Telerehabilitation: policy issues and research tools

Katherine D Seelman, Linda M Hartman, Katherine D Seelman, Linda M Hartman

Abstract

The importance of public policy as a complementary framework for telehealth, telemedicine, and by association telerehabilitation, has been recognized by a number of experts. The purpose of this paper is to review literature on telerehabilitation (TR) policy and research methodology issues in order to report on the current state of the science and make recommendations about future research needs. An extensive literature search was implemented using search terms grouped into main topics of telerehabilitation, policy, population of users, and policy specific issues such as cost and reimbursement. The availability of rigorous and valid evidence-based cost studies emerged as a major challenge to the field. Existing cost studies provided evidence that telehomecare may be a promising application area for TR. Cost studies also indicated that telepsychiatry is a promising telepractice area. The literature did not reference the International Classification on Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Rigorous and comprehensive TR assessment and evaluation tools for outcome studies are tantamount to generating confidence among providers, payers, clinicians and end users. In order to evaluate consumer satisfaction and participation, assessment criteria must include medical, functional and quality of life items such as assistive technology and environmental factors.

Keywords: Telehomecare; Telepractice; Telepsychiatry; Telerehabilitation.

References

    1. American Telemedicine Association ATA - American Telemedicine Association. 2008 Retrieved October 1, 2008 from
    1. American Telemedicine Association Special Interest Group Telerehabilitation Bibliography, Spring 2006. 2006 Retrieved October 11, 2008, from .
    1. Baron C, Hatfield B, Georgeadis A. Management of communication disorders using family member input, group treatment, and telerehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2005;12(2):49–56.
    1. Bashshur R, Shannon G, Sapci H. Telemedicine evaluation. Telemed J E Health. 2005;11(3):296–316.
    1. Center for Information Technology Leadership The value of provider-to-provider telehealth technologies. 2007 Retrieved October 20, 2008, from .
    1. Center for Telemedicine and e-Health Law 2005Telehealth & Emerging Technologies - ReimbursementRetrieved October 13, 2008, from
    1. Cooper RA, Fitzgerald SG, Bonninger ML, Brienza DM, Shapcott N, Cooper R, et al. Telerehabilitation: Expanding access to rehabilitation expertise. Proceedings of the IEEE. 2001;89(8):1176–1191.
    1. Cruise CM, Lee MHM. Delivery of rehabilitation services to people aging with a disability. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics of North America. 2005;16(1):267–284.
    1. Cusack CM, Pan E, Hook JM, Vincent A, Kaelber DC, Middleton B. The value proposition in the widespread use of telehealth. J Telemed Telecare. 2008;14(4):167–168.
    1. Daly JM, Jogerst G, Park JY, Kang YD, Bae T. A nursing home telehealth system: keeping residents connected. J Gerontol Nurs. 2005;31(8):46–51.
    1. DeLisa JA, editor. Rehabilitation Medicine: Principles and practice. 3rd ed. New York: Lippincott-Raven; 1998.
    1. Demiris G, Shigaki CL, Schopp LH. An evaluation framework for a rural home-based telerehabilitation network. J Med Syst. 2005;29(6):595–603.
    1. Egner A, Phillips VL, Vora R, Wiggers E. Depression, fatigue, and health-related quality of life among people with advanced multiple sclerosis: results from an exploratory telerehabilitation study. NeuroRehabilitation. 2003;18(2):125–133.
    1. Galea M, Tumminia J, Garback LM. Telerehabilitation in spinal cord injury persons: A novel approach. Telemedicine Journal & E-Health. 2006;12(2):160–162.
    1. Gray GA, Stamm BH, Toevs S, Reischl U, Yarrington D. Study of participating and nonparticipating states’ telemedicine Medicaid reimbursement status: Its impact on Idaho’s policymaking process. Telemed J E Health. 2006;12(6):681–690.
    1. Grigsby J, Brega AG, Devore PA. The evaluation of telemedicine and health services research. Telemed J E Health. 2005;11(3):317–328.
    1. Hersh WR, Hickam DH, Severance SM, Dana TL, Krages KP, Helfand M. Telemedicine for the Medicare population: Update. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep) 2006;(131):1–41.
    1. Jennett PA, Andruchuk K. Telehealth: ‘real life’ implementation issues. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2001;64(3):169–174.
    1. Jennett PA, Scott RE, Affleck Hall L, Hailey D, Ohinmaa A, Anderson C, et al. Policy implications associated with the socioeconomic and health system impact of telehealth: A case study from Canada. Telemed J E Health. 2004;10(1):77–83.
    1. Kaplan B, Litewka S. Ethical challenges of telemedicine and telehealth. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics. 2008;17(4):401–416.
    1. Kinsella A. Disabled populations & telerehabilitation--new approaches. Caring. 1999;18(8):20–22.
    1. Kinsella A. The Home Telehealth Primer. 2008. Retrieved October 10, 2008, from .
    1. Krupinski E, Dimmick S, Grigsby J, Mogel G, Puskin D, Speedie S, et al. Research recommendations for the American Telemedicine Association. Telemedicine Journal & E-Health. 2006;12(5):579–589.
    1. Lehoux P, Blume S. Technology assessment and the sociopolitics of health technologies. Journal of Health Politics, Policy & Law. 2000;25(6):1083–1120.
    1. Marschollek M, Mix S, Wolf KH, Effertz B, Haux R, Steinhagen-Thiessen E. ICT-based health information services for elderly people: Past experiences, current trends, and future strategies. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine. 2007;32(4):251–261.
    1. Marziali E, Serafini JMD, McCleary L. A systematic review of practice standards and research ethics in technology-based home health care intervention programs for older adults. Journal of Aging & Health. 2005;17(6):679–696.
    1. McCarthy D, Fox K. Case study: University of Tennessee Health Science Center’s Telehealth Networks. 2007 Retrieved October 10, 2008, from .
    1. Pak HS, Brown-Connolly NE, Bloch C, Clarke M, Clyburn C, Doarn CR, et al. Global forum on telemedicine: Connecting the world through partnerships. Telemedicine Journal & E-Health. 2008;14(4):389–395.
    1. Palsbo SE. Medicaid payment for telerehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(7):1188–1191.
    1. Phillips VL, Vesmarovich S, Hauber R, Wiggers E, Egner A. Telehealth: reaching out to newly injured spinal cord patients. Public Health Rep. 2001;116(Suppl 1):94–102.
    1. Powell JA, Lowe P, Griffiths FE, Thorogood M. A critical analysis of the literature on the Internet and consumer health information. J Telemed Telecare. 2005;11(Suppl 1):41–43.
    1. Puskin DS. HHS Perspective on Telehealth. 2001 Retrieved October 5, 2008, from .
    1. Puskin DS, Urka MA. A policy maker’s glimpse of the road ahead: Telerehabilitation in the 21st century. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 1999;5(3):70–74.
    1. Rehabilitation Engineering Research Center on Telerehabilitation Telerehabilitation: meeting consumer needs through rehabilitation engineering research. 2007 Retrieved October 18, 2008, from .
    1. Roine R, Ohinmaa A, Hailey D. Assessing telemedicine: A systematic review of the literature. Cmaj. 2001;165(6):765–771.
    1. Rosen MJ. Telerehabilitation. Telemed J E Health. 2004;10(2):115–117.
    1. Rumberger JS, Dansky K. Is there a business case for telehealth in home health agencies? Telemed J E Health. 2006;12(2):122–127.
    1. Scalvini S, Vitacca M, Paletta L, Giordano A, Balbi B. Telemedicine: A new frontier for effective healthcare services. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 2004;61(4):226–233.
    1. Scheideman-Miller C, Clark PC, Moorad A, Post ML, Hodge BG, Smeltzer S. Efficacy and sustainability of a telerehabilitation program. 2002 Retrieved October 5, 2008, from .
    1. Schmeida M, McNeal R, Mossberger K. Policy determinants affect telehealth implementation. Telemed J E Health. 2007;13(2):100–107.
    1. Scott RE, Chowdhury MF, Varghese S. Telehealth policy: looking for global complementarity. J Telemed Telecare. 2002;8(Suppl 3):S3:55–57.
    1. Stein J. Commentary: J. Stein. CyberPsychology & Behavior. 2005;8(3):216–217.
    1. Telemedicine Information Exchange Telemedicine 101. 2005 Retrieved October 10, 2008, from .
    1. Theodorus D, Russell T. Telerehabilitation: Current perspectives. In: Latifi R, editor. Current principles and practices of telemedicine and e-Health. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2008. pp. 119–209.
    1. U.S. Centers for Disease Control Healthy People 2010. Chapter 6. Disability and secondary conditions (n.d.).
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration Rural Telemedicine Projects. 1994 Retrieved September 30, 2008, from .
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration Telehealth. (n.d.) Retrieved September 18, 2008, from
    1. US Department of Health and Human Services Health Resources and Services Administration TeleHealth for Kansans (OAT Grant) 2006 Retrieved October 10, 2008, from .
    1. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Care Coordination Services Home Telehealth. 2008 Retrieved September 30, 2008, from
    1. Vo AH. The telehealth promise: Better health care and cost savings for the 21st century. 2008 Retrieved October 9, 2008, from .
    1. Waters RJ. Let’s make a deal -- How to structure telehealth ventures. 2007 Retrieved October 8, 2008, from .
    1. Waters RJ. Telehomecare is essential to long-term home care. Caring : National Association for Home Care magazine. 2008;27(2):52–53.
    1. Waters RJ. A tripartite relationship for home care in the future. Caring : National Association for Home Care magazine. 2008;27(1):48–49.
    1. Waters RJ, Eder-Van Hook J. Retiring baby boomers create opportunities for innovation. Caring : National Association for Home Care magazine. 2005;24(10):84–86.
    1. Weinstein RS, Lopeez AM, Krupinski EA, Beinar SJ, Holcomb M, McNeely RA, et al. Current principles and practices of telemedicine and e-Health. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2008. Integrating telemedicine and telehealth: Putting it all together; pp. 23–38.
    1. Whitten P, Buis L. Private payer reimbursement for telemedicine services in the United States. Telemed J E Health. 2007;13(1):15–23.
    1. Whitten P, Sypher BD. Evolution of telemedicine from an applied communication perspective in the United States. Telemed J E Health. 2006;12(5):590–600.
    1. Winters J. Workshop on home care technologies for the 21st century. 1999 Retrieved October 15, 2008, from .
    1. Wipf KR, Langner B. Policy approaches to chronic disease management. Home health care management practice. 2006;18:452–462.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit