Type and Timing of Rehabilitation Following Acute and Subacute Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review

Anthony S Burns, Ralph J Marino, Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan, James W Middleton, Lindsay A Tetreault, Joseph R Dettori, Kathryn E Mihalovich, Michael G Fehlings, Anthony S Burns, Ralph J Marino, Sukhvinder Kalsi-Ryan, James W Middleton, Lindsay A Tetreault, Joseph R Dettori, Kathryn E Mihalovich, Michael G Fehlings

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the literature to address the following clinical questions: In adult patients with acute and subacute complete or incomplete traumatic SCI, (1) does the time interval between injury and commencing rehabilitation affect outcome?; (2) what is the comparative effectiveness of different rehabilitation strategies, including different intensities and durations of treatment?; (3) are there patient or injury characteristics that affect the efficacy of rehabilitation?; and (4) what is the cost-effectiveness of various rehabilitation strategies?

Methods: A systematic search was conducted for literature published through March 31, 2015 that evaluated rehabilitation strategies in adults with acute or subacute traumatic SCI at any level. Studies were critically appraised individually and the overall strength of evidence was evaluated using methods proposed by the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation) working group.

Results: The search strategy yielded 384 articles, 19 of which met our inclusion criteria. Based on our results, there was no difference between body weight-supported treadmill training and conventional rehabilitation with respect to improvements in Functional Independence Measure (FIM) Locomotor score, Lower Extremity Motor Scores, the distance walked in 6 minutes or gait velocity over 15.2 m. Functional electrical therapy resulted in slightly better FIM Motor, FIM Self-Care, and Spinal Cord Independence Measure Self-Care subscores compared with conventional occupational therapy. Comparisons using the Toronto Rehabilitation Institute Hand Function Test demonstrated no differences between groups in 7 of 9 domains. There were no clinically important differences in Maximal Lean Test, Maximal Sidewards Reach Test, T-shirt Test, or the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure between unsupported sitting training and standard in-patient rehabilitation.

Conclusion: The current evidence base for rehabilitation following acute and subacute spinal cord injury is limited. Methodological challenges have contributed to this and further research is still needed.

Keywords: rehabilitation; spinal cord injuries.

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Results of literature search

References

    1. Burns AS, Marino RJ, Flanders AE, Flett H. Clinical diagnosis and prognosis following spinal cord injury. Handb Clin Neurol. 2012;109:47–62. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-52137-8.00003-6.
    1. Fawcett JW, Curt A, Steeves JD, et al. Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trials. Spinal Cord. 2007;45:190–205. doi:10.1038/sj.sc.3102007.
    1. Roy RR, Harkema SJ, Edgerton VR. Basic concepts of activity-based interventions for improved recovery of motor function after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:1487–1497. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2012.04.034.
    1. Kirshblum SC, Burns SP, Biering-Sorensen F, et al. International standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury (revised 2011). J Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34:535–546. doi:10.1179/204577211X13207446293695.
    1. Coleman WP, Geisler FH. Injury severity as primary predictor of outcome in acute spinal cord injury: retrospective results from a large multicenter clinical trial. Spine J. 2004;4:373–378. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2003.12.006.
    1. Kay ED, Deutsch A, Wuermser LA. Predicting walking at discharge from inpatient rehabilitation after a traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:745–750. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2007.03.013.
    1. Marino RJ, Ditunno JF, Jr, Donovan WH, Maynard F., Jr Neurologic recovery after traumatic spinal cord injury: data from the model spinal cord injury systems. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1391–1396.
    1. Tee JW, Chan CH, Gruen RL, et al. Early predictors of health-related quality of life outcomes in polytrauma patients with spine injuries: a level 1 trauma center study. Global Spine J. 2014;4:21–32. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1358617.
    1. Wright JG, Swiontkowski MF, Heckman JD. Introducing levels of evidence to the journal. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A:1–3.
    1. West S, King V, Carey TS, et al. Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2002;47:1–11.
    1. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2004;328:1490 doi:10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490.
    1. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:401–406. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015
    1. Dobkin B, Barbeau H, Deforge D, et al. The evolution of walking-related outcomes over the first 12 weeks of rehabilitation for incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury: the multicenter randomized Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:25–35. doi:10.1177/1545968306295556.
    1. Lucareli PR, Lima MO, Lima FP, de Almeida JG, Brech GC, D’Andréa Greve JM. Gait analysis following treadmill training with body weight support versus conventional physical therapy: a prospective randomized controlled single blind study. Spinal Cord. 2011;49:1001–1007.
    1. Popovic MR, Kapadia N, Zivanovic V, Furlan JC, Craven BC, McGillivray C. Functional electrical stimulation therapy of voluntary grasping versus only conventional rehabilitation for patients with subacute incomplete tetraplegia: a randomized clinical trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011;25:433–442. doi:10.1177/1545968310392924.
    1. Kohlmeyer KM, Hill JP, Yarkony GM, Jaeger RJ. Electrical stimulation and biofeedback effect on recovery of tenodesis grasp: a controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:702–706.
    1. Harvey LA, Ristev D, Hossain MS, et al. Training unsupported sitting does not improve ability to sit in people with recently acquired paraplegia: a randomised trial. J Physiother. 2011;57:83–90.
    1. Putzke JD, Barrett JJ, Richards JS, DeVivo MJ. Age and spinal cord injury: an emphasis on outcomes among the elderly. J Spinal Cord Med. 2003;26:37–44.
    1. Teeter L, Gassaway J, Taylor S, et al. Relationship of physical therapy inpatient rehabilitation interventions and patient characteristics to outcomes following spinal cord injury: the SCIRehab project. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012;35:503–526. doi:10.1179/2045772312y.0000000058.
    1. Whiteneck G, Gassaway J, Dijkers MP, Heinemann AW, Kreider SE. Relationship of patient characteristics and rehabilitation services to outcomes following spinal cord injury: the SCIRehab project. J Spinal Cord Med. 2012;35:484–502. doi:10.1179/2045772312y.0000000057.
    1. DeJong G, Tian W, Hsieh CH, et al. Rehospitalization in the first year of traumatic spinal cord injury after discharge from medical rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(4 suppl):S87–S97. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.037.
    1. Furlan JC, Kattail D, Fehlings MG. The impact of co-morbidities on age-related differences in mortality after acute traumatic spinal cord injury. J Neurotrauma. 2009;26:1361–1367. doi:10.1089/neu.2008-0764.
    1. Horn SD, Smout RJ, DeJong G, et al. Association of various comorbidity measures with spinal cord injury rehabilitation outcomes. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:S75–S86.
    1. Tian W, Hsieh CH, DeJong G, Backus D, Groah S, Ballard PH. Role of body weight in therapy participation and rehabilitation outcomes among individuals with traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(4 suppl):S125–S136. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2012.10.039.
    1. Abdul-Sattar AB. Predictors of functional outcome in patients with traumatic spinal cord injury after inpatient rehabilitation: in Saudi Arabia. NeuroRehabilitation. 2014;35:341–347.
    1. Iseli E, Cavigelli A, Dietz V, Curtz A. Prognosis and recovery in ischaemic and traumatic spinal cord injury: clinical and electrophysiological evaluation. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1999;67:567–571.
    1. Burns AS, Yee J, Flett HM, Cournoyea N. Impact of benchmarking and clinical decision making tools on rehabilitation length of stay following spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2013;51:165–169. doi:10.1038/sc.2012.91.
    1. Yarkony GM, Roth EJ, Heinemann AW, Wu YC, Katz RT, Lovell L. Benefits of rehabilitation for traumatic spinal cord injury. Multivariate analysis in 711 patients. Arch Neurol. 1987;44:93–96.
    1. Dobkin BH. Confounders in rehabilitation trials of task-oriented training: lessons from the designs of the EXCITE and SCILT multicenter trials. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21:3–13. doi:10.1177/1545968306297329.
    1. Whyte J, Hart T. It’s more than a black box; it’s a Russian doll: defining rehabilitation treatments. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82:639–652. doi:10.1097/01.PHM.0000078200.61840.2D.
    1. Whiteneck G, Gassaway J, Dijkers M, Jha A. New approach to study the contents and outcomes of spinal cord injury rehabilitation: the SCIRehab project. J Spinal Cord Med. 2009;32:251–259.
    1. Gassaway J, Whiteneck G, Dijkers M. Clinical taxonomy development and application in spinal cord injury research: the SCIRehab project. J Spinal Cord Med. 2009;32:260–269.
    1. Scivoletto G, Morganti B, Molinari M. Early versus delayed inpatient spinal cord injury rehabilitation: an Italian study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:512–516. doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2004.05.021.
    1. Sumida M, Fujimoto M, Tokuhiro A, Tominaga T, Magara A, Uchida R. Early rehabilitation effect for traumatic spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:391–395. doi:10.1053/apmr.2001.19780.
    1. Whiteneck G, Gassaway J, Dijkers M, et al. The SCIRehab project: treatment time spent in SCI rehabilitation. Inpatient treatment time across disciplines in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. J Spinal Cord Med. 2011;34:133–148. doi:10.1179/107902611X12971826988011.
    1. Yang JF, Musselman KE, Livingstone D, et al. Repetitive mass practice or focused precise practice for retraining walking after incomplete spinal cord injury? A pilot randomized clinical trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014;28:314–324. doi:10.1177/1545968313508473.
    1. Field-Fote EC, Roach KE. Influence of a locomotor training approach on walking speed and distance in people with chronic spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial. Phys Ther. 2011;91:48–60. doi:10.2522/ptj.20090359.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit