Reliability and validity of measures taken during the Chester step test to predict aerobic power and to prescribe aerobic exercise

J P Buckley, J Sim, R G Eston, R Hession, R Fox, J P Buckley, J Sim, R G Eston, R Hession, R Fox

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the reliability and validity of measures taken during the Chester step test (CST) used to predict VO(2)max and prescribe subsequent exercise.

Methods: The CST was performed twice on separate days by 7 males and 6 females aged 22.4 (SD 4.6) years. Heart rate (HR), ratings of perceived exertion (RPE), and oxygen uptake (VO(2)) were measured at each stage of the CST.

Results: RPE, HR, and actual VO(2) were the same at each stage for both trials but each of these measures was significantly different between CST stages (p<0.0005). Intertrial bias +/-95% limits of agreement (95% LoA) of HR reached acceptable limits at CST stage IV (-2+/-10 beats/min) and for RPE at stages III (0.2+/-1.4) and IV (0.5+/-1.9). Age estimated HRmax significantly overestimated actual HRmax of 5 beats/min (p = 0.016) and the 95% LoA showed that this error could range from an underestimation of 17 beats/min to an overestimation of 7 beats/min. Estimated versus actual VO(2) at each CST stage during both trials showed errors ranging between 11% and 19%. Trial 1 underestimated actual VO(2)max by 2.8 ml/kg/min (p = 0.006) and trial 2 by 1.6 ml/kg/min (not significant). The intertrial agreement in predicted VO(2)max was relatively narrow with a bias +/-95% LoA of -0.8+/-3.7 ml/kg/min. The RPE and %HRmax (actual) correlation improved with a second trial. At all CST stages in trial 2 RPE:%HRmax coefficients were significant with the highest correlations at CST stages III (r = 0.78) and IV (r = 0.84).

Conclusion: CST VO(2)max prediction validity is questioned but the CST is reliable on a test-retest basis. VO(2)max prediction error is due more to VO(2) estimation error at each CST stage compared with error in age estimated HRmax. The HR/RPE relation at >50% VO(2)max reliably represents the recommended intensity for developing cardiorespiratory fitness, but only when a practice trial of the CST is first performed.

References

    1. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1989;58(5):494-9
    1. Br J Sports Med. 1988 Dec;22(4):153-5
    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991 Jan;23(1):80-7
    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1991 Jan;23(1):88-92
    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1993 Jan;25(1):71-80
    1. Res Q Exerc Sport. 1995 Sep;66(3):239-46
    1. JAMA. 1996 May 8;275(18):1424-7
    1. Br J Sports Med. 1997 Jun;31(2):120-5
    1. Occup Health (Lond). 1996 Dec;48(12):436-8
    1. Br J Sports Med. 1997 Dec;31(4):314-8
    1. Sports Med. 1998 Oct;26(4):217-38
    1. Int J Sports Med. 1999 Jan;20(1):34-9
    1. J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1999 Sep;39(3):207-12
    1. Br J Sports Med. 2000 Aug;34(4):297-302
    1. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001 Aug;33(8):1404-10
    1. Acta Physiol Scand. 1971 Nov;83(3):399-406
    1. Can Med Assoc J. 1976 Apr 17;114(8):680-2
    1. Br Heart J. 1979 Jan;41(1):99-105
    1. Biol Psychol. 1979 Feb;8(1):31-43
    1. Ergonomics. 1979 Oct;22(10):1141-6
    1. Lancet. 1986 Feb 8;1(8476):307-10
    1. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1987 Jul;63(1):97-104
    1. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1989;59(5):365-9

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit