The Effect of Case-Based Learning Method on Perceived Competence and Critical Thinking Levels (Case-Based)
2019年2月7日 更新者：Rukiye Burucu、Selcuk University
The Effect of Case-Based Learning Method on Perceived Competence and Critical Thinking Levels in Nursing Students: Mixed Method
Second-year nursing students are randomly assigned to experimental and control groups.
The case-based teaching method was applied to the experimental group and the classical teaching method was applied to the control group.
After the initiative, both groups observed differences in perceived competence and critical thinking levels.
In addition, the focus groups were interviewed with the experimental group and the opinions and suggestions about the initiative were evaluated qualitatively and the total mix method was used.
研究概览
详细说明
Nursing secondary school students were randomized into two groups.
Case-based training was given to the experimental group, and classical training was given to the control group.
Critical thinking scale and self-efficacy scale both before and after the training were applied to both groups.
Posttest scores were calculated and compared for both groups.
The focus group consultation with 10 people from the experimental group was carried out and the opinions and suggestions about the initiative were taken and evaluated.
Permission was obtained in writing from all institutions before and after the participants, and the study was conducted by creating ethical conditions.Four separate training cases were given to the experimental group.
the control group continued the classical training and no intervention was made.
研究类型
介入性
注册 (实际的)
74
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
Selçuklu/Konya
-
Konya、Selçuklu/Konya、火鸡、0506234752
- Selçuk Univercity
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
18年 至 26年 (成人)
接受健康志愿者
是的
有资格学习的性别
全部
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Become a nursing 2nd year student
- Want to participate in the research
- Not to be in the health profession
- Having passed the course of internal medicine nursing
- Being the first to see the surgical diseases nursing course
- Be able to devote time for case discussions outside of class
Exclusion Criteria:
- Being a foreign national (Unable to speak / understand Turkish effectively)
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：其他
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：单身的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：Experimental Group
Experimental group: case-based teaching method applied
|
critical thinking, self efficacy, focus group interview
|
|
无干预：Control Group
Control group: classical teaching method applied
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
CRITICAL THINKING TENDENCY SCALE
大体时间：4 months
|
It was developed by a Turkish researcher and reliability of validity was done.
The scale covers 49.161% of the variance.
Factor loads range from 0.33 to 0.71.
Sub-dimensions: metacity, flexibility, systematicness, determination and patience, open mindedness.
The scale consists of 49 questions in total.
Scale your scale; I totally agree (5), I mostly agree (4), Partially agree (3), I mostly do not agree (2), I never agree (1).
The test retest correlation coefficient of the scale was 0.761 and the correlation coefficient between the two half scores was 0.95.
The Cronbach Alpha coefficient is 0.963.
Confirmatory factor analysis was performed with the AMOS program (Ratio = 2778.981,
Sd = 1073, X2 / Sd = 2.590, GFI = 0.903, CFI = 0.932, RMSEA = 0.038).
The total score ranges from 49 to 245, with a high score indicating a high tendency to think critically
|
4 months
|
|
Effect of case-based learning method on self-efficacy level
大体时间：4 months
|
The German version was originally used by Schwarzer.
It was originally prepared as 20 items, then reduced to 10 items.
Over time, it has been translated and used in more than twenty languages.
Item total correlations are between 0.30 and 0.77.
Reliability of Turkish validity was done; Alpha internal consistency coefficient was 0.79-0.63,
total alpha coefficient was 0.83.
Test-retest reliability coefficient of the scale is r = 0.80, p <0.001.
Factor analys's results of the Turkish version show that it accounts for 47% of the total variance.
The item total score correlation coefficients are between 0.37 and 0.59.
The items of the scale have scores ranging from 1 to 4, with a total score ranging from 10 to 40.
High score is considered as high self-efficacy perception.
|
4 months
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Focus group interview
大体时间：4 months
|
Group suggestions and comments (qualitative study)
|
4 months
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
2017年12月1日
初级完成 (实际的)
2018年2月1日
研究完成 (实际的)
2018年8月15日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2018年8月30日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2019年2月7日
首次发布 (实际的)
2019年2月8日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2019年2月8日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2019年2月7日
最后验证
2019年1月1日
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他研究编号
- RBurucu
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？
未定
IPD 计划说明
it is planned that the work will be shared after the writing is completed
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
不
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
不
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.
Case- based Learning的临床试验
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonNational Institute on Aging (NIA); Oregon Health and Science University; University of Texas Southwestern...完全的
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham; National Institute on Aging (NIA); University of California... 和其他合作者邀请报名
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonJohns Hopkins University; University of Colorado, Denver; Northwestern University; Columbia University 和其他合作者主动，不招人肾脏疾病 | 肾功能衰竭，慢性 | 沟通 | 晚期肾脏疾病 | 姑息治疗 | 生命尽头 | 透析 | 肾透析 | 决策 | 决策辅助 | 决策支持技术 | 肾病专家 | 晚期肾病 | 生命支持治疗美国
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute on Aging (NIA); Mount Zion Health Fund主动，不招人
-
Thomas Jefferson University完全的