced musculoskeletal physiotherapy: barriers and enablers to multi-site implementation. Musculoskeletal Care 2018; 16:440–449.
    1. Huijg JM, Crone MR, Verheijden MW, van der Zouwe N, Middelkoop BJ, Gebhardt WA. Factors influencing the adoption, implementation, and continuation of physical activity interventions in primary health care: a Delphi study. BMC Fam Pract 2013; 14:142.
    1. Huijg JM, Dusseldorp E, Gebhardt WA, et al. . Factors associated with physical therapists’ implementation of physical activity interventions in The Netherlands. Phys Ther 2015; 95:539–557.
    1. Presseau J, Johnston M, Francis JJ, et al. . Theory-based predictors of multiple clinician behaviors in the management of diabetes. J Behav Med 2014; 37:607–620.
    1. Lohm D, Kirpitchenko L. Interviewing pairs. Discussions on migration and identity. SAGE research methods cases. Thousand Oaks: SAGE; 2014.
    1. Carter N, Bryant-Lukosius D, DiCenso A, Blythe J, Neville AJ. The use of triangulation in qualitative research. Oncol Nurs Forum 2014; 41:545–547.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit