Intervention in the Timeliness of Two Electrocardiography Types for Patients in the Emergency Department With Chest Pain: Randomized Controlled Trial

Suyoung Yoo, Hansol Chang, Taerim Kim, Hee Yoon, Sung Yeon Hwang, Tae Gun Shin, Min Seob Sim, Ik Joon Jo, Jin-Ho Choi, Won Chul Cha, Suyoung Yoo, Hansol Chang, Taerim Kim, Hee Yoon, Sung Yeon Hwang, Tae Gun Shin, Min Seob Sim, Ik Joon Jo, Jin-Ho Choi, Won Chul Cha

Abstract

Background: In the emergency department (ED), the result obtained using the 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG) is the basis for diagnosing and treating patients with chest pain. It was found that performing ECG at the appropriate time could improve treatment outcomes. Hence, a wearable ECG device with a timer can ensure that the findings are continuously recorded.

Objective: We aimed to compare the time accuracy of a single-patch 12-lead ECG (SP-ECG) with that of conventional ECG (C-ECG). We hypothesized that SP-ECG would result in better time accuracy.

Methods: Adult patients who visited the emergency room with chest pain but were not in shock were randomly assigned to one of the following 2 groups: the SP-ECG group or the C-ECG group. The final analysis included 33 (92%) of the 36 patients recruited. The primary outcome was the comparison of the time taken by the 2 groups to record the ECG. The average ages of the participants in the SP-ECG and C-ECG groups were 63.7 (SD 18.4) and 58.1 (SD 12.4) years, respectively.

Results: With a power of 0.95 and effect sizes of 0.05 and 1.36, the minimum number of samples was calculated. The minimum sample size for each SP-ECG and C-ECG group is 15.36 participants, assuming a 20% dropout rate. As a result, 36 patients with chest pain participated, and 33 of them were analyzed. The timeliness of SP-ECG and C-ECG for the first follow-up ECG was 87.5% and 47.0%, respectively (P=.74). It was 75.0% and 35.2% at the second follow-up, respectively (P=.71).

Conclusions: Continuous ECG monitoring with minimal interference from other examinations is feasible and essential in complex ED situations. However, the precision of SP-ECG has not yet been proved. Nevertheless, the application of SP-ECG is expected to improve overcrowding and human resource shortages in EDs, though more research is needed.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04114760; https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT04114760.

Keywords: ECG; EKG; accuracy; angina; cardiac; cardiology; chest; diagnose; diagnosis; electrocardiogram; electrocardiography; emergency; emergency department; heart; imaging; pain; randomization; randomized; wireless technology.

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

©Suyoung Yoo, Hansol Chang, Taerim kim, Hee yoon, Sung Yeon Hwang, Tae Gun Shin, Min Seob Sim, Ik joon Jo, Jin-Ho Choi, Won Chul Cha. Originally published in the Interactive Journal of Medical Research (https://www.i-jmr.org/), 13.09.2022.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study protocol. C-ECG: conventional electrocardiography (ECG); SP-ECG: single-patch 12-lead ECG.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Design configuration. 1. Main socket: socket of the patch for performing 12-lead electrocardiography. 2. Single-patch–type electrode. LA: left arm; RA: right arm; RL: right leg; V1-V4: voltage1-voltage.
Figure 3
Figure 3
System architecture of the single-patch 12-lead electrocardiography (ECG). 8 ch DC: converts an amplified analog signal into a digital signal;amplifier: amplifies analog voltage obtained from the electrodes; digital signal processing: computes received digital signals as ECG signals through digital operations; display: converts output processed ECG data into a visualization graph; HPF (high-pass filter): eliminates low-frequency noise; LA: left arm; LL: left leg; LPF (low-pass filter): eliminates high-frequency noise; notch (notch filter): eliminates noise at a certain frequency, eliminates 60-Hz noise used for commercial power sources; RA: right arm; RL: right leg; storage: stores processed ECG data; V1-V4: voltage1-voltage4; WCT: Wilson’s Central Terminal.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Timing of electrocardiography measurements (gray areas indicate accurate time intervals). C-ECG: conventional electrocardiography (ECG); SP-ECG: single-patch 12-lead ECG.

References

    1. Birnbaum Y, Wilson JM, Fiol M, de Luna AB, Eskola M, Nikus K. ECG diagnosis and classification of acute coronary syndromes. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2014 Jan;19(1):4–14. doi: 10.1111/anec.12130.
    1. Zègre Hemsey JK, Drew BJ. Prehospital electrocardiography: a review of the literature. J Emerg Nurs. 2012 Jan;38(1):9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jen.2011.09.001. S0099-1767(11)00470-3
    1. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, Burri H, Butler J, Čelutkienė J, Chioncel O, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, Crespo-Leiro MG, Farmakis D, Gilard M, Heymans S, Hoes AW, Jaarsma T, Jankowska EA, Lainscak M, Lam CSP, Lyon AR, McMurray JJV, Mebazaa A, Mindham R, Muneretto C, Francesco Piepoli M, Price S, Rosano GMC, Ruschitzka F, Kathrine Skibelund A, ESC Scientific Document Group 2021 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2021 Sep 21;42(36):3599–3726. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368.6358045
    1. Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, Allen LA, Byun JJ, Colvin MM, Deswal A, Drazner MH, Dunlay SM, Evers LR, Fang JC, Fedson SE, Fonarow GC, Hayek SS, Hernandez AF, Khazanie P, Kittleson MM, Lee CS, Link MS, Milano CA, Nnacheta LC, Sandhu AT, Stevenson LW, Vardeny O, Vest AR, Yancy CW. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2022 May 03;145(18):e895–e1032. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001063. 5370218
    1. Mathews R, Peterson ED, Li S, Roe MT, Glickman SW, Wiviott SD, Saucedo JF, Antman EM, Jacobs AK, Wang TY. Use of emergency medical service transport among patients with ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2011 Jul 12;124(2):154–163. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.110.002345.
    1. Riley RF, McCabe JM. ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: challenges in diagnosis. US Cardiology Review. 2016;10(2):91–4. doi: 10.15420/usc.2016.
    1. Fesmire FM, Decker WW, Diercks DB, Ghaemmaghami CA, Nazarian D, Brady WJ, Hahn S, Jagoda AS, American College of Emergency Physicians Clinical Policies Subcommittee (Writing Committee) on Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med. 2006 Sep;48(3):270–301. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2006.07.005.S0196-0644(06)01011-0
    1. Karlson BW, Herlitz J, Wiklund O, Richter A, Hjalmarson A. Early prediction of acute myocardial infarction from clinical history, examination and electrocardiogram in the emergency room. The American Journal of Cardiology. 1991 Jul;68(2):171–175. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90739-8.
    1. McQueen M, Holder D, El-Maraghi N. Assessment of the accuracy of serial electrocardiograms in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. American Heart Journal. 1983 Feb;105(2):258–261. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(83)90524-0.
    1. Nowakowski JF. Use of cardiac enyzmes in the evaluation of acute chest pain. Annals of Emergency Medicine. 1986 Mar;15(3):354–360. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80584-4.
    1. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, Bates ER, Green LA, Hand M, Hochman JS, Krumholz HM, Kushner FG, Lamas GA, Mullany CJ, Ornato JP, Pearle DL, Sloan MA, Smith SC, Alpert JS, Anderson JL, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gibbons RJ, Gregoratos G, Halperin JL, Hiratzka LF, Hunt SA, Jacobs AK, American College of Cardiology. American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Canadian Cardiovascular Society ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction) Circulation. 2004 Aug 31;110(9):e82–292.110/9/e82
    1. Hong KJ, Shin SD, Song KJ, Cha WC, Cho JS. Association between ED crowding and delay in resuscitation effort. Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Mar;31(3):509–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2012.09.029.S0735-6757(12)00520-7
    1. Diercks DB, Kirk JD, Lindsell CJ, Pollack CV, Hoekstra JW, Gibler WB, Hollander JE. Door-to-ECG time in patients with chest pain presenting to the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;24(1):1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2005.05.016.S0735-6757(05)00274-3
    1. Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gøtzsche PC, Devereaux P, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG, Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials Group CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010 Aug;63(8):e1–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.004. S0895-4356(10)00103-4
    1. Townsend N, Wilson L, Bhatnagar P, Wickramasinghe K, Rayner M, Nichols M. Cardiovascular disease in Europe: epidemiological update 2016. Eur Heart J. 2016 Nov 07;37(42):3232–3245. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw334.ehw334
    1. Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, Califf RM, Cheitlin MD, Hochman JS, Jones RH, Kereiakes D, Kupersmith J, Levin TN, Pepine CJ, Schaeffer JW, Smith EE, Steward DE, Theroux P, Gibbons RJ, Alpert JS, Eagle KA, Faxon DP, Fuster V, Gardner TJ, Gregoratos G, Russell RO, Smith SC. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: executive summary and recommendations. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association task force on practice guidelines (committee on the management of patients with unstable angina) Circulation. 2000 Sep 05;102(10):1193–209. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.102.10.1193.
    1. Nemati E, Deen M, Mondal T. A wireless wearable ECG sensor for long-term applications. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2012 Jan;50(1):36–43. doi: 10.1109/mcom.2012.6122530.
    1. Ouellette L, VanDePol E, Chassee T, Tavares E, Flannigan M, Jones J. Emergency department electrocardiogram images sent through the mobile phone: Feasibility and accuracy. Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Apr;36(4):731–732. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.09.010.S0735-6757(17)30736-2

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit