Engaging young people in the design of a sexual reproductive health intervention: Lessons learnt from the Yathu Yathu ("For us, by us") formative study in Zambia

Melvin Simuyaba, Bernadette Hensen, Mwelwa Phiri, Chisanga Mwansa, Lawrence Mwenge, Mutale Kabumbu, Steve Belemu, Kwame Shanaube, Ab Schaap, Sian Floyd, Sarah Fidler, Richard Hayes, Helen Ayles, Musonda Simwinga, Melvin Simuyaba, Bernadette Hensen, Mwelwa Phiri, Chisanga Mwansa, Lawrence Mwenge, Mutale Kabumbu, Steve Belemu, Kwame Shanaube, Ab Schaap, Sian Floyd, Sarah Fidler, Richard Hayes, Helen Ayles, Musonda Simwinga

Abstract

Background: Meeting the sexual and reproductive health (SRH) needs of adolescents and young people (AYP) requires their meaningful engagement in intervention design. We describe an iterative process of engaging AYP to finalise the design of a community-based, peer-led and incentivised SRH intervention for AYP aged 15-24 in Lusaka and the lessons learnt.

Methods: Between November 2018 and March 2019, 18 focus group discussions, eight in-depth interviews and six observations were conducted to assess AYP's knowledge of HIV/SRH services, factors influencing AYP's sexual behaviour and elicit views on core elements of a proposed intervention, including: community-based spaces (hubs) for service delivery, type of service providers and incentivising service use through prevention points cards (PPC; "loyalty" cards to gain points for accessing services and redeem these for rewards). A total of 230 AYP (15 participated twice in different research activities) and 21 adults (only participated in the community mapping discussions) participated in the research. Participants were purposively selected based on age, sex, where they lived and their roles in the study communities. Data were analysed thematically.

Results: Alcohol and drug abuse, peer pressure, poverty, unemployment and limited recreation facilities influenced AYP's sexual behaviours. Adolescent boys and young men lacked knowledge of contraceptive services and all AYP of pre and post exposure prophylaxis for HIV prevention. AYP stated a preference for accessing services at "hubs" located in the community rather than the health facility. AYP considered the age, sex and training of the providers when choosing whom they were comfortable accessing services from. PPCs were acceptable among AYP despite the loyalty card concept being new to them. AYP suggested financial and school support, electronic devices, clothing and food supplies as rewards.

Conclusions: Engaging AYP in the design of an SRH intervention was feasible, informative and considered responsive to their needs. Although AYP's suggestions were diverse, the iterative process of AYP engagement facilitated the design of an intervention that is informed by AYP and implementable.

Trial registration: This formative study informed the design of this trial: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04060420. Registered 19 August, 2019.

Keywords: Adolescents and young people; Community-based; Engagement; Incentivised; Participatory; Peer-led; Qualitative; Sexual and reproductive health; Zambia.

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare that they have no competing interests.

© 2021. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Sequence of data collection activities and key areas of enquiry per activity
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Final design of the prevention points card with the study logo

References

    1. UNAIDS. Ending the AIDS epidemic for adolescents, with adolescents. A practical guide to meaningfully engage adolescents in the AIDS response. 2016 2016. Report No.
    1. World Health Organization. WHO recommendations on adolescent sexual and reproductive health and rights. Geneva: 2018.
    1. Singh JA, Siddiqi M, Parameshwar P, Chandra-Mouli V. World Health Organization Guidance on Ethical Considerations in Planning and Reviewing Research Studies on Sexual and Reproductive Health in Adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2019;64(4):427–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.01.008.
    1. Blum RW, Mmari K, Moreau C. It begins at 10: How gender expectations shape early adolescence around the world. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2017;61(4):S3-S4. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.07.009.
    1. World Health Organization. Global health sector strategy on sexually transmitted infections 2016–2021, towards ending STIs. Geneva: 2016.
    1. Francis SC, Mthiyane TN, Baisley K, Mchunu SL, Ferguson JB, Smit T, et al. Prevalence of sexually transmitted infections among young people in South Africa: A nested survey in a health and demographic surveillance site. PLoS medicine. 2018;15(2):e1002512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002512.
    1. UNAIDS . Global AIDS update: Miles to go - Closing Gaps. Righting Injustices: Breaking Barriers; 2018.
    1. Ministry of Health Zambia. Zambia Population-based HIV Impact Assessment (ZAMPHIA) 2016: First Report. December 2017.
    1. Central Statistical Office (CSO) [Zambia], Ministry of Health (MOH) [Zambia], ICF. Zambia Demographic and Health Survey 2018: Key Indicators. Rockville, Maryland, USA: Central Statistical Office, Ministry of Health, and ICF: 2019.
    1. Powers JL, Tiffany JS. Engaging youth in participatory research and evaluation. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice. 2006;12:S79-S87. doi: 10.1097/00124784-200611001-00015.
    1. Kirshner B, O’Donoghue J, McLaughlin M. Youth-adult research collaborations: Bringing youth voice to the research process. Organized Activities As Contexts of Development: Psychology Press; 2005. pp. 143–68.
    1. Hayes R, Floyd S, Schaap A, Shanaube K, Bock P, Sabapathy K, et al. A universal testing and treatment intervention to improve HIV control: one-year results from intervention communities in Zambia in the HPTN 071 (PopART) cluster-randomised trial. PLoS medicine. 2017;14(5):e1002292. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002292.
    1. Shanaube K, Schaap A, Chaila MJ, Floyd S, Mackworth-Young C, Hoddinott G, et al. Community intervention improves knowledge of HIV status of adolescents in Zambia: findings from HPTN 071-PopART for youth study. AIDS (London, England) 2017;31(Suppl 3):S221. doi: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001530.
    1. Hayes R, Ayles H, Beyers N, Sabapathy K, Floyd S, Shanaube K, et al. HPTN 071 (PopART): rationale and design of a cluster-randomised trial of the population impact of an HIV combination prevention intervention including universal testing and treatment–a study protocol for a cluster randomised trial. Trials. 2014;15(1):57. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-57.
    1. Simwinga M, Bond V, Makola N, Hoddinott G, Belemu S, White R, et al. Implementing community engagement for combination prevention: lessons learnt from the first year of the HPTN 071 (PopART) community-randomized study. Current HIV/AIDS Reports. 2016;13(4):194–201. doi: 10.1007/s11904-016-0322-z.
    1. Yathu Yathu . An Impact Evaluation of Community-based Peer-led Sexual and Reproductive Health Services. Identifier: NCT04060420; 2019.
    1. Bond V, Ngwenya F, Murray E, Ngwenya N, Viljoen L, Gumede D, et al. Value and limitations of broad brush surveys used in community-randomized trials in Southern Africa. Qualitative health research. 2019;29(5):700–18. doi: 10.1177/1049732318809940.
    1. Murray E, Marais B, Mans G, Beyers N, Ayles H, Godfrey-Faussett P, et al. A multidisciplinary method to map potential tuberculosis transmission ‘hot spots’ in high-burden communities. The international journal of tuberculosis and lung disease. 2009;13(6):767–74.
    1. Creswell JW, Miller DL. Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into practice. 2000;39(3):124–30. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2.
    1. Hindin MJ, Kalamar AM, Thompson T-a, Upadhyay UD. Interventions to prevent unintended and repeat pregnancy among young people in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the published and gray literature. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2016;59(3):S8-S15.
    1. Kalamar AM, Bayer AM, Hindin MJ. Interventions to prevent sexually transmitted infections, including HIV, among young people in low-and middle-income countries: a systematic review of the published and gray literature. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2016;59(3):S22-S31.
    1. Beres LK, Simbeza S, Holmes CB, Mwamba C, Mukamba N, Sharma A, et al. Human-Centered Design Lessons for Implementation Science: Improving the Implementation of a Patient-Centered Care Intervention. Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes. 2019;82:S230-S43. doi: 10.1097/QAI.0000000000002216.
    1. Dulin MF, Tapp H, Smith HA, De Hernandez BU, Furuseth OJ. A community based participatory approach to improving health in a Hispanic population. Implementation science. 2011;6(1):1–11. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-38.
    1. Jull J, Giles A, Graham ID. Community-based participatory research and integrated knowledge translation: advancing the co-creation of knowledge. Implementation science. 2017;12(1):1–9. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0696-3.
    1. Chernick LS, Berrigan M, Gonzalez A, Konja A, Stockwell MS, Ehrhardt A, et al. Engaging Adolescents With Sexual Health Messaging: A Qualitative Analysis. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2019;65(5):660–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2019.05.029.
    1. Steinke J, Root-Bowman M, Estabrook S, Levine DS, Kantor LM. Meeting the needs of sexual and gender minority youth: formative research on potential digital health interventions. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2017;60(5):541–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.11.023.
    1. Rothwell E, Anderson R, Botkin JR. Deliberative discussion focus groups. Qualitative health research. 2016;26(6):734–40. doi: 10.1177/1049732315591150.
    1. Oliveras C, Cluver L, Bernays S, Armstrong A. Nothing about us without RIGHTS—meaningful engagement of children and youth: from research prioritization to clinical trials, implementation science, and policy. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999). 2018;78(1):S27.
    1. Nkole T, Munalula KM, Zulu MJ. Adolescent-Friendly Health Services in Public Health Facilities in Lusaka, Zambia 2019 April 2019. Report No.
    1. Hawke LD, Relihan J, Miller J, McCann E, Rong J, Darnay K, et al. Engaging youth in research planning, design and execution: practical recommendations for researchers. Health Expectations. 2018;21(6):944–9. doi: 10.1111/hex.12795.
    1. Russell T. Pairwise ranking made easy. PLA notes 1997:25 – 6.
    1. Mwenge L, Sigande L, Hensen B, Simuyaba M, Mwansa C, Kabumbu M, et al. ‘For us by us’: Adolescents and young people’s preferences for HIV and sexual reproductive health service delivery in Zambia. 3rd International workshop on HIV and adolescence; 2–4 October 2019; Nairobi, Kenya Reviews in Antiviral Therapy and Infectious Diseases 2019_10; 2019.
    1. Nwakamma IJ, Talla CS, Kei SE, Okoro GC, Asuquo G, Onu KA. Adolescent and Young People’s Utilization of HIV/Sexual and Reproductive Health Services: Comparing Health Facilities and Mobile Community Outreach Centers. International Journal of Translational Medical Research and Public Health. 2019;3(2):66–74. doi: 10.21106/ijtmrph.74.
    1. Kidman R, Waidler J, Palermo T. Uptake of HIV testing among adolescents and associated adolescent-friendly services. BMC health services research. 2020;20(1):1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05731-3.
    1. Geary RS, Gómez-Olivé FX, Kahn K, Tollman S, Norris SA. Barriers to and facilitators of the provision of a youth-friendly health services programme in rural South Africa. BMC health services research. 2014;14(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-259.
    1. Mbalinda SN, Bakeera-Kitaka S, Lusota DA, Magongo EN, Musoke P, Kaye DK. Barriers and facilitators for transitioning of young people from adolescent clinics to adult ART clinics in Uganda: unintended consequences of successful adolescent ART clinics. BMC health services research. 2020;20(1):1–12. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05701-9.
    1. Kennedy EC, Bulu S, Harris J, Humphreys D, Malverus J, Gray NJ. “Be kind to young people so they feel at home”: a qualitative study of adolescents’ and service providers’ perceptions of youth-friendly sexual and reproductive health services in Vanuatu. BMC health services research. 2013;13(1):1–12. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-455.
    1. Nglazi MD, van Schaik N, Kranzer K, Lawn SD, Wood R, Bekker L-G. An incentivized HIV counseling and testing program targeting hard-to-reach unemployed men in Cape Town, South Africa. Journal of acquired immune deficiency syndromes (1999). 2012;59(3):e28.
    1. Baird S, Chirwa E, McIntosh C, Özler B. The short-term impacts of a schooling conditional cash transfer program on the sexual behavior of young women. Health economics. 2010;19(S1):55–68. doi: 10.1002/hec.1569.
    1. Fatusi AO. Young people’s sexual and reproductive health interventions in developing countries: Making the investments count. Journal of Adolescent Health. 2016;59(3):S1-S3. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.06.016.
    1. De Walque D, Dow WH, Nathan R, Abdul R, Abilahi F, Gong E, et al. Incentivising safe sex: a randomised trial of conditional cash transfers for HIV and sexually transmitted infection prevention in rural Tanzania. BMJ open. 2012;2(1):e000747. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000747.
    1. Baum F. Researching public health: behind the qualitative-quantitative methodological debate. Social science & medicine. 1995;40(4):459–68. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)E0103-Y.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit