A Randomized Controlled Trial Shows that both 14-Day Hybrid and Bismuth Quadruple Therapies Cure Most Patients with Helicobacter pylori Infection in Populations with Moderate Antibiotic Resistance

Feng-Woei Tsay, Deng-Chyang Wu, Hsien-Chung Yu, Sung-Shuo Kao, Kung-Hung Lin, Jin-Shiung Cheng, Huay-Min Wang, Wen-Chi Chen, Wei-Chih Sun, Kuo-Wang Tsai, Ping-I Hsu, Feng-Woei Tsay, Deng-Chyang Wu, Hsien-Chung Yu, Sung-Shuo Kao, Kung-Hung Lin, Jin-Shiung Cheng, Huay-Min Wang, Wen-Chi Chen, Wei-Chih Sun, Kuo-Wang Tsai, Ping-I Hsu

Abstract

Hybrid therapy is a novel two-step treatment achieving a high eradication rate for Helicobacter pylori infection. Currently, whether this new therapy achieves a higher eradication rate than bismuth quadruple therapy remains an unanswered question. The aim of this prospective, randomized comparative study was to investigate the efficacies of 14-day hybrid therapy and bismuth quadruple therapy in the treatment of H. pylori infection. From July 2013 to June 2015, eligible H. pylori-infected subjects were randomly assigned to receive either 14-day bismuth quadruple therapy (pantoprazole, bismuth subcitrate, tetracycline, and metronidazole for 14 days) or 14-day hybrid therapy (a 7-day dual therapy with pantoprazole plus amoxicillin, followed by a 7-day quadruple therapy with pantoprazole plus amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and metronidazole). H. pylori status was examined 6 weeks after the end of treatment. Three hundred thirty H. pylori-infected participants were randomized to receive 14-day bismuth quadruple therapy (n = 164) or 14-day hybrid therapy (n = 166). The eradication rates by intention-to-treat analysis were similar: 93.9% versus 92.8%, respectively (95% confidence interval [CI], -4.3% to 5.4%; P = 0.68). Per-protocol analysis yielded similar results (96.7% versus 94.9%, respectively; P = 0.44). However, bismuth quadruple therapy had a higher frequency of adverse events than hybrid therapy (55.5% versus 15.7%, respectively; 95% CI, 30.4% to 49.2%; P < 0.001). The two treatments exhibited comparable drug adherence (93.9% versus 97%, respectively). The resistance rates of antibiotics were: clarithromycin, 16.7% of patients; amoxicillin, 1.3%; metronidazole, 25%; and tetracycline, 0%. In the bismuth quadruple therapy group, the eradication rate of metronidazole-resistant strains was lower than that of metronidazole-susceptible strains (70.0% versus 96.4%, respectively; P = 0.04). In the hybrid therapy group, no significant impact of clarithromycin or metronidazole resistance on eradication rates was identified. Both 14-day hybrid and bismuth quadruple therapies cure most patients with H. pylori infection in populations with moderate antibiotic resistance. However, the 14-day hybrid therapy has fewer adverse effects than the bismuth quadruple therapy. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT02541864.).

Keywords: Helicobacter pylori; antibiotic resistance; bismuth quadruple therapy; hybrid therapy.

Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Disposition of patients. We recruited 330 H. pylori-infected patients: 164 to the 14-day bismuth quadruple therapy group and 166 to the 14-day hybrid therapy group. In the bismuth group, 14 patients were excluded from the per-protocol analysis for poor adherence or incomplete follow-up. In the hybrid group, 9 patients were excluded from the per-protocol analysis.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit