Long-term outcomes from the Phase II L-MIND study of tafasitamab (MOR208) plus lenalidomide in patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma

Johannes Duell, Kami J Maddocks, Eva González-Barca, Wojciech Jurczak, Anna Marina Liberati, Sven De Vos, Zsolt Nagy, Aleš Obr, Gianluca Gaidano, Pau Abrisqueta, Nagesh Kalakonda, Marc André, Martin Dreyling, Tobias Menne, Olivier Tournilhac, Marinela Augustin, Andreas Rosenwald, Maren Dirnberger-Hertweck, Johannes Weirather, Sumeet Ambarkhane, Gilles Salles, Johannes Duell, Kami J Maddocks, Eva González-Barca, Wojciech Jurczak, Anna Marina Liberati, Sven De Vos, Zsolt Nagy, Aleš Obr, Gianluca Gaidano, Pau Abrisqueta, Nagesh Kalakonda, Marc André, Martin Dreyling, Tobias Menne, Olivier Tournilhac, Marinela Augustin, Andreas Rosenwald, Maren Dirnberger-Hertweck, Johannes Weirather, Sumeet Ambarkhane, Gilles Salles

Abstract

Tafasitamab (MOR208), an Fc-modified, humanized, anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody, combined with the immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide was clinically active with a good tolerability profile in the open-label, single-arm, phase II L-MIND study of patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) ineligible for autologous stem-cell transplantation. To assess long-term outcomes, we report an updated analysis with ≥35 months' follow-up. Patients were aged >18 years, had received one to three prior systemic therapies (including ≥1 CD20-targeting regimen) and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2. Patients received 28-day cycles of tafasitamab (12 mg/kg intravenously), once weekly during cycles 1-3, then every 2 weeks during cycles 4-12. Lenalidomide (25 mg orally) was administered on days 1-21 of cycles 1-12. After cycle 12, progression-free patients received tafasitamab every 2 weeks until disease progression. The primary endpoint was best objective response rate. After ≥35 months' follow-up (data cut-off: October 30, 2020), the objective response rate was 57.5% (n=46/80), including a complete response in 40.0% of patients (n=32/80) and a partial response in 17.5% of patients (n=14/80). The median duration of response was 43.9 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 26.1-not reached), the median overall survival was 33.5 months (95% CI: 18.3-not reached) and the median progression-free survival was 11.6 months (95% CI: 6.3-45.7). There were no unexpected toxicities. Subgroup analyses revealed consistent long-term efficacy results across most subgroups of patients. This extended follow-up of L-MIND confirms the long duration of response, meaningful overall survival, and well-defined safety profile of tafasitamab plus lenalidomide followed by tafasitamab monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02399085.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) diagram of the L-MIND study at the October 30, 2020 data cut-off.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Proportion of patients in remission. (A-C) Kaplan-Meier plots of duration of response (A), progression-free survival. (B) and overall survival (C) after 35 months of follow-up. 95% CI. 95% confidence interval; CR: complete response; DoR: duration of response; NE: not evaluable; NR: not reached; OS: overall survival; PD: progressive disease; PFS: progression- free survival; PR: partial response; SD: stable disease.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Kaplan-Meier estimates of 30-month time-toevent endpoints. (A) Duration of response,* (B) progression-free survival and (C) overall survival rates. *Based on patients who achieved an objective response (CR or PR) in the respective subgroups. 95% CI: 95% confidence interval; DoR: duration of response; IPI: International Prognostic Index; nC: number of patients censored; nE: number of patients with event; nR: number of patients at risk; n#: number of responders within each subgroup (A: DoR), or number of overall patients within each subcategory (B: PFS; C: OS); OS: overall survival; PFS: progression- free survival. The vertical line indicates the 30- month DoR (A), PFS (B) and OS (C) rates across all responders/patients.

References

    1. World Health Organization. World Cancer Report 2020: Cancer Research for Cancer Prevention. Cancer Control. 2020;199.
    1. Sarkozy C, Sehn LH. New drugs for the management of relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Ann Lymphoma. 2019;3:10.
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines: B-Cell Lymphomas V3.2021. Published 2021. . Accessed February 7, 2021.
    1. Tilly H, Gomes da Silva M, Vitolo U, et al. . Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2015;26(Suppl 5):v116-v125.
    1. Neelapu SS, Locke FL, Bartlett NL, et al. . Axicabtagene ciloleucel CAR T-cell therapy in refractory large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2017;377(26):2531-2544.
    1. Schuster SJ, Bishop MR, Tam CS, et al. . Tisagenlecleucel in adult relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(1):45-56.
    1. Sehn LH, Herrera AF, Flowers CR, et al. . Polatuzumab vedotin in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(2):155-165.
    1. Salles G, Duell J, González Barca E, et al. . Tafasitamab plus lenalidomide in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (L-MIND): a multicentre, prospective, single- arm, phase 2 study. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21(7):978-988.
    1. Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, et al. . Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(5):579-586.
    1. Woyach JA, Awan F, Flinn IW, et al. . A phase 1 trial of the Fc-engineered CD19 antibody XmAb5574 (MOR00208) demonstrates safety and preliminary efficacy in relapsed CLL. Blood. 2014;124(24):3553-3560.
    1. Jurczak W, Zinzani PL, Hess G, et al. . A phase IIa, open-label, multicenter study of single-agent tafasitamab (MOR208), an Fcoptimized anti-CD19 antibody, in patients with relapsed or refractory B-cell non- Hodgkin’s lymphoma: long-term followup, final analysis. Blood. 2019;134 (Suppl_1):4078.
    1. Panel on Opportunistic Infections in Adults and Adolescents with HIV. Guidelines for the Prevention and Treatment of Opportunistic Infections in Adults and Adolescents with HIV. Published 2020. . Accessed July 21, 2020.
    1. US Food & Drug Administration. FDA grants accelerated approval to tafasitamabcxix for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Published online 2020:1-2. . Accessed February 7, 2021.
    1. The International Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma Prognostic Factors Project. A predictive model for aggressive non- Hodgkin’s lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 1993;329(14):987-994.
    1. Witzig TE, Vose JM, Zinzani PL, et al. . An international phase II trial of single-agent lenalidomide for relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(7):1622-1627.
    1. Zinzani PL, Rigacci L, Cox MC, et al. . Lenalidomide monotherapy in heavily pretreated patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma: an Italian observational multicenter retrospective study in daily clinical practice. Leuk Lymphoma. 2015;56(6):1671-1676.
    1. Mounier N, El Gnaoui T, Tilly H, et al. . Rituximab plus gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with refractory/relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who are not candidates for high-dose therapy. A phase II Lymphoma Study Association trial. Haematologica. 2013;98(11):1726-1731.
    1. Locke FL, Ghobadi A, Jacobson CA, et al. . Long-term safety and activity of axicabtagene ciloleucel in refractory large B-cell lymphoma (ZUMA-1): a single-arm, multicentre, phase 1–2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20(1):31-42.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit