Current insights in non-invasive ventilation for the treatment of neonatal respiratory disease

Dhivya Lakshmi Permall, Asfia Banu Pasha, Xiao-Qing Chen, Dhivya Lakshmi Permall, Asfia Banu Pasha, Xiao-Qing Chen

Abstract

Deleterious consequences of the management of respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) with invasive ventilation have led to more in-depth investigation of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) modalities. NIV has significantly and positively altered the treatment outcomes and improved mortality rates of preterm infants with RDS. Among the different NIV modes, nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) has shown considerable benefits compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP). Despite reports of heated humidified high-flow nasal cannula's (HHHFNC) non-inferiority compared to NCPAP, some trials have been terminated due to high treatment failure rates with HHHFNC use. Moreover, RDS management with the combination of INSURE (INtubation SURfactant Extubation) technique and NIV ensures higher success rates. This review elaborates on the currently used various modes of NIV and novel techniques are also briefly discussed.

Keywords: Continuous positive airway pressure; Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation; Newborn; Non-invasive ventilation; Respiratory distress syndrome.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

    1. Cummings James J., Polin Richard A. Noninvasive Respiratory Support. Pediatrics. 2015;137(1):e20153758. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3758.
    1. Isayama T, Iwami H, McDonald S, Beyene J. Association of noninvasive ventilation strategies with mortality and bronchopulmonary dysplasia among preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016;316(6):611–624. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.10708.
    1. Bhandari V. The potential of non-invasive ventilation to decrease BPD. Semin Perinatol. 2013;37(2):108–114. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2013.01.007.
    1. Doyle LW, Anderson PJ. Long-term outcomes of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;14(6):391–395. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2009.08.004.
    1. Chen C-Y, Chou A-K, Chen Y-L, Chou H-C, Tsao P-N, Hsieh W-S. Quality improvement of nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy in neonatal intensive care unit. Pediatr Neonatol. 2017;58(3):229–235. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2016.04.005.
    1. Gupta S, Donn SM. Continuous positive airway pressure: physiology and comparison of devices. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;21(3):204–211. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2016.02.009.
    1. Mazmanyan P, Mellor K, Dore CJ, Modi N. A randomised controlled trial of flow driver and bubble continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants in a resource-limited setting. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016;101(1):F16–F20. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308464.
    1. Alexiou S, Panitch HB. Physiology of non-invasive respiratory support. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;21(3):174–180. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2016.02.007.
    1. Owen LS, Manley BJ. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in preterm infants: equipment, evidence, and synchronization. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;21(3):146–153. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2016.01.003.
    1. Owen LS, Morley CJ, Dawson JA, Davis PG. Effects of non-synchronised nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation on spontaneous breathing in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011;96(6):F422–F4F8. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.205195.
    1. Davis PG, Morley CJ, Owen LS. Non-invasive respiratory support of preterm neonates with respiratory distress: continuous positive airway pressure and nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009;14(1):14–20. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2008.08.003.
    1. Duman N, Tüzün F, Sever AH, Arslan MK, İşcan B, Dilek M, et al. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation with or without very early surfactant therapy for the primary treatment of respiratory distress syndrome. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(2):252–257. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2014.997203.
    1. Chyi-Her L, Shan-Tair W, Yuh-Jyh L, Tsu-Fuh Y. Efficacy of nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation in treating apnea of prematurity. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1998;26(5):349–353. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(199811)26:5<349::AID-PPUL8>;2-7.
    1. Stern DJ, Weisner MD, Courtney SE. Synchronized neonatal non-invasive ventilation-a pilot study: the graseby capsule with bi-level NCPAP. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014;49(7):659–664. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22880.
    1. Ferguson KN, Roberts CT, Manley BJ, Davis PG. Interventions to improve rates of successful Extubation in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(2):165–174. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.3015.
    1. Kirpalani H, Millar D, Lemyre B, Yoder BA, Chiu A, Roberts RS. A trial comparing noninvasive ventilation strategies in preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(7):611–620. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214533.
    1. Solevag AL, Kann IC. N-BiPAP treatment in infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a population study. Early Hum Dev. 2015;91(10):577–581. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2015.07.004.
    1. Jeon GW. Respiratory support with heated humidified high flow nasal cannula in preterm infants. Korean J Pediatr. 2016;59(10):389–394. doi: 10.3345/kjp.2016.59.10.389.
    1. Wilkinson D, Andersen C, O’Donnell CP, De Paoli AG, Manley BJ. High flow nasal cannula for respiratory support in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;2:Cd006405.
    1. Roberts CT, Hodgson KA. Nasal high flow treatment in preterm infants. Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol. 2017;3:15. doi: 10.1186/s40748-017-0056-y.
    1. Roberts CT, Owen LS, Manley BJ, Frøisland DH, Donath SM, Dalziel KM, et al. Nasal high-flow therapy for primary respiratory support in preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(12):1142–1151. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1603694.
    1. Schmid F, Olbertz DM, Ballmann M. The use of high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) as respiratory support in neonatal and pediatric intensive care units in Germany - a nationwide survey. Respir Med. 2017;131:210–214. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2017.08.027.
    1. Lemyre B, Laughon M, Bose C, Davis PG. Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus early nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;12:Cd005384.
    1. Ramanathan R, Sekar KC, Rasmussen M, Bhatia J, Soll RF. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation after surfactant treatment for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants <30 weeks’ gestation: a randomized, controlled trial. J Perinatol. 2012;32:336. doi: 10.1038/jp.2012.1.
    1. Sai Sunil Kishore M, Sourabh D, Praveen K. Early nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome. Acta Paediatr. 2009;98(9):1412–1415. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2009.01348.x.
    1. Meneses J, Bhandari V, Alves JG. Nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2012;166(4):372–376. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.1142.
    1. Tang S, Zhao J, Shen J, Hu Z, Shi Y. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in neonates: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Indian Pediatr. 2013;50(4):371–376. doi: 10.1007/s13312-013-0122-0.
    1. Yuan S, Shifang T, Jinning Z, Jie S. A prospective, randomized, controlled study of NIPPV versus nCPAP in preterm and term infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2014;49(7):673–678. doi: 10.1002/ppul.22883.
    1. Kugelman A, Feferkorn I, Riskin A, Chistyakov I, Kaufman B, Bader D. Nasal intermittent mandatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome: a randomized, controlled, prospective study. J Pediatr. 2007;150(5):521–6.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.01.032.
    1. Silveira CST, Leonardi KM, Melo APCF, Zaia JE, Brunherotti MAA. Response of preterm infants to 2 noninvasive Ventilatory support systems: nasal CPAP and nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation. Respir Care. 2015;60(12):1772–1776. doi: 10.4187/respcare.03565.
    1. Lemyre B, Davis PG, De Paoli AG. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for apnea of prematurity. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;1:CD002272.
    1. Barrington KJ, Bull D, Finer NN. Randomized trial of nasal synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation compared with continuous positive airway pressure after Extubation of very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2001;107(4):638–641. doi: 10.1542/peds.107.4.638.
    1. Lemyre B, Davis PG, De Paoli AG, Kirpalani H. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) for preterm neonates after extubation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(9):Cd003212. 10.1002/14651858.CD003212.pub2.
    1. Esmaeilnia T, Nayeri F, Taheritafti R, Shariat M, Moghimpour-Bijani F. Comparison of complications and efficacy of NIPPV and nasal CPAP in preterm infants with RDS. Iran J Pediatr. 2016;26(2):e2352.
    1. Oncel MY, Arayici S, Uras N, Alyamac-Dizdar E, Sari FN, Karahan S, et al. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure versus nasal intermittent positive-pressure ventilation within the minimally invasive surfactant therapy approach in preterm infants: a randomised controlled trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2016;101(4):F323–F328. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2015-308204.
    1. Li W, Long C, Zhangxue H, Jinning Z, Shifang T, Juan M, et al. Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis and up-date. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015;50(4):402–409. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23130.
    1. Salvo Vincenzo, Lista Gianluca, Lupo Enrica, Ricotti Alberto, Zimmermann Luc J. I., Gavilanes Antonio W. D., Gitto Eloisa, Colivicchi Micaela, Ferraù Valeria, Gazzolo Diego. Comparison of three non-invasive ventilation strategies (NSIPPV/BiPAP/NCPAP) for RDS in VLBW infants. The Journal of Maternal-Fetal & Neonatal Medicine. 2017;31(21):2832–2838. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2017.1357693.
    1. Lista G, Castoldi F, Fontana P, Daniele I, Cavigioli F, Rossi S, et al. Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus bi-level nasal CPAP in preterm babies with respiratory distress syndrome: a randomised control trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2010;95(2):F85–FF9. doi: 10.1136/adc.2009.169219.
    1. Rong ZH, Li WB, Liu W, Cai BH, Wang J, Yang M, et al. Nasal bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in preterm infants </=32 weeks: a retrospective cohort study. J Paediatr Child Health. 2016;52(5):493–498. doi: 10.1111/jpc.13175.
    1. Claudio M, Mario M, Agnese A, Gaetano C. Nasal Bilevel vs. continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2005;40(5):426–430. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20276.
    1. Victor Suresh, Roberts Stephen A., Mitchell Simon, Aziz Huma, Lavender Tina. Biphasic Positive Airway Pressure or Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: A Randomized Trial. Pediatrics. 2016;138(2):e20154095. doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-4095.
    1. Yoder BA, Stoddard RA, Li M, King J, Dirnberger DR, Abbasi S. Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula versus nasal CPAP for respiratory support in neonates. Pediatrics. 2013;131(5):e1482–e1e90. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-2742.
    1. Murki S, Singh J, Khant C, Kumar Dash S, Oleti TP, Joy P, et al. High-flow nasal cannula versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure for primary respiratory support in preterm infants with respiratory distress: a randomized controlled trial. Neonatology. 2018;113(3):235–241. doi: 10.1159/000484400.
    1. Kadivar MM, Mosayebi ZM, Razi NM, Nariman SM, Sangsari RM. High flow nasal Cannulae versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in neonates with respiratory distress syndrome managed with INSURE method: a randomized clinical trial. Iran J Med Sci. 2016;41(6):494–500.
    1. Lavizzari A, Colnaghi M, Ciuffini F, Veneroni C, Musumeci S, Cortinovis I, et al. Heated, humidified high-flow nasal cannula vs nasal continuous positive airway pressure for respiratory distress syndrome of prematurity: a randomized clinical noninferiority trial. JAMA Pediatr. 2016. 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2016.1243.
    1. Manley BJ, Roberts CT, Arnolda GRB, Wright IMR, Owen LS, Dalziel KM, et al. A multicentre, randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial, comparing nasal high flow with nasal continuous positive airway pressure as primary support for newborn infants with early respiratory distress born in Australian non-tertiary special care nurseries (the HUNTER trial): study protocol. BMJ Open. 2017;7(6):e016746. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016746.
    1. Salvo V, Lista G, Lupo E, Ricotti A, Zimmermann LJ, Gavilanes AW, et al. Noninvasive ventilation strategies for early treatment of RDS in preterm infants: an RCT. Pediatrics. 2015;135(3):444–451. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-0895.
    1. Ricotti A, Salvo V, Zimmermann LJI, Gavilanes AWD, Barberi I, Lista G, et al. N-SIPPV versus bi-level N-CPAP for early treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013;26(13):1346–1351. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.784255.
    1. Kugelman A, Riskin A, Said W, Shoris I, Mor F, Bader D. A randomized pilot study comparing heated humidified high-flow nasal cannulae with NIPPV for RDS. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015;50(6):576–583. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23022.
    1. Aghai ZH, Saslow JG, Nakhla T, Milcarek B, Hart J, Lawrysh-Plunkett R, et al. Synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (SNIPPV) decreases work of breathing (WOB) in premature infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) compared to nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006;41(9):875–881. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20461.
    1. Chang H-Y, Claure N, D'Ugard C, Torres J, Nwajei P, Bancalari E. Effects of synchronization during nasal ventilation in clinically stable preterm infants. Pediatr Res. 2011;69:84. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e3181ff6770.
    1. Huang L, Mendler MR, Waitz M, Schmid M, Hassan MA, Hummler HD. Effects of synchronization during noninvasive intermittent mandatory ventilation in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome immediately after Extubation. Neonatology. 2015;108(2):108–114. doi: 10.1159/000431074.
    1. Gizzi C, Montecchia F, Panetta V, Castellano C, Mariani C, Campelli M, et al. Is synchronised NIPPV more effective than NIPPV and NCPAP in treating apnoea of prematurity (AOP)? A randomised cross-over trial. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100(1):F17–F23. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305892.
    1. Ramos-Navarro C, Sanchez-Luna M, Sanz-Lopez E, Maderuelo-Rodriguez E, Zamora-Flores E. Effectiveness of synchronized noninvasive ventilation to prevent intubation in preterm infants. AJP Rep. 2016;6(3):e264–e271. doi: 10.1055/s-0036-1586205.
    1. Khalaf MN, Brodsky N, Hurley J, Bhandari V. A prospective randomized, controlled trial comparing synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure as modes of extubation. Pediatrics. 2001;108(1):13–17. doi: 10.1542/peds.108.1.13.
    1. Gizzi C, Papoff P, Giordano I, Massenzi L, Barbàra CS, Campelli M, et al. Flow-synchronized nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation for infants <32 weeks’ gestation with respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Res Prac. 2012;2012:301818.
    1. Roberts CT, Davis PG, Owen LS. Neonatal non-invasive respiratory support: synchronised NIPPV, non-synchronised NIPPV or bi-level CPAP: what is the evidence in 2013? Neonatology. 2013;104(3):203–209. doi: 10.1159/000353448.
    1. Owen LS, Morley CJ, Davis PG. Effects of synchronisation during SiPAP-generated nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) in preterm infants. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2015;100(1):F24–F30. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2013-305830.
    1. Manley BJ, Owen LS, Hooper SB, Jacobs SE, Cheong JLY, Doyle LW, et al. Towards evidence-based resuscitation of the newborn infant. Lancet. 2017;389(10079):1639–1648. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30547-0.
    1. Foglia EE, Jensen EA, Kirpalani H. Delivery room interventions to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia in extremely preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2017;37(11):1171–1179. doi: 10.1038/jp.2017.74.
    1. Morley CJ, Davis PG, Doyle LW, Brion LP, Hascoet J-M, Carlin JB. Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2008;358(7):700–708. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa072788.
    1. Network SSGotEKSNNR Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(21):1970–1979. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0911783.
    1. Committee on Fetus and Newborn; American Academy of Pediatrics. Respiratory support in preterm infants at birth. Pediatrics. 2014;133(1):171–4.
    1. Stevens TP, Blennow M, Myers EH, Soll R. Early surfactant administration with brief ventilation vs selective surfactant and continued mechanical ventilation for preterm infants with or at risk for respiratory distress syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007;2007(4):CD003063.
    1. Schmölzer GM, Kumar M, Pichler G, Aziz K, O’Reilly M, Cheung P-Y. Non-invasive versus invasive respiratory support in preterm infants at birth: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ. 2013;347:f5980. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5980.
    1. Lista G, La Verde PA, Castoldi F. Sustained inflation and its role in the delivery room Management of Preterm Infants. Neonatology. 2016;109(4):366–368. doi: 10.1159/000444899.
    1. Fuchs H, Lindner W, Leiprecht A, Mendler MR, Hummler HD. Predictors of early nasal CPAP failure and effects of various intubation criteria on the rate of mechanical ventilation in preterm infants of <29 weeks gestational age. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011;96(5):F343–F3F7. doi: 10.1136/adc.2010.205898.
    1. De Jaegere AP, van der Lee JH, Canté C, van Kaam AH. Early prediction of nasal continuous positive airway pressure failure in preterm infants less than 30 weeks gestation. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101(4):374–379. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.2011.02558.x.
    1. Dargaville PA, Aiyappan A, De Paoli AG, Dalton RGB, Kuschel CA, Kamlin CO, et al. Continuous positive airway pressure failure in preterm infants: incidence, predictors and consequences. Neonatology. 2013;104(1):8–14. doi: 10.1159/000346460.
    1. Lista G, Boni L, Scopesi F, Mosca F, Trevisanuto D, Messner H, et al. Sustained lung inflation at birth for preterm infants: a randomized clinical trial. Pediatrics. 2015;135(2):e457–e464. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1692.
    1. Foglia EE, Owen LS, Thio M, Ratcliffe SJ, Lista G, te Pas A, et al. Sustained aeration of infant lungs (SAIL) trial: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16:95. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0601-9.
    1. Fischer HS, Bohlin K, Buhrer C, Schmalisch G, Cremer M, Reiss I, et al. Nasal high-frequency oscillation ventilation in neonates: a survey in five European countries. Eur J Pediatr. 2015;174(4):465–471. doi: 10.1007/s00431-014-2419-y.
    1. Ullrich TL, Czernik C, Buhrer C, Schmalisch G, Fischer HS. Nasal high-frequency oscillatory ventilation impairs heated humidification: a neonatal bench study. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017;52(11):1455–1460. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23824.
    1. Mukerji A, Finelli M, Belik J. Nasal high-frequency oscillation for lung carbon dioxide clearance in the newborn. Neonatology. 2013;103(3):161–165. doi: 10.1159/000345613.
    1. Mukerji A, Singh B, Helou SE, Fusch C, Dunn M, Belik J, et al. Use of noninvasive high-frequency ventilation in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective review. Amer J Perinatol. 2015;32(02):171–176. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1381317.
    1. Aktas S, Unal S, Aksu M, Ozcan E, Ergenekon E, Turkyilmaz C, et al. Nasal HFOV with Binasal cannula appears effective and feasible in ELBW newborns. J Trop Pediatr. 2016;62(2):165–168. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmv088.
    1. Xing-Wang Z, Jin-Ning Z, Shi-Fang T, Jun Y, Yuan S. Noninvasive high-frequency oscillatory ventilation versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm infants with moderate-severe respiratory distress syndrome: a preliminary report. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2017;52(8):1038–1042. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23755.
    1. Stein H, Beck J, Dunn M. Non-invasive ventilation with neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in newborns. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;21(3):154–161. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2016.01.006.
    1. Stein H, Firestone K. Application of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in neonates. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014;19(1):60–69. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2013.09.005.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit