Pertuzumab Plus Trastuzumab for Treatment-Refractory HER2-Amplified Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Comparison of the MyPathway Trial With a Real-World External Control Arm

Yusuke Narita, Takuya Yoshimoto, Tomoyuki Namai, Takashi Asakawa, Satoe Kawakami, Craig Gower-Page, Irmarie Reyes-Rivera, Arisha Patel, Yoshiaki Nakamura, Yusuke Narita, Takuya Yoshimoto, Tomoyuki Namai, Takashi Asakawa, Satoe Kawakami, Craig Gower-Page, Irmarie Reyes-Rivera, Arisha Patel, Yoshiaki Nakamura

Abstract

Purpose: We compared overall survival (OS) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-amplified, treatment-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving pertuzumab plus trastuzumab (PER-HER) in the phase IIa MyPathway multibasket study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02091141) with OS in those receiving routine clinical care in an electronic health record-derived external control arm.

Methods: A noninterventional study was conducted using patient-level data from MyPathway participants receiving PER-HER and real-world patients with HER2-amplified treatment-refractory mCRC receiving routine clinical care. This study used a deidentified US-based clinico-genomic database (CGDB). For patients in the CGDB who met study eligibility criteria at multiple index dates (treatment initiation dates in the treatment-refractory setting), all eligible index dates were used for the analysis. Standardized mortality ratio weighting on the basis of propensity score derived a pseudopopulation (postweighting population) balancing key prognostic variables between arms. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used for estimation of the hazard ratio (HR) in the primary OS analysis. A series of sensitivity analyses were conducted to investigate the robustness and consistency of the primary analysis.

Results: The PER-HER arm comprised 57 patients enrolled in the MyPathway study by August 1, 2017 (data cutoff); the external control arm comprised 18 patients (27 index dates) with HER2-amplified mCRC who met the major MyPathway eligibility criteria in CGDB collected between 2011 and 2019. The estimated HR for OS from the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model in the postweighting population was 0.729 (95% CI, 0.184 to 3.900). The results of sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary analysis in terms of the point estimate of HR.

Conclusion: Despite a small sample size, these findings suggest that PER-HER could have a potential OS benefit for this population.

Conflict of interest statement

Yusuke NaritaEmployment: Chugai PharmaStock and Other Ownership Interests: Chugai Pharma Takuya YoshimotoEmployment: Chugai PharmaStock and Other Ownership Interests: Chugai Pharma Tomoyuki NamaiEmployment: Chugai Pharma Takashi AsakawaEmployment: Chugai Pharma Satoe KawakamiEmployment: Chugai Pharma Craig Gower-PageEmployment: Roche, Publicis Health (I), Vifor Pharma (I)Leadership: Vifor Pharma (I)Stock and Other Ownership Interests: RocheTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche Irmarie Reyes-RiveraEmployment: Roche Pharma AGStock and Other Ownership Interests: Roche/GenentechResearch Funding: Roche Pharma AGTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche Pharma AG Arisha PatelEmployment: Genentech/Roche Yoshiaki NakamuraHonoraria: Chugai Pharma, Guardant Health AMEA, MerckResearch Funding: Taiho Pharmaceutical (Inst), Guardant Health (Inst), Genomedia (Inst), Chugai Pharma (Inst), Seattle Genetics (Inst), Roche (Inst)No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

Figures

FIG 1.
FIG 1.
Study design. CGDB, clinico-genomic database; EC, external control; FH, Flatiron Health; FMI, Foundation Medicine Inc; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; I/E, inclusion/exclusion; mCRC, metastatic colorectal cancer; PER-HER, pertuzumab plus trastuzumab.
FIG 2.
FIG 2.
EC arm patient attrition. CTCAE, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events; EC, external control; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; FMI, Foundation Medicine Inc; HER2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; mCRC, metastatic colorectal cancer; NCI, National Cancer Institute. aPatients with missing value are allowed to be included.

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. : Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68:394-424, 2018
    1. Goldberg RM, Sargent DJ, Morton RF, et al. : A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:23-30, 2004
    1. Tournigand C, Andre T, Achille E, et al. : FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer: A randomized GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol 22:229-237, 2004
    1. Venook AP, Niedzwiecki D, Lenz HJ, et al. : Effect of first-line chemotherapy combined with cetuximab or bevacizumab on overall survival in patients with KRAS wild‐type advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA 317:2392-2401, 2017
    1. Cremolini C, Loupakis F, Antoniotti C, et al. : FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Updated overall survival and molecular subgroup analyses of the open-label, phase 3 TRIBE study. Lancet Oncol 16:1306-1315, 2015
    1. Heinemann V, von Weikersthal LF, Decker T, et al. : FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 15:1065-1075, 2014
    1. Parmar A, Chan KKW, Ko YJ: Metastatic colorectal cancer: Therapeutic options for treating refractory disease. Curr Oncol 26:S24-S32, 2019. (suppl 1)
    1. Marx AH, Burandt EC, Choschzick M, et al. : Heterogenous high-level HER-2 amplification in a small subset of colorectal cancers. Hum Pathol 41:1577-1585, 2010
    1. Seo AN, Kwak Y, Kim DW, et al. : HER2 status in colorectal cancer: Its clinical significance and the relationship between HER2 gene amplification and expression. PLoS One 9:e98528, 2014
    1. Sawada K, Nakamura Y, Yamanaka T, et al. : Prognostic and predictive value of HER2 amplification in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 17:198-205, 2018
    1. Sartore-Bianchi A, Trusolino L, Martino C, et al. : Dual-targeted therapy with trastuzumab and lapatinib in treatment-refractory, KRAS codon 12/13 wild-type, HER2-positive metastatic colorectal cancer (HERACLES): A proof-of-concept, multicentre, open-label, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 17:738-746, 2016
    1. Raghav KPS, Overman MJ, Yu R, et al. : HER2 amplification as a negative predictive biomarker for anti-epidermal growth factor receptor antibody therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 34, 2016. (suppl 15; abstr 3517)
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network : NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. Colon Cancer. Version 3.2021.
    1. Meric-Bernstam F, Hurwitz H, Raghav KPS, et al. : Pertuzumab and trastuzumab for HER2-amplified metastatic colorectal cancer: An updated report from MyPathway, a multicentre, open-label, phase 2a multiple basket study. Lancet Oncol 20:518-530, 2019
    1. Nakamura Y, Okamoto W, Kato T, et al. : Circulating tumor DNA-guided treatment with pertuzumab plus trastuzumab for HER2-amplified metastatic colorectal cancer: A phase 2 trial. Nat Med 27:1899-1903, 2021
    1. Burcu M, Dreyer NA, Franklin JM, et al. : Real-world effectiveness to support regulatory decision-making for medicines: Considerations for external control arms. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 29:1228-1235, 2020
    1. Singal G, Miller PG, Agarwala V, et al. : Association of patient characteristics and tumor genomics with clinical outcomes among patients with non-small cell lung cancer using a clinicogenomic database. JAMA 321:1391-1399, 2019
    1. Gower-Page C, Li C, Schröder C, et al. : Simulation-based evaluation of index date selection methods with external controls. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 30:340-341, 2021. (suppl 1)
    1. Backenroth D: How to choose a time zero for patients in external control arms. Pharm Stat 20:783-792, 2021
    1. Schröder C, Lawrence M, Li C, et al. : Building external control arms from patient-level electronic health record data to replicate the randomized IMblaze370 control arm in metastatic colorectal cancer. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 5:450-458, 2021
    1. Carrigan G, Whipple S, Capra WB, et al. : Using electronic health records to derive control arms for early phase single-arm lung cancer trials: Proof-of-concept in randomized controlled trials. Clin Pharmacol Ther 107:369-377, 2020

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit