Comparison of low back fusion techniques: transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) or posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) approaches

Chad D Cole, Todd D McCall, Meic H Schmidt, Andrew T Dailey, Chad D Cole, Todd D McCall, Meic H Schmidt, Andrew T Dailey

Abstract

The authors review and compare posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). A review of the literature is performed wherein the history, indications for surgery, surgical procedures with their respective biomechanical advantages, potential complications, and grafting substances are presented. Along with the technical advancements and improvements in grafting substances, the indications and use of PLIF and TLIF have increased. The rate of arthrodesis has been shown to increase given placement of bone graft along the weight-bearing axis. The fusion rate across the disc space is further enhanced with the placement of posterior pedicle screw-rod constructs and the application of an osteoinductive material. The chief advantages of the TLIF procedure compared with the PLIF procedure included a decrease in potential neurological injury, improvement in lordotic alignment given graft placement within the anterior column, and preservation of posterior column integrity through minimizing lamina, facet, and pars dissection.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Schematic representation of lumbar spine demonstrating the area of bony removal and route of access to the intervertebral body space. (Top) Medial box represents area and access for the PLIF procedure; (bottom) lateral box represents area and access for the TLIF procedure
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic representation of lumbar spine demonstrating the angle of interbody graft insertion for the PLIF procedure (top, medial) and TLIF procedure (bottom, lateral)

References

    1. Resnick DK, Choudhri TF, Dailey AT, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 8: lumbar fusion for disc herniation and radiculopathy. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2:673–678. doi: 10.3171/spi.2005.2.6.0673.
    1. Davis H. Increasing rates of cervical and lumbar spine surgery in the United States, 1979–1990. Spine. 1994;19:1117–1123. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199405001-00003.
    1. Resnick DK, Choudhri TF, Dailey AT, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 1: introduction and methodology. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2:637–638. doi: 10.3171/spi.2005.2.6.0637.
    1. Briggs H, Milligan P. Chip fusion of the low back following exploration of the spinal canal. J Bone Joint Surg. 1944;26:125–130.
    1. Jaslow I. Intracorporeal bone graft in spinal fusion after disc removal. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1946;82:215–222.
    1. Cloward RB. The treatment of ruptured lumbar intervertebral discs by vertebral body fusion. I. Indications, operative technique, after care. J Neurosurg. 1953;10:154–168. doi: 10.3171/jns.1953.10.2.0154.
    1. Cloward RB. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion updated. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;193:16–9.
    1. Collis JS. Total disc replacement: a modified posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Report of 750 cases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;193:64–7.
    1. Fraser RD. Interbody, posterior, and combined lumbar fusions. Spine. 1995;20:167S–177S. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199512151-00016.
    1. Hutter CG. Posterior intervertebral body fusion. A 25-year study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1983;179:86–96.
    1. Lee CK, Vessa P, Lee JK. Chronic disabling low back pain syndrome caused by internal disc derangements. The results of disc excision and posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine. 1995;20:356–361.
    1. Lin PM. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion technique: complications and pitfalls. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;193:90–102.
    1. Prolo DJ, Oklund SA, Butcher M. Toward uniformity in evaluating results of lumbar spine operations. A paradigm applied to posterior lumbar interbody fusions. Spine. 1986;11:601–606. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198607000-00012.
    1. Steffee AD, Sitkowski DJ. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion and plates. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1988;227:99–102.
    1. Turner JA, Ersek M, Herron L, et al. Patient outcomes after lumbar spinal fusions. JAMA. 1992;268:907–911. doi: 10.1001/jama.268.7.907.
    1. Brantigan JW, Steffee AD, Geiger JM. A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Mechanical testing. Spine. 1991;16:S277–S282. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199106001-00020.
    1. Ray CD. Threaded titanium cages for lumbar interbody fusions. Spine. 1997;22:667–679. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199703150-00019.
    1. DeBowes RM, Grant BD, Bagby GW, et al. Cervical vertebral interbody fusion in the horse: a comparative study of bovine xenografts and autografts supported by stainless steel baskets. Am J Vet Res. 1984;45:191–199.
    1. Wagner P, Grant B, Bagby G. Evaluation of cervical spinal fusion as a treatment in the equine “wobbler” syndrome. Vet Surg. 1979;8:84–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-950X.1979.tb00614.x.
    1. Bagby GW. Arthrodesis by the distraction-compression method using a stainless steel implant. Orthopedics. 1988;11:931–934.
    1. Butts M, Kuslick S, Bechtold J. Biomechanical analysis of a new method for spinal interbody fusion. Boston, MA: American Society of Mechanical Engineers; 1987.
    1. Bagby G. The Bagby and Kuslich (BAK) method of lumbar interbody fusion. Spine. 1999;24:1857. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199909010-00019.
    1. Branch CL, Branch CL., Jr Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with the keystone graft: technique and results. Surg Neurol. 1987;27:449–454. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(87)90252-7.
    1. Hutter CG. Spinal stenosis and posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;193:103–14.
    1. Simmons JW. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion with posterior elements as chip grafts. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;193:85–9.
    1. Wiltberger BR. Intervertebral body fusion by the use of posterior bone dowel. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1964;35:69–79.
    1. Brodke DS, Dick JC, Kunz DN, et al. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion. A biomechanical comparison, including a new threaded cage. Spine. 1997;22:26–31. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199701010-00005.
    1. Barnes B, Rodts GE, Jr, Haid RW, Jr, et al. Allograft implants for posterior lumbar interbody fusion: results comparing cylindrical dowels and impacted wedges. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:1191–1198. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200211000-00014.
    1. Freeman BJ, Licina P, Mehdian SH. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion combined with instrumented postero-lateral fusion: 5-year results in 60 patients. Eur Spine J. 2000;9:42–46. doi: 10.1007/s005860050007.
    1. Harms J, Rolinger H. A one-stager procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses: dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion (author’s transl) Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1982;120:343–347. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1051624.
    1. Mummaneni PV, Haid RW, Rodts GE. Lumbar interbody fusion: state-of-the-art technical advances. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004;1:24–30. doi: 10.3171/spi.2004.1.1.0024.
    1. Resnick DK, Choudhri TF, Dailey AT, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 9: fusion in patients with stenosis and spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2:679–685. doi: 10.3171/spi.2005.2.6.0679.
    1. Resnick DK, Choudhri TF, Dailey AT, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 10: fusion following decompression in patients with stenosis without spondylolisthesis. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2:686–691. doi: 10.3171/spi.2005.2.6.0686.
    1. Zdeblick TA. The treatment of degenerative lumbar disorders. A critical review of the literature. Spine. 1995;20:126S–137S. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199512151-00009.
    1. Esses SI, Botsford DJ, Kostuik JP. The role of external spinal skeletal fixation in the assessment of low-back disorders. Spine. 1989;14:594–601. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198906000-00009.
    1. Stokes IA, Frymoyer JW. Segmental motion and instability. Spine. 1987;12:688–691. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198709000-00009.
    1. Wetzel FT, LaRocca SH, Lowery GL, et al. The treatment of lumbar spinal pain syndromes diagnosed by discography. Lumbar arthrodesis. Spine. 1994;19:792–800. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199404000-00012.
    1. Mooney V, Robertson J. The facet syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1976;115:149–56.
    1. Kuslich SD, Ulstrom CL, Michael CJ. The tissue origin of low back pain and sciatica: a report of pain response to tissue stimulation during operations on the lumbar spine using local anesthesia. Orthop Clin North Am. 1991;22:181–187.
    1. McCarron RF, Wimpee MW, Hudkins PG, et al. The inflammatory effect of nucleus pulposus. A possible element in the pathogenesis of low-back pain. Spine. 1987;12:760–764. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198710000-00009.
    1. Olmarker K, Rydevik B, Nordborg C. Autologous nucleus pulposus induces neurophysiologic and histologic changes in porcine cauda equina nerve roots. Spine. 1993;18:1425–1432. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199318110-00005.
    1. Greenough CG, Fraser RD. The effects of compensation on recovery from low-back injury. Spine. 1989;14:947–955. doi: 10.1097/00007632-198909000-00006.
    1. Deyo RA, Cherkin D, Conrad D, et al. Cost, controversy, crisis: low back pain and the health of the public. Annu Rev Public Health. 1991;12:141–156. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pu.12.050191.001041.
    1. Frymoyer JW, Pope MH, Clements JH, et al. Risk factors in low-back pain. An epidemiological survey. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983;65:213–218.
    1. Khoo LT, Palmer S, Laich DT, et al. Minimally invasive percutaneous posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurosurgery. 2002;51:S166–81.
    1. Rosenberg WS, Mummaneni PV. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: technique, complications, and early results. Neurosurgery. 2001;48:569–574. doi: 10.1097/00006123-200103000-00022.
    1. Grob D, Scheier HJ, Dvorak J, et al. Circumferential fusion of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1991;111:20–25. doi: 10.1007/BF00390187.
    1. Kim SS, Denis F, Lonstein JE, et al. Factors affecting fusion rate in adult spondylolisthesis. Spine. 1990;15:979–984. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199009000-00026.
    1. Kozak JA, O’Brien JP. Simultaneous combined anterior and posterior fusion. An independent analysis of a treatment for the disabled low-back pain patient. Spine. 1990;15:322–328. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199004000-00014.
    1. Slosar PJ, Reynolds JB, Schofferman J, et al. Patient satisfaction after circumferential lumbar fusion. Spine. 2000;25:722–726. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200003150-00012.
    1. Enker P, Steffee AD. Interbody fusion and instrumentation. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994;300:90–101.
    1. Gertzbein SD, Hollopeter MR, Hall S. Pseudarthrosis of the lumbar spine. Outcome after circumferential fusion. Spine. 1998;23:2352–2356. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199811010-00021.
    1. Ames CP, Acosta FL, Jr, Chi J, et al. Biomechanical comparison of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion performed at 1 and 2 levels. Spine. 2005;30:E562–E566. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000180505.80347.b1.
    1. Salehi SA, Tawk R, Ganju A, et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: surgical technique and results in 24 patients. Neurosurgery. 2004;54:368–374. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000103493.25162.18.
    1. Blume HG. Unilateral posterior lumbar interbody fusion: simplified dowel technique. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;193:75–84.
    1. Evans JH. Biomechanics of lumbar fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1985;193:38–46.
    1. Branch CL., Jr The case for posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Clin Neurosurg. 1996;43:252–267.
    1. Krishna M, Pollock RD, Bhatia C. Incidence, etiology, classification, and management of neuralgia after posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery in 226 patients. Spine J. 2008;8:374–379. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.09.004.
    1. Sears W. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis: restoration of sagittal balance using insert-and-rotate interbody spacers. Spine J. 2005;5:170–179. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2004.05.257.
    1. Gerber M, Crawford NR, Chamberlain RH, et al. Biomechanical assessment of anterior lumbar interbody fusion with an anterior lumbosacral fixation screw–plate: comparison to stand-alone anterior lumbar interbody fusion and anterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screws in an unstable human cadaver model. Spine. 2006;31:762–768. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000206360.83728.d2.
    1. Maghout Juratli S, Franklin GM, Mirza SK, et al. Lumbar fusion outcomes in Washington State workers’ compensation. Spine. 2006;31:2715–2723. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000244589.13674.11.
    1. Weiner BK, Fraser RD. Spine update lumbar interbody cages. Spine. 1998;23:634–640. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199803010-00020.
    1. Wang ST, Goel VK, Fu CY, et al. Comparison of two interbody fusion cages for posterior lumbar interbody fusion in a cadaveric model. Int Orthop. 2006;30:299–304. doi: 10.1007/s00264-006-0076-0.
    1. Brantigan JW, Steffee AD. A carbon fiber implant to aid interbody lumbar fusion. Two-year clinical results in the first 26 patients. Spine. 1993;18:2106–2107.
    1. Vadapalli S, Sairyo K, Goel VK, et al. Biomechanical rationale for using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) spacers for lumbar interbody fusion-A finite element study. Spine. 2006;31:E992–E998. doi: 10.1097/.
    1. Jost B, Cripton PA, Lund T, et al. Compressive strength of interbody cages in the lumbar spine: the effect of cage shape, posterior instrumentation and bone density. Eur Spine J. 1998;7:132–141. doi: 10.1007/s005860050043.
    1. Humphreys SC, Hodges SD, Patwardhan AG, et al. Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion. Spine. 2001;26:567–571. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200103010-00023.
    1. Lowe TG, Coe JD. Resorbable polymer implants in unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg. 2002;97:464–467.
    1. Gibson S, McLeod I, Wardlaw D, et al. Allograft versus autograft in instrumented posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion: a randomized control trial. Spine. 2002;27:1599–1603. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200208010-00002.
    1. Mummaneni PV, Pan J, Haid RW, et al. Contribution of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 to the rapid creation of interbody fusion when used in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a preliminary report. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine. 2004;1:19–23. doi: 10.3171/spi.2004.1.1.0019.
    1. Alexander JT, Branch CL, Jr, Subach BR, et al. Applications of a resorbable interbody spacer in posterior lumbar interbody fusion. J Neurosurg. 2002;97:468–472.
    1. Resnick DK, Choudhri TF, Dailey AT, et al. Guidelines for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 16: bone graft extenders and substitutes. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;2:733–736. doi: 10.3171/spi.2005.2.6.0733.
    1. Burkus JK, Heim SE, Gornet MF, et al. Is INFUSE bone graft superior to autograft bone? An integrated analysis of clinical trials using the LT-CAGE lumbar tapered fusion device. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16:113–122.
    1. Boden SD, Kang J, Sandhu H, et al. Use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 to achieve posterolateral lumbar spine fusion in humans: a prospective, randomized clinical pilot trial: 2002 Volvo Award in clinical studies. Spine. 2002;27:2662–2673. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200212010-00005.
    1. Kasai Y, Takegami K, Uchida A. Mixture ratios of local bone to artificial bone in lumbar posterolateral fusion. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2003;16:31–37.
    1. Linovitz RJ, Peppers TA. Use of an advanced formulation of beta-tricalcium phosphate as a bone extender in interbody lumbar fusion. Orthopedics. 2002;25:s585–s589.
    1. Thalgott JS, Giuffre JM, Fritts K, et al. Instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion using coralline hydroxyapatite with or without demineralized bone matrix, as an adjunct to autologous bone. Spine J. 2001;1:131–137. doi: 10.1016/S1529-9430(01)00011-0.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit