Changes in mortality and morbidities among infants born at less than 25 weeks during the post-surfactant era

S R Hintz, W K Poole, L L Wright, A A Fanaroff, D E Kendrick, A R Laptook, R Goldberg, S Duara, B J Stoll, W Oh, NICHD Neonatal Research Network, S R Hintz, W K Poole, L L Wright, A A Fanaroff, D E Kendrick, A R Laptook, R Goldberg, S Duara, B J Stoll, W Oh, NICHD Neonatal Research Network

Abstract

Objectives: To compare mortality and death or major morbidity (DOMM) among infants <25 weeks estimated gestational age (EGA) born during two post-surfactant era time periods.

Study design and patients: Comparative cohort study of very low birthweight (501-1500 g) infants <25 weeks EGA in the NICHD Neonatal Research Network born during two post-surfactant era time periods (group I, 1991-1994, n=1408; group II, 1995-1998, n=1348). Perinatal and neonatal factors were compared, and group related mortality and DOMM risk were evaluated.

Results: Mortality was higher for group I (63.1% v 56.7%; p=0.0006). Antenatal steroids (ANS) and antenatal antibiotics (AABX), surfactant (p<0.0001), and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (p=0.0008) were more prevalent in group II. In a regression model that controlled for basic and delivery factors only, mortality risk was greater for group I than for group II (odds ratio (OR) 1.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2 to 1.7); the addition of AABX and surfactant, or ANS (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.2) to the model appeared to account for this difference. There was no difference in DOMM (86.8% v 88.4%; p=0.2), but risk was lower for group I in regression models that included ANS (OR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.94).

Conclusion: Survival to discharge was more likely during the more recent period because of group differences in ANS, AABX, and surfactant. However, this treatment shift may reflect an overall more aggressive management approach. More consistent application of treatment has led to improving survival of <25 week EGA infants during the post-surfactant era, but possibly at the cost of greater risk of major in-hospital morbidities.

References

    1. Pediatrics. 1996 Nov;98(5):931-7
    1. J Perinatol. 1995 Nov-Dec;15(6):494-502
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1997 Nov;90(5):803-8
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Mar;178(3):462-8
    1. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 1998 Mar;78(2):F99-104
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Dec;179(6 Pt 1):1632-9
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 Mar;180(3 Pt 1):665-9
    1. Pediatrics. 1999 Jul;104(1 Pt 1):15-21
    1. Pediatrics. 2000 May;105(5):1046-50
    1. Pediatrics. 2000 Jun;105(6):1216-26
    1. Semin Neonatol. 2000 May;5(2):89-106
    1. Clin Perinatol. 2000 Jun;27(2):255-62
    1. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2000 Jul;154(7):725-31
    1. Pediatrics. 2000 Oct;106(4):659-71
    1. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2000 Nov;83(3):F177-81
    1. J Perinatol. 2000 Dec;20(8 Pt 1):496-503
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Jul;185(1):220-6
    1. Semin Perinatol. 2001 Oct;25(5):348-59
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Apr;186(4):796-802
    1. Pediatrics. 2002 Jul;110(1 Pt 1):143-51
    1. Semin Neonatol. 2003 Feb;8(1):63-71
    1. Pediatrics. 2004 Jun;113(6):1559-66
    1. J Pediatr. 1978 Apr;92(4):529-34
    1. JAMA. 1985 Jun 28;253(24):3564-7
    1. Am J Dis Child. 1986 Jun;140(6):576-9
    1. J Pediatr. 1990 Apr;116(4):620-6
    1. J Pediatr. 1991 Oct;119(4):606-14
    1. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1993 Apr;35(4):312-20
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994 Aug;171(2):432-9
    1. N Engl J Med. 1994 Sep 22;331(12):753-9
    1. J Pediatr. 1995 Mar;126(3):427-33
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Nov;173(5):1423-31
    1. Pediatrics. 1997 Oct;100(4):633-9

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit