Radiomics based analysis to predict local control and survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with volumetric modulated arc therapy

Luca Cozzi, Nicola Dinapoli, Antonella Fogliata, Wei-Chung Hsu, Giacomo Reggiori, Francesca Lobefalo, Margarita Kirienko, Martina Sollini, Davide Franceschini, Tiziana Comito, Ciro Franzese, Marta Scorsetti, Po-Ming Wang, Luca Cozzi, Nicola Dinapoli, Antonella Fogliata, Wei-Chung Hsu, Giacomo Reggiori, Francesca Lobefalo, Margarita Kirienko, Martina Sollini, Davide Franceschini, Tiziana Comito, Ciro Franzese, Marta Scorsetti, Po-Ming Wang

Abstract

Background: To appraise the ability of a radiomics based analysis to predict local response and overall survival for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Methods: A set of 138 consecutive patients (112 males and 26 females, median age 66 years) presented with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A to C were retrospectively studied. For a subset of these patients (106) complete information about treatment outcome, namely local control, was available. Radiomic features were computed for the clinical target volume. A total of 35 features were extracted and analyzed. Univariate analysis was used to identify clinical and radiomics significant features. Multivariate models by Cox-regression hazards model were built for local control and survival outcome. Models were evaluated by area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. For the LC analysis, two models selecting two groups of uncorrelated features were analyzes while one single model was built for the OS analysis.

Results: The univariate analysis lead to the identification of 15 significant radiomics features but the analysis of cross correlation showed several cross related covariates. The un-correlated variables were used to build two separate models; both resulted into a single significant radiomic covariate: model-1: energy p < 0.05, AUC of ROC 0.6659, C.I.: 0.5585-0.7732; model-2: GLNU p < 0.05, AUC 0.6396, C.I.:0.5266-0.7526. The univariate analysis for covariates significant with respect to local control resulted in 9 clinical and 13 radiomics features with multiple and complex cross-correlations. After elastic net regularization, the most significant covariates were compacity and BCLC stage, with only compacity significant to Cox model fitting (Cox model likelihood ratio test p < 0.0001, compacity p < 0.00001; AUC of the model is 0.8014 (C.I. = 0.7232-0.8797)).

Conclusion: A robust radiomic signature, made by one single feature was finally identified. A validation phases, based on independent set of patients is scheduled to be performed to confirm the results.

Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma; Liver cancer; Outcome prediction; Radiomics; texture analysis; VMAT.

Conflict of interest statement

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This is a retrospective study approved by notification by the Cheng Chin hospital’s Ethical Review Committee. Informed consent to participate in the study was obtained from each patient at admission.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

L. Cozzi acts as Scientific Advisor to Varian Medical Systems and is Clinical Research Scientist at Humanitas Cancer Center. All other co-authors have no conflicts of interest. No other conflict or source should be disclosed.

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cross correlation matrix. Numerical values correspond to Person correlation coefficient, achieved with Person correlation test P-Value >0.05 (low cross correlation)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Cross correlation matrix for covariates used for log-rank test. Uncorrelated covariates are shown with Pearson correlation test P-Value
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Elastic net regularization process with partial likelihood deviance plot. The minimum value corresponds to the covariates used for multivariate modeling (Cox model). The two vertical dot lines represent one standard deviation on each sides from the minimum value, corresponding to the chosen variables that better fit the model
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Calibration plot for Cox model. The predicted overall survival at 12 months shows good agreement among predicted and actual survival while the 24 months prediction shows lack of fit in the first group of patients and a general underestimate of the predicted survival

References

    1. Altekruse SF, McGlynn KA, Reichman ME. Hepatocellular carcinoma incidence, mortality, and survival trends in the United States from 1975 to 2005. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:1485–1491. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.7753.
    1. El-Serag HB, Mason AC. Rising incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma in the United States. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:745–750. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199903113401001.
    1. Lawrence TS, Robertson JM, Anscher MS, et al. Hepatic toxicity resulting from cancer treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1995;31:1237–1248. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)00418-K.
    1. Dawson LA, Ten Haken RK. Partial volume tolerance of the liver to radiation. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2005;15:279–283. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2005.04.005.
    1. Pan CC, Kavanagh BD, Dawson LA, et al. Radiation-associated liver injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:S94–100. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.06.092.
    1. Munoz-Schuffenegger P, Ng S, Dawson L. Radiation induced liver toxicity. Semin Radiat Oncol.2017;27:350-7.
    1. Park HC, Seong J, Han KH, et al. Dose-response relationship in local radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;54:150–155. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(02)02864-X.
    1. Cheng JC, Wu JK, Huang CM, et al. Dosimetric analysis and comparison of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and radiation-induced liver disease. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56:229–234. doi: 10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00091-9.
    1. Eccles CL, Bissonnette JP, Craig T, et al. Treatment planning study to determine potential benefit of intensity-modulated radiotherapy versus conformal radiotherapy for unresectable hepatic malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72:582–588. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.06.1496.
    1. Kuo YC, Chiu YM, Shih WP, et al. Volumetric intensity-modulated arc (RapidArc) therapy for primary hepatocellular carcinoma: comparison with intensity-modulated radiotherapy and 3-D conformal radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol. 2011;6:76. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-6-76.
    1. Reggiori G, Mancosu P, Castiglioni S, Alongi F, Pellegrini C, Lobefalo F, Catalano M, Fogliata A, Arcangeli S, Navarria P, Cozzi L, Scorsetti M. Can volumetric modulated arc therapy with flattening filter free beams play a role in stereotactic body radiotherapy for liver lesions? A volume-based analysis. Med Phys. 2012;39:1112–1118. doi: 10.1118/1.3679858.
    1. Gong G, Yin Y, Guo Y, Liu T, Chen J, Lu J, Ma C, Sun T, Bai T, Zhang G, Li D, Wang R. Dosimetric differences among volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy (Rapidarc) plans based on different target volumes in radiotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Radiat Res. 2013;54:182–189. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrs068.
    1. Wang PM, Hsu WC, Chung NN, Chang FL, Jang CJ, Fogliata A, Scorsetti M, Cozzi L. Feasibility of stereotactic body radiation therapy with volumetric modulated arc therapy and high intensity photon beams for hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Radiat Oncol. 2014;9:18. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-9-18.
    1. Scorsetti M, Comito T, Cozzi L, Clerici E, Tozzi A, Franzese C, Navarria P, Fogliata A, Tomatis S, D’Agostino G, Iftode C, Mancosu P, Ceriani R, Torzilli G. The challenge of inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): results of a single institutional experience on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2015;141:1301–1309. doi: 10.1007/s00432-015-1929-y.
    1. Aerts H, Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Parmar C, Grossmann P, Carvalho S, et al. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4006.
    1. Lambin P, van Stiphout R, Starmans M, et al. Predicting outcomes in radiation oncology, multifactorial decision support systems. Nat Rev. 2013;10:27–40.
    1. Larue R, Defraene G, De Ruysscher D, Lambin P, van Elmpt W. Quantitative radiomics studies for tissue characterization: a review of technology and methodological procedures. Br J Radiol. 2017;90:20160665. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160665.
    1. Wu W, Parmar C, Grossmann P, Quackenbush J, Lambin P, et al. Exploratory study to identify radiomics classifiers for lung cancer histology. Front Oncol. 2016;6:71.
    1. Parmar C, Grossmann P, Rietveld D, Rietbergen M, Lambin P, Aerts H. Radiomic machine leraning classifiers for prognostic biomarkers of head and neck cancer. Front Oncol. 2015;3(5):272.
    1. Limkin E, Sun R, Dercle L, Zacharaki E, Robert C, Reuze S, et al. Promised and challenges for the implementation of computational medical imaging (radiomics) in oncology. Ann Oncol. 2017;28:1191–2006. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx034.
    1. Scalco E, Rizzo G. Texture analysis of medical images for radiotherapy applications. Br J Radiol. 2017;90:20160642. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20160642.
    1. Sala E, Mema E, Himoto Y, Veeraraghavan H, Brenton J, Snyder A, et al. Unravelling tumour heterogeneity using next-generation imaging: radiomics, radiogenomics and habitat imaging. Clin Radiol. 2017;72:3–10. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.09.013.
    1. Echegaray S, Gevaerrt O, Shah R, Kamaya A, Louie J, Kothary N, Napel S. Core samples for radiomics features that are insensitive to tumor segmentation: method and pilot study using CT images of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Med Imaging. 2015;2:04011. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.2.4.041011.
    1. Chen S, Zhu Y, Liang C. Texture analysis of baseline multiphasic hepatic computed tomography images for the prognosis of single hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy: a retrospective pilot study. Eur J Radiol. 2017;90:198–204. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.02.035.
    1. Li M, Fu S, Zhu Y, Liu Z, Chen S, Lu L, Liang C. Computed tomography texture analysis to facilitate therapeutic decision making in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2016;7:13248–13259. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7467.
    1. Raman S, Schroeder J, Huang P, Chen Y, Coquia S, Kawamoto S, Fishman E. Preliminary data using computed tomography texture analysis for the classification of hypervascular liver lesions: generation of a predictive model on the basis of quantitative spatial frequency measurements. A work in progress. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2015;39:383–395.
    1. Lubner M, Stabo N, Lubner S, del Rio A, Song C, Halberg R, Pickhardt P. CT textural analysis of hepatic metastatic colorectal cancer: pre-treatment tumor heterogeneity correlates with pathology and clinical ourcomes. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40:2331–2337. doi: 10.1007/s00261-015-0438-4.
    1. Simpson A, Doussot A, Creasy J, Adams L, Allen P, DeMatteo R, Goenen M, Kingham T, Shia J, Jarnagin W, Do R, D’Agelica M. Computed tomography image texture: a noninvasive prognostic marker of hepatic recurrence after hepatectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017; 10.1245/s10434-017-5896-1.
    1. Wang PM, Hsu WC, Chung NN, Chang FL, Fogliata A, Cozzi L. Radiotherapy with volumetric modulated arc therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma patients ineligible for surgery or ablative treatments. StrahlentherOnkol. 2013;189:301–307. doi: 10.1007/s00066-012-0298-6.
    1. Wang PM, Hsu WC, Chung NN, Chang FL, Fogliata A, Cozzi L. Radiation treatment with volumetric modulated arc therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Early clinical outcome and toxicity profile from a retrospective analysis of 138 patients. Radiat Oncol. 2012;7:207. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-207.
    1. Orlhac F, Soussan M, Chouahnia K, Martinod E, Buvat I. 18F-FDG PET-derived textural indices reflect tissue-specific uptake pattern in non-small cell lung cancer. PLoS One. 2015;10:1–16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145063.
    1. Orlhac F, Nioche C, Buvat I. Technical appendix — local image features extraction — — LIFEx —. Paris; 2016.
    1. Haralick R, Shanmugam K, Dinstein I. Texture features for image classification. IEEE Trans Sys Man Cyb SMC. 1973;3:610–621. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1973.4309314.
    1. Amadasun M, King R. Textural features corresponding to textural properties. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern. 1989;19:1264–1274. doi: 10.1109/21.44046.
    1. Huang L, Kim H, Furst J, Raicu D. A run lenght encoding approach for path analysis of C. elegans. search behavior. Comput Math Methods Med. 2016;35:160-89.
    1. Thibault G, et al. Texture indexes and gray level size zone matrix application to cell nuclei classification. Pattern Recognit Inf Process. 2009;140:145.
    1. Sollini M, Cozzi L, Antunovic L, Chiti A, Kirienko M. PET Radiomics in NSCLC: state of the art and a proposal for harmonization of methodology. Sci Rep. 2017;7:358. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00426-y.
    1. Team RC. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R foundation for statistical computing; 2016.
    1. Zou H, Hastie T. Regularizatin and variable selection via the elastic net. J R Statist Soc B. 2005;67:301–320. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit