A receptor for antibody on B lymphocytes. I. Method of detection and functional significance

A Basten, J F Miller, J Sprent, J Pye, A Basten, J F Miller, J Sprent, J Pye

Abstract

Evidence is presented for the existence on all B lymphocytes, but not on T lymphocytes, of a membrane-associated receptor for antibody. The receptor was detected by a radioautographic technique in which lymphoid cells were incubated with antibody followed by the corresponding radioiodinated antigen. The ease with which antibody eluted during washing indicated that the bond between antibody and cell was weak. The formation of an antibody-antigen complex on the cell surface, however, stabilized the bond and permitted accurate quantitation of cells with adherent antibody. The ability of several combinations of antibody and antigen to adhere to the cells demonstrated the nonspecificity of the phenomenon and emphasized the need for care in interpretation of antigen-binding studies particularly when immune cells are being used. The identity of antibody-binding lymphocytes was established by two different approaches. In the first, mouse lymphocyte populations greatly enriched for either T cells or B cells were examined. Their T cell content was assessed by means of well-established markers such as the theta C3H isoantigen. When this was compared with the number of antibody-binding cells, an inverse relationship was obtained in each instance; thus almost all thoracic duct cells from athymic mice labeled with an immune complex although none were theta positive. The striking reduction in antibody-binding cells observed in bursectomized chickens provided a second and independent line of evidence suggesting that B cells, not T cells, bind antibody. The ability of B cells from primed animals to bind antibody in vivo made it important to test whether this phenomenon was related to the carriage of immunological memory. No correlation was, however, found between membrane-bound antibody and memory. It was proposed that the existence of a receptor of this kind may provide a rational explanation for antibody-dependent killing of target cells and may prove of importance in antigen concentration particularly during the secondary response.

References

    1. Immunology. 1970 Mar;18(3):397-404
    1. Nature. 1970 Sep 19;227(5264):1246-8
    1. Immunology. 1970 Oct;19(4):629-35
    1. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1970 Nov;135(2):400-5
    1. Immunology. 1970 Jul;19(1):105-16
    1. J Exp Med. 1971 Jan 1;133(1):156-67
    1. Nat New Biol. 1971 May 26;231(21):104-6
    1. Science. 1971 Jul 9;173(3992):154-6
    1. J Exp Med. 1971 Nov 1;134(5):1266-84
    1. Nat New Biol. 1971 Sep 15;234(50):195-8
    1. Cell Immunol. 1970 Sep;1(3):300-15
    1. J Exp Med. 1972 Mar 1;135(3):627-42
    1. J Exp Med. 1954 Feb;99(2):167-82
    1. J Exp Med. 1959 Aug 1;110(2):207-19
    1. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci. 1964 Jun;42:267-82
    1. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1971;40(1):59-71
    1. J Exp Med. 1970 Oct 1;132(4):702-20
    1. Nat New Biol. 1971 Apr 28;230(17):267-70
    1. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1971;40(4-5):719-28
    1. J Exp Med. 1964 Sep 1;120:413-33
    1. Eur J Immunol. 1971 Jan;1(1):27-30
    1. Immunology. 1965 Oct;9(4):349-57
    1. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol. 1966;29(4):368-83
    1. Lancet. 1967 Jun 17;1(7503):1304-5
    1. Immunology. 1968 Apr;14(4):599-600
    1. J Exp Med. 1968 Oct 1;128(4):801-20
    1. Immunology. 1969 Oct;17(4):503-16

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit