Multi-institutional phase 2 clinical and pharmacogenomic trial of tipifarnib plus etoposide for elderly adults with newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia

Judith E Karp, Tatiana I Vener, Mitch Raponi, Ellen K Ritchie, B Douglas Smith, Steven D Gore, Lawrence E Morris, Eric J Feldman, Jacqueline M Greer, Sami Malek, Hetty E Carraway, Valerie Ironside, Steven Galkin, Mark J Levis, Michael A McDevitt, Gail R Roboz, Christopher D Gocke, Carlo Derecho, John Palma, Yixin Wang, Scott H Kaufmann, John J Wright, Elizabeth Garret-Mayer, Judith E Karp, Tatiana I Vener, Mitch Raponi, Ellen K Ritchie, B Douglas Smith, Steven D Gore, Lawrence E Morris, Eric J Feldman, Jacqueline M Greer, Sami Malek, Hetty E Carraway, Valerie Ironside, Steven Galkin, Mark J Levis, Michael A McDevitt, Gail R Roboz, Christopher D Gocke, Carlo Derecho, John Palma, Yixin Wang, Scott H Kaufmann, John J Wright, Elizabeth Garret-Mayer

Abstract

Tipifarnib (T) exhibits modest activity in elderly adults with newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia (AML). Based on preclinical synergy, a phase 1 trial of T plus etoposide (E) yielded 25% complete remission (CR). We selected 2 comparable dose levels for a randomized phase 2 trial in 84 adults (age range, 70-90 years; median, 76 years) who were not candidates for conventional chemotherapy. Arm A (T 600 mg twice a day × 14 days, E 100 mg days 1-3 and 8-10) and arm B (T 400 mg twice a day × 14 days, E 200 mg days 1-3 and 8-10) yielded similar CR, but arm B had greater toxicity. Total CR was 25%, day 30 death rate 7%. A 2-gene signature of high RASGRP1 and low aprataxin (APTX) expression previously predicted for T response. Assays using blasts from a subset of 40 patients treated with T plus E on this study showed that AMLs with a RASGRP1/APTX ratio of more than 5.2 had a 78% CR rate and negative predictive value 87%. This ratio did not correlate with outcome in 41 patients treated with conventional chemotherapies. The next T-based clinical trials will test the ability of the 2-gene signature to enrich for T responders prospectively. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00602771.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
OS for all 63 patients treated with the T + E arm A. Dotted lines indicate 95% CI.
Figure 2
Figure 2
OS by response category for 62 patients treated in arm A. Responders: CR (complete remission) PR/HI (partial remission/hematologic improvement. Nonresponders: SD + PD indicates stable disease plus progressive disease.
Figure 3
Figure 3
DFS (median, 6; 95% CI, 5.1, Infinity) for the 15 arm A patients who achieved CR. Dotted lines indicate 95% CI.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Accuracy of the optimized quantitative PCR assay in a phase 2 study of T + E study in elderly AML. (A) ROC analysis using complete remission (CR) only as response. AUC indicates area under the ROC curve. (B) A 2 × 2 contingency table using the optimal cutoff and 2-gene assay performance characteristics. NR indicates no response; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; ORR, overall response rate; Spec, specificity; and Sens, sensitivity. (C) Kaplan-Meier analysis of patients stratified using an optimal ratio cut-off of 5.2. HR indicates hazard ratio.
Figure 5
Figure 5
OS of 41 AML patients treated with intensive induction chemotherapy with Ara-C, anthracycline, and a third agent (flavopiridol or etoposide): stratification by high versus low 2-gene ratio. Median ratio = 0.959. HR indicates hazard ratio.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit