Estimating salivary carriage of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 in nonsymptomatic people and efficacy of mouthrinse in reducing viral load: A randomized controlled trial

PremPrashant Chaudhary, Arsen Melkonyan, Archana Meethil, Shweta Saraswat, David L Hall, James Cottle, Mark Wenzel, Nadine Ayouty, Spenser Bense, Fabiola Casanova, Matthew Chaney, Hannah Chase, Rebecca Hermel, Matthew McClement, Claire Sesson, Bryce Woolsey, Purnima Kumar, PremPrashant Chaudhary, Arsen Melkonyan, Archana Meethil, Shweta Saraswat, David L Hall, James Cottle, Mark Wenzel, Nadine Ayouty, Spenser Bense, Fabiola Casanova, Matthew Chaney, Hannah Chase, Rebecca Hermel, Matthew McClement, Claire Sesson, Bryce Woolsey, Purnima Kumar

Abstract

Background: Many people infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) never develop substantial symptoms. With more than 34 million people in the United States already infected and highly transmissible variants rapidly emerging, it is highly probable that post- and presymptomatic people will form an important fraction of those seeking dental care. Salivary carriage rates in these populations are not known. Moreover, although preventing transmission is critical for controlling spread, the efficacy of mouthrinses in reducing oral viral load is poorly studied.

Methods: The authors recruited 201 asymptomatic, presymptomatic, postsymptomatic, and symptomatic people and measured copy numbers of SARS-CoV-2 in unstimulated saliva using real-time reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Subsequently, the authors inducted 41 symptomatic people into a randomized, triple-blinded study and instructed them to rinse with saline, 1% hydrogen peroxide, 0.12% chlorhexidine, or 0.5% povidone-iodine for 60 seconds. The authors measured viral load 15 and 45 minutes after rinsing.

Results: Salivary SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 23% of asymptomatic, 60% of postsymptomatic, and 28% of presymptomatic participants. Neither carriage rate nor viral load correlated with COVID-19 symptomatology, age, sex, or race or ethnicity. All 4 mouthrinses decreased viral load by 61% through 89% at 15 minutes and by 70% through 97% at 45 minutes. The extent of reduction correlated significantly with initial viral load.

Conclusions: Nonsymptomatic people can pose a risk of transmitting the virus, and mouthrinses are simple and efficacious means of reducing this risk, especially when the load is less than 104 copies per milliliter.

Practical implications: At a time when resources are stretched, the findings of this study contribute to evidence-based selection of personal protection equipment and simple infection-control practices to reduce contagion at source. This clinical trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The registration number is NCT04603794.

Keywords: Aerosol; SARS-CoV-2; chlorhexidine; dental; hydrogen peroxide; mouthrinse; povidone-iodine; saline; saliva.

Copyright © 2021 American Dental Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient selection workflow. SARS-CoV-2: .Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Reduction of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 load 15 and 45 minutes after rinsing for 1 minute with 15 milliliters of normal saline, 1% hydrogen peroxide, 0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate, or 0.5% povidone-iodine. Bars represent median reduction from baseline at each time point, and error bars indicate standard error of the mean.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/instance/8193024/bin/fx1_lrg.jpg

References

    1. Kalenderian E., Xiao Y., Spallek H., Franklin A., Olsen G., Walji M. COVID-19 and dentistry: challenges and opportunities for providing safe care. Accessed August 31, 2020.
    1. Guidance for dental settings Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed November 27, 2020.
    1. Zhao S., Cao J., Sun R., Zhang L., Liu B. Analysis of anxiety-related factors amongst frontline dental staff during the COVID-19 pandemic in Yichang, China. BMC Oral Health. 2020;20(1):342.
    1. Peditto M., Scapellato S., Marcianò A., Costa P., Oteri G. Dentistry during the COVID-19 epidemic: an Italian workflow for the management of dental practice. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(9):3325.
    1. Interim infection prevention and control guidance for dental settings during the COVID-19 response. Accessed Nov 27, 2020.
    1. Miyake S, Ashikari K, Kato S, et al. SARS-CoV-2 prevalence in saliva and gastric and intestinal fluid in patients undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy in COVID-19 endemic areas: prospective cross-sectional study in Japan. Dig Endosc. Published online February 6, 2021.
    1. Murakami E., Ghatak-Roy A., Popova M., et al. COVID-19 infection among emergency department healthcare providers in a large tertiary academic medical center following the peak of the pandemic. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;40:27–31.
    1. Teo A.K.J., Choudhury Y., Tan I.B., et al. Saliva is more sensitive than nasopharyngeal or nasal swabs for diagnosis of asymptomatic and mild COVID-19 infection. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):3134.
    1. Feres M., Figueiredo L.C., Faveri M., Stewart B., de Vizio W. The effectiveness of a preprocedural mouthrinse containing cetylpyridinium chloride in reducing bacteria in the dental office. JADA. 2010;141(4):415–422.
    1. García-Caballero L., Quintas V., Prada-López I., Seoane J., Donos N., Tomás I. Chlorhexidine substantivity on salivary flora and plaque-like biofilm: an in situ model. PLoS One. 2013;8(12)
    1. Joshi A.A., Padhye A.M., Gupta H.S. Efficacy of two pre-procedural rinses at two different temperatures in reducing aerosol contamination produced during ultrasonic scaling in a dental set-up: a microbiological study. J Int Acad Periodontol. 2017;19(4):138–144.
    1. Hassandarvish P., Tiong V., Mohamed N.A., et al. In vitro virucidal activity of povidone iodine gargle and mouthwash against SARS-CoV-2: implications for dental practice. Br Dent J. Published online December. 2020;10 doi: 10.1038/s41415-020-2402-0.
    1. Xu C., Wang A., Hoskin E.R., et al. Differential effects on antiseptic mouth rinses on SARS-CoV-2 infectivity in vitro. Pathogens. 2021;10(3):272.
    1. Gottsauner M.J., Michaelides I., Schmidt B., et al. A prospective clinical pilot study on the effects of a hydrogen peroxide mouthrinse on the intraoral viral load of SARS-CoV-2. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24(10):3707–3713.
    1. Seneviratne C.J., Balan P., Ko K.K.K., et al. Efficacy of commercial mouth-rinses on SARS-CoV-2 viral load in saliva: randomized control trial in Singapore. Infection. 2021;49(2):305–311.
    1. American Dental Association. Return to work toolkit. Accessed January 6, 2020.
    1. Navazesh M. Methods for collecting saliva. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1993;694(1):72–77.
    1. Vogels C., Brackney D.E., Kalinich C., et al. SalivaDirect: RNA extraction-free SARS-CoV-2 diagnostics. . Accessed November 27, 2020.
    1. Xu H., Zhong L., Deng J., et al. High expression of ACE2 receptor of 2019-nCoV on the epithelial cells of oral mucosa. Int J Oral Sci. 2020;12(1):8.
    1. Srinivasan M, Zunt SL, Goldblatt LI. Oral epithelial expression of angiotensin converting enzyme-2: implications for COVID-19 diagnosis and prognosis. bioRxiv. June 23, 2020. Preprint. Version 1. Withdrawal status: active.
    1. Hoffmann M., Kleine-Weber H., Schroeder S., et al. SARS-CoV-2 Cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell. 2020;181(2):271–280. e8.
    1. Goyal A., Reeves D.B., Cardozo-Ojeda E.F., Schiffer J.T., Mayer B.T. Viral load and contact heterogeneity predict SARS-CoV-2 transmission and super-spreading events. eLife. 2021;10
    1. Wölfel R., Corman V.M., Guggemos W., et al. Virological assessment of hospitalized patients with COVID-2019. Nature. 2020;581(7809):465–469.
    1. Meethil A.P., Saraswat S., Chaudhary P.P., Dabdoub S.M., Kumar P.S. Sources of SARS-CoV-2 and other microorganisms in dental aerosols. J Dent Res. 2021;100(8):817–823. doi: 10.1177/00220345211015948.
    1. Estrich C.G., Mikkelsen M., Morrissey R., et al. Estimating COVID-19 prevalence and infection control practices among US dentists. JADA. 2020;151(11):815–824.
    1. Liu R., Yi S., Zhang J., Lv Z., Zhu C., Zhang Y. Viral Load dynamics in sputum and nasopharyngeal swab in patients with COVID-19. J Dent Res. 2020;99(11):1239–1244.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit