Simplified routines in prescribing physical activity can increase the amount of prescriptions by doctors, more than economic incentives only: an observational intervention study

Gerthi Persson, Ingvar Ovhed, Eva Ekvall Hansson, Gerthi Persson, Ingvar Ovhed, Eva Ekvall Hansson

Abstract

Background: Physical inactivity is one well-known risk factor related to disease. Physical activity on prescription (PAP) has been shown in some studies to be a successful intervention for increasing physical activity among patients with a sedentary lifestyle. The method involves motivational counselling that can be time-consuming for the prescribing doctor and might be a reason why physical activity on prescription is not used more frequently. This study might show a way to make the method of prescribing physical activity more user-friendly. The purpose is to determine whether a change in procedures increases the use of physical activity on prescription, and thus the aim of this study is to describe the methodology used.

Results: The observational intervention study included an intervention group consisting of one Primary Health Care (PHC) clinic and a control group consisting of six PHC clinics serving 149,400 inhabitants in the County of Blekinge, Sweden.An economic incentive was introduced in both groups when prescribing physical activity on prescription. In the intervention group, a change was made to the process of prescribing physical activity, together with information and guidance to the personnel working at the clinics. Physical therapists were used in the process of carrying out the prescription, conducting the motivational interview and counselling the patient. This methodology was used to minimise the workload of the physician. The chi-2 test was used for studying differences between the two groups. PAP prescribed by doctors increased eightfold in the intervention group compared to the control group. The greatest increase of PAP was seen among physicians in the intervention group as compared to all other professionals in the control group. The economic incentive gave a significant but smaller increase of PAP by doctors.

Conclusion: By simplifying and developing PAP, this study has shown a concrete way to increase the implementation of physical activity on prescription in general practice, as opposed to what can be gained by an economic bonus system alone. This study indicates that a bonus system may not be enough to implement an evidence-based method.

References

    1. The Health and Medical Service Act (1982:763) (pdf 198 kB) 1982.
    1. National Institute of Public Health, Stockholm (1997) Determinants of the Burden of Disease in the European Union. Stockholm: NIPH. 1997.
    1. World Health Organization. The world health report 2002: Reducing risks, promoting healthy life. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.
    1. Rollnick S, Miller WR, Butler C. Motivational interviewing in health care: helping patients change behavior. New York: Guilford Press; 2008.
    1. Rome A, Persson U, Ekdahl C, Gard G. Physical activity on prescription (PAP): costs and consequences of a randomized, controlled trial in primary healthcare. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2009;27(4):216–222. doi: 10.3109/02813430903438734.
    1. Hosper K, Deutekom M, Stronks PK. The effectiveness of "Exercise on Prescription" in stimulating physical activity among women in ethnic minority groups in the Netherlands: protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:406. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-406.
    1. Bredahl TV, Puggaard L, Roessler KK. Exercise on Prescription. Effect of attendance on participants' psychological factors in a Danish version of Exercise on Prescription: a study protocol. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008;8:139. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-139.
    1. Yrkesföreningarna för fysisk aktivitet. FYSS 2008: fysisk aktivitet i sjukdomsprevention och sjukdomsbehandling [Physical activity in prevention and treatment of disease] Stockholm: Statens folkhälsoinstitut[The Swedish National Institute of Public Health]; 2008.
    1. Leijon M, Jacobson M. Fysisk aktivitet på recept-fungerar det? En utvärdering av Östgötamodellen [Physical activity on prescription- does it work? An evaluation of the model from Östergötland] Linköping, Sweden: Folkhälsovetenskapligt centrum i Östergötland; 2006.
    1. Hagberg LA, Lindholm L. Cost-effectiveness of healthcare-based interventions aimed at improving physical activity. Scand J Public Health. 2006;34(6):641–653. doi: 10.1080/14034940600627853.
    1. Cobiac LJ, Vos T, Barendregt JJ. Cost-effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity: a modelling study. PLoS Medicine/Public Library of Science. 2009;6(7):e1000110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000110.
    1. United States Public Health Service. Office of the Surgeon General National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion President's Council on Physical Fitness and Sports (U.S.) Boston: Jones and Bartlett Publishers; 1998. Physical activity and health : A report of the surgeon general.
    1. The National Institute of Public Health. Folkhälsopolitisk rapport.2005 [Public Health political report 2005] Stockholm: Statens folkhälsoinstitut; 2005.
    1. Engström LM. Motionsvanor i förändring[Exercise habits in change] Svensk Idrottsforskning. 1997;6(3):10–5.
    1. Kallings LV, Leijon M, Hellenius ML, Stahle A. Physical activity on prescription in primary health care: a follow-up of physical activity level and quality of life. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2008;18(2):154–161. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2007.00678.x.
    1. Leijon M. Activating people: physical activity in the general population and referral schemes among primary health care patients in a Swedish county. 2009.
    1. Ovhed I. Effects of different methods of giving up smoking used in general practice. Lakartidningen. 1980;77(39):3406–3408.
    1. Wemme M. Utvärdering av "Sätt sydvästra Skåne i rörelse", del 1[Evaluation of "Set the southwest region of Skåne in motion", part 1] Malmö, Sweden: Socialmedicinska enheten, Region Skåne, Universitetssjukhuset MAS, Department of Social Medicine, County of Skåne Malmö University Hospital; 2003.
    1. Poskiparta M, Kasila K, Kiuru P. Dietary and physical activity counselling on type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose tolerance by physicians and nurses in primary healthcare in Finland. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2006;24(4):206–210. doi: 10.1080/02813430600866463.
    1. SBU Statens beredning för medicinsk utvärdering. Metoder för att främja fysisk aktivitet: en systematisk litteraturöversikt [Methods of promoting physical activity: a systematic review] Stockholm: SBU[The Swedish Council on Technology Assessment in Health Care]; 2007.
    1. Harrison RA, McNair F, Dugdill L. Access to exercise referral schemes -- a population based analysis. J Public Health (Oxf) 2005;27(4):326–330. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdi048.
    1. Lawlor DA, Hanratty B. The effect of physical activity advice given in routine primary care consultations: a systematic review. J Public Health Med. 2001;23(3):219–226. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/23.3.219.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit