Guselkumab induces robust reduction in acute phase proteins and type 17 effector cytokines in active psoriatic arthritis: results from phase 3 trials

Kristen Sweet, Qingxuan Song, Matthew J Loza, Iain B McInnes, Keying Ma, Karen Leander, Vani Lakshminarayanan, Carol Franks, Philip Cooper, Stefan Siebert, Kristen Sweet, Qingxuan Song, Matthew J Loza, Iain B McInnes, Keying Ma, Karen Leander, Vani Lakshminarayanan, Carol Franks, Philip Cooper, Stefan Siebert

Abstract

Objective: To investigate serum protein expression in participants with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and changes after guselkumab treatment.

Methods: Participants with PsA were treated with guselkumab or placebo in the DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2 studies. Serum levels of acute phase reactants C reactive protein (CRP) and serum amyloid A (SAA) and inflammatory cytokines/chemokines were measured at weeks 0, 4 and 24 in 300 study participants and 34 healthy controls (HCs). The PSUMMIT studies measured serum interleukin (IL)-17A, IL-17F and CRP after ustekinumab treatment and levels with ustekinumab versus guselkumab treatment were compared.

Results: Baseline serum levels of CRP, SAA, IL-6, IL-17A and IL-17F were elevated in participants with active PsA vs HCs (p<0.05, geometric mean (GM) ≥40% higher). Baseline T-helper cell 17 (Th17) effector cytokines were significantly associated with baseline psoriasis but not joint disease activity. Compared with placebo, guselkumab treatment resulted in decreases in serum CRP, SAA, IL-6, IL-17A, IL-17F and IL-22 as early as week 4 and continued to decrease through week 24 (p<0.05, GM decrease from baseline ≥33%). At week 24, IL-17A and IL-17F levels were not significantly different from HCs, suggesting normalisation of peripheral IL-23/Th17 axis effector cytokines postguselkumab treatment. Reductions in IL-17A/IL-17F levels were greater in guselkumab-treated versus ustekinumab-treated participants, whereas effects on CRP levels were similar.

Conclusion: Guselkumab treatment reduced serum protein levels of acute phase and Th17 effector cytokines and achieved comparable levels to those in HCs. In participants with PsA, reductions of IL-17A and IL-17F were of greater magnitude after treatment with guselkumab than with ustekinumab.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03162796 NCT03158285.

Keywords: Arthritis; Biological Therapy; Cytokines; Psoriatic.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: KS, QS, MJL, KM, KL, VL, CF and PC are employees of Janssen Research & Development, a wholly owned subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson and own company stock. SS, FRCP, PhD has received research grants, consulting fees and/or honoraria (all <US$10 000 per annum) from AbbVie, Amgen (previously Celgene), Biogen, Janssen, and Novartis. Iain B. McInnes, FRCP, PhD has received research grants, consulting fees, and/or honoraria (all US$<10 000 per annum) from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and UCB.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Baseline levels of acute phase reactants (A–C) and IL-23/Th17 effector cytokines (D–F) in patients with PsA in DISCOVER studies compared with matched healthy controls. Concentration (log2) of analyte (indicated at top of plots) for PsA patients (baseline) and healthy controls. Data presented as symbols representing individual participants and summarised by box plots. Each box represents the upper and lower IQR; lines inside the boxes represent the median; and whiskers represent the range. *Generalised linear model p<0.05 and absolute value of fold difference ≥1.4 vs healthy controls. CRP, C reactive protein; IL, interleukin; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; SAA, serum amyloid A; Th17, T-helper cell 17.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Boxplots of Baseline IL-17A (A) (p=0.0432) and IL-17F (B) (p=0.0222) levels in PASI75 guselkumab non-responders (open circles) and guselkumab responders (grey) at week 24. Each box represents the upper and lower IQR; lines inside the boxes represent the median; and whiskers represent the range. IL interleukin; PASI, Psoriasis Area and severity index.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Change in serum CRP (A), SAA (B), IL-6 (C), IL-17A (D), IL-17F (E) and IL-22 (F) levels in PsA patients in response to treatment with guselkumab compared with placebo over 24 weeks. *P≤0.05 vs baseline, fold difference ≥1.4; #p≤0.05 vs PBO, fold difference ≥1.4; error bars represent two SEs of the mean (~95% CI). BL, baseline; CRP, C reactive protein; GUS, guselkumab; IL, interleukin; PBO, placebo; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; SAA, serum amyloid A; qw4, every 4 weeks; qw8, every 8 weeks; Wk, week.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of changes in serum CRP (A), IL-17A (B) and IL-17F (C) levels with guselkumab (data from DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2 phase 3 studies) and ustekinumab (data from PSUMMIT-1 and PSUMMIT-2 phase 3 studies) over 24 weeks. CRP, C reactive protein; IL, interleukin; PsA, psoriatic arthritis; Wk, week.

References

    1. Alinaghi F, Calov M, Kristensen LE, et al. . Prevalence of psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational and clinical studies. J Am Acad Dermatol 2019;80:251–65. 10.1016/j.jaad.2018.06.027
    1. Siebert S, Sweet K, Dasgupta B, et al. . Responsiveness of serum C-reactive protein, interleukin-17A, and Interleukin-17F levels to ustekinumab in psoriatic arthritis: lessons from two phase III, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019;71:1660–9. 10.1002/art.40921
    1. Mahil SK, Ezejimofor MC, Exton LS, et al. . Comparing the efficacy and tolerability of biologic therapies in psoriasis: an updated network meta-analysis. Br J Dermatol 2020;183:638–49. 10.1111/bjd.19325
    1. Siebert S, Millar NL, McInnes IB. Why did IL-23p19 inhibition fail in AS: a tale of tissues, trials or translation? Ann Rheum Dis 2019;78:1015–8. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-213654
    1. Mease PJ, Smolen JS, Behrens F, et al. . A head-to-head comparison of the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab and adalimumab in biological-naïve patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 24-week results of a randomised, open-label, blinded-assessor trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:123–31. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-215386
    1. McInnes IB, Behrens F, Mease PJ, et al. . Secukinumab versus adalimumab for treatment of active psoriatic arthritis (EXCEED): a double-blind, parallel-group, randomised, active-controlled, phase 3B trial. Lancet 2020;395:1496–505. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30564-X
    1. Belasco J, Louie JS, Gulati N, et al. . Comparative genomic profiling of synovium versus skin lesions in psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2015;67:934–44. 10.1002/art.38995
    1. Deodhar A, Helliwell PS, Boehncke W-H, et al. . Guselkumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis who were biologic-naive or had previously received TNFα inhibitor treatment (DISCOVER-1): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2020;395:1115–25. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30265-8
    1. Mease PJ, Rahman P, Gottlieb AB, et al. . Guselkumab in biologic-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis (DISCOVER-2): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet 2020;395:1126–36. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30263-4
    1. U.S. Food and Drug Administration . Part 630—Requirements For Blood and Blood Components Intended For Transfusion Or For Further Manufacturing Use [Internet]. Electronic Code of Federal Regulations, 2020.
    1. McInnes IB, Kavanaugh A, Gottlieb AB, et al. . Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 1 year results of the phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled PSUMMIT 1 trial. Lancet 2013;382:780–9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60594-2
    1. Ritchlin C, Rahman P, Kavanaugh A, et al. . Efficacy and safety of the anti-IL-12/23 p40 monoclonal antibody, ustekinumab, in patients with active psoriatic arthritis despite conventional non-biological and biological anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy: 6-month and 1-year results of the phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised PSUMMIT 2 trial. Ann Rheum Dis 2014;73:990–9. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204655
    1. Diels J, Thilakarathne P, Cameron C, et al. . Adjusted treatment comparisons between guSelkumab and uStekinumab for treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: the COMPASS analysis. Br J Dermatol 2020;183:276–84. 10.1111/bjd.18634
    1. Murphy CA, Langrish CL, Chen Y, et al. . Divergent pro- and antiinflammatory roles for IL-23 and IL-12 in joint autoimmune inflammation. J Exp Med 2003;198:1951–7. 10.1084/jem.20030896
    1. Schurich A, Raine C, Morris V, et al. . The role of IL-12/23 in T cell-related chronic inflammation: implications of immunodeficiency and therapeutic blockade. Rheumatology 2018;57:246–54. 10.1093/rheumatology/kex186
    1. Nussbaum L, Chen YL, Ogg GS. Role of regulatory T cells in psoriasis pathogenesis and treatment. Br J Dermatol 2021;184:14–24. 10.1111/bjd.19380
    1. Nerviani A, Boutet M-A, Tan WSG, et al. . IL-23 skin and joint profiling in psoriatic arthritis: novel perspectives in understanding clinical responses to IL-23 inhibitors. Ann Rheum Dis 2020. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-218186. [Epub ahead of print: 26 Nov 2020].
    1. Singh JA, Guyatt G, Ogdie A, et al. . Special article: 2018 American College of Rheumatology/National psoriasis Foundation guideline for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol 2019;71:5–32. 10.1002/art.40726
    1. Gossec L, Baraliakos X, Kerschbaumer A, et al. . EULAR recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2019 update. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:700–12. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217159

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit