Design of Effisayil™ 2: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Spesolimab in Preventing Flares in Patients with Generalized Pustular Psoriasis

Akimichi Morita, Siew Eng Choon, Hervé Bachelez, Milan J Anadkat, Slaheddine Marrakchi, Min Zheng, Tsen-Fang Tsai, Hamida Turki, Harry Hua, Sushmita Rajeswari, Christian Thoma, A David Burden, Akimichi Morita, Siew Eng Choon, Hervé Bachelez, Milan J Anadkat, Slaheddine Marrakchi, Min Zheng, Tsen-Fang Tsai, Hamida Turki, Harry Hua, Sushmita Rajeswari, Christian Thoma, A David Burden

Abstract

Introduction: Generalized pustular psoriasis (GPP) is a rare autoinflammatory skin disease characterized by flares of widespread erythema with sterile pustules, and can be relapsing with recurrent flares, or persistent with intermittent flares. Spesolimab, a humanized anti-interleukin-36 (IL-36) receptor monoclonal antibody, targets the key IL-36 pathogenetic pathway in GPP. A previous study showed that spesolimab treatment led to rapid pustular and skin clearance in patients with GPP flares, which was sustained for up to 12 weeks. This study investigates the long-term effects of spesolimab on GPP flares, for which no specific treatments are currently available. The Effisayil™ 2 study will assess whether maintenance treatment with subcutaneous spesolimab prevents the occurrence of GPP flares and determine the optimal dosing regimen to achieve this aim.

Methods: Patients will have a documented history of GPP with a Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment (GPPGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear) at screening and randomization. Patients will be randomized 1:1:1:1 to three groups receiving a 600-mg subcutaneous loading dose of spesolimab followed by a 300-mg maintenance dose administered every 4 or 12 weeks, or a 300-mg loading dose followed by a 150-mg maintenance dose administered every 12 weeks, and one group receiving placebo, for 48 weeks. The primary endpoint is time to first GPP flare. If a patient experiences a GPP flare during the randomized maintenance treatment period, an open-label intravenous dose of 900-mg spesolimab will be administered, with an option for a second intravenous dose after 1 week.

Conclusions: Effisayil™ 2 is the first placebo-controlled study in patients with GPP to investigate whether maintenance treatment with spesolimab can prevent flares and provide sustained disease control. This study will provide valuable insights on the long-term management of patients with this potentially life-threatening skin disease.

Trial registration number: NCT04399837.

Keywords: Biologics; Clinical trials; Generalized pustular psoriasis; Immunomodulatory therapies; Inflammatory skin diseases; Spesolimab.

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Overall study design, with loading and maintenance phase treatment arms, and handling of GPP flares during the randomized maintenance treatment period. *GPP flare defined as an increase in GPPGA total score of ≥ 2 from baseline and the pustular component of GPPGA of ≥ 2. †Administered 1 week after initial treatment with OL spesolimab in response to a GPP flare if patients meet qualifying criteria: for patients with GPPGA total score of ≥ 3 and a pustular component of GPPGA of ≥ 2 at baseline, if the GPPGA total score is ≥ 2 and the pustular component of GPPGA is ≥ 2; and for patients with GPPGA total score of 2 and a pustular component of GPPGA of ≥ 2 at baseline, if the pustular component of GPPGA is ≥ 2. ‡12 weeks after initial treatment with OL spesolimab in response to a GPP flare. §Other medication for GPP may be prescribed, but intensified spesolimab maintenance should be attempted first. ¶Patients may be treated with other medication for GPP at the investigator’s discretion, but the patient will be discontinued from any further study drug. GPP generalized pustular psoriasis, GPPGA Generalized Pustular Psoriasis Physician Global Assessment, IV intravenous, LD loading dose, OL open-label, OLE open-label extension, q4w every 4 weeks, q12w every 12 weeks, R randomization, SC subcutaneous

References

    1. Choon SE, Lai NM, Mohammad NA, Nanu NM, Tey KE, Chew SF. Clinical profile, morbidity, and outcome of adult-onset generalized pustular psoriasis: analysis of 102 cases seen in a tertiary hospital in Johor, Malaysia. Int J Dermatol. 2014;53(6):676–684. doi: 10.1111/ijd.12070.
    1. Fujita H, Terui T, Hayama K, Akiyama M, Ikeda S, Mabuchi T, et al. Japanese guidelines for the management and treatment of generalized pustular psoriasis: the new pathogenesis and treatment of GPP. J Dermatol. 2018;45(11):1235–1270. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.14523.
    1. Navarini AA, Burden AD, Capon F, Mrowietz U, Puig L, Köks S, et al. European consensus statement on phenotypes of pustular psoriasis. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(11):1792–1799. doi: 10.1111/jdv.14386.
    1. Komine M, Morita A. Generalized pustular psoriasis: current management status and unmet medical needs in Japan. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2021;17(9):1015–1027. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2021.1961580.
    1. Bachelez H. Pustular psoriasis: the dawn of a new era. Acta Derm Venereol. 2020;100(3):adv00034. doi: 10.2340/00015555-3388.
    1. Kromer C, Loewe E, Schaarschmidt ML, Pinter A, Gerdes S, Herr R, et al. Drug survival in the treatment of generalized pustular psoriasis: a retrospective multicenter study. Dermatol Ther. 2021;34(2):e14814. doi: 10.1111/dth.14814.
    1. Okubo Y, Kotowsky N, Gao R, Saito K, Morita A. Clinical characteristics and health-care resource utilization in patients with generalized pustular psoriasis using real-world evidence from the Japanese Medical Data Center Database. J Dermatol. 2021;48(11):1675–1687. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.16084.
    1. Gooderham MJ, Van Voorhees AS, Lebwohl MG. An update on generalized pustular psoriasis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2019;15(9):907–919. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2019.1648209.
    1. Takeichi T, Akiyama M. Generalized pustular psoriasis: clinical management and update on autoinflammatory aspects. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020;21(2):227–236. doi: 10.1007/s40257-019-00492-0.
    1. Thailand Food and Drug Administration. LUMICEF Summary of Product Characteristics 2019 [Available from: .
    1. Taiwan Center for Drug Evaluation. Lumicef subcutaneous injection 210 mg syringe 2019 [Available from: .
    1. Morita A, Kotowsky N, Gao R, Shimizu R, Okubo Y. Patient characteristics and burden of disease in Japanese patients with generalized pustular psoriasis: results from the Medical Data Vision claims database. J Dermatol. 2021;48(10):1463–1473. doi: 10.1111/1346-8138.16022.
    1. Strober B, Kotowsky N, Medeiros R, Mackey RH, Harrold LR, Valdecantos WC, et al. Unmet medical needs in the treatment and management of generalized pustular psoriasis flares: evidence from a survey of Corrona Registry Dermatologists. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2021;11(2):529–541. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00493-0.
    1. Bachelez H, Choon SE, Marrakchi S, Burden AD, Tsai TF, Morita A, et al. Inhibition of the interleukin-36 pathway for the treatment of generalized pustular psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(10):981–983. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1811317.
    1. Bachelez H, Choon SE, Marrakchi S, Burden AD, Tsai TF, Morita A, et al. Trial of spesolimab for generalized pustular psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2021;385(26):2431–2440. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2111563.
    1. US FDA approves first treatment option for generalized pustular psoriasis flares in adults 2022. Available from: .
    1. Choon SE, Lebwohl MG, Marrakchi S, Burden AD, Tsai TF, Morita A, et al. Study protocol of the global Effisayil 1 Phase II, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of spesolimab in patients with generalized pustular psoriasis presenting with an acute flare. BMJ Open. 2021;11(3):e043666. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043666.
    1. Kharawala S, Golembesky AK, Bohn RL, Esser D. The clinical, humanistic, and economic burden of generalized pustular psoriasis: a structured review. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2020;16(3):239–252. doi: 10.1080/1744666X.2019.1708193.
    1. Mercieca-Bebber R, King MT, Calvert MJ, Stockler MR, Friedlander M. The importance of patient-reported outcomes in clinical trials and strategies for future optimization. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2018;9:353–367. doi: 10.2147/PROM.S156279.
    1. Feldman SR, Regnier SA, Chirilov A, Hey F, Gilloteau I, Cella D. Patient-reported outcomes are important elements of psoriasis treatment decision making: a discrete choice experiment survey of dermatologists in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019;80(6):1650–1657. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2019.01.039.
    1. Anderson KC, Landgren O, Arend RC, Chou J, Jacobs IA. Humanistic and economic impact of subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of oncology biologics. Future Oncol. 2019;15(28):3267–3281. doi: 10.2217/fon-2019-0368.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit