Improvement of functional outcome for patients with newly diagnosed grade 2 or 3 gliomas with co-deletion of 1p/19q - IMPROVE CODEL: the NOA-18 trial

A Wick, A Sander, M Koch, M Bendszus, S Combs, T Haut, A Dormann, S Walter, M Pertz, J Merkle-Lock, N Selkrig, R Limprecht, L Baumann, M Kieser, F Sahm, U Schlegel, F Winkler, M Platten, W Wick, T Kessler, A Wick, A Sander, M Koch, M Bendszus, S Combs, T Haut, A Dormann, S Walter, M Pertz, J Merkle-Lock, N Selkrig, R Limprecht, L Baumann, M Kieser, F Sahm, U Schlegel, F Winkler, M Platten, W Wick, T Kessler

Abstract

Background: Given the young age of patients with CNS WHO grade 2 and 3 oligodendrogliomas and the relevant risk of neurocognitive, functional, and quality-of-life impairment with the current aggressive standard of care treatment, chemoradiation with PCV, of the tumour located in the brain optimizing care is the major challenge.

Methods: NOA-18 aims at improving qualified overall survival (qOS) for adult patients with CNS WHO grade 2 and 3 oligodendrogliomas by randomizing between standard chemoradiation with up to six six-weekly cycles with PCV and six six-weekly cycles with lomustine and temozolomide (CETEG) (n = 182 patients per group accrued over 4 years) thereby delaying radiotherapy and adding the chemoradiotherapy concept at progression after initial radiation-free chemotherapy, allowing for effective salvage treatment and delaying potentially deleterious side effects. QOS represents a new concept and is defined as OS without functional and/or cognitive and/or quality of life deterioration regardless of whether tumour progression or toxicity is the main cause. The primary objective is to show superiority of an initial CETEG treatment followed by partial brain radiotherapy (RT) plus PCV (RT-PCV) at progression over partial brain radiotherapy (RT) followed by procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) chemotherapy (RT-PCV) and best investigators choice (BIC) at progression for sustained qOS. An event concerning a sustained qOS is then defined as a functional and/or cognitive and/or quality of life deterioration after completion of primary therapy on two consecutive study visits with an interval of 3 months, tolerating a deviation of at most 1 month. Assessments are done with a 3-monthly MRI, assessment of the NANO scale, HRQoL, and KPS, and annual cognitive testing. Secondary objectives are evaluation and comparison of the two groups regarding secondary endpoints (short-term qOS, PFS, OS, complete and partial response rate). The trial is planned to be conducted at a minimum of 18 NOA study sites in Germany.

Discussion: qOS represents a new concept. The present NOA trial aims at showing the superiority of CETEG plus RT-PCV over RT-PCV plus BIC as determined at the level of OS without sustained functional deterioration for all patients with oligodendroglioma diagnosed according to the most recent WHO classification.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT05331521 . EudraCT 2018-005027-16.

Keywords: CCNU and Temozolomide for Glioma (CETEG); Health-related quality of life (HRQoL); Neurocognition; Oligodendroglioma; Procarbazine, CCNU, vincristine (PCV); Qualified overall survival (qOS).

Conflict of interest statement

MP and WW are inventors and patent-holders on ‘Peptides for use in treating or diagnosing IDH1R132H positive cancers’ (EP2800580B1).

© 2022. The Author(s).

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Trial summary of IMPROVE CODEL/NOA-18. RT: For CNS WHO grade 3 oligodendroglioma: Radiotherapy is performed as 33 fractions of 1.8 Gy for a total dose of 59.4 Gy. One fraction is given daily five days per week for about 6 to 7 weeks. For CNS WHO grade 2 oligodendroglioma, radiotherapy is performed as 28 fractions of 1.8 Gy for a total dose of 50.4/54 Gy for over approximately 5–6 weeks. Tx Break: Rest period is 4 weeks long (± 2 weeks) total. PCV: PCV chemotherapy, cycles are about 6 weeks long each. Day 1: CCNU 110 mg/m2 orally (capped at 200 mg); Days 8 and 29: vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 i.v. (capped at 2 mg); Days 8 to 21: procarbazine 60 mg/m2 orally (capped at 100 mg). CETEG: CCNU/temozolomide chemotherapy cycles are 6 weeks long. Day 1: CCNU 100 mg/m2orally (capped at 200 mg); Days 2–6: Temozolomide 100 mg/m2(cycle 1) with dose escalation in 50 mg/m2steps according to toxicity in subsequent cycles.+Therapy at progression is as suggested at the time of the protocol preparation. It is reasonable that patients without prior radiotherapy will undergo radiotherapy; it is also very likely that PCV will be used as adjunct chemotherapy if bone marrow reserve allows and if there are no safety concerns from the initial CETEG treatment. The treatment at progression in the standard arm is less predictable; there may be an option for second radiotherapy or even reuse of the full radiochemotherapy regimen as it had been given at diagnosis. The trial will therefore continue to assess any endpoint-relevant scans and scales and also list the secondary treatments, but not attempt a full registration of the treatment, which is considered standard and not driven by trial requirements
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
RT-PCV administration and dosing. 1Follow these procedures for pseudoprogression: a) if pseudoprogression is felt to be present, treatment should continue and functional imaging (i.e., MRI perfusion, spectroscopy) or pathological confirmation should be considered; b) if pseudoprogression is known to be present, continue treatment per study protocol; c) if tumor progression is present, the patient should be discontinued from the study; d) if equivocal, contact the study PI. 2For CNS WHO grade 3 oligodendroglioma phase 1 RT is about 6 to 7 weeks long total. For CNS WHO grade 2 oligodendroglioma phase 1 RT is about 6 weeks. 3Phase 2 Rest Period is 4 weeks long (± 2 weeks) total. 4Phase 3 (chemotherapy cycles) are about 6 to 7 weeks long each. 5The maximum dose of CCNU (dose cap) is 200 mg. CCNU is administered at a dose of 110 mg/m2 body surface area calculated according to Du Bois once every six weeks. It is recommended to be taken at least 3 h after the last meal in the morning or the evening. An antiemesis using a 5HT3 antagonist or a comparable medication should be used one hour before CCNU. The capsules should be swallowed whole and not opened or dissolved. If the dose is missed it can be taken within 48 hours of the usual starting day, but the interval to the first dose of procarbazine needs to be maintained. 6The maximum dose (dose cap) of vincristine is 2 mg. 7Procarbazine is usually taken fasting in the morning or 3 hours after the last meal at any time at 2 capsules. There is no specific concomitant medication. Some patients may benefit from an antiemesis at the discretion of the investigator
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
CETEG administration and dosing. 1 CCNU is administered at a dose of 100 mg/m2 body surface area calculated according to Du Bois once every six weeks. It is recommended to be taken at least 3 h after the last meal in the morning or the evening. An antiemesis using a 5HT3 antagonist or a comparable medication should be used one hour before CCNU. The capsules should be swallowed whole and not opened or dissolved. If the dose is missed it can be taken within 48 hours of the usual starting day, but the interval to the first dose of TMZ needs to be maintained. 2 The first cycle of temozolomide is administered at the dose of 100 mg/m2. It will be taken once daily (QD) at 100 mg per m2 body surface area calculated according to Du Bois on days 2–6 of a 42 days cycle, fasting in the morning. An antiemesis using a 5HT3 antagonist or a comparable medication should be used one hour before temozolomide. The capsule should be swallowed whole and not opened or dissolved. If a dose is missed it can be taken within 6 hours of the usual morning dose. If the time is greater than 6 hours than the regular time or the patient vomits the dose, the patient should wait and take the next dose. The dose is escalated to 150 mg/m2 and 200 mg/m2 as of subsequent cycles in the absence of toxicity. 3 Follow these procedures for pseudoprogression: a) if pseudoprogression is felt to be present, treatment should continue and functional imaging (i.e., MRI perfusion, spectroscopy) or pathological confirmation should be considered; b) if pseudoprogression is known to be present, continue treatment per study protocol; c) if tumor progression is present, the patient should be discontinued from the study; d) if equivocal, contact the study PI. 4Treatment cycles are about 6 weeks long each
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Definition of the primary endpoint (including handling of missing values/visits). Green means that there is no decline, and red means that there is a decline that is relevant in terms of the primary endpoint

References

    1. Louis DN, Perry A, Wesseling P, Brat DJ, Cree IA, Figarella-Branger D, et al. The 2021 WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Neuro-Oncology. 2021;23:1231–1251. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noab106.
    1. Weller M, van den Bent M, Preusser M, Le Rhun E, Tonn JC, Minniti G, et al. EANO guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of diffuse gliomas of adulthood. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2021;18:170–186. doi: 10.1038/s41571-020-00447-z.
    1. Parsons DW, Jones S, Zhang X, Lin JC, Leary RJ, Angenendt P, et al. An integrated genomic analysis of human glioblastoma multiforme. Science. 2008;321:1807–1812. doi: 10.1126/science.1164382.
    1. Ward PS, Patel J, Wise DR, Abdel-Wahab O, Bennett BD, Coller HA, et al. The common feature of leukemia-associated IDH1 and IDH2 mutations is a neomorphic enzyme activity converting alpha-ketoglutarate to 2-hydroxyglutarate. Cancer Cell. 2010;17:225–234. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2010.01.020.
    1. Wick A, Bähr O, Schuler M, Rohrberg K, Chawla SP, Janku F, et al. Phase I Assessment of Safety and Therapeutic Activity of BAY1436032 in Patients with IDH1-Mutant Solid Tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27:2723–2733. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4256.
    1. Mellinghoff IK, Ellingson BM, Touat M, Maher E, De La Fuente MI, Holdhoff M, et al. Ivosidenib in isocitrate dehydrogenase 1–mutated advanced glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38:3398–3406. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.03327.
    1. Mellinghoff IK, Penas-Prado M, Peters KB, Burris HA, 3rd, Maher EA, Janku F, et al. Vorasidenib, a Dual Inhibitor of Mutant IDH1/2, in Recurrent or Progressive Glioma; Results of a First-in-Human Phase I Trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(16):4491–4499. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-0611.
    1. Klein M, Heimans JJ, Aaronson NK, van der Ploeg HM, Grit J, Muller M, et al. Effect of radiotherapy and other treatment-related factors on mid-term to long-term cognitive sequelae in low-grade gliomas: a comparative study. Lancet. 2002;360:1361–1368. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)11398-5.
    1. Douw L, Klein M, Fagel SS, van den Heuvel J, Taphoorn MJ, Aaronson JK, et al. Cognitive and radiological effects of radiotherapy in patients with low-grade glioma: long-term follow-up. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8:810–818. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70204-2.
    1. Habets EJ, Taphoorn MJ, Nederend S, Klein M, et al. Health-related quality of life and cognitive functioning in long-term anaplastic oligodendroglioma and oligoastrocytoma survivors. J Neuro-Oncol. 2014;116:161–168. doi: 10.1007/s11060-013-1278-0.
    1. Lassman AB, Iwamoto FM, Cloughesy TF, Delgadillo D, Hoang-Xuan K, et al. International retrospective study of over 1000 adults with anaplastic oligodendroglial tumors. Neuro-Oncol. 2011;13:649–659. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nor040.
    1. Wick W, Roth P, Hartmann C, Hau P, Nakamura M, Stockhammer F, et al. Neurooncology Working Group (NOA) of the German Cancer Society. Long-term analysis of the NOA-04 randomized phase III trial of sequential radiochemotherapy of anaplastic glioma with PCV or temozolomide. Neuro Oncol. 2016;18:1529–1537.
    1. Herrlinger U, Tzaridis T, Mack F, Steinbach JP, Schlegel U, Sabel M, et al. Neurooncology Working Group of the German Cancer Society. Lomustine-temozolomide combination therapy versus standard temozolomide therapy in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated MGMT promoter (CeTeG/NOA-09): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2019;393:678–688. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31791-4.
    1. Fliessbach K, Rogowski S, Hoppe C, Sabel M, Goeppert M, Helmstaedter C, et al. Computer-based assessment of cognitive functions in brain tumor patients. J Neuro-Oncol. 2010;100:427–437. doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0194-9.
    1. Taphoorn MJ, Henriksson R, Bottomley A, Cloughesy T, Wick W, Mason WP, et al. Health-Related Quality of Life in a Randomized Phase III Study of Bevacizumab, Temozolomide, and Radiotherapy in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33:2166–2175. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.60.3217.
    1. Nayak L, DeAngelis LM, Brandes AA, Peereboom DM, Galanis E, Lin NU, et al. The Neurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (NANO) scale: a tool to assess neurologic function for integration into the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria. Neuro-Oncology. 2017;19:625–635. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nox029.
    1. Wen PY, Macdonald DA, Reardon DA, Cloughesy TF, Sorensen AG, Galanis E, et al. Updated Response Assessment Criteria For High-Grade Gliomas: Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Working Group. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1963–1972. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.26.3541.
    1. Cairncross G, Wang M, Shaw E, Jenkins R, Brachman D, Buckner J, et al. Phase III trial of chemoradiotherapy for anaplastic oligodendroglioma: long-term results of RTOG 9402. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:337–343. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.2674.
    1. van den Bent MJ, Brandes AA, Taphoorn MJB, Kros JM, Kouwenhoven MCM, Delattre J-Y, et al. Adjuvant procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine chemotherapy in newly diagnosed anaplastic oligodendroglioma: long-term follow-up of EORTC brain tumor group study 26951. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:344–350. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2012.43.2229.
    1. Wick W, Hartmann C, Engel C, Stoffels M, Felsberg J, Stockhammer F, et al. NOA-04 randomized phase III trial of sequential radiochemotherapy of anaplastic glioma with procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine or temozolomide. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5874–5880. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.6497.
    1. Buckner JC, Shaw EG, Pugh SL, Chakravarti A, Gilbert MR, Barger GR, et al. Radiation plus procarbazine, CCNU, and vincristine in low-grade glioma. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:1344–1355. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1500925.
    1. O’Brien PC, Fleming TR. A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics. 1979;35:549–556. doi: 10.2307/2530245.
    1. Schoenfeld D. The asymptotic properties of nonparametric tests for comparing survival distributions. Biometrika. 1981;68:316–319. doi: 10.1093/biomet/68.1.316.
    1. Schoenfeld DA. Sample-size formula for the proportional-hazards regression model. Biometrics. 1983;39:499–503. doi: 10.2307/2531021.
    1. Platten M, Bunse L, Wick A, Bunse T, Le Cornet L, Harting I, et al. A vaccine targeting mutant IDH1 in newly diagnosed glioma. Nature. 2021;592:463–468. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03363-z.
    1. Yung WK, Albright RE, Olson J, Fredericks R, Fink K, Prados MD, et al. A phase II study of temozolomide vs. procarbazine in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse. Br J Cancer. 2000;83:588–593. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2000.1316.
    1. Webre C, Shonka N, Smith L, Liu D, De Groot J. PC or PCV, That Is the Question: Primary Anaplastic Oligodendroglial Tumors Treated with Procarbazine and CCNU With and Without Vincristine. Anticancer Res. 2015;35:5467–72.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit