Denne side blev automatisk oversat, og nøjagtigheden af ​​oversættelsen er ikke garanteret. Der henvises til engelsk version for en kildetekst.

The Effect of Priming of Questionnaire Content on Grip Strength in Patients With Hand and Upper Extremity Illness

1. marts 2017 opdateret af: David C. Ring, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Objectives:

To determine the association between priming and measurements of hand function such as grip strength

Primary null hypothesis:

There is no difference in grip strength (best of three attempts) as a percent of the opposite hand between patients that complete the standard Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) compared to patients that complete the positively adjusted PCS.

Secondary null hypotheses:

There is no difference in grip strength (last of three attempts) as a percent of the opposite hand between patients that complete the standard PCS compared to patients that complete the positively adjusted PCS.

There is no difference in grip strength (best of three attempts) before and after completing the questionnaires between patients that complete the standard PCS compared to patients that complete the positively adjusted PCS.

Studieoversigt

Detaljeret beskrivelse

Priming affects all aspects of human behavior. Prior research by the investigators' group determined that completing a positively phrased version of the pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) primed patients to report less disability on average than completing the standard PCS. The influence of priming can be better understood by determining if it also affects direct measurements of hand function such as grip strength measures.

Undersøgelsestype

Interventionel

Tilmelding (Faktiske)

122

Fase

  • Ikke anvendelig

Kontakter og lokationer

Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.

Studiesteder

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, Forenede Stater, 02114
        • Massachusetts General Hospital

Deltagelseskriterier

Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.

Berettigelseskriterier

Aldre berettiget til at studere

18 år og ældre (Voksen, Ældre voksen)

Tager imod sunde frivillige

Ingen

Køn, der er berettiget til at studere

Alle

Beskrivelse

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All English-speaking adult patients visiting the Orthopaedic Hand and Upper Extremity Service

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to complete enrollment forms due to mental status or language problem

Studieplan

Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.

Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?

Design detaljer

  • Primært formål: Behandling
  • Tildeling: Randomiseret
  • Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
  • Maskning: Dobbelt

Våben og indgreb

Deltagergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandling
Eksperimentel: Standard PCS
Grip strength measurements and completes standard PCS
Subject completes the standard version of the PCS Questionnaire
Research Assistant takes Grip Strength Measurements
Eksperimentel: Positive PCS
Grip strength measurements and completes positively adjusted PCS
Research Assistant takes Grip Strength Measurements
Subject completes the positively-adjusted version of the PCS Questionnaire

Hvad måler undersøgelsen?

Primære resultatmål

Resultatmål
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse
Tidsramme
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Tidsramme: enrollment
The pain catastrophizing scale is a 13-item scale to measure catastrophic thinking. The scale is from 0-4 and scores range from 0-52, a lower score indicates less catastrophic thinking about pain.
enrollment
Positive Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS)
Tidsramme: enrollment
The positive pain catastrophizing scale (PCS) is a positively-phrased 13-item scale to measure catastrophic thinking. The scale is from 0-4 and scores range from 0-52, a higher score indicates less catastrophic thinking about pain.
enrollment
Difference in Grip Strength Measured With Dynamometer
Tidsramme: Day 1
Difference in Grip strength of the non-affected hand after completing intervention. Each participant completed the grip strength measurement 3 times on the non-affected hand at enrollment (day 1). The results reported represent an increase or decrease in mean grip strength and maximum grip strength after completing the intervention.
Day 1
Difference in Grip Strength Measured With Dynamometer
Tidsramme: Day 1
Difference in Grip strength of the injured hand after completing intervention. Each participant completed the grip strength measurement 3 times on the injured hand at enrollment (day 1). The results reported represent an increase or decrease in mean grip strength and maximum grip strength after completing the intervention.
Day 1
Difference in Grip Strength Measured With Dynamometer
Tidsramme: Day 1
Difference in Grip strength of both hands after completing intervention. Each participant completed the grip strength measurement 3 times with both hands at enrollment (day 1). The results reported represent an increase or decrease in mean grip strength and maximum grip strength after completing the intervention.
Day 1

Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere

Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.

Datoer for undersøgelser

Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.

Studer store datoer

Studiestart

1. juni 2015

Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)

1. august 2015

Studieafslutning (Faktiske)

1. august 2015

Datoer for studieregistrering

Først indsendt

15. juni 2015

Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier

8. juli 2015

Først opslået (Skøn)

9. juli 2015

Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler

Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)

13. april 2017

Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier

1. marts 2017

Sidst verificeret

1. marts 2017

Mere information

Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse

Andre undersøgelses-id-numre

  • 2015P000879

Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .

Kliniske forsøg med Standard PCS

Abonner