Glycopyrrolate in comparison to hyoscine hydrobromide and placebo in the treatment of hypersalivation induced by clozapine (GOTHIC1): a feasibility study

Inti Qurashi, Simon Chu, Richard Drake, Victoria Hartley, Imran Chaudhry, J F W Deakin, Nusrat Husain, Inti Qurashi, Simon Chu, Richard Drake, Victoria Hartley, Imran Chaudhry, J F W Deakin, Nusrat Husain

Abstract

Background: Clozapine-induced hypersalivation (CIH) is a common side effect of clozapine treatment and is disliked by clozapine patients, potentially threatening adherence to clozapine treatment. We proposed a trial of alternative medications, hyoscine and glycopyrrolate, for the treatment of CIH and the primary objective of the feasibility study was to assess the recruitment and retention of community clozapine patients as well as assess the metrics of the primary hypersalivation measure.

Methods: This 11-month trial took place in two NHS trusts in northwest UK. Participants were community-dwelling clozapine patients aged 18-65 years who were suffering from CIH, and were recruited from community mental health clinics. They were randomised using a telephone randomisation service to receive either hyoscine (1 week at 0.6 mg daily, 3 weeks at 0.9 mg daily), glycopyrrolate (1 week at 2 mg daily, 3 weeks at 3 mg daily) or placebo. Participants and investigators were blinded to which study arm the participants had been randomised to. We collected data on salivation levels and side effects on a weekly basis and also assessed cognition at the beginning and end of the trial. We also interviewed a sample of participants after the trial to gather information on their experience of having taken part.

Results: One hundred and thirty-eight potential participants agreed to being contacted by researchers about participation in the trial and of these, 29 participants were randomised. Of these, four participants exited the trial before taking any trial medication, and two participants left the study owing to concerns of side effects. Data from four participants was missing, and complete data was available for 19 participants who completed the trial. The mean recruitment rate overall was 1.3 participants per site per month, and the overall retention rate was 76%. Interview data suggested that participants' experiences of trial participation were overwhelmingly positive.

Conclusions: The feasibility study demonstrated that a trial of alternative medications in the treatment of CIH is feasible; patients were willing to be randomised to the trial and retention rate was high.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02613494, registered 24 November 2015.

Keywords: Clozapine-induced hypersalivation; Cognition; Drooling; Feasibility study; Glycopyrrolate; Hyoscine; Refractory schizophrenia; Side effects.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interestsThe authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CONSORT diagram showing key stages of study design
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CONSORT diagram showing the number of patients who consented to contact, were randomised, were followed-up and complete datasets analysed

References

    1. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (UK) Psychosis and schizophrenia in adults. Treatment and management. Updated edition. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence; 2014.
    1. Maher S, Cunningham A, O’Callaghan N, Byrne F, McDonald C, McInerney S, Hallahan B. Clozapine-induced hypersalivation: an estimate of prevalence, severity and impact on quality of life. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2016;6:178–184. doi: 10.1177/2045125316641019.
    1. Safferman A, Lieberman JA, Kane JM. Update on the clinical efficacy and side-effects of clozapine. Schizophr Bull. 1991;17:247–261. doi: 10.1093/schbul/17.2.247.
    1. Brodkin ES, Pelton GH, Price LH. Treatment of clozapine-induced parotid gland swelling. Am J Psychiatry. 1996;153:445.
    1. Qurashi I, Stephenson P, Chu S, Duffy C, Husain N, Chaudhry I. An evaluation of subjective experiences, effects and overall satisfaction with clozapine treatment in a UK forensic service. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2015;5:146–150. doi: 10.1177/2045125315581996.
    1. Joint Formulary Committee. British National Formulary 75. London: British Medical Association and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society; 2018.
    1. Syed R, Au K, Cahill C, Duggan L, He Y, Udu V, Xia J. Pharmacological interventions for clozapine-induced hypersalivation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;3:CD005579.
    1. Sockalingam S, Shammi C, Remington G. Clozapine-induced hypersalivation: a review of treatment strategies. Can J Psychiatr. 2007;52:377–384. doi: 10.1177/070674370705200607.
    1. Bird A, Smith T, Walton A. Current treatment strategies for clozapine-induced sialorrhea. Ann Pharmacother. 2011;45:667–669. doi: 10.1345/aph.1P761.
    1. Segev A, Evans A, Hodsoll J, Whiskey E, Sheriff RS, Shergill S, MacCabe JH. Hyoscine for clozapine-induced hypersalivation: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled cross-over trial. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2019;34:101–107. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000251.
    1. Praharaj SK, Arora M, Gandotra S. Clozapine-induced sialorrhea: pathophysiology and management strategies. Psychopharmacology. 2006;185:265–273. doi: 10.1007/s00213-005-0248-4.
    1. Taylor D, Paton C, Kapur S. The Maudsley prescribing guidelines in psychiatry. 12. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell; 2015.
    1. Sherman SJ, Atri A, Hasselmo ME, Stern CE, Howard MW. Scopolamine impairs human recognition memory: data and modeling. Behav Neurosci. 2003;117:526–539. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.117.3.526.
    1. Green MF. What are the functional consequences of neurocognitive deficits in schizophrenia? Am J Psychiatry. 1996;153:321–330. doi: 10.1176/ajp.153.3.321.
    1. Mirakhur RK, Dundee JW. Glycopyrrolate: pharmacology and clinical use. Anaesthesia. 1983;38:1195–1204. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.1983.tb12525.x.
    1. Liang CS, Ho PS, Shen LJ, Lee WK, Yang FW, Chiang KT. Comparison of the efficacy and impact on cognition of glycopyrrolate and biperiden for clozapine-induced sialorrhea in schizophrenic patients: a randomized, double-blind, crossover study. Schizophr Res. 2010;119:138–144. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2010.02.1060.
    1. Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA, on behalf of the PAFS consensus group CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016;2:64–732. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0105-8.
    1. Thomas-Stonell N, Greenberg J. Three treatment approaches and clinical factors in the reduction of drooling. Dysphagia. 1988;3:73–78. doi: 10.1007/BF02412423.
    1. Julious SA. Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm Stat. 2005;4:287–291. doi: 10.1002/pst.185.
    1. Moore CG, Carter RE, Nietert PJ, Stewart PW. Recommendations for planning pilot studies in clinical and translational research. Clin Transl Sci. 2011;4:332–337. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00347.x.
    1. Schoenfeld D. Statistical considerations for pilot studies. Int J Radiat Oncol. 1980;6:371–374. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(80)90153-4.
    1. Spivak B, Adlersberg S, Rosen L, Gonen N, Mester R, Weizman A. Trihexyphenidyl treatment of clozapine-induced hypersalivation. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1997;12:213–215. doi: 10.1097/00004850-199707000-00005.
    1. Keefe RSE, Poe M, Walker TM, Harvey PD. The relationship of the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) to functional capacity and real world functional outcome. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2006;28:260–269. doi: 10.1080/13803390500360539.
    1. Keefe RSE, Goldberg TE, Harvey PD, Gold JM, Poe MP, Coughenour L. The Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia: reliability, sensitivity, and comparison with a standard neurocognitive battery. Schizophr Res. 2004;68:283–297. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2003.09.011.
    1. Day JC, Wood G, Dewey M, Bentall RP. A self-rating scale for measuring neuroleptic side-effects: validation in a group of schizophrenic patients. Brit J Psychiatry. 1995;166:650–653. doi: 10.1192/bjp.166.5.650.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit