Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Using an End-of-life Conversation Game to Engage Underserved Communities in Advance Care Planning

31. Oktober 2019 aktualisiert von: Lauren Van Scoy, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
This national project will provide an effective, evidence-based intervention for advance care planning (ACP) to 50 underserved US communities, those with poor access to healthcare systems due to economic, cultural or other barriers. The project will also examine 15 of the 50 communities to learn about the unique needs of African American communities in regards to ACP and to assess the intervention with this population. The team includes the Hospice Foundation of America and a university-based research team from Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center.

Studienübersicht

Detaillierte Beschreibung

The project goal explores how best to meet the needs of underserved communities to improve engagement in the advance care planning (ACP) process, which is defined as a complex and ongoing process that involves discussions with loved ones and/or clinicians, and/or may involve completion of an advance directive document. This national project involves two components: 1) a community outreach program, Community Game Days; and 2) a research project. The community outreach component seeks to provide an effective, evidence based ACP intervention to 50 underserved communities (defined as those with poor access to healthcare systems due to economic, cultural or linguistic barriers). Of these, 15 African American communities across the United States will be selected for participation in the research aspect of the project which seeks to assess the program's impact on and to learn about the unique needs of African American populations with regard to ACP. A highly integrated, collaborative approach will be used, bringing together a national organization concerned about end-of-life care (the Hospice Foundation of America (HFA) and a university-based academic research team (led by Dr. Lauren Van Scoy at Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center through her research program, Project Talk).

The project teams will organize and support a 14-month long community outreach project that will bring an end-of-life conversation game, "Hello," to 50 communities across the United States. The game has been found to stimulate substantive, enjoyable and meaningful end-of-life discussions among participants. Further, over 70% of participants who played the game went on to perform additional ACP behaviors.2-4 That body of research is limited, however, by a primarily Caucasian or South Asian Indian demographic. It is well established that African Americans have historically low rates of ACP completion when compared to Caucasians and that they often receive overly aggressive and unwanted care at the end-of-life.5,6 Thus, learning how best to engage the African American population in ACP activities is critical. Thus, this research project aims to determine whether and to what extent this priming activity yields similar results in African American communities. The research team will conduct mixed methods research on the impact of the game on the performance of subsequent ACP behavior as well as explore the broad needs of African American communities with regards to ACP.

Fifteen of the 50 qualified locations who can demonstrate through a screening process the ability to attract a majority African American audience will be selected to participate in the research aspect of the project which will involve: 1) pre-game questionnaires to assess population characteristics and readiness to engage in ACP, 2) post- game questionnaires to assess satisfaction, realism about the conversation game and readiness to engage in ACP, 3) post-game focus groups to further explore opinions about the game, the value of priming activities, and the broad needs of the community for encouraging ACP, and 4) 3 month follow-up phone interviews to assess ACP behaviors that have been performed and perceived impact of the priming activity. Participants from the additional 35 sites can opt-in to participate in a 3 months follow-up phone call. As the trial progressed, the time-frame for follow-up phone interviews was extended to 3 - 9 months.

Upon completion of this project, this collaboration is expected to have reached up to 1000 African American individuals and 1,500 other underserved individuals and provided them with an enjoyable and rich experience that facilitates communication about end-of-life issues. The research data is expected to provide a significant contribution to the field by yielding information about the needs of 15 African American communities as well as to yield data related to the impact of the priming activity (the game) on ACP behaviors in this traditionally underserved group.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Tatsächlich)

1122

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienorte

    • Pennsylvania
      • Hershey, Pennsylvania, Vereinigte Staaten, 17011
        • Penn State Hershey College of Medicine

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

18 Jahre und älter (Erwachsene, Älterer Erwachsener)

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Ja

Studienberechtigte Geschlechter

Alle

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Are over the age of 18
  2. Attend a community Game Day event hosted as part of the Hospice Foundation of America community outreach "Hello Project"

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Do not speak English
  2. Have significant difficulties with hearing or speaking difficulties by self-report
  3. Do not provide informed consent

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Sonstiges
  • Zuteilung: N / A
  • Interventionsmodell: Einzelgruppenzuweisung
  • Maskierung: Keine (Offenes Etikett)

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Spielteilnehmer
Alle Teilnehmer nehmen am Gesprächsspiel „Hallo“ zum Lebensende teil, bei dem offene Fragen zur medizinischen Entscheidungsfindung und zu Themen am Lebensende beantwortet werden.
To play 'Hello', players are provided 32 open-ended questions in a prearranged order and an equal number of game chips. A player reads aloud the first question. Players then individually write down their answers, and take turns sharing answers with the group (players can opt to pass). Players control how long they share, what they share, and when they are ready to proceed to the next question. During the conversation, players may choose to acknowledge others for a particularly thoughtful, poignant, or even funny comment by giving them a chip. A simple pre-game coin flip determines whether the player with the most chips 'wins' the game ('heads'), or the player with the least amount of chips wins the game ('tails').
Andere Namen:
  • Previously named "My Gift of Grace"

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Rate of ACP Behaviors
Zeitfenster: 9 months post intervention
This phone questionnaire assesses whether participants went on to perform various behaviors related to advance care planning.
9 months post intervention

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change in ACP Engagement Survey scores
Zeitfenster: Baseline (Day 0); immediately post-intervention (Day 0); 3-9 months post intervention
This validated questionnaire measure assesses engagement in various ACP behaviors and/or readiness to perform ACP behaviors. Items are scored on a 5 point Likert scale (1-5, with 5 indicating highest readiness to perform ACP). Items are averaged for a final score ranging 1-5.
Baseline (Day 0); immediately post-intervention (Day 0); 3-9 months post intervention
Conversation satisfaction questionnaire
Zeitfenster: Immediately post-intervention (Day 0)
Measures participants' satisfaction with the conversation. There are 5 items in the measure, each item is scored on a 1-7 scale with 1 being lowest conversation satisfaction. The items are averaged for the final score ranging 1-7 with 7 indicating the highest conversation satisfaction.
Immediately post-intervention (Day 0)
ACP Values/Beliefs Questionnaire
Zeitfenster: immediately post-intervention (Day 0)
Measure participants' attitudes about ACP. This a 8-item questionnaire. Scores are calculated by summative responses and the total score ranges from 7-49 with 7 being the least amount of skepticism (a better outcome).
immediately post-intervention (Day 0)
Conversation Realism Questionnaire
Zeitfenster: immediately post-intervention (Day 0)
The Conversation Realism survey is an 8-item questionnaire that measures how realistic players felt the game conversation was. Each question is measured with a 7- point Likert scale, with "1" being the least realistic and "7" being the most realistic (better outcome) conversation.
immediately post-intervention (Day 0)
Net Promoter Score
Zeitfenster: immediately post-intervention (0)
The Net Promoter Score is a widely single-question (How likely are you to recommend Hello to friends and family?) used to measure participants' game experience on a 10-point scale. It is measured in two ways: (1) raw score is measured on a 10-point scale with 0 being "not likely at all" to 10 (better outcome) being "extremely likely" (2) calculated score = 10-point scale is broken down as follows: detractor score (0-6); passive score (7-8); promoter score (9-10). Passive scores are ignored. The calculated score is: (total number of promoters) - (total number of detractors) / (total number of responses) = score ranging from - 100 to +100 with +100 being the best (better outcome).
immediately post-intervention (0)
Hello Game Assessment - Qualitative focus group interview
Zeitfenster: immediately post-intervention (Day 0)
Group discussions held to collect feedback and opinions about playing the conversation game. Data collected is qualitative.
immediately post-intervention (Day 0)
ACP Needs Assessment - Qualitative focus group interview
Zeitfenster: immediately post-intervention (Day 0)
Qualitative focus groups will explore the needs of diverse African American populations with regards to ACP and end-of-life planning
immediately post-intervention (Day 0)

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Ermittler

  • Hauptermittler: Lauren J Van Scoy, Penn State College of Medicine

Publikationen und hilfreiche Links

Die Bereitstellung dieser Publikationen erfolgt freiwillig durch die für die Eingabe von Informationen über die Studie verantwortliche Person. Diese können sich auf alles beziehen, was mit dem Studium zu tun hat.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Tatsächlich)

28. Februar 2018

Primärer Abschluss (Tatsächlich)

15. September 2019

Studienabschluss (Tatsächlich)

15. September 2019

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

23. Februar 2018

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

28. Februar 2018

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

7. März 2018

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

4. November 2019

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

31. Oktober 2019

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Oktober 2019

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Zusätzliche relevante MeSH-Bedingungen

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • Study00009009

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

NEIN

Beschreibung des IPD-Plans

Aggregate data may be provided upon request

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Unheilbare Krankheit

Abonnieren