Third degree obstetric anal sphincter tears: risk factors and outcome of primary repair

A H Sultan, M A Kamm, C N Hudson, C I Bartram, A H Sultan, M A Kamm, C N Hudson, C I Bartram

Abstract

Objectives: To determine (i) risk factors in the development of third degree obstetric tears and (ii) the success of primary sphincter repair.

Design: (i) Retrospective analysis of obstetric variables in 50 women who had sustained a third degree tear, compared with the remaining 8553 vaginal deliveries during the same period. (ii) Women who had sustained a third degree tear and had primary sphincter repair and control subjects were interviewed and investigated with anal endosonography, anal manometry, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency measurements.

Setting: Antenatal clinic in teaching hospital in inner London.

Subjects: (i) All women (n = 8603) who delivered vaginally over a 31 month period. (ii) 34 women who sustained a third degree tear and 88 matched controls.

Main outcome measures: Obstetric risk factors, defecatory symptoms, sonographic sphincter defects, and pudendal nerve damage.

Results: (i) Factors significantly associated with development of a third degree tear were: forceps delivery (50% v 7% in controls; P = 0.00001), primiparous delivery (85% v 43%; P = 0.00001), birth weight > 4 kg (P = 0.00002), and occipito-posterior position at delivery (P = 0.003). No third degree tear occurred during 351 vacuum extractions. Eleven of 25 (44%) women who were delivered without instruments and had a third degree tear did so despite a posterolateral episiotomy. (ii) Anal incontinence or faecal urgency was present in 16 women with tears and 11 controls (47% v 13%; P = 0.00001). Sonographic sphincter defects were identified in 29 with tears and 29 controls (85% v 33%; P = 0.00001). Every symptomatic patient had persistent combined internal and external sphincter defects, and these were associated with significantly lower anal pressures. Pudendal nerve terminal motor latency measurements were not significantly different.

Conclusions: Vacuum extraction is associated with fewer third degree tears than forceps delivery. An episiotomy does not always prevent a third degree tear. Primary repair is inadequate in most women who sustain third degree tears, most having residual sphincter defects and about half experiencing anal incontinence, which is caused by persistent mechanical sphincter disruption rather than pudendal nerve damage. Attention should be directed towards preventive obstetric practice and surgical techniques of repair.

References

    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1992 Sep;99(9):724-6
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1962 May;19:677-80
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989 May;96(5):505-6
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989 May;160(5 Pt 1):1027-30
    1. Br J Radiol. 1991 Mar;64(759):225-7
    1. J Reprod Med. 1986 Apr;31(4):240-4
    1. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1991;31(4):213-6
    1. N Engl J Med. 1993 Dec 23;329(26):1905-11
    1. Br J Surg. 1992 Feb;79(2):104-6
    1. Surg Clin North Am. 1980 Apr;60(2):457-63
    1. Gut. 1988 Jan;29(1):1-4
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Jun 11;286(6381):1873-5
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1949 Apr;57(4):730-5
    1. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1993 Jun;100(6):524-30
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984 Sep 8;289(6445):587-90
    1. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1983 Jun;38(6):322-38
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Nov;78(5 Pt 1):823-7
    1. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1993 Dec;43(3):263-70
    1. Dis Colon Rectum. 1987 Jul;30(7):521-5
    1. Gastrointest Radiol. 1989 Fall;14(4):349-53
    1. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1988;67(4):315-8
    1. Br J Surg. 1993 Apr;80(4):508-11
    1. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1960 Oct;80:654-62
    1. Obstet Gynecol. 1989 May;73(5 Pt 1):732-8
    1. Gut. 1975 Jun;16(6):482-9
    1. Br J Surg. 1990 Aug;77(8):876-7
    1. J Nurse Midwifery. 1979 Jan-Feb;24(1):18-26

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit