Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography for bone assessment of neurogenic heterotopic ossification of the hip: a preliminary study
Raphaël Amar, Tristan Thiry, Marjorie Salga, Dominique Safa, Annaëlle Chetrit, Laure Gatin, Robert-Yves Carlier, Raphaël Amar, Tristan Thiry, Marjorie Salga, Dominique Safa, Annaëlle Chetrit, Laure Gatin, Robert-Yves Carlier
Abstract
Background: Neurogenic heterotopic ossification (NHO) is a frequent complication, often involving the hip. The functional impact may require surgical management and pre-surgical imaging assessment is necessary, usually by computed tomography (CT). We aimed to compare the performances of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CT for bone assessment on pre-surgical imaging of the heterotopic ossifications and their features in NHO of the hip.
Methods: This single-center prospective preliminary study included all patients who underwent surgery for NHO with joint limitation from July 2019 to March 2020. All patients had a CT after biphasic iodinated solution injection and an MRI including T1-weighted, STIR and ZTE sequences. Standardized reports were completed for both exams for each patient, evaluating location, implantation and fragmentation of NHO, relation to the joint capsule and bone mineralization, then were compared.
Results: Seven patients from 32 to 70 years old (mean = 50.2 ± 17.2 years) were evaluated. NHO were bilateral in 2 patients, for a total of nine hips: six right hips and three left hips. Observed concordance rates between MRI and CT were, respectively, 94.4% for location, 100% for circumferential extension, 87.3% for implantation 88.9% for fragmentation, 77.8% for relation to the joint capsule and 66.7% for bone mineralization. It was 100% for femoral neck fracture and osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
Conclusion: This preliminary study suggests that pre-surgical MRI imaging should be considered as effective as CT for bone assessment of NHO and their features.
Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03832556. Registered February 6, 2019, https://ichgcp.net/clinical-trials-registry/NCT03832556 .
Keywords: Magnetic resonance imaging; Neurogenic heterotopic ossification; Zero Echo Time.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
© 2021. The Author(s).
Figures
References
- Seipel R, Langner S, Platz T, Lippa M, Kuehn JP, Hosten N. Neurogenic heterotopic ossification: epidemiology and morphology on conventional radiographs in an early neurological rehabilitation population. Skelet Radiol. 2012;41(1):61–66. doi: 10.1007/s00256-011-1115-5.
- Migliorini F, Trivellas A, Eschweiler J, Driessen A, Tingart M, Maffulli N. NSAIDs for prophylaxis for heterotopic ossification after total hip arthroplasty: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Calcif Tissue Int. 2021;108(2):196–206. doi: 10.1007/s00223-020-00763-7.
- Denormandie P, de I’Escalopier N, Gatin L, Grelier A, Genêt F. Resection of neurogenic heterotopic ossification (NHO) of the hip. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2018;104(1):S121–S127. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2017.04.015.
- Carlier RY, Safa DML, Parva P, Mompoint D, Judet T, Denormandie P, et al. Ankylosing neurogenic myositis ossificans of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87-B(3):301–305. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B3.14737.
- Law-ye B, Hangard C, Felter A, Safa D, Denormandie P, Genet F, et al. Pre-surgical CT-assessment of neurogenic myositis ossificans of the hip and risk factors of recurrence: a series of 101 consecutive patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1294-2.
- Zagarella A, Impellizzeri E, Maiolino R, Attolini R, Castoldi MC. Pelvic heterotopic ossification: when CT comes to the aid of MR imaging. Insights Imaging. 2013;4(5):595–603. doi: 10.1007/s13244-013-0265-5.
- Wick L, Berger M, Knecht H, Glücker T, Ledermann HP. Magnetic resonance signal alterations in the acute onset of heterotopic ossification in patients with spinal cord injury. Eur Radiol. 2005;15(9):1867–1875. doi: 10.1007/s00330-005-2769-y.
- Weiger M, Pruessmann KP. MRI with zero echo time. eMagRes. 2012;1:311–322.
- Sneag DB, Shah P, Koff MF, Lim WY, Rodeo SA, Potter HG. Quantitative ultrashort echo time magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of postoperative menisci: a pilot study. HSS J ®. 2015;11(2):123–129. doi: 10.1007/s11420-014-9420-x.
- Bae WC, Du J, Bydder GM, Chung CB. Conventional and ultrashort MRI of articular cartilage, meniscus and intervertebral disc. Top Magn Reson Imaging TMRI. 2010;21(5):275–289. doi: 10.1097/RMR.0b013e31823ccebc.
- Breighner RE, Endo Y, Konin GP, Gulotta LV, Koff MF, Potter HG. Technical developments: zero echo time imaging of the shoulder: enhanced osseous detail by using MR imaging. Radiology. 2017;286(3):960–966. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017170906.
- Argentieri EC, Koff MF, Breighner RE, Endo Y, Shah PH, Sneag DB. Diagnostic accuracy of zero-echo time MRI for the evaluation of cervical neural foraminal stenosis. Spine. 2018;43(13):928–933. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002462.
- Genet F, Marmorat J-L, Lautridou C, Schnitzler A, Mailhan L, Denormandie P. Impact of late surgical intervention on heterotopic ossification of the hip after traumatic neurological injury. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009;91-B(11):1493–1498. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.91B11.22305.
- Zhao X, Song HK, Seifert AC, Li C, Wehrli FW. Feasibility of assessing bone matrix and mineral properties in vivo by combined solid-state 1H and 31P MRI. PLoS ONE. 2017;12(3):e0173995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0173995.
- Kazerooni AF, Pozo JM, McCloskey EV, Rad HS, Frangi AF. Diffusion MRI for assessment of bone quality; a review of findings in healthy aging and osteoporosis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2020;51(4):975–992. doi: 10.1002/jmri.26973.
Source: PubMed