The Effect of Case-Based Learning Method on Perceived Competence and Critical Thinking Levels (Case-Based)
7. februar 2019 opdateret af: Rukiye Burucu, Selcuk University
The Effect of Case-Based Learning Method on Perceived Competence and Critical Thinking Levels in Nursing Students: Mixed Method
Second-year nursing students are randomly assigned to experimental and control groups.
The case-based teaching method was applied to the experimental group and the classical teaching method was applied to the control group.
After the initiative, both groups observed differences in perceived competence and critical thinking levels.
In addition, the focus groups were interviewed with the experimental group and the opinions and suggestions about the initiative were evaluated qualitatively and the total mix method was used.
Studieoversigt
Status
Afsluttet
Betingelser
Intervention / Behandling
Detaljeret beskrivelse
Nursing secondary school students were randomized into two groups.
Case-based training was given to the experimental group, and classical training was given to the control group.
Critical thinking scale and self-efficacy scale both before and after the training were applied to both groups.
Posttest scores were calculated and compared for both groups.
The focus group consultation with 10 people from the experimental group was carried out and the opinions and suggestions about the initiative were taken and evaluated.
Permission was obtained in writing from all institutions before and after the participants, and the study was conducted by creating ethical conditions.Four separate training cases were given to the experimental group.
the control group continued the classical training and no intervention was made.
Undersøgelsestype
Interventionel
Tilmelding (Faktiske)
74
Fase
- Ikke anvendelig
Kontakter og lokationer
Dette afsnit indeholder kontaktoplysninger for dem, der udfører undersøgelsen, og oplysninger om, hvor denne undersøgelse udføres.
Studiesteder
-
-
Selçuklu/Konya
-
Konya, Selçuklu/Konya, Kalkun, 0506234752
- Selçuk Univercity
-
-
Deltagelseskriterier
Forskere leder efter personer, der passer til en bestemt beskrivelse, kaldet berettigelseskriterier. Nogle eksempler på disse kriterier er en persons generelle helbredstilstand eller tidligere behandlinger.
Berettigelseskriterier
Aldre berettiget til at studere
18 år til 26 år (Voksen)
Tager imod sunde frivillige
Ja
Køn, der er berettiget til at studere
Alle
Beskrivelse
Inclusion Criteria:
- Become a nursing 2nd year student
- Want to participate in the research
- Not to be in the health profession
- Having passed the course of internal medicine nursing
- Being the first to see the surgical diseases nursing course
- Be able to devote time for case discussions outside of class
Exclusion Criteria:
- Being a foreign national (Unable to speak / understand Turkish effectively)
Studieplan
Dette afsnit indeholder detaljer om studieplanen, herunder hvordan undersøgelsen er designet, og hvad undersøgelsen måler.
Hvordan er undersøgelsen tilrettelagt?
Design detaljer
- Primært formål: Andet
- Tildeling: Randomiseret
- Interventionel model: Parallel tildeling
- Maskning: Enkelt
Våben og indgreb
Deltagergruppe / Arm |
Intervention / Behandling |
|---|---|
|
Eksperimentel: Experimental Group
Experimental group: case-based teaching method applied
|
critical thinking, self efficacy, focus group interview
|
|
Ingen indgriben: Control Group
Control group: classical teaching method applied
|
Hvad måler undersøgelsen?
Primære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
CRITICAL THINKING TENDENCY SCALE
Tidsramme: 4 months
|
It was developed by a Turkish researcher and reliability of validity was done.
The scale covers 49.161% of the variance.
Factor loads range from 0.33 to 0.71.
Sub-dimensions: metacity, flexibility, systematicness, determination and patience, open mindedness.
The scale consists of 49 questions in total.
Scale your scale; I totally agree (5), I mostly agree (4), Partially agree (3), I mostly do not agree (2), I never agree (1).
The test retest correlation coefficient of the scale was 0.761 and the correlation coefficient between the two half scores was 0.95.
The Cronbach Alpha coefficient is 0.963.
Confirmatory factor analysis was performed with the AMOS program (Ratio = 2778.981,
Sd = 1073, X2 / Sd = 2.590, GFI = 0.903, CFI = 0.932, RMSEA = 0.038).
The total score ranges from 49 to 245, with a high score indicating a high tendency to think critically
|
4 months
|
|
Effect of case-based learning method on self-efficacy level
Tidsramme: 4 months
|
The German version was originally used by Schwarzer.
It was originally prepared as 20 items, then reduced to 10 items.
Over time, it has been translated and used in more than twenty languages.
Item total correlations are between 0.30 and 0.77.
Reliability of Turkish validity was done; Alpha internal consistency coefficient was 0.79-0.63,
total alpha coefficient was 0.83.
Test-retest reliability coefficient of the scale is r = 0.80, p <0.001.
Factor analys's results of the Turkish version show that it accounts for 47% of the total variance.
The item total score correlation coefficients are between 0.37 and 0.59.
The items of the scale have scores ranging from 1 to 4, with a total score ranging from 10 to 40.
High score is considered as high self-efficacy perception.
|
4 months
|
Sekundære resultatmål
Resultatmål |
Foranstaltningsbeskrivelse |
Tidsramme |
|---|---|---|
|
Focus group interview
Tidsramme: 4 months
|
Group suggestions and comments (qualitative study)
|
4 months
|
Samarbejdspartnere og efterforskere
Det er her, du vil finde personer og organisationer, der er involveret i denne undersøgelse.
Sponsor
Datoer for undersøgelser
Disse datoer sporer fremskridtene for indsendelser af undersøgelsesrekord og resumeresultater til ClinicalTrials.gov. Studieregistreringer og rapporterede resultater gennemgås af National Library of Medicine (NLM) for at sikre, at de opfylder specifikke kvalitetskontrolstandarder, før de offentliggøres på den offentlige hjemmeside.
Studer store datoer
Studiestart (Faktiske)
1. december 2017
Primær færdiggørelse (Faktiske)
1. februar 2018
Studieafslutning (Faktiske)
15. august 2018
Datoer for studieregistrering
Først indsendt
30. august 2018
Først indsendt, der opfyldte QC-kriterier
7. februar 2019
Først opslået (Faktiske)
8. februar 2019
Opdateringer af undersøgelsesjournaler
Sidste opdatering sendt (Faktiske)
8. februar 2019
Sidste opdatering indsendt, der opfyldte kvalitetskontrolkriterier
7. februar 2019
Sidst verificeret
1. januar 2019
Mere information
Begreber relateret til denne undersøgelse
Andre undersøgelses-id-numre
- RBurucu
Plan for individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)
Planlægger du at dele individuelle deltagerdata (IPD)?
UBESLUTET
IPD-planbeskrivelse
it is planned that the work will be shared after the writing is completed
Lægemiddel- og udstyrsoplysninger, undersøgelsesdokumenter
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret lægemiddelprodukt
Ingen
Studerer et amerikansk FDA-reguleret enhedsprodukt
Ingen
Disse oplysninger blev hentet direkte fra webstedet clinicaltrials.gov uden ændringer. Hvis du har nogen anmodninger om at ændre, fjerne eller opdatere dine undersøgelsesoplysninger, bedes du kontakte register@clinicaltrials.gov. Så snart en ændring er implementeret på clinicaltrials.gov, vil denne også blive opdateret automatisk på vores hjemmeside .