Observational study to assess the effectiveness of postoperative pain management of patients undergoing elective cesarean section

Samina Ismail, Khurram Shahzad, Faraz Shafiq, Samina Ismail, Khurram Shahzad, Faraz Shafiq

Abstract

Background: The study was designed to assess the strategy, effectiveness, and safety of postoperative pain management in patients undergoing elective cesarean section in the obstetric unit of our hospital.

Materials and methods: Patients having elective cesarean section from December 2008 to May 2009 were included in this observational study. We recorded patient's demographics, postoperative pain orders, and analgesia regime on the day of surgery. Anesthesia team, which included one of the investigators, assessed the overall pain since the time of surgery by visual analogue scale (VAS) and also recorded any complications since the time of surgery and patients' satisfaction with the pain management.

Results: A total of 263 patients were reviewed during the study period. Postoperative analgesia regime was started by the obstetric team in 81% of patients and in rest by the anesthesia team. The common modality of pain management was intravenous opioid infusion (94%) and coanalgesia was used in 99% of patients. The analysis of pain at rest by VAS was between 1 and 3 in 89.7%, 4 and 6 in 9.5%, and 7 and 10 in 0.8% of patients. The VAS on movement was 1-3 in 60.1%, 4-6 in 33.1%, and 7-10 in 6.8% of patients. Patients' opinion regarding postoperative pain management was satisfactory in 91.6% of patients and unsatisfactory in 8.4% of patients. Overall, 9% of patients had minor complications, which responded well to treatment.

Conclusion: The regime for postoperative pain management was mostly started and followed by the obstetric team at the hospital. Although the postoperative pain management was adequate in terms of patients' safety, it was not effective according to the goal set by Joint Commission on Accreditation of uniformly low pain score of not more than 3 out of 10 both at rest and with movement.

Keywords: Cesarean section; postoperative pain assessment; visual analogue scale.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Percentage of patients having mild, moderate, and severe pain scores at rest and movement

References

    1. Villar J, Valladares E, Wojdyla D, Zavaleta N, Carroli G, Velazco A, et al. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: The 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet. 2006;367:1819–29.
    1. Dolin SJ, Cashman JN, Bland JM. Effectiveness of acute postoperative pain management: I. Evidence from published data. Br J Anaesth. 2002;89:409–23.
    1. Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: Results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg. 2003;97:534–40.
    1. Rawal N. 10 years of acute pain services: Achievements and challenges. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999;24:68–73.
    1. Pan PH. Post cesarean delivery pain management: Multimodal approach. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2006;15:185–8.
    1. Karlsten R, Strom K, Gunningberg L. Improving assessment of postoperative pain in surgical wards by education and training. Qual Saf Health Care. 2005;14:332–5.
    1. Carvalho B, Cohen SE, Lipman SS, Fuller A, Mathusamy AD, Macario A. Patient preferences for anesthesia outcomes associated with cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:1182–7.
    1. Marks RM, Sachar EJ. Under treatment of medical inpatients with narcotic analgesics. Ann Intern Med. 1973;78:173–81.
    1. Loper K, Butler S, Nessly M, Wild L. Paralyzed with pain: The need for education. Pain. 1989;37:315–7.
    1. Ready LB, Oden R, Chadwick HS, Benedetti C, Rooke GA, Caplan R, et al. Development of an anesthesiology based postoperative pain management service. Anesthesiology. 1988;68:100–6.
    1. McDonnell NJ, Keating ML, Muchatuta NA, Pavy TJ, Paech MJ. Analgesia after caesarean delivery. Anaesth Intensive Care. 2009;37:539–51.
    1. Hawkins JL, Gibbs CP, Orleans M, Martin-Salvaj G, Beaty B. Obstetric anesthesia work force survey, 1981 versus 1992. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:135–43.
    1. Chen B, Kwan W, Lee C, Cantley E. A national survey of obstetric post- anaesthesia care in teaching hospitals. Anesth Analg. 1993;76:S43.
    1. Dahlgren G, Hultstrand C, Jakobsson J, Norman M, Eriksson EW, Martin H. Intrathecal sufentanil, fentanyl, or placebo added to Bupivicain for cesarean section. Anesth Analg. 1997;85:1288–93.
    1. Kolawole IK, Fawole AA. Postoperative pain management following caesarean section in University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital (UITH), Ilorin, Nigeria. West Afr J Med. 2003;22:305–9.
    1. Church JJ. Continuous narcotic infusions for relief of postoperative pain. Br Med J. 1979;1:977–9.
    1. Stepleton JV, Austin KL, Mather LE. A pharmacokinetic approach to postoperative pain: Continuous infusion of pethidine. Anaesth Intensive Care. 1979;7:5–32.
    1. Rutter PC, Murphy F, Dudley HA. Morphine: Controlled trial of different methods of administration for postoperative pain relief. Anaesthesia. 1985;40:1086–92.
    1. Hepner D, Eappen S. Postoperative Analgesia: Systemic and Local Techniques. In: Chestnut DH, Polley LS, Tsen LC, Wong CA, editors. Obstetric Anaesthesia: Principles and Practice. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby; 2009. pp. 575–92.
    1. Lane S, Evans P, Arfeen Z, Misra U. A comparison of intrathecal fentanyl and diamorphine as adjuncts in spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. Anaesthesia. 2005;60:453–7.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit