Treatment of Highly Drug-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis

Francesca Conradie, Andreas H Diacon, Nosipho Ngubane, Pauline Howell, Daniel Everitt, Angela M Crook, Carl M Mendel, Erica Egizi, Joanna Moreira, Juliano Timm, Timothy D McHugh, Genevieve H Wills, Anna Bateson, Robert Hunt, Christo Van Niekerk, Mengchun Li, Morounfolu Olugbosi, Melvin Spigelman, Nix-TB Trial Team, Nokuphiwa Mvuna, Caryn Upton, Naadira Vanker, Lize Greyling, Michelle Eriksson, Stella Maris Fabiane, Julio Ortiz Canseco, Priya Solanki, Francesca Conradie, Andreas H Diacon, Nosipho Ngubane, Pauline Howell, Daniel Everitt, Angela M Crook, Carl M Mendel, Erica Egizi, Joanna Moreira, Juliano Timm, Timothy D McHugh, Genevieve H Wills, Anna Bateson, Robert Hunt, Christo Van Niekerk, Mengchun Li, Morounfolu Olugbosi, Melvin Spigelman, Nix-TB Trial Team, Nokuphiwa Mvuna, Caryn Upton, Naadira Vanker, Lize Greyling, Michelle Eriksson, Stella Maris Fabiane, Julio Ortiz Canseco, Priya Solanki

Abstract

Background: Patients with highly drug-resistant forms of tuberculosis have limited treatment options and historically have had poor outcomes.

Methods: In an open-label, single-group study in which follow-up is ongoing at three South African sites, we investigated treatment with three oral drugs - bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid - that have bactericidal activity against tuberculosis and to which there is little preexisting resistance. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of the drug combination for 26 weeks in patients with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis and patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis that was not responsive to treatment or for which a second-line regimen had been discontinued because of side effects. The primary end point was the incidence of an unfavorable outcome, defined as treatment failure (bacteriologic or clinical) or relapse during follow-up, which continued until 6 months after the end of treatment. Patients were classified as having a favorable outcome at 6 months if they had resolution of clinical disease, a negative culture status, and had not already been classified as having had an unfavorable outcome. Other efficacy end points and safety were also evaluated.

Results: A total of 109 patients were enrolled in the study and were included in the evaluation of efficacy and safety end points. At 6 months after the end of treatment in the intention-to-treat analysis, 11 patients (10%) had an unfavorable outcome and 98 patients (90%; 95% confidence interval, 83 to 95) had a favorable outcome. The 11 unfavorable outcomes were 7 deaths (6 during treatment and 1 from an unknown cause during follow-up), 1 withdrawal of consent during treatment, 2 relapses during follow-up, and 1 loss to follow-up. The expected linezolid toxic effects of peripheral neuropathy (occurring in 81% of patients) and myelosuppression (48%), although common, were manageable, often leading to dose reductions or interruptions in treatment with linezolid.

Conclusions: The combination of bedaquiline, pretomanid, and linezolid led to a favorable outcome at 6 months after the end of therapy in a high percentage of patients with highly drug-resistant forms of tuberculosis; some associated toxic effects were observed. (Funded by the TB Alliance and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02333799.).

Copyright © 2020 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Time to unfavourable outcome (ITT) A Overall; B by TB Type
Figure 2
Figure 2
Time to culture negative status for those positive at baseline (ITT) A Overall; B by TB Type
Figure 3
Figure 3
Time to first reduction or interruption of linezolid i) Due to Peripheral neuropathy; ii) Due to Myelosuppression; A Overall; by TB Type;

References

    1. WHO The End TB Strategy. 2014. [cited 2018 09/09/2018]; Available from: .
    1. Gandhi N.R., et al. , Risk factors for mortality among MDR- and XDR-TB patients in a high HIV prevalence setting. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2012. 16(1): p. 90-7.
    1. Nunn A.J., et al. , A Trial of a Shorter Regimen for Rifampin-Resistant Tuberculosis. N Engl J Med, 2019. 380(13): p. 1201-1213.
    1. Gandhi N.R., et al. , Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis as a cause of death in patients co-infected with tuberculosis and HIV in a rural area of South Africa. Lancet, 2006. 368(9547): p. 1575-80.
    1. O'Donnell M.R., et al. , Treatment outcomes for extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis and HIV co-infection. Emerg Infect Dis, 2013. 19(3): p. 416-24.
    1. Haagsma A.C., et al. , Selectivity of TMC207 towards mycobacterial ATP synthase compared with that towards the eukaryotic homologue. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2009. 53(3): p. 1290-2.
    1. Pym A.S., et al. , Bedaquiline in the treatment of multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Eur Respir J, 2016. 47(2): p. 564-74.
    1. Schnippel K., et al. , Effect of bedaquiline on mortality in South African patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med, 2018. 6(9): p. 699-706.
    1. Lee M., et al. , Linezolid for treatment of chronic extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. N Engl J Med, 2012. 367(16): p. 1508-18.
    1. Yang J.S., et al. , Delamanid, Bedaquiline, and Linezolid Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Distributions and Resistance-related Gene Mutations in Multidrug-resistant and Extensively Drug-resistant Tuberculosis in Korea. Ann Lab Med, 2018. 38(6): p. 563-568.
    1. Singh R., et al. , PA-824 kills nonreplicating Mycobacterium tuberculosis by intracellular NO release. Science, 2008. 322(5906): p. 1392-5.
    1. Manjunatha U., Boshoff H.I., and Barry C.E., The mechanism of action of PA-824: Novel insights from transcriptional profiling. Commun Integr Biol, 2009. 2(3): p. 215-8.
    1. Tyagi S., et al. , Bactericidal activity of the nitroimidazopyran PA-824 in a murine model of tuberculosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother, 2005. 49(6): p. 2289-93.
    1. Stover C.K., et al. , A small-molecule nitroimidazopyran drug candidate for the treatment of tuberculosis. Nature, 2000. 405(6789): p. 962-6.
    1. Diacon A.H., et al. , 14-day bactericidal activity of PA-824, bedaquiline, pyrazinamide, and moxifloxacin combinations: a randomised trial. Lancet, 2012. 380(9846): p. 986-93.
    1. Cherry C.L., et al. , Evaluation of a clinical screening tool for HIV-associated sensory neuropathies. Neurology, 2005. 65(11): p. 1778-81.
    1. DMID , Division of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, U.S. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; 2007.
    1. WHO , Technical Report on critical concentrations for drug susceptibility testing of medicines used in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis. 2018.
    1. Ismail N.A., et al. , Defining Bedaquiline Susceptibility, Resistance, Cross-Resistance and Associated Genetic Determinants: A Retrospective Cohort Study. EBioMedicine, 2018. 28: p. 136-142.
    1. WHO , Consolidated guidelines on drug-resistant tuberculosis treatment. Available from , 2019.
    1. Collaborative Group for the Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data in, M.D.R.T.B.t., et al. , Treatment correlates of successful outcomes in pulmonary multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: an individual patient data meta-analysis. Lancet, 2018. 392(10150): p. 821-834.
    1. Mbuagbaw L., et al. , Outcomes of Bedaquiline Treatment in Patients with Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis. Emerg Infect Dis, 2019. 25(5): p. 936-943.
    1. Olayanju O., et al. , Long-term bedaquiline-related treatment outcomes in patients with extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis from South Africa. Eur Respir J, 2018. 51(5).
    1. Nunn A.J., Phillips P.P., and Mitchison D.A., Timing of relapse in short-course chemotherapy trials for tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis, 2010. 14(2): p. 241-2.
    1. Gillespie S.H., et al. , Four-month moxifloxacin-based regimens for drug-sensitive tuberculosis. N Engl J Med, 2014. 371(17): p. 1577-87.
    1. Jindani A., et al. , High-dose rifapentine with moxifloxacin for pulmonary tuberculosis. N Engl J Med, 2014. 371(17): p. 1599-608.
    1. Merle C.S., et al. , A four-month gatifloxacin-containing regimen for treating tuberculosis. N Engl J Med, 2014. 371(17): p. 1588-98.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit