Efficacy and tolerability of bevacizumab in patients with severe Covid-19

Jiaojiao Pang, Feng Xu, Gianmarco Aondio, Yu Li, Alberto Fumagalli, Ming Lu, Giuseppe Valmadre, Jie Wei, Yuan Bian, Margherita Canesi, Giovanni Damiani, Yuan Zhang, Dexin Yu, Jun Chen, Xiang Ji, Wenhai Sui, Bailu Wang, Shuo Wu, Attila Kovacs, Miriam Revera, Hao Wang, Xu Jing, Ying Zhang, Yuguo Chen, Yihai Cao, Jiaojiao Pang, Feng Xu, Gianmarco Aondio, Yu Li, Alberto Fumagalli, Ming Lu, Giuseppe Valmadre, Jie Wei, Yuan Bian, Margherita Canesi, Giovanni Damiani, Yuan Zhang, Dexin Yu, Jun Chen, Xiang Ji, Wenhai Sui, Bailu Wang, Shuo Wu, Attila Kovacs, Miriam Revera, Hao Wang, Xu Jing, Ying Zhang, Yuguo Chen, Yihai Cao

Abstract

On the basis of Covid-19-induced pulmonary pathological and vascular changes, we hypothesize that the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) drug bevacizumab might be beneficial for treating Covid-19 patients. From Feb 15 to April 5, 2020, we conducted a single-arm trial (NCT04275414) and recruited 26 patients from 2-centers (China and Italy) with severe Covid-19, with respiratory rate ≥30 times/min, oxygen saturation ≤93% with ambient air, or partial arterial oxygen pressure to fraction of inspiration O2 ratio (PaO2/FiO2) >100 mmHg and ≤300 mmHg, and diffuse pneumonia confirmed by chest imaging. Followed up for 28 days. Among these, bevacizumab plus standard care markedly improves the PaO2/FiO2 ratios at days 1 and 7. By day 28, 24 (92%) patients show improvement in oxygen-support status, 17 (65%) patients are discharged, and none show worsen oxygen-support status nor die. Significant reduction of lesion areas/ratios are shown in chest computed tomography (CT) or X-ray within 7 days. Of 14 patients with fever, body temperature normalizes within 72 h in 13 (93%) patients. Relative to comparable controls, bevacizumab shows clinical efficacy by improving oxygenation and shortening oxygen-support duration. Our findings suggest bevacizumab plus standard care is highly beneficial for patients with severe Covid-19. Randomized controlled trial is warranted.

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1. CONSORT flow diagram.
Fig. 1. CONSORT flow diagram.
Twenty-seven participants were enrolled. All participants received bevacizumab treatment (BEVA). One participant dropped out.
Fig. 2. Comparison of dynamic changes of…
Fig. 2. Comparison of dynamic changes of PaO2/FiO2 between BEVA (bevacizumab) and control groups.
PaO2/FiO2 values in all patients (a), Chinese (b), and Italian (c) groups. The dashed lines represent the baselines; nodes in the lines represent the median values; the lower and upper values of the bar correspond to the 25th and 75th percentiles (Q1 and Q3); the length of the bar represents the interquartile range (IQR); red and blue numbers correspond to the sample sizes (n); numbers on the horizontal lines represent p-values. D-values (the difference values between days 1 or 7 and baseline) of individual patients were utilized for the comparisons between BEVA and control groups of all patients (d), Chinese (e), and Italian (f) patients. The center lines of boxes represent median values; the lower and upper hinges represent Q1 and Q3, the range between which represents IQR; whiskers correspond to the highest or lowest values of non-outlier data (within 1.5 × IQR from the lower or upper hinges); numbers on the horizontal lines represent p-values; red and blue numbers correspond to the sample sizes (n); the red and blue dots represent the data of individual patients. For ac, p-values were calculated by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. For df, p-values were calculated by Wilcoxon signed-rank test. PaO2/FiO2 partial arterial oxygen pressure to fraction of inspiration O2 ratio. p < 0.05 for two-tailed hypothesis tests was considered statistically significant. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.
Fig. 3. Changes in oxygen-support status in…
Fig. 3. Changes in oxygen-support status in individual patients.
Baseline (day 0) is the day when treatment with a single dose of bevacizumab was performed. The final oxygen-support statuses are on the discharge date or at the end of the 28-day follow-up. For each individual patient, colored columns represent the oxygen-support status of the patient over time. Diamond symbols represent patients discharged from hospitals; star symbols represent patients improved but not discharged, and circle symbols show patients unchanged.
Fig. 4. Representative chest CT images.
Fig. 4. Representative chest CT images.
Typical chest CT images of a Chinese patient with severe Covid-19 who received bevacizumab at day 8 (b) relative to the prior treatment baseline (a). Typical chest CT images of an Italian patient with severe Covid-19 who received bevacizumab at day 7 (d) relative to the prior treatment baseline (c).
Fig. 5. Representative chest X-ray images.
Fig. 5. Representative chest X-ray images.
Chest X-ray images of an Italian patient with severe Covid-19 who received bevacizumab treatment at days 0 (a), 3 (b), and 7 (c) relative to the prior treatment baseline.
Fig. 6. Changes in fever symptom, lymphocyte…
Fig. 6. Changes in fever symptom, lymphocyte counts, and inflammation markers of individual patients.
Dynamic changes in fever status of 14 BEVA (bevacizumab)-treated patients who had a fever at enrollment (a). Day 0 marks the time point for initiating bevacizumab treatment; red, orange, and blue columns indicate the duration of fever or normal body temperature status before and after BEVA treatment; and diamonds represent discharge. Numbers along the vertical axis represent the patient numbers that match Fig. 2. Changes of lymphocyte counts (n = 14) (b) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels (n = 9) (c) before and after BEVA treatment were analyzed by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. The center lines of boxes represent median values; the lower and upper hinges represent the 25th and 75th percentiles (Q1 and Q3), the range between which represents the interquartile range (IQR); whiskers correspond to the highest or lowest values of non-outlier data (within 1.5 × IQR from the lower or upper hinges); numbers on the horizontal lines represent p-values. The red dots represent the data of individual treated patients. p < 0.05 for two-tailed hypothesis tests was considered statistically significant. Source data are provided as a Source Data file.

References

    1. World Health Organization. Coronavirus disease (Covid-19) outbreak. (2020).
    1. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) outbreak in china: summary of a report of 72314 cases from the Chinese center for disease control and prevention. JAMA. 2020;323:1239–1242. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648.
    1. Yang X, et al. Clinical course and outcomes of critically ill patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia in Wuhan, China: a single-centered, retrospective, observational study. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020;8:475–481. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30079-5.
    1. Bhatraju PK, et al. Covid-19 in critically ill patients in the Seattle region - case series. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:2012–2022. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2004500.
    1. Huang C, et al. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet. 2020;395:497–506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5.
    1. Goyal P, et al. Clinical characteristics of Covid-19 in New York city. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:2372–2374. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2010419.
    1. Cao B, et al. A trial of lopinavir-ritonavir in adults hospitalized with severe Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:1787–1799. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001282.
    1. Grein J, et al. Compassionate use of remdesivir for patients with severe Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:2327–2336. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2007016.
    1. Borba MGS, et al. Effect of high vs low doses of chloroquine diphosphate as adjunctive therapy for patients hospitalized with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw. Open. 2020;3:e208857. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8857.
    1. Torres A, Loeches IM, Sligl W, Lee N. Severe flu management: a point of view. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46:153–162. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05868-8.
    1. Harris C, Carson G, Baillie JK, Horby P, Nair H. An evidence-based framework for priority clinical research questions for Covid-19. J. Glob. Health. 2020;10:011001. doi: 10.7189/jogh.10.011001.
    1. Liu Y, Cox SR, Morita T, Kourembanas S. Hypoxia regulates vascular endothelial growth factor gene expression in endothelial cells. Identification of a 5′ enhancer. Circ. Res. 1995;77:638–643. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.77.3.638.
    1. Marti HH, Risau W. Systemic hypoxia changes the organ-specific distribution of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1999;95:15809–15814. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15809.
    1. Kaner RJ, et al. Lung overexpression of the vascular endothelial growth factor gene induces pulmonary edema. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2000;22:657–664. doi: 10.1165/ajrcmb.22.6.3779.
    1. Lee CG, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) induces remodeling and enhances TH2-mediated sensitization and inflammation in the lung. Nat. Med. 2004;10:1095–1103. doi: 10.1038/nm1105.
    1. Rodriguez-Morales AJ, et al. Clinical, laboratory and imaging features of Covid-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2020;34:101623. doi: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101623.
    1. Guan WJ, et al. Clinical characteristics of coronavirus disease 2019 in China. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:1708–1720. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2002032.
    1. Liu Q, et al. Gross examination report of a Covid-19 death autopsy. Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2020;36:21–23.
    1. Tian S, et al. Pulmonary pathology of early-phase 2019 novel coronavirus (Covid-19) pneumonia in two patients with lung cancer. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2020;15:700–704. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2020.02.010.
    1. Mehta P, et al. Covid-19: consider cytokine storm syndromes and immunosuppression. Lancet. 2020;395:1033–1034. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30628-0.
    1. Thickett DR, Armstrong L, Christie SJ, Millar AB. Vascular endothelial growth factor may contribute to increased vascular permeability in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2001;164:1601–1605. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.9.2011071.
    1. Watanabe M, Boyer JL, Crystal RG. Genetic delivery of bevacizumab to suppress vascular endothelial growth factor-induced high-permeability pulmonary edema. Hum. Gene Ther. 2009;20:598–610. doi: 10.1089/hum.2008.169.
    1. Varga Z, et al. Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID-19. Lancet. 2020;395:1417–1418. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30937-5.
    1. Ackermann M, et al. Pulmonary vascular endothelialitis, thrombosis, and angiogenesis in covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383:120–128. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2015432.
    1. Scott IU, et al. Effect of bevacizumab vs aflibercept on visual acuity among patients with macular edema due to central retinal vein occlusion: the SCORE2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;317:2072–2087. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.4568.
    1. Zhang Y, et al. Activation of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-3 in macrophages restrains TLR4-NF-kappaB signaling and protects against endotoxin shock. Immunity. 2014;40:501–514. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.01.013.
    1. Janela B, et al. A subset of type I conventional dendritic cells controls cutaneous bacterial infections through VEGFalpha-mediated recruitment of neutrophils. Immunity. 2019;50:1069–1083.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.03.001.
    1. Henry BM. Covid-19, ECMO, and lymphopenia: a word of caution. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020;8:e24. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30119-3.
    1. Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, et al. Complex immune dysregulation in covid-19 patients with severe respiratory failure. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;27:992–1000.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.04.009.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit