Imlifidase Desensitization in Crossmatch-positive, Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients: Results of an International Phase 2 Trial (Highdes)

Stanley C Jordan, Christophe Legendre, Niraj M Desai, Tomas Lorant, Mats Bengtsson, Bonnie E Lonze, Ashley A Vo, Anna Runström, Lena Laxmyr, Kristoffer Sjöholm, Åsa Schiött, Elisabeth Sonesson, Kathryn Wood, Lena Winstedt, Christian Kjellman, Robert A Montgomery, Stanley C Jordan, Christophe Legendre, Niraj M Desai, Tomas Lorant, Mats Bengtsson, Bonnie E Lonze, Ashley A Vo, Anna Runström, Lena Laxmyr, Kristoffer Sjöholm, Åsa Schiött, Elisabeth Sonesson, Kathryn Wood, Lena Winstedt, Christian Kjellman, Robert A Montgomery

Abstract

Background: Highly HLA sensitized patients have limited access to life-saving kidney transplantation because of a paucity of immunologically suitable donors. Imlifidase is a cysteine protease that cleaves IgG leading to a rapid decrease in antibody level and inhibition of IgG-mediated injury. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of imlifidase in converting a positive crossmatch test to negative, allowing highly sensitized patients to be transplanted with a living or deceased donor kidney.

Methods: This open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial conducted at 5 transplant centers, evaluated the ability of imlifidase to create a negative crossmatch test within 24 h. Secondary endpoints included postimlifidase donor-specific antibody levels compared with predose levels, renal function, and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles. Safety endpoints included adverse events and immunogenicity profile.

Results: Of the transplanted patients, 89.5% demonstrated conversion of baseline positive crossmatch to negative within 24 h after imlifidase treatment. Donor-specific antibodies most often rebounded 3-14 d postimlifidase dose, with substantial interpatient variability. Patient survival was 100% with graft survival of 88.9% at 6 mo. With this, 38.9% had early biopsy proven antibody-mediated rejection with onset 2-19 d posttransplantation. Serum IgG levels began to normalize after ~3-7 d posttransplantation. Antidrug antibody levels were consistent with previous studies. Seven adverse events in 6 patients were classified as possibly or probably related to treatment and were mild-moderate in severity.

Conclusions: Imlifidase was well tolerated, converted positive crossmatches to negative, and enabled patients with a median calculated panel-reactive antibody of 99.83% to undergo kidney transplantation resulting in good kidney function and graft survival at 6 mo.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02790437.

Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.

Figures

Graphical abstract
Graphical abstract
FIGURE 1.
FIGURE 1.
Study design. DD, deceased donor; DSA, donor-specific antibody; IVIg, intravenous immune globulin; LD, living donor.
FIGURE 2.
FIGURE 2.
Patient disposition.
FIGURE 3.
FIGURE 3.
Dosing and crossmatch of patients receiving >1 dose of imlifidase. CDC, complement-dependent cytotoxicity; DD, deceased donor; LD, living donor.
FIGURE 4.
FIGURE 4.
Pretransplant DSAs. DSA, donor-specific antibody; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.
FIGURE 5.
FIGURE 5.
Time postimlifidase dose to reach MFI

FIGURE 6.

DSA levels over 6 mo.…

FIGURE 6.

DSA levels over 6 mo. DSA, donor-specific antibody; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.

FIGURE 6.
DSA levels over 6 mo. DSA, donor-specific antibody; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.

FIGURE 7.

Median eGFR for patient with…

FIGURE 7.

Median eGFR for patient with and without DGF. DGF, delayed graft function; eGFR,…

FIGURE 7.
Median eGFR for patient with and without DGF. DGF, delayed graft function; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.
All figures (8)
FIGURE 6.
FIGURE 6.
DSA levels over 6 mo. DSA, donor-specific antibody; MFI, mean fluorescence intensity.
FIGURE 7.
FIGURE 7.
Median eGFR for patient with and without DGF. DGF, delayed graft function; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate.

References

    1. United States Renal Data System. 2018 USRDS Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States. Bethesda, MD; 2018.
    1. Jarl J, Desatnik P, Peetz Hansson U, et al. . Do kidney transplantations save money? A study using a before-after design and multiple register-based data from Sweden. Clin Kidney J. 2018;11:283–288.
    1. Hart A, Smith JM, Skeans MA, et al. . OPTN/SRTR 2017 Annual Data Report: Kidney. Am J Transplant. 2019;19(Suppl 2):19–123.
    1. Jordan SC, Choi J, Vo A. Kidney transplantation in highly sensitized patients. Br Med Bull. 2015;114:113–125.
    1. Statistics Report Library. Available at . Accessed February 21, 2020.
    1. Keith DS, Vranic GM. Approach to the highly sensitized kidney transplant candidate. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11:684–693.
    1. Marfo K, Lu A, Ling M, et al. . Desensitization protocols and their outcome. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6:922–936.
    1. Orandi BJ, Luo X, Massie AB, et al. . Survival benefit with kidney transplants from HLA-incompatible live donors. N Engl J Med. 2016;374:940–950.
    1. Schinstock CA, Smith BH, Montgomery RA, et al. . Managing highly sensitized renal transplant candidates in the era of kidney paired donation and the new kidney allocation system: Is there still a role for desensitization? Clin Transplant. 2019;33:e13751.
    1. Ingelfinger JR. A bacterial IgG-degrading enzyme to unhinge antibodies. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:487–489.
    1. Orandi BJ, Garonzik-Wang JM, Massie AB, et al. . Quantifying the risk of incompatible kidney transplantation: a multicenter study. Am J Transplant. 2014;14:1573–1580.
    1. Vo AA, Petrozzino J, Yeung K, et al. . Efficacy, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of desensitization using IVIG and rituximab. Transplantation. 2013;95:852–858.
    1. Kozlowski T, Andreoni K. Limitations of rituximab/IVIg desensitization protocol in kidney transplantation; is this better than a tincture of time? Ann Transplant. 2011;16:19–25.
    1. Patel S, Benken J, West Thielke P, et al. . Three year outcomes following positive cross match renal transplantation despite failure to convert to negative flow cross match after desensitization. J Clin Nephrol. 2018;2:29–38.
    1. Montgomery RA, Lonze BE, King KE, et al. . Desensitization in HLA-incompatible kidney recipients and survival. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:318–326.
    1. Ge S, Chu M, Choi J, et al. . Imlifidase inhibits HLA antibody-mediated NK cell activation and antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) in vitro. Transplantation. 2020;104:1574–1579.
    1. Winstedt L, Järnum S, Nordahl EA, et al. . Complete removal of extracellular IgG antibodies in a randomized dose-escalation phase I study with the bacterial enzyme IdeS–a novel therapeutic opportunity. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0132011.
    1. Lorant T, Bengtsson M, Eich T, et al. . Safety, immunogenicity, pharmacokinetics, and efficacy of degradation of anti-HLA antibodies by IdeS (imlifidase) in chronic kidney disease patients. Am J Transplant. 2018;18:2752–2762.
    1. Lonze BE, Tatapudi VS, Weldon EP, et al. . IdeS (Imlifidase): a novel agent that cleaves human IgG and permits successful kidney transplantation across high-strength donor-specific antibody. Ann Surg. 2018;268:488–496.
    1. Roufosse C, Simmonds N, Clahsen-van Groningen M, et al. . A 2018 reference guide to the Banff classification of renal allograft pathology. Transplantation. 2018;102:1795–1814.
    1. Jordan SC, Lorant T, Choi J, et al. . IgG endopeptidase in highly sensitized patients undergoing transplantation. N Engl J Med. 2017;377:442–453.
    1. Jackson KR, Covarrubias K, Holscher CM, et al. . The national landscape of deceased donor kidney transplantation for the highly sensitized: transplant rates, waitlist mortality, and posttransplant survival under KAS. Am J Transplant. 2019;19:1129–1138.
    1. Vo AA, Aubert O, Haas M, et al. . Clinical relevance of posttransplant DSAs in patients receiving desensitization for HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2019;103:2666–2674.
    1. Schwenger V, Morath C. Immunoadsorption in nephrology and kidney transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2010;25:2407–2413.
    1. Lipshutz GS, McGuire S, Zhu Q, et al. . ABO blood type-incompatible kidney transplantation and access to organs. Arch Surg. 2011;146:453–458.
    1. Habal MV, Farr M, Restaino S, et al. . Desensitization in the era of precision medicine: moving from the bench to bedside. Transplantation. 2019;103:1574–1581.
    1. Schinstock CA, Mannon RB, Budde K, et al. . Recommended treatment for antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: the 2019 Expert Consensus From the Transplantion Society Working Group. Transplantation. 2020;104:911–922.
    1. Abu Jawdeh BG, Cuffy MC, Alloway RR, et al. . Desensitization in kidney transplantation: review and future perspectives. Clin Transplant. 2014;28:494–507.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit