Implementation of rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigenic testing in a laboratory without access to molecular methods: Experiences of a general hospital
Laurent Blairon, Alain Wilmet, Ingrid Beukinga, Marie Tré-Hardy, Laurent Blairon, Alain Wilmet, Ingrid Beukinga, Marie Tré-Hardy
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 Ag (Antigen) Respi-Strip assay is a new immunochromatographic diagnostic tool recently available for antigenic diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. The proposed sensitivity is not higher than 60 %, but its high specificity allows both quick decisions for the management of patients and confirmation by molecular diagnosis for only negative tests. However, from the first tests performed, we suspected that the sensitivity observed with routine use was much lower than that announced by the manufacturer.
Materials and methods: Over a period of one month, we compared the negative results obtained with the COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip kit with those obtained from qRT-PCR performed in a laboratory qualified for the molecular diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2. All samples tested were naso-pharyngeal smears from UTM-RT medium.
Results: Of 774 patients tested, 714 negative samples were sent for confirmation, and 159 were found to be positive by qRT-PCR. The median positive percentage agreement was 23.9 % (95 % CI: 14.2 %-38.2 %). The Cohen's kappa score was 0.35.
Conclusion: Using this immunochromatographic assay as a triage test did not significantly reduce the number of samples outsourced for COVID-19 confirmation by qRT-PCR. In addition, even if the turn-around time is short, the assay is completely manual, which is not suitable for large volumes of routine samples. The sensitivity of this rapid test is poor, and improvements are needed to enhance its performance.
Keywords: Antigen testing; COVID-19; Point-of-care; Rapid diagnosis; SARS-CoV-2; qRT-PCR.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Figures
References
- World Health Organisation, editor. Advice on the Use of Point-of-Care Immunodiagnostic Tests for COVID-19. Scientific brief, (2020); 2020.
- Vandenberg O. Infectious Diseases (except HIV/AIDS) 2020. Development and potential usefulness of the COVID-19 Ag Respi-Strip diagnostic assay in a pandemic context.
- Fang Y., Zhang H., Xie J., Lin M., Ying L., Pang P., Ji W. Sensitivity of chest CT for COVID-19: comparison to RT-PCR. Radiology. 2020 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200432.
- Tré-Hardy M., Wilmet A., Beukinga I., Dogné J.M., Douxfils J., Blairon L. Validation of a chemiluminescent assay for specific SARS-CoV-2 antibody. Clin. Chem. Lab. Med. 2020 doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-0594. [published online ahead of print, 2020 May 25]
- Zhang W., Du R.-H., Li B., Zheng X.-S., Yang X.-L., Hu B., Wang Y.-Y., Xiao G.-F., Yan B., Shi Z.-L., Zhou P. Molecular and serological investigation of 2019-nCoV infected patients: implication of multiple shedding routes. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020;9:386–389. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1729071.
- Xie X., Zhong Z., Zhao W., Zheng C., Wang F., Liu J. Chest CT for typical 2019-nCoV pneumonia: relationship to negative RT-PCR testing. Radiology. 2020 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200343.
- Ai T., Yang Z., Hou H., Zhan C., Chen C., Lv W., Tao Q., Sun Z., Xia L. Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: a report of 1014 cases. Radiology. 2020 doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020200642.
- Watson P.F., Petrie A. Method agreement analysis: a review of correct methodology. Theriogenology. 2010;73:1167–1179. doi: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2010.01.003.
Source: PubMed