The effects of computer-based mindfulness training on Self-control and Mindfulness within Ambulatorily assessed network Systems across Health-related domains in a healthy student population (SMASH): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Zarah Rowland, Mario Wenzel, Thomas Kubiak, Zarah Rowland, Mario Wenzel, Thomas Kubiak

Abstract

Background: Self-control is an important ability in everyday life, showing associations with health-related outcomes. The aim of the Self-control and Mindfulness within Ambulatorily assessed network Systems across Health-related domains (SMASH) study is twofold: first, the effectiveness of a computer-based mindfulness training will be evaluated in a randomized controlled trial. Second, the SMASH study implements a novel network approach in order to investigate complex temporal interdependencies of self-control networks across several domains.

Methods: The SMASH study is a two-armed, 6-week, non-blinded randomized controlled trial that combines seven weekly laboratory meetings and 40 days of electronic diary assessments with six prompts per day in a healthy undergraduate student population at the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Germany. Participants will be randomly assigned to (1) receive a computer-based mindfulness intervention or (2) to a wait-list control condition. Primary outcomes are self-reported momentary mindfulness and self-control assessed via electronic diaries. Secondary outcomes are habitual mindfulness and habitual self-control. Further measures include self-reported behaviors in specific self-control domains: emotion regulation, alcohol consumption and eating behaviors. The effects of mindfulness training on primary and secondary outcomes are explored using three-level mixed models. Furthermore, networks will be computed with vector autoregressive mixed models to investigate the dynamics at participant and group level. This study was approved by the local ethics committee (reference code 2015_JGU_psychEK_011) and follows the standards laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki (2013).

Discussion: This randomized controlled trial combines an intensive Ambulatory Assessment of 40 consecutive days and seven laboratory meetings. By implementing a novel network approach, underlying processes of self-control within different health domains will be identified. These results will deepen the understanding of self-control performance and will guide to just-in-time individual interventions for several health-related behaviors.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02647801 . Registered on 15 December 2015 (registered retrospectively). .

Keywords: Ambulatory assessment; Mindfulness; Network approach; Randomized controlled trial; Self-control.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Participant time-line. Both conditions come to all assessment time points and take part in an Ambulatory Assessment. Ambulatory Assessment starts 1 day after the baseline assessment: for 40 consecutive days, signals are distributed six times a day (all items are listed in Additional file 2). KIMS Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Scale, BFI-44 Big Five Inventory-44, MAAS Mindful Attention Awareness Scale, SCS-K-D Self-control Scale-K-D, SDS-17 Social Desirability Scale-17, WHO-5 World Health Organization Five Wellbeing Index, BSI-18 Brief Symptom Inventory, ERQ Emotion Regulation Questionnaire, AAS Adult Attachment Scale, DEBQ Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire, TMS Toronto Mindfulness Scale. The post-intervention Feedback Questionnaire assesses effort that was expended during Ambulatory Assessment
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Time-to-time dynamics between several variables at baseline (day 1 till day 6). Variables: SCD = self-control depletion; M = mindfulness; NA = negative affect; NE = negative event; C = conflict; D = desire strength. Solid arrows represent positive relations and dashed arrows represent negative relations. The thicker the line the higher is the fixed-effect coefficient. In this case, only coefficients reaching significance are presented (p < .05)

References

    1. Baumeister RF, Heatherton TF, Tice DM. Losing control: how and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego: Academic Press, Inc; 1994.
    1. Tangney JP, Baumeister RF, Boone AL. High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. J Pers. 2004;72:277–322. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x.
    1. Hofmann W, Luhmann M, Fisher RR, Vohs KD, Baumeister RF. Yes, But are they happy? Effects of trait self-control on affective well-being and life satisfaction. J Pers. 2014;82:265–77. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12050.
    1. Willis TA, Isasi CR, Mendoza D, Ainette MG. Self-control constructs related to measures of dietary intake and physical activity in adolescents. J Adolesc Health. 2007;41:551–8. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.06.013.
    1. Fan M, Jin Y. Obesity and Self-control: food consumption, physical activity and weight-loss intention. Appl Econ Perspect Pol. 2014;36:125–45. doi: 10.1093/aepp/ppt034.
    1. Ford JA, Blumenstein L. Self-control and substance use among college students. J Drug Issues. 2013;43:56–68. doi: 10.1177/0022042612462216.
    1. Hofmann W, Baumeister RF, Förster G, Vohs KD. Everyday temptations: an experience sampling study of desire, conflict, and self-control. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2012;102:1318–35. doi: 10.1037/a0026545.
    1. Hofmann W, Vohs KD, Baumeister RF. What people desire, feel conflicted about, and try to resist in everyday life. Psychol Sci. 2012;23:582–8. doi: 10.1177/0956797612437426.
    1. Nater UM, Hoppmann C, Klumb PL. Neuroticism and conscientiousness are associated with cortisol diurnal profiles in adults – Role of positive and negative affect. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2010;35:1573–7. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2010.02.017.
    1. Trull TJ, Ebner-Priemer U. Ambulatory Assessment. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2013;9:151–76. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050212-185510.
    1. Shiffman S, Dunbar MS, Li X, Scholl SM, Tindle HA, Anderson SJ, et al. Smoking patterns and stimulus control in intermittent and daily smokers. PLoS One. 2014;9:e89911. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089911.
    1. Koval P, Brose A, Pe ML, Houben M, Erbas Y, Champagne D, et al. Emotional inertia and external events: the roles of exposure, reactivity, and recovery. Emotion. 2015;15:625–36. doi: 10.1037/emo0000059.
    1. Hofmann W, Adriaanse M, Vohs K, Baumeister RF. Dieting and the self-control of eating in everyday environments: an experience sampling study. Br J Health Psychol. 2013;19:523–39. doi: 10.1111/bjhp.12053.
    1. Kabat-Zinn J. Wherever you go, there you are: mindfulness meditation in everyday life. New York: Hyperion Books; 1994.
    1. Kabat-Zinn J. Full catastrophe living: using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain and illness. New York: Delacorte; 1990.
    1. Chiesa A, Serretti A. Are mindfulness-based interventions effective for substance use disorders? A systematic review of the evidence. Subst Use Misuse. 2014;49:492–512. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2013.770027.
    1. Katterman S, Kleinmann BM, Hood MM, Nackers LM, Corsica JA. Mindfulness meditation as an intervention for binge eating, emotional eating, and weight loss: a systematic review. Eat Behav. 2014;15:197–204. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2014.01.005.
    1. Kuhlmann SM, Bürger A, Esser G, Hammerle F. A mindfulness-based stress prevention training for medical students (MediMind): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Trials. 2015;16:40. doi: 10.1186/s13063-014-0533-9.
    1. Tomfohr-Madsen LM, Campbell TS, Giesbrecht GF, Letourneau NL, Carlson LE, Madsen JW, et al. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for psychological distress in pregnancy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. BMC Trials. 2016;17:498. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1601-0.
    1. Low J, Serfaty M, Davis S, Vickerstaff V, Gola A, Omar RZ, et al. Acceptance and commitment therapy for adults with advanced cancer (CanACT): study protocol for a feasibility randomized controlled trial. BMC Trials. 2016;17:77. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1169-8.
    1. Baer RA. Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: a conceptual and empirical review. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2003;10:125–43. doi: 10.1093/clipsy.bpg015.
    1. Grabovac AD, Lau MA, Willett BR. Mechanisms of mindfulness: a Buddhist psychological model. Mindfulness. 2011;2:154–66. doi: 10.1007/s12671-011-0054-5.
    1. Feltman R, Robinson MD, Ode S. Mindfulness as a moderator of neuroticism-outcome relations: a self-regulation perspective. J Res Pers. 2009;43:953–61. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2009.08.009.
    1. Bringmann LF, Vissers N, Wichers M, Geschwind N, Kuppens P, Peeters F, et al. A network approach to psychopathology: new insights into clinical longitudinal data. PLoS One. 2013;8:e60188. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0060188.
    1. World Medical Association World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Med Assoc. 2013;310:2191–4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.
    1. Levinson DB, Stoll EL, Kindy SD, Merry HL, Davidson RJ. A mind you can count on: validating breath counting as a behavioral measure of mindfulness. Front Psychol. 2014;5:1202. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01202.
    1. Brown KW, Ryan RM. The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;84:822–48. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822.
    1. Michalak J, Heidenreich T, Ströhle G, Nachtigall C. Die deutsche Version der Mindful Attention and Awareness Scale (MAAS) Psychometrische Befunde zu einem Achtsamkeitsfragebogen. Z Klin Psychol Psychother. 2008;37:200–8. doi: 10.1026/1616-3443.37.3.200.
    1. Bertrams A, Unger A, Dickhäuser O. Momentan verfügbare Selbstkontrollkraft—Vorstellung eines Messinstruments und erste Befunde aus pädagogisch-psychologischen Kontexten. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie. 2011;25:185–96. doi: 10.1024/1010-0652/a000042.
    1. Bertrams A, Dickhäuser O. Messung dispositioneller Selbstkontroll-Kapazität. Eine deutsche Adaptation der Kurzform der Self-Control Scale (SCS-K-D) Diagnostica. 2009;55:2–10. doi: 10.1026/0012-1924.55.1.2.
    1. John OP, Donahue EM, Kentle RL. The Big Five Inventory—Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research; 1991.
    1. Lang FR, Lüdtke O, Asendorpf JB. Testgüte und psychometrische Äquivalenz der deutschen Version des Big Five Inventory (BFI) bei jungen, mittelalten und alten Erwachsenen. Diagnostica. 2001;47:111–21. doi: 10.1026//0012-1924.47.3.111.
    1. Stöber J. Die Soziale-Erwünschtheits-Skala-17 (SES17). Entwicklung und erste Befunde zu Reliabilität und Validität. Diagnostica. 1999;45:173–7. doi: 10.1026//0012-1924.45.4.173.
    1. Stöber J. The Social Desirability Scale-17 (SDS-17): Convergent validity, discriminant validity, and relationship with age. Eur J Psychol Assess. 2001;17:222–32. doi: 10.1027//1015-5759.17.3.222.
    1. Baer RA, Smith GT, Allen KB. Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills. Assessment. 2004;11:191–206. doi: 10.1177/1073191104268029.
    1. Ströhle G, Nachtigall C, Michalak J, Heidenreich T. Die Erfassung von Achtsamkeit als mehrdimensionales Konstrukt Die deutsche Version des Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS-D) Z Klin Psychol Psychother. 2010;39:1–12. doi: 10.1026/1616-3443/a000001.
    1. Lau MA, Bishop SR, Segal ZV, Buis T, Anderson ND, Carlson L, et al. The Toronto Mindfulness Scale: development and validation. J Clin Psychol. 2006;62:1445–67. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20326.
    1. World Health Organization: Regional Office for Europe. Wellbeing measures in primary health care: The DepCare Project. Consensus meeting, Stockholm. 1998. . Accessed 1 Mar 2016.
    1. Brähler E, Mühlan H, Albani C, Schmidt S. Teststatistische Prüfung und Normierung der deutschen Versionen des EUROHIS-QOL Lebensqualität-Index und des WHO-5 Wohlbefindens-Index. Diagnostica. 2007;53:83–96. doi: 10.1026/0012-1924.53.2.83.
    1. Spitzer C, Hammer S, Löwe B, Grabe HJ, Barnow S, Rose M, et al. Die Kurzform des Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18): erste Befunde zu den psychometrischen Kennwerten der deutschen Version. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2011;79:517–23. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1281602.
    1. Derogatis LR. Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI)-18 Administration, scoring and procedures manual. Minneapolis: NCS Pearson, Inc; 2001.
    1. Gross JJ, John OP. Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003;85:348–62. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348.
    1. Abler B, Kessler H. Emotion Regulation Questionnaire—Eine deutschsprachige Fassung des ERQ von Gross und John. Diagnostica. 2009;55:144–52. doi: 10.1026/0012-1924.55.3.144.
    1. Collins NL, Read SJ. Adult Attachment, Working models, and relationship quality in dating couples. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990;58:644–63. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.58.4.644.
    1. Schmidt S, Strauß B, Höger D, Brähler E. Die Adult Attachment Scale (AAS)—Teststatistische Prüfung und Normierung der deutschen Version. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2004;54:375–82. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-815000.
    1. Grunert SC. Ein Inventar zur Erfassung von Selbstaussagen zum Ernährungsverhalten. Diagnostica. 1989;35:167–79.
    1. van Strien T, Frijters JER, Bergers GPA, Defares PB. The Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ) for assessment of restrained, emotional, and external eating behavior. Int J Eat Disorder. 1986;5:295–315. doi: 10.1002/1098-108X(198602)5:2<295::AID-EAT2260050209>;2-T.
    1. Russell JA. Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychol Rev. 2003;110:145–72. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145.
    1. Kuppens P, Allen NB, Sheeber L. Emotional inertia and psychological maladjustment. Psychol Sci. 2011;21:984–91. doi: 10.1177/0956797610372634.
    1. Borkovec TD, Ray WJ, Stöber J. Worry: A cognitive phenomenon intimately linked to affective, physiological, and interpersonal behavioral processes. Cognit Ther Res. 1998;22:561–76. doi: 10.1023/A:1018790003416.
    1. van Winkel M, Nicolson NA, Wichers M, Viechtbauer W, Myin-Germeys I, Peeters F. Daily life stress reactivity in remitted versus non-remitted depressed individuals. Eur Psychiatry. 2015;30:441–7. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2015.02.011.
    1. Guay F, Vallerand RJ, Blanchard C. On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS) Motiv Emot. 2000;24:175–213. doi: 10.1023/A:1005614228250.
    1. Bakker AB. The work-related flow inventory: construction and initial validation of the WOLF. J Vocat Behav. 2008;72:400–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2007.11.007.
    1. Gillath O, Hart J, Noftle EE, Stockdale GD. Development and validation of a state adult attachment measure (SAAM) J Res Pers. 2009;43:362–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2008.12.009.
    1. Sonnentag S, Fritz C. The recovery experience questionnaire: development and validation of a measure assessing recuperation and unwinding at work. J Occup Health Psychol. 2007;12:204–21. doi: 10.1037/1076-8998.12.3.204.
    1. Hektner JM, Schmidt JA, Csikszentmihalyi M. Experience sampling method: measuring the quality of everyday life. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2006.
    1. Aarts E, Verhage M, Veenvliet JV, Dolan CV, van der Sluis S. A solution to dependency: using multilevel analysis to accommodate nested data. Nat Neurosci. 2014;17:491–6. doi: 10.1038/nn.3648.
    1. Khoury B, Lecomte T, Fortin G, Masse M, Therien P, Bouchard V, et al. Mindfulness-based therapy: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Clin Psychol Rev. 2013;33:763–71. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2013.05.005.
    1. Schulz KF, Grimes DA. Generation of allocation sequences in randomised trials: chance, not choice. Lancet. 2002;359:515–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07683-3.
    1. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013. ISBN 3-900051-07-0 . Accessed 1 Feb 2016.
    1. Epskamp S, Deserno MK, Bringmann LF. mlVAR: Multi-Level Vector Autoregression. R package version 3.0.0. 2015. . Accessed 1 Feb 2016.
    1. Epskamp S, Costantini G, Cramer AOJ, Waldorp LJ, Schmittmann VD, Borsboom D. qgraph: graph plotting methods, psychometric data visualization and graphical model estimation. R package version 3.0.0. 2015. . Accessed 1 Feb 2016.
    1. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 1995;57:289–300.
    1. Bringmann LF, Pe ML, Vissers N, Ceulemans E, Borsboom D, Vanpaemel W, et al. Assessing temporal emotion dynamics using networks. assessment. 2016. doi:10.1177/1073191116645909.
    1. Opsahl T, Agneessens F, Skvoretz J. Node centrality in weighted networks: generalizing degree and shortest paths. Soc Networks. 2010;32:245–51. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.006.
    1. Riley WT, Rivera DE, Atienza AA, Nilsen W, Allison SM, Mermelstein R. Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: are our theories up to the task? Transl Behav Med. 2011;1:53–71. doi: 10.1007/s13142-011-0021-7.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit