Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Disposition of Trazpiroben, a D2 /D3 Receptor Antagonist: Phase I Single- and Multiple-Ascending Dose Studies in Healthy Japanese Participants

Takayoshi Yamaguchi, Kentarou Kudou, Hiroyuki Okamoto, Chunlin Chen, Roger Whiting, Hisakuni Sekino, Takayoshi Yamaguchi, Kentarou Kudou, Hiroyuki Okamoto, Chunlin Chen, Roger Whiting, Hisakuni Sekino

Abstract

Trazpiroben (TAK-906) is a peripherally selective dopamine D2 /D3 receptor antagonist being developed to treat chronic gastroparesis. This phase I, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, single- and multiple-ascending dose, parallel-group study evaluated the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of trazpiroben in healthy Japanese men. Findings were compared with those from a prior US trial in healthy individuals. Overall, 24 participants were enrolled into 3 cohorts (each n = 8). Per cohort, 6 participants received trazpiroben (cohort 1, 50 mg; 2, 100 mg; 3, 10 mg) once on day 1 and twice daily on days 3 through 7, and two received placebo. Trazpiroben was well tolerated, with no clinically meaningful adverse events observed. Following single- and multiple-dose administration, trazpiroben was rapidly absorbed and eliminated (mean elimination half-life, 1.89-6.45 hours; median time to maximum serum concentration [steady state], 1.00-1.25 hours). Serum prolactin increased with trazpiroben treatment (mean maximum serum concentration 93.32 ng/mL [10 mg] vs. 10.83 ng/mL [placebo]), illustrating receptor target engagement. Results reflected those from healthy US participants, indicating a lack of differences between these ethnic populations in trazpiroben disposition and safety profile. Trazpiroben may represent a promising therapy for chronic gastroparesis across different populations, with further evaluation ongoing in a phase IIb study (NCT03544229).

Keywords: gastroparesis; pharmacodynamics; pharmacokinetics; safety; trazpiroben.

Conflict of interest statement

Y.T. and K.K. are employees of Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd. and receive stock or stock options. O.H. was an employee of PRA Development Center KK at the time of the study. He is currently an employee of Alexion Pharma GK. C.C. was an employee of Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., and received stock or stock options at the time of the study. He is currently an employee of Bayer Pharmaceuticals. R.W., a former shareholder of Altos Therapeutics LLC, will benefit from any future payments by Takeda with respect to certain clinical development and commercial milestones for trazpiroben. R.W. has received consulting fees from Takeda. S.H. is an employee of Houeikai Medical Corporation. Y.T., K.K., O.H., C.C., R.W., and S.H. have agreements with Takeda not to publish any Takeda‐sponsored research without prior authorization.

© 2021 Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mean (SD) plasma concentration–time curves of trazpiroben following single and multiple doses in Japanese participants. Plasma concentrations below the lower limit of quantification (0.05 ng/mL) were assigned a value of 0 ng/mL. SD, standard deviation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean plasma concentration–time curves of trazpiroben following single and multiple doses in Japanese and US participants. Predose samples were assigned a sampling time of 0 hours. Plasma concentrations below the lower limit of quantification (0.05 ng/mL) were assigned a value of 0 ng/mL.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean serum concentration of prolactin following administration of single and multiple doses of trazpiroben in Japanese and US participants. Predose samples were assigned a sampling time of 0 hours.

References

    1. Camilleri M, Parkman HP, Shafi MA, Abell TL, Gerson L, American College of G . Clinical guideline: management of gastroparesis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(1):18‐37.
    1. Gharibans AA, Coleman TP, Mousa H, Kunkel DC. Spatial patterns from high‐resolution electrogastrography correlate with severity of symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia and gastroparesis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019;17(13):2668‐2677.
    1. Bekkelund M, Sangnes DA, Gunnar Hatlebakk J, Aabakken L. Pathophysiology of idiopathic gastroparesis and implications for therapy. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2019;54(1):8‐17.
    1. Parkman HP, Hasler WL, Fisher RS. American Gastroenterological Association technical review on the diagnosis and treatment of gastroparesis. Gastroenterology. 2004;127(5):1592‐1622.
    1. Krishnasamy S, Abell TL. Diabetic gastroparesis: principles and current trends in management. Diabetes Ther. 2018;9(suppl 1):1‐42.
    1. Lacy BE, Crowell MD, Mathis C, Bauer D, Heinberg LJ. Gastroparesis: quality of life and health care utilization. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018;52(1):20‐24.
    1. Jung HK, Choung RS, Locke GR 3rd, et al. The incidence, prevalence, and outcomes of patients with gastroparesis in Olmsted County, Minnesota, from 1996 to 2006. Gastroenterology. 2009;136(4):1225‐1233.
    1. Oshima T, Siah KTH, Kim YS, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and practice survey of gastroparesis in Asia by Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021;27(1):46‐54.
    1. Charvat H, Goto A, Goto M, et al. Impact of population aging on trends in diabetes prevalence: a meta‐regression analysis of 160,000 Japanese adults. J Diabetes Investig. 2015;6(5):533‐542.
    1. Acosta A, Camilleri M. Prokinetics in gastroparesis. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2015;44(1):97‐111.
    1. Enweluzo C, Aziz F. Gastroparesis: a review of current and emerging treatment options. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2013;6:161‐165.
    1. Tack J, Camilleri M. New developments in the treatment of gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2018;43:111‐117.
    1. Janssen P, Harris MS, Jones M, et al. The relation between symptom improvement and gastric emptying in the treatment of diabetic and idiopathic gastroparesis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108(9):1382‐1391.
    1. Koch KL, Stern RM, Stewart WR, Vasey MW. Gastric emptying and gastric myoelectrical activity in patients with diabetic gastroparesis: effect of long‐term domperidone treatment. Am J Gastroenterol. 1989;84(9):1069‐1075.
    1. Giudicessi JR, Ackerman MJ, Camilleri M. Cardiovascular safety of prokinetic agents: a focus on drug‐induced arrhythmias. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2018;30(6):e13302.
    1. Hondeghem LM. Domperidone: limited benefits with significant risk for sudden cardiac death. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2013;61(3):218‐225.
    1. Sanguinetti MC, Tristani‐Firouzi M. hERG potassium channels and cardiac arrhythmia. Nature. 2006;440(7083):463‐469.
    1. Nishihara M, Ramsden D, Balani SK. Evaluation of the drug‐drug interaction potential for trazpiroben (TAK‐906), a D2/D3 receptor antagonist for gastroparesis, towards cytochrome P450s and transporters. Xenobiotica. 2021;51(6):668‐679.
    1. Chen C, Zhang W, Bari M, Almansa C, Baratta M, Rosario M. Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of trazpiroben (TAK‐906), a peripherally selective D2/D3 dopamine receptor antagonist, in the presence and absence of itraconazole, a potent CYP 3A4 inhibitor. Clin Pharmacol. 2021;13:145‐155.
    1. Whiting R, Choppin A, Luehr G. TAK‐906, a novel dopamine D2/D3 receptor antagonist for the treatment of gastroparesis. Gastroenterology 2020;158(6):S‐638.
    1. Whiting RL, Choppin A, Luehr G, Jasper JR. Preclinical evaluation of the effects of trazpiroben (TAK‐906), a novel, potent dopamine D2/D3 receptor antagonist for the management of gastroparesis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2021.379(1):85–95.
    1. Kreckler L, Osinski M, Williams S, Whiting R. Safety pharmacology evaluations of TAK‐906, a novel dopamine D2/D3 selective receptor antagonist for the management of gastroparesis. Gastroenterology. 2020;158(6):S‐627.
    1. Whiting RL, Darpo B, Chen C, et al. Safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of trazpiroben (TAK‐906), a novel selective D2/D3 receptor antagonist: a phase 1 randomized, placebo‐controlled single‐ and multiple‐dose escalation study in healthy participants. Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev. 2021;10:927–939.
    1. Kuo B, Scimia C, Dukes G, et al. Randomised clinical trial: safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of trazpiroben (TAK‐906), a dopamine D2/D3 receptor antagonist, in patients with gastroparesis. Alimentary Pharmacol Therapeut. 2021;54(3):267‐280.
    1. Schlegel S, Schlösser R, Hiemke C, Nickel O, Bockisch A, Hahn K. Prolactin plasma levels and D 2‐dopamine receptor occupancy measured with IBZM‐SPECT. Psychopharmacology. 1996;124(3):285‐287.
    1. Asano H, Tomita T, Nakamura K, et al. Prevalence of gastric motility disorders in patients with functional dyspepsia. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2017;23(3):392.
    1. Miwa H, Kusano M, Arisawa T, et al. Evidence‐based clinical practice guidelines for functional dyspepsia. J Gastroenterol. 2015;50(2):125‐139.
    1. Parkman HP, Mishra A, Jacobs M, et al. Clinical response and side effects of metoclopramide: associations with clinical, demographic, and pharmacogenetic parameters. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2012;46(6):494‐503.
    1. Rao AS, Camilleri M. Review article: metoclopramide and tardive dyskinesia. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;31(1):11‐19.
    1. Leelakanok N, Holcombe A, Schweizer ML. Domperidone and risk of ventricular arrhythmia and cardiac death: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clin Drug Investig. 2016;36(2):97‐107.
    1. Zucker I, Prendergast BJ. Sex differences in pharmacokinetics predict adverse drug reactions in women. Bio Sex Diff. 2020;11:1‐14.
    1. Yu Y, Chen J, Li D, Wang L, Wang W, Liu H. Systematic analysis of adverse event reports for sex differences in adverse drug events. Sci Rep. 2016;6(1):1‐9.
    1. Gonzalez Z, Loganathan P, Sarosiek I, McCallum RW. Gender‐related differences in gastroparesis. Am J Med Sci. 2020;360(5):474‐483.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit