Effect of novel inhaler technique reminder labels on the retention of inhaler technique skills in asthma: a single-blind randomized controlled trial

Iman A Basheti, Nathir M Obeidat, Helen K Reddel, Iman A Basheti, Nathir M Obeidat, Helen K Reddel

Abstract

Inhaler technique can be corrected with training, but skills drop off quickly without repeated training. The aim of our study was to explore the effect of novel inhaler technique labels on the retention of correct inhaler technique. In this single-blind randomized parallel-group active-controlled study, clinical pharmacists enrolled asthma patients using controller medication by Accuhaler [Diskus] or Turbuhaler. Inhaler technique was assessed using published checklists (score 0-9). Symptom control was assessed by asthma control test. Patients were randomized into active (ACCa; THa) and control (ACCc; THc) groups. All patients received a "Show-and-Tell" inhaler technique counseling service. Active patients also received inhaler labels highlighting their initial errors. Baseline data were available for 95 patients, 68% females, mean age 44.9 (SD 15.2) years. Mean inhaler scores were ACCa:5.3 ± 1.0; THa:4.7 ± 0.9, ACCc:5.5 ± 1.1; THc:4.2 ± 1.0. Asthma was poorly controlled (mean ACT scores ACCa:13.9 ± 4.3; THa:12.1 ± 3.9; ACCc:12.7 ± 3.3; THc:14.3 ± 3.7). After training, all patients had correct technique (score 9/9). After 3 months, there was significantly less decline in inhaler technique scores for active than control groups (mean difference: Accuhaler -1.04 (95% confidence interval -1.92, -0.16, P = 0.022); Turbuhaler -1.61 (-2.63, -0.59, P = 0.003). Symptom control improved significantly, with no significant difference between active and control patients, but active patients used less reliever medication (active 2.19 (SD 1.78) vs. control 3.42 (1.83) puffs/day, P = 0.002). After inhaler training, novel inhaler technique labels improve retention of correct inhaler technique skills with dry powder inhalers. Inhaler technique labels represent a simple, scalable intervention that has the potential to extend the benefit of inhaler training on asthma outcomes.

Asthma: REMINDER LABELS IMPROVE INHALER TECHNIQUE: Personalized labels on asthma inhalers remind patients of correct technique and help improve symptoms over time. Iman Basheti at the Applied Science Private University in Jordan and co-workers trialed the approach of placing patient-specific reminder labels on dry-powder asthma inhalers to improve long-term technique. Poor asthma control is often exacerbated by patients making mistakes when using their inhalers. During the trial, 95 patients received inhaler training before being split into two groups: the control group received no further help, while the other group received individualized labels on their inhalers reminding them of their initial errors. After three months, 67% of patients with reminder labels retained correct technique compared to only 12% of controls. They also required less reliever medication and reported improved symptoms. This represents a simple, cheap way of tackling inhaler technique errors.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Novel Inhaler Technique Labels. At the baseline visit, the label was highlighted with any step, which the patient performed incorrectly at the initial assessment. The labels were printed in the Arabic language as shown in the first photo
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Flow chart of study participation. For the four patients who withdraw prior to baseline inhaler assessment (two males, two females), there were no significant differences from remaining patients in mean age (44 (SD 5.0 years, P = 0.84) or mean ACT score (15.75 (SD 2.22, P = 0.184)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean inhaler technique score. a ACC users in the active (n = 28) and control (n = 26) groups. b TH users in the active (n = 23) and control (n = 18) groups
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Asthma symptom control, assessed by ACT (Range 5–25, higher score is better symptom control). a Patients using the ACC in the active (n = 28) and control (n = 26) groups. b Patients using the TH in the active (n = 23) and control (n = 18) groups

References

    1. Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Global strategy for asthma management and prevention report. . (Accessed April 2016)(2016).
    1. Abu-Ekteish F, Otoom S, Shehabi I. Prevalence of asthma in Jordan: comparison between bedouins and urban schoolchildren using the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood phase III protocol. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2009;30:181–185. doi: 10.2500/aap.2009.30.3208.
    1. Abuekteish F, Alwash R, Hassan M, Daoud AS. Prevalence of asthma and wheeze in primary school children in northern Jordan. Ann. Trop. Paediatr. 1996;16:227–231. doi: 10.1080/02724936.1996.11747831.
    1. To T, et al. Global asthma prevalence in adults: findings from the cross-sectional world health survey. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:204. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-204.
    1. Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Global strategy for asthma management and prevention. . (Accessed august 2015) (2015).
    1. Basheti IA, Armour CL, Reddel HK, Bosnic-Anticevich SZ. Long-term maintenance of pharmacists’ inhaler technique demonstration skills. Am. J. Pharm. Educ. 2009;73:32. doi: 10.5688/aj730232.
    1. Basheti IA, et al. User error with diskus and turbuhaler by asthma patients and pharmacists in jordan and australia. Respir. Care. 2011;56:1916–1923. doi: 10.4187/respcare.01205.
    1. Broeders ME, Sanchis J, Levy ML, Crompton GK, Dekhuijzen PN. The ADMIT series--issues in inhalation therapy. 2. Improving technique and clinical effectiveness. Prim. Care. Respir. J. 2009;18:76–82. doi: 10.4104/pcrj.2009.00025.
    1. Abdelrahim ME, Assi KH, Chrystyn H. Dose emission and aerodynamic characterization of the terbutaline sulphate dose emitted from a turbuhaler at low inhalation flow. Pharm. Dev. Technol. 2013;18:944–949. doi: 10.3109/10837450.2011.620970.
    1. Melani AS, et al. Inhalation technique and variables associated with misuse of conventional metered-dose inhalers and newer dry powder inhalers in experienced adults. Ann. Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2004;93:439–446. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61410-X.
    1. Melani AS, et al. Inhaler mishandling remains common in real life and is associated with reduced disease control. Respir. Med. 2011;105:930–938. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.01.005.
    1. Basheti IA, Reddel HK, Armour CL, Bosnic-Anticevich SZ. Counseling about turbuhaler technique: needs assessment and effective strategies for community pharmacists. Respir. Care. 2005;50:617–623.
    1. De Blaquiere P, Christensen DB, Carter WB, Martin TR. Use and misuse of metered-dose inhalers by patients with chronic lung disease. A controlled, randomized trial of two instruction methods. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1989;140:910–916. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/140.4.910.
    1. Ovchinikova L, Smith L, Bosnic-Anticevich S. Inhaler technique maintenance: gaining an understanding from the patient’s perspective. J. Asthma. 2011;48:616–624. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2011.580032.
    1. van der Palen J, Klein JJ, Kerkhoff AH, van Herwaarden CL, Seydel ER. Evaluation of the long-term effectiveness of three instruction modes for inhaling medicines. Patient Educ. Couns. 1997;32:S87–95. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(97)00100-6.
    1. Pothirat C, et al. Evaluating inhaler use technique in copd patients. Int. J. Chron. Obstruct. Pulmon. Dis. 2015;10:1291–1298. doi: 10.2147/COPD.S85681.
    1. Nimmo CJ, Chen DN, Martinusen SM, Ustad TL, Ostrow DN. Assessment of patient acceptance and inhalation technique of a pressurized aerosol inhaler and two breath-actuated devices. Ann. Pharmacother. 1993;27:922–927. doi: 10.1177/106002809302700721.
    1. Brennan VK, Osman LM, Graham H, Critchlow A, Everard ML. True device compliance: the need to consider both competence and contrivance. Respir. Med. 2005;99:97–102. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2004.05.015.
    1. Basheti IA, Armour CL, Bosnic-Anticevich SZ, Reddel HK. Evaluation of a novel educational strategy, including inhaler-based reminder labels, to improve asthma inhaler technique. Patient Educ. Couns. 2008;72:26–33. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.01.014.
    1. Basheti IA, Reddel HK, Armour CL, Bosnic-Anticevich SZ. Improved asthma outcomes with a simple inhaler technique intervention by community pharmacists. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2007;119:1537–1538. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2007.02.037.
    1. Warsi A, Wang PS, LaValley MP, Avorn J, Solomon DH. Self-management education programs in chronic disease: a systematic review and methodological critique of the literature. Arch. Intern. Med. 2004;164:1641–1649. doi: 10.1001/archinte.164.15.1641.
    1. Raynor DK, Savage I, Knapp P, Henley J. We are the experts: people with asthma talk about their medicine information needs. Patient. Educ. Couns. 2004;53:167–174. doi: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00126-5.
    1. van der Palen J, et al. Inhalation technique of 166 adult asthmatics prior to and following a self-management program. J. Asthma. 1999;36:441–447. doi: 10.3109/02770909909087286.
    1. Carpenter DM, et al. Using videos to teach children inhaler technique: a pilot randomized controlled trial. J. Asthma. 2015;52:81–87. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2014.944983.
    1. Giraud V, Allaert FA, Roche N. Inhaler technique and asthma: feasibility and acceptability of training by pharmacists. Respir. Med. 2011;105:1815–1822. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2011.07.004.
    1. Schatz M, et al. The minimally important difference of the asthma control test. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2009;124:719–723. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.06.053.
    1. Basheti I. A., Armour C. L., Reddel H. K., Bosnic-Anticevich S. Z. Innovative Asthma Education and Management by Community Pharmacists (Hauppauge, Nova Science Publishers, 2008).
    1. Bosnic-Anticevich SZ, Sinha H, So S, Reddel HK. Metered-dose inhaler technique: the effect of two educational interventions delivered in community pharmacy over time. J. Asthma. 2010;47:251–256. doi: 10.3109/02770900903580843.
    1. Overington JD, et al. Implementing clinical guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: barriers and solutions. J. Thorac. Dis. 2014;6:1586–1596.
    1. Foster JM, et al. Inhaler reminders improve adherence with controller treatment in primary care patients with asthma. J. Allergy. Clin. Immunol. 2014;134:1260–1268. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.05.041.
    1. Basheti IA, Hamadi SA, Reddel HK. Inter-professional education unveiling significant association between asthma knowledge and inhaler technique. Pharm. Pract. (Granada) 2016;14:713. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2016.01.713.
    1. Resnick DJ, et al. Physicians’ metered dose inhaler technique after a single teaching session. Ann. Allergy Asthma. Immunol. 1996;76:145–148. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63413-8.
    1. Jackevicius CA, Chapman KR. Inhaler education for hospital-based pharmacists: how much is required? Can. Respir. J. 1999;6:237–244. doi: 10.1155/1999/695365.
    1. Basheti IA, Qunaibi EA, Hamadi SA, Reddel HK. Inhaler technique training and health-care professionals: effective long-term solution for a current problem. Respir. Care. 2014;59:1716–1725. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02671.
    1. Lababidi H, Hijaoui A, Zarzour M. Validation of the arabic version of the asthma control test. Ann. Thorac. Med. 2008;3:44–47. doi: 10.4103/1817-1737.39635.
    1. Basheti IA, Bosnic-Anticevich SZ, Armour CL, Reddel HK. Checklists for powder inhaler technique: a review and recommendations. Respir. Care. 2014;59:1140–1154. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02342.
    1. van der Palen J, Klein JJ, Schildkamp AM. Comparison of a new multidose powder inhaler (diskus/accuhaler) and the turbuhaler regarding preference and ease of use. J. Asthma. 1998;35:147–152. doi: 10.3109/02770909809068202.

Source: PubMed

3
Předplatit