Low dose dexamethasone as treatment for women with heavy menstrual bleeding: A response-adaptive randomised placebo-controlled dose-finding parallel group trial (DexFEM)

Pamela Warner, Lucy Harriet Ravenscroft Whitaker, Richard Anthony Parker, Christopher John Weir, Anne Douglas, Christian Holm Hansen, Mayank Madhra, Stephen Gilbert Hillier, Philippa Tansy Kemp Saunders, John Peter Iredale, Scott Semple, Ov Daniel Slayden, Brian Robert Walker, Hilary Octavia Dawn Critchley, Pamela Warner, Lucy Harriet Ravenscroft Whitaker, Richard Anthony Parker, Christopher John Weir, Anne Douglas, Christian Holm Hansen, Mayank Madhra, Stephen Gilbert Hillier, Philippa Tansy Kemp Saunders, John Peter Iredale, Scott Semple, Ov Daniel Slayden, Brian Robert Walker, Hilary Octavia Dawn Critchley

Abstract

Background: The symptom of heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB) diminishes quality-of-life for many mid-age women and imposes substantial societal burden. We investigated our hypothesis that HMB reflects impaired endometrial vasoconstriction due to endometrial glucocorticoid deficiency. Does reversing this deficiency, by short-term luteal-phase treatment with exogenous glucocorticoid (dexamethasone), ameliorate HMB?

Methods: In our Bayesian response-adaptive parallel-group placebo-controlled randomised trial, five pre-planned interim analyses used primary outcome data to adjust randomisation probabilities to favour doses providing most dose-response information. Participants with HMB, recruited from Lothian (Scotland) NHS clinics and via community invitations/advertisements, were aged over 18 years; reported regular 21-42 day menstrual cycles; and had measured menstrual blood loss (MBL) averaging ≥ 50 mL over two screening periods. Identically encapsulated placebo, or one of six Dexamethasone doses (0·2 mg, 0·4 mg, 0·5 mg, 0·6 mg, 0·75 mg, 0·9 mg), were taken orally twice-daily over five days in the mid-luteal phase of three menstrual cycles. Participants, investigators, and those measuring outcomes were masked to group assignment. Primary outcome, change in average MBL from screening to 'treatment', was analysed by allocated treatment, for all with data.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01769820; EudractCT 2012-003,405-98 FINDINGS: Recruitment lasted 29/01/2014 to 25/09/2017; 176 were screened, 107 randomised and 97 provided primary outcome data (n = 24,5,9,21,8,14,16 in the seven arms, placebo to 1·8 mg total daily active dose). In Bayesian normal dynamic linear modelling, 1·8 mg dexamethasone daily showed a 25 mL greater reduction in MBL from screening, than placebo (95% credible interval 1 to 49 mL), and probability 0·98 of benefit over placebo. Adverse events were reported by 75% (58/77) receiving dexamethasone, 58% (15/26) taking placebo. Three serious adverse events occurred, two during screening, one in a placebo participant. No woman withdrew due to adverse effects.

Interpretation: Our adaptive trial in HMB showed that dexamethasone 1·8 mg daily reduced menstrual blood loss. The role of dexamethasone in HMB management deserves further investigation.

Funding: UK MRC DCS/DPFS grant MR/J003611/1.

Keywords: Abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB); Adaptive randomisation; Bayesian; Dexamethasone; Endometrium; Heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB); Menorrhagia; Randomised controlled trial.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Competing Interest PW, CHH, AD, LW & MM, PTKS, SGH, ODS, CJW and RAP have no competing interests to disclose. Other disclosures, all outside the current research study, are: BRW is a paid consultant for Actinogen Medical, an inventor on patents owned by the University of Edinburgh relating to manipulating and monitoring glucocorticoid action; receives royalties as editor of Davidson's Principles & Practice of Medicine published by Elsevier; and an honorarium as Chair of the MRC Population & Systems Medicine. SS receives support from GlaxoSmithKline for his research group. JPI is supported by the UK National Institute of Health Research (NIHR) and is Director of the University Hospitals Bristol Trust and University of Bristol NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. HODC reports clinical research support for laboratory consumables and staff from Bayer AG and she has also provided consultancy advice (but with no personal remuneration) for Bayer AG; Vifor Pharma; Gedeon Richter; Myovant. She receives royalties from Up-to-Date for article on Abnormal Uterine Bleeding.

Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant time-line in study – 5 to 6 months from screening appointment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CONSORT diagram.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Primary outcome results: Posterior median difference, for each dexamethasone dose group minus placebo, in change in menstrual blood loss volume (mL), Rogue and 95% CrI Legend: Primary outcome is change in assayed MBL for an individual i.e. their treatment phase MBL– screening MBL. Normal dynamic linear model of change in MBL is adjusted for Screening MBL of each participant.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Treatment Review Questionnaire secondary outcome results: Difference in proportions responding as indicated - for each dexamethasone dose minus placebo - and 95% CrI Legend: The left-panel items ask participant to compare their most recent menstrual period (3rd), to before the trial, while the right-panel items ask for 'absolute' judgements. Estimates plotted in shaded area favour dexamethasone, while those plotted in unshaded area, favour placebo. Left panel n = 97, 95, 97 respectively, and right panel n = 97, 95, 96.

References

    1. Santer M., Warner P., Wyke S. A Scottish postal survey suggested that prevailing clinical pre-occupation with heavy periods does not reflect the epidemiology of reported symptoms and problems. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:1206–1210.
    1. Shapley P., Jordan K., Croft P.R. An epidemiological survey of symptoms of menstrual loss in the community. BJGP. 2004;54:359–363.
    1. Bhattacharya S., Middleton L., Tsourapas A., Lee A., Champaneria R., Daniels J. Hysterectomy, endometrial ablation and Mirena(R) for heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review of clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2011;15:1–252.
    1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists . RCOG Press; London: 2011. London school of hygiene & tropical medicine, ipsos MORI. national heavy menstrual bleeding audit: first annual report.
    1. Harlow S.D., Campbell O.M. Epidemiology of menstrual disorders in developing countries: a systematic review. BJOG. 2004;111:6–16.
    1. National Institute for Clinical Excellence . NICE Clinical Guideline CG44; 2007. Heavy menstrual bleeding.
    1. Anand E., Kumar P., Unisa S., Singh J. Neglect of menstrual disorders in reproductive health care in India: a population-based survey. Women's Reprod. Health. 2018;5(4):287–300. doi: 10.1080/23293691.2018.1523116.
    1. Sriprasert I., Pakrashi T., Kimble T., Archer D.F. Heavy menstrual bleeding diagnosis and medical management. Contracept Reprod Med. 2017;2:20.
    1. Kaloo P., Davies S. Case discussion: heavy menstrual bleeding in primary care and beyond. Br J Family Med. 2014;2
    1. Period poverty Scotland , Accessed Sep 2020
    1. Munro M.G., Critchley H.O.D., Fraser I.S., for the FIGO Menstrual Disorders Committee The two FIGO systems for normal and abnormal uterine bleeding symptoms and classification of causes of abnormal uterine bleeding in the reproductive years: 2018 revisions. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2018;143:393–408.
    1. K A Matteson D., D Rahn T.L., Wheeler I.I., Casiano E., Siddiqui N.Y., Harvey H.S., for the Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Systematic Review Group Non-surgical management of heavy menstrual bleeding: a systematic review and practice guidelines. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(3):632–643. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182839e0e.
    1. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists . RCOG Press; London: 2013. London school of hygiene & tropical medicine, IPSOS MORI. National heavy menstrual bleeding audit: third annual report.
    1. Rae M., Mohamad A., Price D., Hadoke P.W., Walker B.R., Mason J.I. Cortisol inactivation by 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase-2 may enhance endometrial angiogenesis via reduced thrombospondin-1 in heavy menstruation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009;94:1443–1450.
    1. Critchley H.O., Maybin J.A., Armstrong G.M., Williams A.R.W. Physiology of the endometrium and regulation of menstruation. Physiol Rev. 2020;100(3):1149–1179. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00031.2019. Epub Feb 7.
    1. Warner P., Weir C.J., Hansen C.H., Douglas A., Madhra M., Hillier S.G. Low-dose dexamethasone as a treatment for women with heavy menstrual bleeding: protocol for response-adaptive randomised placebo-controlled dose-finding parallel group trial (DexFEM) BMJ Open. 2015;5(1)
    1. Hansen C.H., Warner P., Parker R.A., Walker B.R., Critchley H.O.D., Weir C.J. Development of a Bayesian response-adaptive trial design for the Dexamethasone for Excessive Menstruation study. Stat Methods Med Res. 2017;26:2681–2699.
    1. Warner P.E., Critchley H.O., Lumsden M.A., Campbell-Brown M., Douglas A., Murray G.D. Menorrhagia I: measured blood loss, clinical features, and outcome in women with heavy periods: a survey with follow-up data. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:1216–1223.
    1. Wyatt K.M., Dimmock P.W., Walker T.J., O'Brien P.M.S. Determination of total menstrual blood loss. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:125–131.
    1. Warner P.E., Critchley H.O., Lumsden M.A., Campbell-Brown M., Douglas A., Murray G.D. Menorrhagia II: is the 80-mL blood loss criterion useful in management of complaint of menorrhagia? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190:1224–1229.
    1. Lukes A.S., Moore K.A., Muse K.N., Gersten J.K., Hecht B.R., Edlund M. Tranexamic acid treatment for heavy menstrual bleeding A randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;116:865–875.
    1. Rahn D.D., Abed H., Sung V.W., Matteson K.A., Rogers R.G., Morrill M.Y. Systematic review highlights difficulty interpreting diverse clinical outcomes in abnormal uterine bleeding trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:293–300.
    1. Warner P., Critchley H.O., Lumsden M.A., Campbell-Brown M., Douglas A., Murray G. Referral for menstrual problems: cross sectional survey of symptoms, reasons for referral, and management. BMJ. 2001;323:24–28.
    1. Santer M., Wyke S., Warner P. What aspects of periods are most bothersome for women reporting heavy menstrual bleeding? Community survey and qualitative study. BMC Womens Health. 2007;7:8.
    1. Lukes A.S., Muse K.N., Richter H.E., Moore K.A., Patrick D.L. Estimating a meaningful reduction in menstrual blood loss for women with heavy menstrual bleeding. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010;26:2673–2678.
    1. Krams M., Sharma A., Dragalin V., Burns D.D., Fardipour P., Padmanabhan S.K. Adaptive approaches in clinical drug development. opportunities and challenges in design and implementation. Pharm Med. 2009;23(3):139–148.
    1. Chataway J., Nicholas R., Todd S., Miller D.H., Parsons N., Valdes-Marquez E. A novel adaptive design strategy increases the efficiency of clinical trials in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2011;17:81–88.
    1. Souverain P.C., Berard A., van Staa T.P., Cooper C., Leufkens H.G.M., Walker B.R. Use of oral glucocorticoids and risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease in a population-based case-control study. Heart. 2004;90:859–865.
    1. van Staa T.P., Leufkens H.G.M., Abenhaim L., Zhang B., Cooper C. Use of oral corticosteroids and risk of fractures. J Bone Miner Res. 2000;15:993–1000.
    1. Kemp M.W., Newnham J.P., Challis J.G., Jobe A.H., Stock S.J. The clinical use of steroids in pregnancy. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2016;22(2):240–259.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit