New developments in the treatment of actinic keratosis: focus on ingenol mebutate gel

Brian Berman, Brian Berman

Abstract

Actinic keratosis is a common disease in older, fair-skinned people, and is a consequence of cumulative ultraviolet exposure. It is part of a disease continuum in photodamaged skin that may lead to invasive squamous cell carcinoma. Treatment options frequently used include cryosurgery and topical pharmacologic agents, which are examples of lesion-directed and field-directed strategies. Ingenol mebutate gel was recently approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for topical treatment of actinic keratosis. While the mechanism of action of ingenol mebutate is not fully understood, in vitro and in vivo studies using tumor models indicate it has multiple mechanisms. Ingenol mebutate directly induces cell death by mitochondrial swelling and loss of cell membrane integrity preferentially in transformed keratinocytes. It promotes an inflammatory response characterized by infiltration of neutrophils and other immunocompetent cells that kills remaining tumor cells. The ability of ingenol mebutate to eliminate mutant p53 patches in ultraviolet-irradiated mouse skin suggests that it may have the potential to treat chronically ultraviolet-damaged skin. In human studies, ingenol mebutate achieved high clearance of actinic keratosis on the head and body after 2-3 consecutive daily treatments when measured by complete or partial clearance of lesions. Localized inflammatory skin responses were generally mild to moderate and resolved in less than a month.

Keywords: actinic keratosis; field therapy; ingenol mebutate gel; nonmelanoma skin cancer; protein kinase C delta.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Chemical structure of ingenol mebutate, C25H34O6.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic model of proposed mechanisms of ingenol mebutate. (A) Ingenol mebutate penetrates skin in a gradient-dependent manner whereby it preferentially induces death in proliferating undifferentiated cells by increases in intracellular calcium, mitochondrial swelling, and loss of cell membrane integrity. (B) Cell death and protein kinase C activation lead to an inflammatory activation of the treated field. Ingenol mebutate increases local production of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and interleukin-8, which recruit and activate neutrophils, and directly activate endothelial cell expression of the adhesion receptors E-selectin and intercellular adhesion molecule-1.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Treatment of skin in ultraviolet B–irradiated SKH1/hr mice with ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel reduced the number of skin lesions and mutant p53 patches that subsequently developed compared with placebo and no treatment. After 30 doses of ultraviolet B radiation, mice were untreated (control) or treated with placebo gel or ingenol mebutate 0.05% gel on days 0 and 2. (A) Representative mice from ingenol mebutate, placebo, and control groups taken at 21 weeks after treatment initiation. (B) The number of mutant p53 patches analyzed by immunohistochemistry in the skin of ultraviolet B–irradiated mice. Each symbol represents an individual mouse, and bars indicate the mean ± standard error of the mean. Copyright © 2012. Nature Publishing Group. Reprinted with permission from Cozzi SJ, Ogbourne SM, James C, et al. Ingenol mebutate field-directed treatment of UVB-damaged skin reduces lesion formation and removes mutant p53 patches. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132(4):1263–1271.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Time course of mean (± standard error of the mean) composite score for local skin reactions from pooled analyses at each study visit. Copyright © 2012. Massachusetts Medical Society. Reprinted with permission from Massachusetts Medical Society from Lebwohl M, Swanson N, Anderson LL, Melgaard A, Xu Z, Berman B. Ingenol mebutate gel for actinic keratosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(11):1010–1019. Abbreviation: LSR, local skin reaction.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Clinical photographs of three patients. Photographs were taken at screening, before treatment on day 1, and on days 3 or 4 (one day after last treatment), 8, 15, 29, and 57. The composite local skin reaction score was calculated at each visit. (A) Forehead lesions. Intermediate peak composite local skin reaction score (10) on day 4 returned to baseline by day 29. (B) Forehead lesions. High peak composite local skin reaction score (19) on day 4 returned to baseline by day 57. (C) Arm lesions. Intermediate peak composite local skin reaction score (12) on day 3 returned to baseline by day 57. Data on file. Clinical study reports PEP005-016 and PEP005-028. Parsippany, NJ: LEO Pharma Inc.; 2010. Abbreviation: LSR, local skin reaction.

References

    1. Drake LA, Ceilley RI, Cornelison RL, et al. Guidelines of care for actinic keratoses. Committee on Guidelines of Care. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;32(1):95–98.
    1. Society for Investigative Dermatology, American Academy of Dermatology Association. The burden of skin diseases, 2005. Available from: . Accessed March 12, 2012.
    1. Cockerell CJ, Wharton JR. New histopathological classification of actinic keratosis (incipient intraepidermal squamous cell carcinoma) J Drugs Dermatol. 2005;4(4):462–467.
    1. Berman B, Bienstock L, Kuritzky L, Mayeaux EJ, Jr, Tyring SK. Actinic keratoses: sequelae and treatments. Recommendations from a consensus panel. J Fam Pract. 2006 May;55(Suppl 5):1–8.
    1. Schwartz RA. The actinic keratosis. A perspective and update. Dermatol Surg. 1997;23(11):1009–1019.
    1. Einspahr JG, Alberts DS, Warneke JA, et al. Relationship of p53 mutations to epidermal cell proliferation and apoptosis in human UV-induced skin carcinogenesis. Neoplasia. 1999;1(5):468–475.
    1. Toll A, Salgado R, Yebenes M, et al. MYC gene numerical aberrations in actinic keratosis and cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Br J Dermatol. 2009;161(5):1112–1118.
    1. Toll A, Salgado R, Yebenes M, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor gene numerical aberrations are frequent events in actinic keratoses and invasive cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas. Exp Dermatol. 2010;19(2):151–153.
    1. Kanellou P, Zaravinos A, Zioga M, et al. Genomic instability, mutations and expression analysis of the tumour suppressor genes p14ARF, p15INK4b, p16INK4a and p53 in actinic keratosis. Cancer Lett. 2008;264(1):145–161.
    1. Padilla RS, Sebastian S, Jiang Z, Nindl I, Larson R. Gene expression patterns of normal human skin, actinic keratosis, and squamous cell carcinoma: a spectrum of disease progression. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146(3):288–293.
    1. Marks R, Foley P, Goodman G, Hage BH, Selwood TS. Spontaneous remission of solar keratoses: the case for conservative management. Br J Dermatol. 1986;115(6):649–655.
    1. Criscione VD, Weinstock MA, Naylor MF, Luque C, Eide MJ, Bingham SF. Actinic keratoses: natural history and risk of malignant transformation in the Veterans Affairs Topical Tretinoin Chemoprevention Trial. Cancer. 2009;115(11):2523–2530.
    1. Dodson JM, DeSpain J, Hewett JE, Clark DP. Malignant potential of actinic keratoses and the controversy over treatment. A patient-oriented perspective. Arch Dermatol. 1991;127(7):1029–1031.
    1. Czarnecki D, Meehan CJ, Bruce F, Culjak G. The majority of cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas arise in actinic keratoses. J Cutan Med Surg. 2002;6(3):207–209.
    1. Mittelbronn MA, Mullins DL, Ramos-Caro FA, Flowers FP. Frequency of pre-existing actinic keratosis in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. Int J Dermatol. 1998;37(9):677–681.
    1. Hurwitz RM, Monger LE. Solar keratosis: an evolving squamous cell carcinoma. Benign or malignant? Dermatol Surg. 1995;21(2):184.
    1. Feldman SR, Fleischer AB., Jr Progression of actinic keratosis to squamous cell carcinoma revisited: clinical and treatment implications. Cutis. 2011;87(4):201–207.
    1. Stockfleth E, Ferrandiz C, Grob JJ, Leigh I, Pehamberger H, Kerl H. Development of a treatment algorithm for actinic keratoses: a European consensus. Eur J Dermatol. 2008;18(6):651–659.
    1. Dinehart SM. The treatment of actinic keratoses. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000;42(1 Pt 2):25–28.
    1. Halpern AC, Hanson LJ. Awareness of, knowledge of and attitudes to nonmelanoma skin cancer (NMSC) and actinic keratosis (AK) among physicians. Int J Dermatol. 2004;43(9):638–642.
    1. Balkrishnan R, Cayce KA, Kulkarni AS, et al. Predictors of treatment choices and associated outcomes in actinic keratoses: results from a national physician survey study. J Dermatolog Treat. 2006;17(3):162–166.
    1. Thai KE, Fergin P, Freeman M, et al. A prospective study of the use of cryosurgery for the treatment of actinic keratoses. Int J Dermatol. 2004;43(9):687–692.
    1. Krawtchenko N, Roewert-Huber J, Ulrich M, Mann I, Sterry W, Stockfleth E. A randomised study of topical 5% imiquimod vs topical 5-fluorouracil vs cryosurgery in immunocompetent patients with actinic keratoses: a comparison of clinical and histological outcomes including 1-year follow-up. Br J Dermatol. 2007;157(Suppl 2):34–40.
    1. Tanghetti E, Werschler P. Comparison of 5% 5-fluorouracil cream and 5% imiquimod cream in the management of actinic keratoses on the face and scalp. J Drugs Dermatol. 2007;6(2):144–147.
    1. Ulrich M, Krueger-Corcoran D, Roewert-Huber J, Sterry W, Stockfleth E, Astner S. Reflectance confocal microscopy for noninvasive monitoring of therapy and detection of subclinical actinic keratoses. Dermatology. 2010;220(1):15–24.
    1. Rivers JK, Arlette J, Shear N, Guenther L, Carey W, Poulin Y. Topical treatment of actinic keratoses with 3.0% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronan gel. Br J Dermatol. 2002;146(1):94–100.
    1. Swanson N, Abramovits W, Berman B, Kulp J, Rigel DS, Levy S. Imiquimod 2.5% and 3.75% for the treatment of actinic keratoses: results of two placebo-controlled studies of daily application to the face and balding scalp for two 2-week cycles. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62(4):582–590.
    1. Loven K, Stein L, Furst K, Levy S. Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of 0.5% fluorouracil cream and 5% fluorouracil cream applied to each side of the face in patients with actinic keratosis. Clin Ther. 2002;24(6):990–1000.
    1. Werschler WP. Considerations for use of fluorouracil cream 0.5% for the treatment of actinic keratosis in elderly patients. J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2008;1(2):22–27.
    1. Lee AD, Jorizzo JL. Optimizing management of actinic keratosis and photodamaged skin: utilizing a stepwise approach. Cutis. 2009;84(3):169–175.
    1. Serra-Guillén C, Nagore E, Hueso L, et al. A randomized pilot comparative study of topical methyl aminolevulinate photodynamic therapy versus imiquimod 5% versus sequential application of both therapies in immunocompetent patients with actinic keratosis: clinical and histologic outcomes. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2012;66(4):e131–e137.
    1. Berlin JM, Rigel DS. Diclofenac sodium 3% gel in the treatment of actinic keratoses postcryosurgery. J Drugs Dermatol. 2008;7(7):669–673.
    1. Tan JK, Thomas DR, Poulin Y, Maddin F, Tang J. Efficacy of imiquimod as an adjunct to cryotherapy for actinic keratoses. J Cutan Med Surg. 2007;11(6):195–201.
    1. Jorizzo JL, Markowitz O, Lebwohl MG, et al. A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, multicenter, efficacy and safety study of 3.75% imiquimod cream following cryosurgery for the treatment of actinic keratoses. J Drugs Dermatol. 2010;9(9):1101–1108.
    1. Jorizzo J, Weiss J, Vamvakias G. One-week treatment with 0.5% fluorouracil cream prior to cryosurgery in patients with actinic keratoses: a double-blind, vehicle-controlled, long-term study. J Drugs Dermatol. 2006;5(2):133–139.
    1. Picato (ingenol mebutate) gel 0.015%, 0.05% [package insert] Parsippany, NJ: LEO Pharma Inc.; 2012.
    1. Weedon D, Chick J. Home treatment of basal cell carcinoma. Med J Aust. 1976;1(24):928.
    1. Green AC, Beardmore GL. Home treatment of skin cancer and solar keratoses. Australas J Dermatol. 1988;29(3):127–130.
    1. Ramsay JR, Suhrbier A, Aylward JH, et al. The sap from Euphorbia peplus is effective against human nonmelanoma skin cancers. Br J Dermatol. 2011;164(3):633–636.
    1. Zibert JR, Bertelsen M, Grue-Sørensen G, et al. Ingenol mebutate penetrates reconstructed human skin in a gradient dependent manner and clears subclinical skin cancer. Poster P5501 presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology; March 16–20, 2012; San Diego, CA.
    1. Ogbourne SM, Suhrbier A, Jones B, et al. Antitumor activity of 3-ingenyl angelate: plasma membrane and mitochondrial disruption and necrotic cell death. Cancer Res. 2004;64(8):2833–2839.
    1. Stahlhut M, Lord JM, Bertelsen M, et al. Ingenol mebutate initiates multiple specific cell death pathways in human cancer cells. Poster P5517 presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology; March 16–20, 2012; San Diego, CA.
    1. Kedei N, Lundberg DJ, Toth A, Welburn P, Garfield SH, Blumberg PM. Characterization of the interaction of ingenol 3-angelate with protein kinase C. Cancer Res. 2004;64(9):3243–3255.
    1. Hampson P, Chahal H, Khanim F, et al. PEP005, a selective small-molecule activator of protein kinase C, has potent antileukemic activity mediated via the delta isoform of PKC. Blood. 2005;106(4):1362–1368.
    1. Serova M, Ghoul A, Benhadji KA, et al. Effects of protein kinase C modulation by PEP005, a novel ingenol angelate, on mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signaling in cancer cells. Mol Cancer Ther. 2008;7(4):915–922.
    1. Benhadji KA, Serova M, Ghoul A, et al. Antiproliferative activity of PEP005, a novel ingenol angelate that modulates PKC functions, alone and in combination with cytotoxic agents in human colon cancer cells. Br J Cancer. 2008;99(11):1808–1815.
    1. Challacombe JM, Suhrbier A, Parsons PG, et al. Neutrophils are a key component of the antitumor efficacy of topical chemotherapy with ingenol-3-angelate. J Immunol. 2006;177(11):8123–8132.
    1. Li L, Shukla S, Lee A, et al. The skin cancer chemotherapeutic agent ingenol-3-angelate (PEP005) is a substrate for the epidermal multi-drug transporter (ABCB1) and targets tumor vasculature. Cancer Res. 2010;70(11):4509–4519.
    1. Fecker LF, Stockfleth E, Braun FK, et al. Enhanced death ligand-induced apoptosis in cutaneous SCC cells by treatment with diclofenac/ hyaluronic acid correlates with downregulation of c-FLIP. J Invest Dermatol. 2010;130(8):2098–2109.
    1. Hampson P, Kavanagh D, Smith E, Wang K, Lord JM, Ed RG. The anti-tumor agent, ingenol-3-angelate (PEP005), promotes the recruitment of cytotoxic neutrophils by activation of vascular endothelial cells in a PKC-delta dependent manner. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2008;57(8):1241–1251.
    1. Le TT, Gardner J, Hoang-Le D, et al. Immunostimulatory cancer chemotherapy using local ingenol-3-angelate and synergy with immunotherapies. Vaccine. 2009;27(23):3053–3062.
    1. Lee WY, Hampson P, Coulthard L, et al. Novel antileukemic compound ingenol 3-angelate inhibits T cell apoptosis by activating protein kinase C theta. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(31):23889–23898.
    1. Cozzi SJ, Ogbourne SM, James C, et al. Ingenol mebutate field-directed treatment of UVB-damaged skin reduces lesion formation and removes mutant p53 patches. J Invest Dermatol. 2012;132(4):1263–1271.
    1. Kane-Maguire N, Cozzi SJ, Ogbourne SM, Mosely R. Modulation of fibroblast phenotype and extracellular matrix composition by ingenol mebutate may be associated with scar resolution and improved dermal cosmesis. Poster P5350 presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology; March 16–20, 2012; San Diego, CA.
    1. Siller G, Gebauer K, Welburn P, Katsamas J, Ogbourne SM. PEP005 (ingenol mebutate) gel, a novel agent for the treatment of actinic keratosis: results of a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, multi-centre, Phase IIa study. Australas J Dermatol. 2009;50(1):16–22.
    1. Anderson L, Schmieder GJ, Werschler WP, et al. Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, vehicle-controlled study of ingenol mebutate gel 0.025% and 0.05% for actinic keratosis. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009;60(6):934–943.
    1. Lebwohl M, Swanson N, Anderson LL, Melgaard A, Xu Z, Berman B. Ingenol mebutate gel for actinic keratosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(11):1010–1019.
    1. Berman B, Marmur E, Melgaard A. Three-day topical treatment with ingenol mebutate gel 0.015% for actinic keratoses on the face and scalp: analysis of data pooled from two trials. Poster P5623 presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology; March 16–20, 2012; San Diego, CA.
    1. Anderson LL, Schmeider GJ, Xu Z, Melgaard A. Two-day topical treatment with ingenol mebutate gel 0.05% for actinic keratoses on the trunk and extremities: analysis of data pooled from two trials. Poster P5640 presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Dermatology; March 16–20, 2012; San Diego, CA.
    1. Jarratt M. A randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of PEP005 (ingenol mebutate) gel, 0.05%, when applied to dorsal forearms with multiple actinic keratoses (AK) in a maximal-use setting, defined as a contiguous 100-cm2 area of skin. Poster presented at the 7th Annual Orlando Dermatology Aesthetic and Clinical meeting; January 15–18, 2010; Orlando, FL.
    1. Hanke CW, Beer KR, Stockfleth E, Wu J, Rosen T, Levy S. Imiquimod 2.5% and 3.75% for the treatment of actinic keratoses: results of two placebo-controlled studies of daily application to the face and balding scalp for two 3-week cycles. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62(4):573–581.
    1. Wolf JE, Jr, Taylor JR, Tschen E, Kang S. Topical 3.0% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronan gel in the treatment of actinic keratoses. Int J Dermatol. 2001;40(11):709–713.
    1. Rivers JK, Arlette J, Shear N, Guenther L, Carey W, Poulin Y. Topical treatment of actinic keratoses with 3.0% diclofenac in 2.5% hyaluronan gel. Br J Dermatol. 2002;146(1):94–100.
    1. Weiss J, Menter A, Hevia O, et al. Effective treatment of actinic keratosis with 0.5% fluorouracil cream for 1, 2, or 4 weeks. Cutis. 2002;70(Suppl 2):22–29.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit