Virtual Arm Boot Camp (V-ABC): study protocol for a mixed-methods study to increase upper limb recovery after stroke with an intensive program coupled with a grasp count device

Lisa A Simpson, Ruth Barclay, Mark T Bayley, Sean P Dukelow, Bradley J MacIntosh, Marilyn MacKay-Lyons, Carlo Menon, W Ben Mortenson, Tzu-Hsuan Peng, Courtney L Pollock, Sepideh Pooyania, Robert Teasell, Chieh-Ling Yang, Jennifer Yao, Janice J Eng, Lisa A Simpson, Ruth Barclay, Mark T Bayley, Sean P Dukelow, Bradley J MacIntosh, Marilyn MacKay-Lyons, Carlo Menon, W Ben Mortenson, Tzu-Hsuan Peng, Courtney L Pollock, Sepideh Pooyania, Robert Teasell, Chieh-Ling Yang, Jennifer Yao, Janice J Eng

Abstract

Background: Encouraging upper limb use and increasing intensity of practice in rehabilitation are two important goals for optimizing upper limb recovery post stroke. Feedback from novel wearable sensors may influence practice behaviour to promote achieving these goals. A wearable sensor can potentially be used in conjunction with a virtually monitored home program for greater patient convenience, or due to restrictions that preclude in-person visits, such as COVID-19. This trial aims to (1) determine the efficacy of a virtual behaviour change program that relies on feedback from a custom wearable sensor to increase use and function of the upper limb post stroke; and (2) explore the experiences and perceptions of using a program coupled with wearable sensors to increase arm use from the perspective of people with stroke.

Methods: This mixed-methods study will utilize a prospective controlled trial with random allocation to immediate or 3-week delayed entry to determine the efficacy of a 3-week behaviour change program with a nested qualitative description study. The intervention, the Virtual Arm Boot Camp (V-ABC) features feedback from a wearable device, which is intended to increase upper limb use post stroke, as well as 6 virtual sessions with a therapist. Sixty-four adults within 1-year post stroke onset will be recruited from seven rehabilitation centres. All outcomes will be collected virtually. The primary outcome measure is upper limb use measured by grasp counts over 3 days from the wearable sensor (TENZR) after the 3-week intervention. Secondary outcomes include upper limb function (Arm Capacity and Movement Test) and self-reported function (Hand Function and Strength subscale from the Stroke Impact Scale). Outcome data will be collected at baseline, post-intervention and at 2 months retention. The qualitative component will explore the experiences and acceptability of using a home program with a wearable sensor for increasing arm use from the point of view of individuals with stroke. Semi-structured interviews will be conducted with participants after they have experienced the intervention. Qualitative data will be analysed using content analysis.

Discussion: This study will provide novel information regarding the efficacy and acceptability of virtually delivered programs to improve upper extremity recovery, and the use of wearable sensors to assist with behaviour change.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04232163 . January 18, 2020.

Keywords: Arm use; Randomized controlled trial; Rehabilitation; Stroke; Upper extremity; Wearable sensor.

Conflict of interest statement

Dr. Menon has a vested interest in commercializing the technology and may benefit financially from its potential commercialization through BioInteractive Technologies. The other authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of mixed-methods study
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
TENZR wrist-worn sensor and app. a TENZR wrist-worn sensor. b App showing a target of 1000 hand counts with 408 completed. c App showing a target of 1000 hand counts with 1029 completed

References

    1. Simpson LA, Hayward KS, McPeake M, Field TS, Eng JJ. Challenges of estimating accurate prevalence of arm weakness early after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021;35:871–879. doi: 10.1177/15459683211028240.
    1. Harris JE, Eng JJ. Paretic upper-limb strength best explains arm activity in people with stroke. Phys Ther. 2007;87:88–97. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20060065.
    1. Nudo RJ, Wise BM, SiFuentes F, Milliken GW. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct. Science. 1996;272:1791–1794. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5269.1791.
    1. Lang CE, MacDonald JR, Gnip C. Counting repetitions: an observational study of outpatient therapy for people with hemiparesis post-stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2007;31:3–10. doi: 10.1097/01.NPT.0000260568.31746.34.
    1. Rand D, Eng JJ. Disparity between functional recovery and daily use of the upper and lower extremities during subacute stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26:76–84. doi: 10.1177/1545968311408918.
    1. Wolf SL, Thompson PA, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Blanton SR, Nichols-Larsen DS, Morris DM, Uswatte G, Taub E, Light KE, Sawaki L. The EXCITE stroke trial: comparing early and delayed constraint-induced movement therapy. Stroke. 2010;41:2309–2315. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.588723.
    1. Lohse KR, Lang CE, Boyd LA. Is more better? Using metadata to explore dose-response relationships in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2014;45:2053–2058. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004695.
    1. Ward NS, Brander F, Kelly K. Intensive upper limb neurorehabilitation in chronic stroke: outcomes from the Queen Square programme. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2019;90:498–506. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2018-319954.
    1. Cooper C, Gross A, Brinkman C, Pope R, Allen K, Hastings S, Bogen BE, Goode AP. The impact of wearable motion sensing technology on physical activity in older adults. Exp Gerontol. 2018;112:9–19. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2018.08.002.
    1. Da-Silva RH, Moore SA, Rodgers H, Shaw L, Sutcliffe L, van Wijck F, Price CI. Wristband Accelerometers to motiVate arm Exercises after Stroke (WAVES): a pilot randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2019;33:1391–1403. doi: 10.1177/0269215519834720.
    1. Zhang W, Creswell J. The use of “mixing” procedure of mixed methods in health services research. Med Care. 2013;51:e51–e57. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e31824642fd.
    1. Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Backman CL, Miller WC. Rating of Everyday Arm-Use in the Community and Home (REACH) scale for capturing affected arm-use after stroke: development, reliability, and validity. PLoS One. 2013;8:e83405. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083405.
    1. Simpson LA, Eng JJ, Chan M. H-GRASP: the feasibility of an upper limb home exercise program monitored by phone for individuals post stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39:874–882. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2016.1162853.
    1. Michie S, Atkins L, West R. The Behaviour Change Wheel Book: A Guide To Designing Interventions. London: Silverback Publishing; 2014.
    1. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
    1. Simpson LA, Mow A, Menon C, Eng JJ. Preliminary examination of the ability of a new wearable device to capture functional hand activity after stroke. Stroke. 2019;50:3643–3646. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026921.
    1. Yang CL, Simpson LA, Eng JJ. Remote evaluation of upper extremity motor function following stroke: The Arm Capacity and Movement Test (ArmCAM). Am J Occup Ther. In Press.
    1. Williamson A, Hoggart B. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. J Clin Nurs. 2005;14:798–804. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01121.x.
    1. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30:2131–2140. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.30.10.2131.
    1. Neergaard MA, Olesen F, Andersen RS, Sondergaard J. Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research? BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2009;9:52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-9-52.
    1. Sandelowski M. What’s in a name? Qualitative description revisited. Research in Nursing & Health. 2010;33:77–84. doi: 10.1002/nur.20362.
    1. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2007;19:349–357. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.
    1. Saunders B, Sim J, Kingstone T, Baker S, Waterfield J, Bartlam B, Burroughs H, Jinks. Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Qual Quant. 2018;52:1893–1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8.
    1. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15:1277–1288. doi: 10.1177/1049732305276687.
    1. Birt L, Scott S, Cavers D, Campbell C, Walter F. Member checking: a tool to enhance trustworthiness or merely a nod to validation? Qual Health Res. 2016;26:1802–1811. doi: 10.1177/1049732316654870.
    1. Morrow SL. Quality and Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research in Counseling Psychology. J Couns Psychol. 2005;52:250–260. doi: 10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.250.
    1. Klassen TD, Dukelow SP, Bayley MT, Benavente O, Hill MD, Krassioukov A, Liu-Ambrose T, Pooyania S, Poulin MJ, Schneeberg A, Yao J, Eng JJ. Higher doses improve walking recovery during stroke inpatient rehabilitation. Stroke. 2020;51:2639–2648. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029245.
    1. Lynch EA, Jones TM, Simpson DB, Fini NA, Kuys SS, Borschmann K, Kramer S, Johnson L, Callisaya ML, Mahendran N, Janssen H, English C. ACTIOnS Collaboration. Activity monitors for increasing physical activity in adult stroke survivors. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;7:CD012543.
    1. Sanders Q, Chan V, Augsburger R, Cramer SC, Reinkensmeyer DJ, Do AH. Feasibility of wearable sensing for in-home finger rehabilitation early after stroke. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2020;28:1363–1372. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2020.2988177.
    1. Yang C-L, Waterson S, Eng JJ. Implementation and evaluation of the virtual Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) for individuals with stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond. Phys Ther. 2021;101(6):pzab083. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzab083.
    1. Yeh HJ, Chen TA, Cheng HC, Chou YJ, Huang N. Long-term rehabilitation utilization pattern among stroke patients under the National Health Insurance program. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021; Online ahead of print. PMID: .

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit