Outcomes in thread lift for facial rejuvenation: a study performed with happy lift™ revitalizing

Antonella Savoia, Ciro Accardo, Fulvio Vannini, Basso Di Pasquale, Alfonso Baldi, Antonella Savoia, Ciro Accardo, Fulvio Vannini, Basso Di Pasquale, Alfonso Baldi

Abstract

Introduction: Barbed suture lifting is a minimally invasive surgical technique for facial rejuvenation. This study examined the efficacy and associated risks with this procedure, using a new synthetic, monofilament suspension thread named "Happy Lift™ Revitalizing" (Promoitalia International S.r.l, Naples, Italy).

Methods: All the patients had average aging signs and required a lifting of modest degree. A total of 37 thread lifts were performed over a 24-month period.

Results: In the majority of patients (89%), the results obtained were considered satisfactory. The incidence of complications was low. Only 6% of the patients had slight post-operation asymmetry that was easily corrected. Minor complications experienced by patients included small ecchymosis (62%), mild erythema (40%), small hemorrhage (25%), mild transitory esthesia (6%) and mild post-operation tumefaction (40%). Histopathological and ecographic analyses were performed on the treated skin of selected patients, demonstrating that the lifting effect is guaranteed and fortified by the cutaneous reaction that appears along the length of the thread.

Conclusion: Thread lift with "Happy Lift™ Revitalizing" is a safe procedure associated with minor complications, when performed on cohorts of patients requiring a facial lifting of modest degree.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
a Double needle for the treatment of the eyebrow; b double needle for the redefinition of the mandibular contour; c double needle for the treatment of the neck
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Exemplificative case of facial rejuvenation. A patient treated for the redefinition of the mandibular contour. a Before the treatment. b Immediately after the treatment. c 6 months after the treatment
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
a Fragment of skin removed 2 months after the procedure from the right cheek containing a white microscopic filament (Happy Lift™ Revitalizing). (H & E, original magnification ×20). b Fragment of skin taken from the right cheek 60 days after the operation. The dermis next to the areas of the right zygomatic malar, where the “Happy Lift™ Revitalizing” thread is inserted, normally represents annexation structures and vessels with no signs of inflammation; an increase in the thickness of the papilla can also be noticed. (H & E, original magnification ×10). c Fragment of subcutaneous tissue removed 2 months after the procedure, showing a connective structure forming a ring with a thickness of around 70 μm around a cavity seat of the “Happy Lift™ Revitalizing”. (H & E, original magnification ×20)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Ultrasound evaluation of the treated zygomatic area of two different patients 90 days from the date of the implant. a The hyper-echogenicity due to the marginal long-lasting fibrosis around the threads is evident; b The particular stereotaxic disposition of the threads route is to be noticed

References

    1. Helfrich YR, Sachs DL, Voorhees JJ. Overview of skin aging and photoaging. Dermatol Nurs. 2008;20:177–183.
    1. Mack WP. Complications in periocular rejuvenation. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2010;18:435–456. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2010.05.002.
    1. Nkengne A, Bertin C. Aging and facial changes–documenting clinical signs, part 1: clinical changes of the aging face. Skinmed. 2012;10:284–289.
    1. Chaffoo RA. Complications in facelift surgery: avoidance and management. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2013;21:551–558. doi: 10.1016/j.fsc.2013.07.007.
    1. Wu WTL. Barbed sutures in facial rejuvenation. Aesthet Surg J. 2004;24:582–587. doi: 10.1016/j.asj.2004.09.007.
    1. Lycka B, Bazan C, Poletti E, Treen B. The emerging technique of the antiptosis subdermal suspension thread. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30:41–44. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30000.x.
    1. Lee S, Isse N. Barbed polypropylene sutures for midface elevation. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2005;7:55–61. doi: 10.1001/archfaci.7.3.203.
    1. Isse NG, Fodor PB. Elevating the midface with barbed polypropylene sutures. Aesthet Surg J. 2005;25:301–303. doi: 10.1016/j.asj.2005.03.007.
    1. Ruff G. Technique and uses for absorbable barbed sutures. Aesthet Surg J. 2006;26:620–628. doi: 10.1016/j.asj.2006.08.011.
    1. De Lorenzi CL. Barbed sutures, rationale and techniques. Aesthet Surg J. 2006;26:223–229. doi: 10.1016/j.asj.2006.01.009.
    1. Sulamanidze MA, Fournier PF, Paikidze TG, Sulamanidze GM. Removal of facial soft tissue ptosis with special threads. Dermatol Surg. 2002;28:367–371. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-4725.2002.01297.x.
    1. Sulamanidze MA, Paikidze TG, Sulamanidze GM, Neigel JM. Facial lifting with “APTOS” threads: featherlift. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2005;38:1109–1117. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2005.05.005.
    1. Horne DF, Kaminer MS. Reduction of face and neck laxity with anchored, barbed polypropylene sutures (Contour Threads) Skin Therapy Lett. 2006;11:5–7.
    1. Villa MT, White LE, Alam M, Yoo SS, Walton RL. Barbed sutures: a review of the literature. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;121:102e–108e.
    1. Council Directive 93/42/EEC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 June 1993. . Accessed 25 Nov 2013.
    1. Garvey PB, Ricciardelli EJ, Gampper T. Outcomes in threadlift for facial rejuvenation. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;62:482–485. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31818c18ed.
    1. Rachel JD, Lack EB, Larson B. Incidence of complications and early recurrence in 29 patients after facial rejuvenation with barbed suture lifting. Dermatol Surg. 2010;36:348–354. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01442.x.

Source: PubMed

Sponzoři a spolupracovníci

Zdravotní podmínky

Drogové intervence

3
Předplatit