Belatacept and Long-Term Outcomes in Kidney Transplantation
Flavio Vincenti, Lionel Rostaing, Joseph Grinyo, Kim Rice, Steven Steinberg, Luis Gaite, Marie-Christine Moal, Guillermo A Mondragon-Ramirez, Jatin Kothari, Martin S Polinsky, Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche, Stephane Munier, Christian P Larsen, Flavio Vincenti, Lionel Rostaing, Joseph Grinyo, Kim Rice, Steven Steinberg, Luis Gaite, Marie-Christine Moal, Guillermo A Mondragon-Ramirez, Jatin Kothari, Martin S Polinsky, Herwig-Ulf Meier-Kriesche, Stephane Munier, Christian P Larsen
Abstract
Background: In previous analyses of BENEFIT, a phase 3 study, belatacept-based immunosuppression, as compared with cyclosporine-based immunosuppression, was associated with similar patient and graft survival and significantly improved renal function in kidney-transplant recipients. Here we present the final results from this study.
Methods: We randomly assigned kidney-transplant recipients to a more-intensive belatacept regimen, a less-intensive belatacept regimen, or a cyclosporine regimen. Efficacy and safety outcomes for all patients who underwent randomization and transplantation were analyzed at year 7 (month 84).
Results: A total of 666 participants were randomly assigned to a study group and underwent transplantation. Of the 660 patients who were treated, 153 of the 219 patients treated with the more-intensive belatacept regimen, 163 of the 226 treated with the less-intensive belatacept regimen, and 131 of the 215 treated with the cyclosporine regimen were followed for the full 84-month period; all available data were used in the analysis. A 43% reduction in the risk of death or graft loss was observed for both the more-intensive and the less-intensive belatacept regimens as compared with the cyclosporine regimen (hazard ratio with the more-intensive regimen, 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35 to 0.95; P=0.02; hazard ratio with the less-intensive regimen, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.94; P=0.02), with equal contributions from the lower rates of death and graft loss. The mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) increased over the 7-year period with both belatacept regimens but declined with the cyclosporine regimen. The cumulative frequencies of serious adverse events at month 84 were similar across treatment groups.
Conclusions: Seven years after transplantation, patient and graft survival and the mean eGFR were significantly higher with belatacept (both the more-intensive regimen and the less-intensive regimen) than with cyclosporine. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00256750.).
Source: PubMed